logo
How shoppers are exploiting return policies — and costing retailers billions

How shoppers are exploiting return policies — and costing retailers billions

New York Post6 days ago

Shoppers are increasingly exploiting return policies with various scams to defraud companies, and it is costing retailers billions.
While retailers have tried to mitigate returns, they amounted to $743 billion in 2023.
Of that, about $101 billion was fraudulent, according to the National Retail Federation.
This problem is getting more sophisticated as shoppers grow increasingly duplicitous, such as returning empty boxes, using fake or altered receipts, or ripping key components from electronics before returning the item.
The challenge for retailers is how to crack down and limit return polices without alienating customers.
Blue Yonder's 2024 Consumer Retail Returns Survey found that more than 90% of respondents admitted that a lenient return policy influences their buying decisions.
Additionally, stricter policies are deterring many shoppers, particularly Gen Z and millennials, from making purchases at all.
Arun Sundaram, vice president and senior equity analyst at CFRA Research, told FOX Business that return fraud remains an issue for retailers, particularly because of the 'growth of e-commerce and the flexible return policies that often come with it.'
4 Shoppers are increasingly exploiting return policies with various scams to defraud companies, and it is costing retailers billions.
Getty Images
This type of fraud not only puts pressure on margins but disrupts inventory planning and drives up operating costs, according to Sundaram.
'In recent years, we've seen many retailers ramp up investments in data and analytics to detect patterns and flag suspicious return activity. Still, striking the right balance between preventing fraud and keeping a positive customer experience is an ongoing challenge,' Sundaram added.
Gaurav Saran, CEO of ReverseLogix.com, told FOX Business that companies started offering competitive return policies such as free returns and 30- or 60-day return policies as shoppers became more reliant on online shopping. In turn, it encouraged more shoppers to buy from the brand, but it also paved the way for a select few to take advantage of the situation.
4 This problem is getting more sophisticated as shoppers grow increasingly duplicitous, such as returning empty boxes, using fake or altered receipts, or ripping key components from electronics before returning the item.
Christopher Sadowski
4 In some cases, customers will return an empty box, claiming the item was missing when they received it. This is known as the 'empty box' scam.
AFP via Getty Images
One of the most common scams, according to Saran, is 'wardrobing.' Consumers purchase clothing with the intent of returning it after they use it. The issue with this type of fraud is it can be difficult to detect, though it is one of the most common problems that clothing retailers have, according to ReverseLogix.com's website.
In some cases, customers will return an empty box, claiming the item was missing when they received it. This is known as the 'empty box' scam. Retailers that don't weigh packages before processing returns may not notice the fraud until after the customer has already been refunded, according to Saran.
Another tactic his company has noticed is called 'bricking.' This is when someone removes key components from electronics before returning the item. While the product looks intact on the outside, it is useless. Retailers that don't check returned items carefully can end up selling worthless goods.
4 If there appears to be fraudulent activity, the company will be notified and can adjust its return policy specific to a customer.
Getty Images
Saran's developed an end-to-end return management system to mitigate these crimes by helping companies configure return processing and even handle repairs. It helps companies ensure that what a customer said they were going to return and the condition they are returning it in are in line with the return policy.
If there appears to be fraudulent activity, the company will be notified and can adjust its return policy specific to a customer.
He works with various companies, including Brooks, Wilson, and Samsonite.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas ‘Trump Burger' joint getting spammed by chicken taco comments online. Why?
Texas ‘Trump Burger' joint getting spammed by chicken taco comments online. Why?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Texas ‘Trump Burger' joint getting spammed by chicken taco comments online. Why?

