Jim Bélanger scores rare Conservative win in Sudbury area
Jim Bélanger came from a family of pioneers that settled in the Azilda area more than 130 years ago.
On Monday, he became a pioneer of sorts himself, becoming the first MP for the new riding of Sudbury East-Manitoulin-Nickel Belt. He is also the first Conservative to be elected at the provincial or federal level in the Sudbury area since Jim Gordon was elected Sudbury MPP in 1981.
Bélanger, 66, is well known in Azilda. 'My family came here in 1886 as pioneers,' he said. 'We live on that same land. We are not related to many of the families with the same name. I am just a regular Joe with a bit of an education.'
Bélanger attended the University of Ottawa, where he pursued a Bachelor of Business Administration. He has worked in the mining industry, logging, agriculture and is currently self-employed in the fuel sector.
'This is going to change my world … my family's world too. (My wife) Sylvie has been very supportive,' and in his victory speech, he once again acknowledged her role.
He also thanked an extensive team that worked hard to make the win happen. 'What a great group of volunteers: giving up evenings, weekends … so many hours. I got everywhere save for Killarney and Gogama.'
Sylvie Bélanger said she is so proud of her husband of 35 years. 'He is thinking about young people, young adults, young families. We have three children of our own. There are grandchildren … and even one on the way.'
With 251 of 259 polls reporting, Belanger had received 26,893 votes, while Liberal Marc Serre, the incumbent, took 21,283.
Andréane Chénier of the NDP got 4,386, Sharilynne St. Louis of the PPC 1,395 and Himal Hossain of the Greens 424.
As results came in for Sudbury East-Manitoulin-Nickel Belt last night, Belanger's supporters cheered. Frank Servant was in the crowd of about 50 people at Overtime Sports Bar & Grill in Chelmsford.
Servant was born and raised in Azilda and has known the Bélanger family all his life.
'I was the first one to pay to have a sign,' he said. 'I believe in Jim. You couldn't have someone better than Jim to represent us. I always was a Conservative, but even more so with Jim.'
Servant was emphatic from the beginning that Bélanger would win. 'We are sure to have a coffee together tomorrow to talk about all this.'
As the evening closed and final results came in, Bélanger's eyes were sparkling with emotion. 'I will work every single day for this riding. I hope politics won't change me. The win really hasn't hit me yet. I am excited.'
In winning Sudbury East-Manitoulin-Nickel Belt, Belanger defeated Liberal Marc Serre, who held the old Nickel Belt riding for a decade.
However, the riding was dramatically redrawn due to redistribution, taking in Manitoulin Island and other rural parts of northeastern Ontario.
Belanger's campaign manager, Diane Suski, attributed his win because he is a strong, believable candidate who represented change as a fundamental element.
'Jim is a fantastic candidate,' Suski said. 'I've known Jim forever. He was always intrigued by the idea of being in politics. I didn't have to convince him to run, it was the right timing. Having a bilingual candidate is important. It is respectful of the nature of the region.'
Suski said she had a very good feeling about Belanger's prospects long before election day. 'The response at the door was that people wanted change.'
She had her fingers crossed nonetheless. When Belanger was declared the winner, she was overjoyed.
'Sure, some of the riding readjustment may have had an impact here tonight,' Suski said. 'The new boundaries brought in Manitoulin. We were very strategic in how we set up the campaign team.
'Because it is such a big riding, we divvied it up into seven units and assigned a manager to each. Did we win the sign war? I don't know, but we spent a lot and we invested a lot in placing them.'
