Neanderthal 'population bottleneck' around 110,000 years ago may have contributed to their extinction
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Neanderthals may have been headed toward their demise much earlier than experts previously thought, new research suggests.
In the study, published online Feb. 20 in the journal Nature Communications, researchers discovered that around 110,000 years ago, our closest human relatives experienced a "population bottleneck" that decimated their genetic diversity.
A population bottleneck occurs when there is a sudden reduction in genetic variation within a species. Bottlenecks in a species can be brought on by a number of processes, such as climate change, hunting or genocide. The end result of a bottleneck may be a population that is sickly or on the verge of extinction.
The scientists identified the bottleneck by analyzing changes in the shape of the Neanderthal inner ear over time.
When they analyzed the inner ears of Neanderthal skulls, they discovered that there was an abrupt decline in variation in this bone in skulls dated to the beginning of the Late Pleistocene, signaling a significant change in the Neanderthal skeleton.
Typically, comparisons among ancient DNA samples help researchers pinpoint when bottlenecks happened. But in this case, the team used the reduced variation in the Neanderthals' ear bones as a proxy. They focused on the semicircular canals, a set of bony tubes in the inner ear that are fully formed at birth. During life, these canals are filled with fluid, helping to maintain balance and detect head movements, such as shaking or nodding. Because semicircular canals are evolutionarily "neutral" — because their variation does not affect a person's survival — tracking subtle changes in the canals over time can shed light on the size and diversity of a past population.
Related: Did we kill the Neanderthals? New research may finally answer an age-old question.
Using CT scans, the researchers examined the semicircular canals of 30 Neanderthals from three time periods: 13 from the site of Sima de los Huesos in Spain that were dated to 430,000 years ago, 10 from the site of Krapina in Croatia that were dated to 120,000 years ago, and seven "late" Neanderthals from France, Belgium and Israel that were dated to 64,000 to 40,000 years ago.
This analysis revealed that the group of late Neanderthals had significantly lower variation in their inner ear bones than the earlier groups did, which led the researchers to conclude that a genetic bottleneck event occurred more recently than 120,000 years ago.
RELATED STORIES
—Who was the last Neanderthal?
—Neanderthals' blood type may help explain their demise, new study finds
—Neanderthals and humans interbred 47,000 years ago for nearly 7,000 years, research suggests
"By including fossils from a wide geographical and temporal range, we were able to capture a comprehensive picture of Neanderthal evolution," study co-author Mercedes Conde-Valverde, a biological anthropologist at the University of Alcalá in Spain, said in a statement. The reduction in diversity between early and late Neanderthals "is especially striking and clear, providing strong evidence of a bottleneck event," she said.
The findings fit in well with previous discoveries about Neanderthals, such as evidence of population turnover that negatively affected European Neanderthals' numbers. But it is unclear if the same pattern holds for southwestern Asian Neanderthals, like those who lived at Shanidar in Iraqi Kurdistan, the researchers wrote in their study, since their skulls were not available for analysis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What is a GPT?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The introduction of generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) marked a significant milestone in the adoption and utility of artificial intelligence in the real world. The technology was created by the then fledgling research lab OpenAI, based on previous research done on transformers in 2017 by Google Labs. It was Google's white paper "Attention is all you need", which laid the foundation for OpenAI's work on the GPT concept. As seen in > Model matchup surprise > ChatGPT announcements > Goodbye ChatGPT-4 > Why ChatGPT 4.1 is a big deal Transformers provided AI scientists with an innovative method of taking user input, and converting it to something that could be used by the neural network using an attention mechanism to identify important parts of the data. This architecture also allows for the information to be processed in parallel rather than sequentially as with traditional neural networks. This provides a huge and critical improvement in speed and efficiency of AI processing. OpenAI's GPT architecture was released in 2018 with GPT-1. By significantly refining Google's transformer ideas, the GPT model demonstrated that large-scale unsupervised learning could produce an extremely capable text generation model which operated at vastly improved speeds. GPT's also uprated the neural networks' understanding of context which improved accuracy and provided human-like coherence. Before GPT, AI language models relied on rule-based systems or simpler neural networks like recurrent neural networks (RNNs), which struggled with long-range dependencies and contextual understanding. The story of the GPT architecture is one of constant incremental improvements ever year since launch. GPT-2 in 2019 introduced a model with 1.5 billion parameters, which started to provide the kind of fluent text responses where AI users are now familiar with. However it was the introduction of GPT-3 (and subsequently 3.5) in 2020 which was the real game-changer. It