A Texas-based burger company that celebrates President Donald Trump is getting spammed online with orders for chicken tacos, a play on a recent phrase about tariff policies. Trump Burger has four locations in southeast Texas, including one in Houston. The burger joints boast Trump-themed menu items, campaign decorations and burger buns stamped with "TRUMP." The first location opened in 2020, founded by Roland Beainy, who moved to the U.S. from Lebanon the year before, according to FOX Business. But recently, the company's Facebook page has been flooded with comments and reviews about chicken tacos. Some of these comments are a response to social media calls to contact the business about chicken tacos after Trump lashed out at a reporter asking about a term a columnist used to describe how some investors are responding to Trump's tariff policy whiplash. Here is the story behind those "chicken taco" comments. Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined "TACO trade" in May, describing how some investors anticipate market rebounds amid Trump's on-again, off-again tariff policies. The acronym stands for "Trump always chickens out." Armstrong describes TACO trade as many investors' strategy to buy into the market that dips when Trump announces steep tariffs on the assumption that he will back off his tariff order, and the market will rebound. In response to questions about the phrase, Trump defended his record on tariffs and called it a "nasty" question. A few social media users have posted the names and numbers of the Trump Burger locations with seemingly sarcastic pleas not to call and order chicken tacos. Trump Burger's Facebook page, which has not posted since early May, has been inundated with comments and reviews talking about chicken tacos. "They ran out of chicken tacos. Was really looking forward to a TACO," one review stated. Similar comments can be found on their Instagram and TikTok posts. Yelp's reviews for two of the locations were turned off June 3, as the restaurant pages show an "Unusual Activity Alert" while Yelp "work(s) to investigate whether the content you see here reflects actual consumer experiences rather than the recent events." At least one review mentioned tacos, though it appears to have been removed for violating the platform's policy. Trump Burger did not respond to multiple forms of outreach from the USA TODAY Network on June 3. Trump Burger has four locations: Kemah, Bellville, Flatonia and Houston. Local media outlets have visited the Trump Burger locations to provide insight into the menu and atmosphere.. "Every Trump Burger location tries to outdo itself in nationalist and personality cult aesthetics," Brittany Britto Garley wrote in Eater Houston, adding there were better burgers to be had in Houston. Bao Ong at the Houston Chronicle wrote, "most dishes are unremarkable and far from making the Chronicle's best burgers guide." Both outlets reported that the restaurant chain has no official connection to the president. The Trump Organization did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @ This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Chicken taco comments flood Trump Burger restaurants on Facebook, Yelp

Colorado Attack Suspect's Family Taken Into ICE Custody
Colorado Attack Suspect's Family Taken Into ICE Custody

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Colorado Attack Suspect's Family Taken Into ICE Custody

Flowers on police barricades outside the Boulder County Courthouse in Boulder, Colorado, on June 2, 2025. Credit - Chet Strange—Getty Images The family of Mohamed Soliman, the suspect charged with throwing Molotov cocktails at people in Boulder, Colo., advocating for the release of Israeli hostages, has been taken into ICE custody, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem announced Tuesday. Soliman, an undocumented immigrant, has been charged with first-degree attempted murder and a federal hate crime in connection with the Sunday attack. Twelve victims, including a Holocaust survivor, were injured, at least two of whom remained hospitalized as of Monday afternoon. 'We are investigating to what extent his family knew about this heinous attack, if they had knowledge of it, or if they provided support to it,' Noem wrote in a post on X. 'I am continuing to pray for the victims of this attack and their families.' DHS did not respond to TIME's request for more information. A DHS official told CBS News that six people, including Soliman's spouse and children, are now in ICE custody. The official said the family would now be deported under expedited removal, which allows immigration officials to remove noncitizens without appearing before a judge. FBI Denver Special Agent in Charge Mark Michalek said during a Monday afternoon press conference that investigators believed that the suspect acted alone. 'If we uncover evidence that others knew of this attack or supported the subject in this attack, rest assured that we will aggressively move to hold them accountable to the fullest extent of the law,' Michalek added. He said the family was 'cooperative' when officials carried out a search warrant Sunday night. Read more: What We Know About the Boulder, Colorado Attack Soliman, of El Paso County, is an Egyptian national who entered the U.S. under a non-immigrant visa that expired in February 2023, according to DHS. The 45-year-old suspect filed for asylum in September 2022. Soliman currently faces 16 counts of attempted murder in the first-degree, two counts of use of an incendiary device, and 16 counts of attempted use of an incendiary device on the state level, along with a federal hate crime charge. The state charges alone carry a possible maximum sentence of more than 350 years in prison. He told authorities that he had been planning the attack for a year and wanted to kill all Zionists, according to an affidavit filed on Monday. Michalek said Soliman yelled 'Free Palestine' while he threw a Molotov cocktail towards the crowd of demonstrators. He is being held on a $10 million bond. He is next set to appear in court on Thursday. Contact us at letters@