The Local Journalism Initiative is made possible through funding from the federal government.
sud.editorial@sunmedia.ca
Bluesky: @sudburystar.bsky.social
X: @SudburyStar
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Carney says Canada will meet 2% NATO spending target by March
Saying that the era of the United States' dominance on the world stage is over, Prime Minister Mark Carney committed his government on Monday to meeting the NATO benchmark target of two per cent of the country's gross domestic product by the end of the current fiscal year in March. The prime minister outlined his vision of Canada moving more closely toward European allies in a speech in Toronto. "We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a dominant role on the world stage. Today, that dominance is a thing of the past," Carney told an audience of foreign policy thinkers, national security officials and defence industry business leaders on Monday morning. Carney said the world is at a turning point — a hinge moment — and that it's time for Canada to chart its own path."The United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contributions to our collective security," Carney said. "In parallel, the world's trade routes, allegiances, energy systems and even intelligence itself are being rewired. Rising great powers are now in strategic competition with America. A new imperialism threatens. Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they will be on the menu." Carney reiterated pledges made during the election campaign to rearm the Canadian military with new submarines, armoured vehicles, drones and other technology. He provided no additional specifics during the speech. Much of the new $9.3 billion in defence spending is foundational, allowing the military to increase recruitment, give current soldiers a pay raise and set the stage for major equipment purchases — as well as an expansion of the Canadian defence industry. WATCH | Carney's full speech: There was speculation that the Liberal government would fold the Canadian Coast Guard entirely into the Department of National Defence — something other countries do. The coast guard is currently a special operating agency under the Fisheries Department with an annual budget of $2.5 billion. At a technical briefing for the media, senior defence officials said the coast guard would remain where it was and there would be no need to arm the civilian agency. However, senior federal officials insisted a more fundamental reorganization of the service would take place. One of the biggest questions on the minds of the opposition parties, whom Carney called to support the plan, was how the dramatic increase would impact the federal budget. Carney said the government would not raise taxes, but acknowledged some cuts would be made elsewhere within the federal more fundamental, defence expert Dave Perry said, is that the Defence Department has had trouble in the past being able to spend additional money. "I think the Government of Canada now has to actually try to come to grips with whether or not it can actually move this money that the prime minister talked about this morning," said Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, who's spent more than decade tracking defence spending. "If bureaucracy proceeds like normal, the way it has been over the past decade and a bit, this money is unlikely to be spent. We're going to have to actually see concrete change across the Canadian government." Federal ministers have been quietly signalling the pathway to a two per cent commitment for the last couple of weeks. The former head of NATO, George Robertson, speaking on CBC's Rosemary Barton Live on June 1, said Industry Minister Mélanie Joly had assured him that Canada would reach the alliance goal, which was first agreed upon in 2014, by the end of the year. Last week, at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Defence Minister David McGuinty signalled Carney would address Canada's defence spending targets before the upcoming leaders' summit in The the two per cent NATO target would require an investment of between $18 billion and $20 billion. In his speech, Carney said Canada will sign on to NATO's defence industrial pledge. Last year, NATO said it wanted its members to develop national plans to bolster the capacity of their individual defence industry sectors, a concept Canada has struggled with — or avoided outright — for decades. "Our goal is tangible commitments from our allies to provide NATO with the necessary resolve to deter aggression and protect against all adversaries in all domains," Carney said. "Our goal is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants." Canada under former prime minister Justin Trudeau faced regular criticism from allies for not meeting NATO's current target of two per cent of GDP. The dispute became public at last year's leaders' summit in Washington when members of the U.S. Congress from both sides of the aisle called out Canada for not having a plan to meet the goal, unlike all other allies.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Britain will lead the world in new nuclear golden age
