logo
Cash at residence: Govt likely to bring impeachment motion against Justice Varma

Cash at residence: Govt likely to bring impeachment motion against Justice Varma

Indian Express27-05-2025

FOLLOWING his indictment by the Supreme Court in-house inquiry panel, the government is likely to bring an impeachment motion in the upcoming monsoon session against former Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma, The Indian Express has learnt.
On May 3, a three-member panel, set up by the Supreme Court, had found credence in the allegations that wads of currency notes were discovered at the judge's official residence when a fire broke out there on March 14.
Appointed by the CJI on March 22, the panel, comprising Justice Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana; Justice G S Sandhawalia, Chief Justice of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh; and Justice Anu Sivaraman, Judge of the High Court of Karnataka; recorded the statements of a range of witnesses.
The Indian Express had reported on May 9 that then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna had forwarded a copy of the inquiry report, along with a recommendation to initiate impeachment proceedings against the judge to President Draupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Justice Varma was also asked to resign but he is learnt to have refused to do so. He was transferred out on March 20 and he took oath as judge at the Allahabad High Court on April 5 but he has not been assigned work.
It is learnt that the President has now referred the former CJI's recommendation to the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha and the Lok Sabha Speaker.
Top sources in the government said that since the former CJI's report recommended impeachment, the motion has to be brought in the Parliament.
For a motion of impeachment to be taken up, it has to be moved by not less than 100 members in the Lower House, and at least 50 members in the Upper House.
'We will bring the motion in the upcoming session. We will ask both the Rajya Sabha Chairman and the Lok Sabha Speaker to take the sense of the House,' said a source, adding that the government will seek consensus from Opposition parties since the final step of impeachment has to be cleared by a two-third majority in both the Houses.
Both Chairman Jagdeep Dhankar and Speaker Om Birla are likely to reach out to Opposition leaders for evolving a consensus. 'This exercise will begin soon,' said a source.
Sources in the Congress said that the party had not yet been approached for a discussion on the matter.
The Monsoon session of Parliament is expected to begin by the third week of July.
The Constitution states that a judge of a constitutional court can only be removed on two grounds: proved misbehaviour' and 'incapacity.' The procedure to be followed for removal is laid down in the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968. Once a motion for impeachment is adopted by either House, the Speaker/ Chairman has to constitute a three-member committee of inquiry. The committee is headed by the Chief Justice of India or a judge of the Supreme Court, and has a Chief Justice of any High Court, and a person who is in the opinion of the Speaker/ Chairman, a 'distinguished jurist'.
If the committee renders a guilty finding, the report of the committee is then adopted by the House in which it was introduced, and the judge's removal is debated.
For an impeachment motion against an SC or HC judge to go through, at least two-thirds of those 'present and voting' in both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha must vote in favour of removing the judge — and the number of votes in favour must be more than 50% of the 'total membership' of each House. If Parliament passes such a vote, the President will pass an order for the removal of the judge.
On May 26, the Supreme Court administration had rejected a plea seeking the panel's report on Justice Varma of the committee under the Right to Information Act.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CAQM directs Delhi-NCR govts to assess landfill fire risk
CAQM directs Delhi-NCR govts to assess landfill fire risk

Hindustan Times

time39 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

CAQM directs Delhi-NCR govts to assess landfill fire risk

New Delhi The Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) on Tuesday directed the Delhi-NCR state governments to carry out a fire-risk assessment of sanitary landfills and dump sites, following proper identification, categorisation, and demarcation of waste. It directed them to adopt preventive measures, including the installation of CCTV cameras and methane gas detectors, to prevent future landfill fires, as it could lead to a spike in particulate matter and release harmful gases such as NO2, SO2, CO, dioxins and furans. The pollution body also asked agencies to carry out extensive biomining or bioremediation at landfills to liquidate the legacy waste, as per the targeted timelines already submitted to the Supreme Court. 'Ensure adequate storage of sand or chemical fire extinguishing means for immediate action, whenever initiation of fire is sensed, besides dedicated fire tenders and other fire safety measures, specifically during the summer season, which is more prone to SLF and dump site fires,' said CAQM, adding periodic mock drills were needed to prevent recurrence of such incidents. The CAQM said municipal solid waste needed to be collected, segregated and processed in accordance with the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, and directed states to adopt zero tolerance towards open waste burning. Co-firing of paddy straw pellets beyond NCR: CAQM In a specific directive to districts outside NCR, the CAQM asked brick kilns to co-fire paddy straw-based pellets, setting a deadline of co-firing 50% of such pellets by November 1, 2028. The deadline is 20% co-firing of paddy straw-based pellets by November 1, 2025, and 30% by November 1, 2026, it said. The initiative aims to power such facilities, rather than relying on thermal plants. 'The state Governments of Punjab and Haryana have been instructed to issue requisite directions in this context mandating the above stipulation for use of paddy straw-based bio-mass pellets or briquettes in brick kilns located in non-NCR areas,' CAQM said in a statement, adding action taken in compliance with these directions will be apprised to the commission every month.