DC mayor hit with ethics complaint over $62K trip to Qatar, jaunts to Masters and Mar-a-Lago
DC mayor hit with ethics complaint over $62K trip to Qatar, jaunts to Masters and Mar-a-Lago

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

DC mayor hit with ethics complaint over $62K trip to Qatar, jaunts to Masters and Mar-a-Lago

Washington, DC Mayor Muriel Bowser was slapped with an ethics complaint filed Tuesday by a watchdog group accusing her of potentially accepting illegal travel and hospitality gifts on at least three long-haul jaunts — including to Qatar, the Masters golf tournament, and President Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort. The Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT) filed the complaint with the DC Board of Ethics and Government Accountability after a local TV station revealed in April that Doha had paid at least $61,930 for the Democrat and four staffers to travel to the 2023 United Nations Climate Change Conference in neighboring Dubai. According to the report by WJLA-TV, Bowser's office initially stated the DC Chamber of Commerce paid for the Qatar trip, which it denied. The mayor's office then claimed the travel was paid for by the US Conference of Mayors. Advertisement In February of this year, the complaint states, Bowser's office asked the Qataris for a complete breakdown of the trip's expenses, which Doha described as an 'in-kind donation.' DC law requires a donation agreement with Qatar, but there is no record of such an understanding. In response to queries by WJLA, Bowser's office claimed it was undertaking proper record-keeping by asking Doha for an itemized record — so an agreement could be drawn up two years after the fact. The FACT complaint, first reported by Fox News, charges that Bowser has kept DC taxpayers in the dark about other trips to destinations as varied as Las Vegas, Miami and Augusta, Ga., where the Masters is held. Advertisement 'It is not simply the Qatar trip, but a troubling pattern from Mar-a-Lago to Doha to Augusta National — the District has no record of who paid for these trips or what public purpose they served, if there was one at all,' Kendra Arnold, executive director of FACT, said in a statement. 'The ethics rules exist to protect against corruption and when they are ignored, the public's trust erodes. I urge the Board to investigate and enforce the law without delay.' 3 DC Mayor Muriel Bowser has allegedly kept 'shoddy' records about her travels. Getty Images 3 The DC mayor has been keen on maintaining friendly relations with President Trump despite their policy differences. Getty Images Advertisement WJLA's investigation found that Bower's chief of staff, Lindsey Parker, submitted a receipt for a three-night stay at Dubai's Atlantis-The Palm Hotel, costing taxpayers a cool $3,500. The station noted that Parker's job description includes approving donations for official travel outside the US. The FACT complaint pointed to DC's strict rules that restrict the acceptance of gifts under most circumstances. 3 DC Mayor Muriel Bowser's team has been evasive about questions regarding her travels. Getty Images Advertisement 'Clearly Mayor Bowser's trip to Qatar qualifies as a gift, and one that elected officials are personally prohibited from accepting,' it read. 'Additionally, this gift would not qualify as a donation made to the District because the donation was not recorded and approved before the donation was used. The District still does not even have a record of it. 'The mayor and Qatar's retroactive description of the gift as an 'in-kind donation' should not carry any weight—both because this is a self-serving claim that was not made until years after the trip and because it does not meet the legal requirements to be categorized as one.' Bowser's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store