Whatever your political stripe, it is clear that energy security is a crucial responsibility for any government. Today's announcements by this Government – that we are embarking on the biggest expansion of new nuclear power in over half a century – speak to that central imperative. Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the cost of living crisis that followed for both families and businesses, showed how vulnerable we are as a country because of our dependence on fossil fuels. This challenge of energy security and the demands of the climate crisis mean that it is in our interests to shift as fast as possible to clean, homegrown power. The demand for that power is expected to at least double by 2050. That's why we need all the clean, homegrown sources that we can get to meet the demands we face. New nuclear is a crucial source of firm, baseload power. Sixteen years ago, when I was the Energy Secretary, I identified eight potential sites for new nuclear, one of which was Sizewell. When we left government in 2010, I assumed that one of my coalition or Conservative successors would get the project over the line – but they didn't. It has taken until 2025 for a government to allocate the funding required to make the project happen. Today, we are setting aside £14.2bn to fund Sizewell C – so we can power the equivalent of around 6m homes with clean, homegrown energy that we control. Sizewell C will support around 10,000 jobs at peak construction and support thousands more nationwide, as well as creating 1,500 apprenticeships. The company has already signed £330m in contracts with local companies and will boost supply chains across the UK with 70pc of contracts predicted to go to 3,500 British suppliers. Good industrial jobs from Sheffield to Derby, Scotland to South East England, paid at high wages. To progress the plant, we are securing a funding model that fairly spreads upfront costs between industry, government, and consumers. We are also backing a new form of nuclear technology in the UK – small modular reactors (SMR). These offer a huge industrial and jobs opportunity for our country and could help fuel heavy industry and data centres across Britain. We will announce the outcome of the small modular reactor competition imminently – helping us to get ahead in the global race to lead in this new technology, with an ambition to deploy one of the first SMR fleets in Europe. The Government is also looking to provide a pathway for advanced nuclear technologies to be deployed in the UK. Taken together this represents a new golden age for nuclear – the biggest building programme in a generation. Once SMRs and Sizewell C come online this, along with Hinkley Point C, will deliver more new nuclear to grid than over the previous half century combined. As we drive forward on nuclear, we are determined to lead the world in the technologies of the future. We are ramping up spending on nuclear fusion research – with over £2.5bn of funding this parliament, including helping progress a fusion power station on the site of a former coal-fired power plant at West Burton. We are choosing to go big on nuclear, as part of our Plan for Change to invest in Britain's future, rather than accept the decline of recent times. This is what the Chancellor's Spending Review is all about: renewing the country with investments and projects that will produce jobs, prosperity and put more money in working people's pockets. For too long, Britain has not made the investments we need in energy and other critical national infrastructure. That is where this Government, led by the decisions of the Prime Minister and Chancellor, is different. We are choosing to double down on Britain's strengths and invest in the future – boosting our energy security, creating good jobs, unlocking new export opportunities and driving growth. There is another crucial thing this drive for new nuclear does – it supports our energy security and protects our home for the future by shifting away from reliance on fossil fuels. I believe it is a cherished value of many Telegraph readers to protect the things we treasure from generation to generation. Our countryside and way of life face a grave threat from the climate crisis. Clean power is about investing in future generations, with jobs and opportunities. It also gives us the chance to leave a safer, more prosperous legacy for future generations. That's why our drive to new nuclear is the right thing for today and for the future of our country. Ed Miliband is the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ed Miliband turns to nuclear power as blackout fears rise
Ed Miliband is to pump billions of pounds into a nuclear power renaissance to keep Britain's lights on. The Energy Secretary will on Tuesday commit £14.2bn to building two giant reactors at Sizewell, Suffolk, capable of providing 6m homes with electricity regardless of low winds and dark winter days. The heavy investment comes as fears rise that Mr Miliband's rush to build wind and solar farms is leaving the grid too exposed to the weather and vulnerable to outages. Over-reliance on intermittent renewables could even threaten blackouts of the kind that hit Spain in April, say experts. Nuclear generation is a reliable source of so-called baseload power, the minimum amount of demand on the grid. Writing in The Telegraph, Mr Miliband said the announcement marked a new 'golden age' for the British nuclear industry. He said: 'This challenge of energy security and the demands of the climate crisis mean that it is in our interests to shift as fast as possible to clean, home-grown power. 