featured 175 billion parameters, and suddenly a single AI model could cope with a vast array of applications from creative writing to code generation. GPT technology went viral in November of 2022 with the launch of ChatGPT. Based on GPT 3.5 and later GPT-4, this astonishing technology instantly propelled AI into public consciousness in a massive way. Unlike previous GPT models, ChatGPT was fine-tuned for conversational interaction. Suddenly business users and ordinary citizens could use an AI for things like customer service, online tutoring or technical support. So powerful was this idea, that the product attracted a 100 million users in a mere 60 days. Today GPT is one of the top two AI system architectures in the world (along with Google's Gemini). Recent improvements have included multimodal capabilities, i.e. the ability to process not just text but also images, video and audio. OpenAI has also updated the platform to improve pattern recognition and enhance unsupervised learning, as well as adding agentic functionality via semi-autonomous tasks. On the commercial front, GPT powered applications are now deeply embedded in many different business and industry enterprises. Salesforce has Einstein GPT to deliver CRM functionality, Microsoft's Copilot is an AI assisted coding tool which incorporates Office suite automation, and there are multiple healthcare AI models which are fine-tuned to provide GPT powered diagnosis, patient interaction and medical research. At the time of writing the only two significant rivals to the GPT architecture are Google's Gemini system and the work being done by DeepSeek, Anthropic's Claude and Meta with its Llama models. The latter products also use transformers, but in a subtly different way to GPT. Google however is a dark horse in the race, as it's becoming clear that the Gemini platform has the potential to dominate the global AI arena within a few short years. Despite the competition, OpenAI remains firmly at the top of many leaderboards in terms of AI performance and benchmarks. Its growing range of reasoning models such as o1 and o3, and its superlative image generation product, GPT Image-1 which uses the technology, continue to demonstrate that there is significant life left in the architecture, waiting to be exploited.
Gizmodo
8 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Mega-Tsunamis That Shook the World for 9 Days Revealed in New Satellite Images
Scientists have finally solved the mystery behind two strange events that shook the entire planet for nine days straight. Their findings close the book on a years-long effort to trace the seismic signals back to their source. In September 2023, global seismometers detected something strange. The Earth was experiencing minor tremors every 90 seconds—and the shaking went on for nine days. One month later, it happened again. Scientists were baffled, as natural tectonic processes couldn't explain the anomalies. After roughly a year of scientific sleuthing, two studies published in 2024 independently hypothesized that the shaking resulted from two huge landslides, setting off two 'mega-tsunamis' in the Dickson Fjord in East Greenland. These enormous standing waves—or seiches—sloshed back and forth inside the fjord and triggered small movements within the Earth's crust, they posited. It was an intriguing possibility, and both studies presented compelling evidence to support their claims. But, 'there were some big uncertainties that made it difficult to fully corroborate that this was actually the root cause,' Thomas Monahan, a Schmidt AI in Science fellow at the University of Oxford, told Gizmodo. So, Monahan and his colleagues set out to confirm whether this hypothesis was correct. In a study published today in the journal Nature Communications, they unveiled the first direct satellite observations of the seiches and definitively linked them to the seismic anomalies. The researchers used data captured by NASA's Surface Water Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite, which launched in December 2022 to map the height of water across 90% of Earth's surface. This type of data collection—known as satellite altimetry—works by transmitting radar pulses from a satellite to Earth's surface, and then measuring the time it takes for the signals to bounce off the surface and return to the satellite. Conventional altimeters failed to capture evidence of the seiches due to long gaps between observations, according to an Oxford statement. As such, they generally struggle to gather data in fjord regions due to the complexity of the terrain, Monahan said. But SWOT is equipped with a cutting-edge altimeter instrument that uses two antennas to triangulate the return signals. This allows the satellite to take very high-resolution measurements of surface water levels. 'What we're able to get is essentially an incredibly high-resolution snapshot of what the elevation of the sea surface is doing in these complex regions,' Monahan said. These snapshots provided a more accurate picture of how the fjord's sea surface height changed during the 2023 seismic events, allowing his research team to calculate the slopes of the massive waves that had formed. 'We were able to essentially unearth the fact that there was a significant anomaly in the fjord exactly when we would expect this wave to occur,' Monahan said. But determining that these seiches formed at the same time as the strange seismic signals still wasn't enough to prove the two events were linked. The researchers needed direct evidence to prove that these huge waves were capable of generating global tremors. To that end, they linked the SWOT snapshots to small movements in the Earth's crust detected at seismic stations located thousands of miles away from the fjord. Coupling this continuous seismic data with the intermittent satellite observations allowed them to reconstruct the characteristics of the wave, even for periods that SWOT did not observe. The researchers also ruled out the possibility that the seismicity stemmed from weather or tidal conditions and ultimately determined that the seiches were the sources of the tremors. These waves formed when a warming glacier collapsed in on itself, Monahan said. 