Supreme Court seeks Telangana's response to petition on local quota in MBBS admissions
Supreme Court seeks Telangana's response to petition on local quota in MBBS admissions

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Supreme Court seeks Telangana's response to petition on local quota in MBBS admissions

Hyderabad: The Supreme Court has directed the Telangana govt to file its response to a petition regarding the local quota in MBBS admissions in the state. The court issued these directions on Monday while hearing petitions filed by a few aspirants who urged to be accommodated in the counselling under the local quota. The matter was posted for further hearing in four weeks. The aspirants were challenging the state govt's orders amending the local quota provisions. A bench of Justices Prashanth Kumar Mishra and Augustine George Masih, while directing all parties to file their responses by the next date of hearing, also allowed the aspirants to mention their case during the partial court work during the vacation in case of any urgency. The bench provided this relaxation when the aspirants claimed that counselling for MBBS admissions would start immediately after the results are declared on June 14. During the hearing, the aspirants claimed that they were born in Telangana and that their parents were also born in the state. The petition challenges the Telangana Medical and Dental Colleges Admission (Admission into MBBS & BDS Courses) Rules, 2017, as amended in 2024. According to the amended rule, students seeking admission to Telangana medical colleges must have studied in the state for four consecutive years before taking their qualifying exam. The petitioners claimed that despite being born in Telangana and having completed most of their education in the state, the applicants became ineligible because they studied classes 11 and 12, or Intermediate, outside the state. They also claimed that the govt passed the amendment after the academic year had started, at a time when they had already been admitted to courses outside the state. When the Supreme Court advised applicants to approach the high court for redress, they argued that the high court could not rule on the matter as their case was now before the Supreme Court.

Stalin: Fear of litigation prompts Ravi to give assent to bills; still 14 bills pending
Stalin: Fear of litigation prompts Ravi to give assent to bills; still 14 bills pending

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Stalin: Fear of litigation prompts Ravi to give assent to bills; still 14 bills pending

Chennai: Chief minister M K Stalin on Tuesday said governor R N Ravi could have given assent to the two bills that reserved seats in local bodies for people with disabilities (PwD) for fear of litigation. The governor's office is still sitting on 14 bills, including the Kalaignar University Bill, which proposes establishing a university named after former chief minister M Karunanidhi, sources told TOI. Asked for his response to the governor giving assent to bills passed by the assembly in its last sitting, Stalin told reporters here, "That was expected. Not a big issue. It was passed by the legislature and sent. Maybe he gave assent because he was afraid that we would go to court. Nothing else." The Supreme Court had on April 8, set a timeline for governors and the President to decide on bills. Sources told TOI that governor Ravi had since then given assent to eight bills, including four appropriation bills. Among the bills awaiting assent are the Tamil Nadu Fiscal Responsibility (Amendment) Bill and the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Bill. These were passed by the legislature in Feb and Dec 2024, respectively. Other pending bills include one to protect economically weaker sections, especially farmers and women self-help groups, from coercive recovery of loans by microfinance institutions. A bill to amend the Goondas Act to punish dumping of biomedical waste in Tamil Nadu from neighbouring states is also pending. When asked about the pending bills in light of the Supreme Court's ruling on timelines, DMK MP P Wilson stated: "Anyone who has faith in the judicial system and believes in the Constitution and the rule of law must respect the Supreme Court's verdict, as it is final. If the governor chooses to defy the court's order, the law should take its own course. However, I want to know whether the Prime Minister is encouraging such defiance of the court's order. Can the President of India remain silent to such a contemptuous act? The governor should have been sacked when the Supreme Court indicted him for malafide actions."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store