'The demand for that power is expected to at least double by 2050. That's why we need all the clean, home-grown sources that we can to meet the demands we face. New nuclear is a crucial source of firm, baseload power.' The money is in addition to the £3.6bn pledged by the previous Conservative government. It means Sizewell C is to receive a total of £17.8bn in public money between 2022 and 2029, with more to follow. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor is set to confirm the funding at the GMB Congress later on Tuesday ahead of the Government's spending review. Ms Reeves is to hand out £300bn more in public spending than was proposed by the Tories, following a record £40bn tax raid last year. The NHS is expected to receive an additional £30bn, meaning it will be among the biggest winners. An extra £113bn is also earmarked for infrastructure projects. However, day-to-day spending will be squeezed, with a real terms rise of 1.2pc in the next three years – down from 2.5pc in the last two years. Unprotected departments will face real terms cuts. A post-Brexit farming fund is expected to be reduced in size. There have also been clashes over police funding and social housing. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, became the last Cabinet minister to settle with the Treasury on Monday, following heated discussions that sources said had raised fears she might resign. As well as billions for Sizewell C, it is also expected that one of Europe's first programmes building small modular reactors (SMRs) will be confirmed. Partly built on production lines by engineering giants including Rolls-Royce, it is hoped these smaller and much cheaper nuclear power stations will allow Britain to more quickly replace the older plants that must be decommissioned in the coming years. Taxpayers will also contribute £2.5bn to a five-year investment in fusion research, which aims to unlock the nuclear reaction which powers the sun as a source of clean and cheap power on Earth. Nuclear power is seen as increasingly vital to protect Britain's power grids after the shutdowns of all its coal-fired power stations and the looming closures of many of the nation's 35 or so large gas-fired power stations. Such traditional 'thermal' power stations generate electricity by making steam that spins turbines. The rotating masses of metal are vital to stabilise the voltage and frequency of the power supplied to the grid – which is highly sensitive to even tiny fluctuations. In the UK, however, nuclear has always proved to be far more expensive than other sources of electricity. This is why, despite the UK opening the world's first commercial nuclear power station in the 1950s, no new nuclear plant has opened in the UK since 1995, with all of the existing fleet except Sizewell B likely to be phased out by the early 2030s. Energy analyst Kathryn Porter warned the UK was committing itself to an outdated and expensive reactor design at Sizewell C. She said: 'It's hard to imagine a 'golden age' of nuclear power with EDF's outdated and troubled reactor design. EDF in France is already looking to the next generation – building another of these older versions is a retrograde step. 'It's also highly unlikely that Sizewell C would be built faster than Hinkley given the lengthening of supply chains.' The costs for Hinkley Point C, under construction in Somerset, have risen from around £20bn to at least £42bn with some experts warning the final bill will come close to £50bn when it starts operating around 2031. Such unpredictable construction costs have made it difficult for the Government to find any companies willing to invest in Sizewell C. EDF, the French state energy company which is building Hinkley, has progressively reduced its stake in Sizewell C leaving the Government holding 84pc. Officials have been seeking foreign state investment including from the United Arab Emirates. Mr Miliband still refuses to divulge the estimated final cost of Sizewell C and negotiations with prospective partners are thought to still be under way. The best estimates to date suggest the power station will cost about £40bn. The money will come initially from the Treasury but it and other investors will recover the construction costs via a new levy, known as the Regulated Asset Base, to be added to consumer and business energy bills. The Government has claimed that this will initially cost only £12 per household per year, but experts say this would raise far less than needed – so the amounts are likely to increase, driving up energy bills. Andrew Bowie, Conservative shadow energy spokesman, said nuclear power offered a reliable and continuous source of electricity essential to balance the intermittency of renewables like wind and solar. 'We need to move to a lower-carbon electricity system that includes wind and solar. 'But we do not have the electricity storage capacity needed for times when the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine. Nuclear will give us reliable baseload electricity to stabilise the system.' Richard Tice, Reform's energy spokesman, was also broadly supportive but criticised Mr Miliband for delays around commissioning SMRs as well. 'We need to accelerate our nuclear plans, but why is the Government being so slow to progress cheaper SMRs that can be delivered faster?' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