'This created very large landslides, which—when they struck the fjord—produced massive mega-tsunamis on the order of 200 meters or 600 feet tall,' he explained. 'This was the first time that a mega-tsunami of that nature had occurred in Eastern Greenland,' Monahan said, adding that this type of event has been documented on the territory's west coast. To see this phenomenon spreading to other parts of the ice sheet 'is concerning,' he said, because it shows that climate change is accelerating in this region. 'I think what this study really emphasizes is that—well, it sounds silly to say—but climate change is a global phenomenon,' Monahan said. 'Some of the biggest and fastest changes are occurring in the Arctic and in remote regions where we may not see it every single day. But it's important to understand and quantify those changes as they will eventually come to impact us where we live,' he said. Indeed, the waves that shook the world offer a stark reminder of the sweeping impacts of rising global temperatures.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Milky Way may not collide with neighboring galaxy Andromeda after all: 'From near-certainty to a coin flip'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A titanic cosmic collision between the Milky Way and its closest large galactic neighbor, Andromeda, may not be as sure a thing as scientists thought. Previously, it had been proposed that there was a good chance that Andromeda and our galactic home, which are moving together, would meet in around 5 billion years and merge to form a daughter galaxy dubbed "Milkomeda." New research has revealed that there is a much smaller chance that these two spiral galaxies will slam into each other and merge over the next 10 billion years than was believed. In fact, it's about 50/50. "Our main finding is that the merger between the Milky Way and Andromeda, which had been predicted to occur in around 4.5 billion years, is actually much less certain. We found only about a 50% chance that this merger will happen during the next 10 billion years," team leader and University of Helsinki researcher Til Sawala told "In short, the probability went from near-certainty to a coin flip. "I was prepared to find something different, but yes, the fact that there is only around a 50/50 chance of a merger was very surprising." Sawala and colleagues reached this conclusion by simulating the next 10 billion years of the Milky Way's journey through the new simulation was based on updated astronomical data from the Hubble Space Telescope and from the European Space Agency (ESA) star tracking mission Gaia. The team also factored in new estimates of the masses of smaller dwarf galaxies around the Milky Way, which, via their gravitational influence, impact the cosmic passage of the Milky Way. "The main difference between our research and previous studies is that we benefited from newer and more precise data, and that we considered a more complete system, including the effect of the Large Magellanic Cloud, the Milky Way's largest satellite galaxy," Sawala said. The team was able to present different scenarios of what could become of the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies as they gradually move together."A head-on collision is very unlikely, we found a less than 2% chance for that. In most of the cases that lead to a merger, the two galaxies will indeed fly past each other at first, which will lead to a loss of orbital energy, and subsequently to a merger," Sawala said. "How close they come on their first passage is very uncertain, however, and if they don't come very close, meaning if their distance is more than around 500,000 light-years, they might not merge at all." The researchers found that if the orbits of the Milky Way and Andromeda come close enough for the two galaxies to gravitationally influence each other, then a merger is an eventuality. "But it's almost equally likely that they stay well separated, in which case they won't merge, and also continue to evolve mostly in isolation," The team found that while the odds of a merger with Andromeda drop when the Large Magellanic Cloud's influence is considered, with this adjustment, the Milky Way becomes more likely to cannibalize this satellite dwarf to this research, our galaxy is almost certain to merge with the Large Magellanic Cloud over the next 2 billion years. Related Stories: — Why do dwarf galaxies line up? 'Zippers' and 'twisters' in the early universe may solve a galactic mystery — Scientists calculate when the universe will end — it's sooner than expected — Amateur astrophotographer captures a stunning galaxy 24 million light-years from Earth (photo) "Of course, now we really want to find out whether the Milky Way and Andromeda will collide or not," Sawala said. "That will not only need more observational data, but also more complete modelling of their interaction, as well as of the effect of the environment in which they evolve. "Luckily, there will be more observational data coming very soon, next year, from the Gaia Space Telescope, and perhaps also from the Hubble Space Telescope." The team's research was published on Monday (June 2) in the journal Nature Astronomy.
