My Week In Cars: New Steve Cropley/Matt Prior podcast (ep.142)
Close
This week Steve Cropley and Matt Prior meet in a Jeep Wrangler to talk their respective Autocar columns. Cropley meets Jo Budge, who decides what your Audi is equipped with, nearly gets run over by an Aston Martin Cygnet, and he and Prior discuss what is the ideal car size, and what the next steps are for Bicester Motion following the tragic fire there two weeks ago.
Make sure you never miss an Autocar podcast. Subscribe to our podcasts via Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Podcasts or via your preferred podcast platform. And if you subscribe, rate and review the pod, we'd really appreciate that too.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The radio debut of the House of Commons: ‘there could be a long-running series here' – archive, 1975
Permanent radio broadcasts from the House of Commons began on 3 April 1978, and from the House of Lords on 4 April. Television broadcasts began on 21 November 1989. 10 June 1975 Ed Boyle, the commercial radio commentator for the first broadcast of parliament, yesterday spent two hours cooped up in a tiny glass box at a temperature of nearly 90 degrees, wearing a jacket, tie, and buttoned up collar, suffering from a particularly ferocious type of dysentery which has already brought his weight down to eight stone. Just to add a touch of challenge to the job, he was operating a new type of microphone kindly supplied by the BBC with operating instructions entirely in Japanese. In spite of this, Mr Boyle and his BBC colleague, David Holmes, who were trapped together in the same tiny glass box, managed somehow to give composed and informative account of the proceedings. Mr Holmes admitted afterwards that the heat had been so great that at times he had thought he would not be able to carry on, and though listeners may have noticed his voice fading occasionally, he always remained strikingly coherent and apparently in command. Mr Boyle now intends to make a few swift changes to make life slightly more bearable. Apart from sartorial changes to Bermuda shorts, for himself, he plans to make commentating easier by fading out some members when the discussion gets too technical. 'Some of the questions are really on very minor and erudite issues, and I guess the MPs won't mind if we turn them down occasionally so as to explain to the listeners what is happening.' Yesterday the two broadcasters were blessed by a good chunk of pungent topical debates, with Tony Benn using industry questions as the chance to prove himself a good Euro-democrat, and with splendid quotations like: 'If the opposition wants any head on a charger, the leader of the Conservative party will have to be a lot more seductive as a Salome than she has been so far.' At the same time, there were highly complex questions about, for example, the funding of the new pod for the stretched version of the Rolls-Royce RB 211 – a matter of great importance, but one which cannot be explained in the few seconds between question and answer. Both commentators had to trim down their remarks to within a second or so either way: Mr Holmes reckoned that if he did not spot immediately whether the speaker was calling an MP for a supplementary or for the next question on the order paper, he would lose two of the four or five vital seconds of explaining time. Time was so tight that Mr Boyle had to make a definite policy decision to give the first name of each MP as well as his surname and party. Often their time was so limited they could only say: 'This is a question about Europe' or, 'This is about British Leyland.' Mr Holmes hopes to grab a few more seconds of talking time while MPs are laughing and cheering between answers. But both men were pleased with the way things had gone, and came out of the box easier in mind if not in body than they had been when they went in. 'What's encouraging is that it looks as if we can do a proper job without the house having to change its way of going about business or even the tempo of its debates, so no one need feel that we are interfering in any way,' said Mr Holmes. The commercial company plans to use more material than the BBC will use, with prime minister's questions live every Tuesday and Thursday, plus special debates. It will also have an hour of extracts and highlights each morning – twice as long as the BBC – with an instant feedback service from a panel of MPs who took part in the debate; and possibly a Saturday morning edition giving chunks of the week's committees. Val Arnold-Forster, our radio critic, adds: It was a lucky day for broadcasters, according to David Holmes at the end of the transmission – audibly breathing a sigh of relief. It was too, it was a well or luckily chosen parliamentary day. At first, both Holmes and his opposite number, Ed Boyle of IRN, seemed to feel a trifle defensive about parliament. Well they might, for BBC listeners anyway missed not only some of Woman's Hour and a play, but since political events always seem to invade children's entertainment, they also missed Listen with Mother. Before the actual live broadcast started, both political editors showed us round like keen members of a parent-teachers association displaying their school: eager to tell us about the hallowed tradition, the problems that the whole institution had in a changing society, and the usefulness of the work done. The leader of the house, Edward Short, appeared on both channels in his headmasterly capacity to say that this was a particularly noisy House of Commons, but he hoped that the MPs would be on their best behaviour. A bit unruly, he thought, and not only the MPs either. There would have been more room, said Mr Short, in the tiny broadcaster's box if IRN and BBC had done the decent thing and agreed to a joint transmission. Nobody need have worried: from the moment question time started we were in capable hands. Both David Holmes and Ed Boyle chipped into the debate sotto voce, to identify and give party allegiances and explanations. Both tried valiantly to feed the listener with the details that make the House of Commons come alive. 'Mr Bidwell, chairman of the Tribune Group … Mr Denis Skinner, always a lively performer … Mr Benn is smiling to himself.' But they need not really have bothered: the proceedings were jolly enough. For those of us used to hearing politicians debating cautiously in front of untried audiences or answering laboured questions and phone-ins, it was an entertaining experience to hear such skilful parliamentary technicians as Harold Wilson and Tony Benn, parrying questions, riposting, joking, and scolding. The jokes were not always very good, but that's true of other radio comedians. Perhaps the laughter and applause sometimes seemed excessive but the barbed retorts were well placed and, as in other radio shows, what seemed like impromptu repartee must have been rehearsed, if only in the bath. 'I do not require lessons in political morality from an honourable member who regularly signs the oath of allegiance and snipes continually at the royal family,' snapped Tony Benn to Willie Hamilton. The uproar which worried Edward Short was cheerful mostly. The general cosiness, which came through strikingly as everyone complimented everyone else on performances in the referendum debate, seemed as easy to grasp as the Archers: we could become as familiar with William Whitelaw's idiosyncrasies as Walter Gabriel's. Final verdict: early days yet, but there could be a compulsive, long-running series here.
BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Neglected' corner of Northampton churchyard transformed
A "once neglected" corner of a churchyard described as an "eyesore" has been renovated and transformed by students and area of St Giles churchyard in Northampton town centre was now a "beautiful and useful space", said Kardi Somerfield from the church's community site had been known to collect litter and attract antisocial benches, five hanging basket posts and a bin were donated from the recent Abington Street improvement works, and were refurbished by students at Northampton College. St Giles Community Group led the project with support from Northampton Business Improvement District (BID).Dr Somerfield said: "What was once an eyesore is now a beautiful and useful space that's already being enjoyed by local residents and visitors."She said volunteers would continue to look after it and it was now "an area we can all be proud of". Mark Mullen, from Northampton BID, said: "This project has been carried out with a real eye on sustainability, by upcycling street furniture from Abington Street and creating attractive new planters that will bring an immediate pop of colour to the garden, while encouraging pollinators to return year on year."Mark Bradshaw, curriculum manager for construction at Northampton College, added: "Having the opportunity to create an attractive, safe and welcoming green space in the heart of the town centre is something we were more than happy to support."It was a brilliant experience for our students, giving them the chance to do real work in the community that they will be able to look back on with a sense of satisfaction for years to come." Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
The 150 page document that aims to help protect Stonehenge
The Stonehenge World Heritage Site is big - so big, it is actually split in two, with much of it around have lived and worked in the area long before they were ever declared a World Heritage Site - so when someone needs to build something, how do you make sure it will not negatively affect the much loved sites?That is where a new draft document of more than 150 A4 pages comes in. Officially labelled a "supplementary planning document", Wiltshire Council's cabinet member for environment, Paul Sample JP, called it an "important draft document that will help protect an historic and vital part of our heritage". It would act as guidance to people wanting to undertake any development - whether a small garden extension or a solar farm - and those making the final as it is only a draft at the moment, Wiltshire Council has it open for consultation and wants to hear from the public. Mr Sample JP said: "At Stonehenge and Avebury we have inherited one of the most important landscapes in the world. "It's essential that there is clear guidance so that any planning decisions affecting the World Heritage Site do not impact it adversely."It explains what needs to be taken into account and shows if there are extra assessments that need to be done to make sure a project will not impact the area negatively. There are some considerations that you would not usually expect to find in a planning document. For example, it discusses astronomy. That is because not only Stonehenge, but a few of the monuments - including Woodhenge and Durrington Walls - are shown to have alignments to solstices and lunar movements. "We know Stonehenge was used as a kind of sun calendar," explained Melanie Pomeroy-Kellinger, who is a manager for archaeology, landscape and historic environment at Wiltshire Council."We can't allow a massive development on the line of midsummer solstice for example. That would interfere with people's enjoyment and understanding of the importance of those alignments."Any development that is too tall for example, might affect the view, give off too much light pollution or reflections that could affect the sites. It also talks about views in the area and how monuments connect to each other, some very obviously, like avenues and ridges. "It's really important to think about it as ceremonial landscape," said Claire Selman, also a member of the team working with the council. "They might have been designed to be visible from one another" she added, mentioning that many also have connections to and woodland are also mentioned - some in a positive light, but it also notes the fact that some already in the area do not fit, with one in particular affecting the winter solstice. George Downs, who also works with the council, explained that while they are looking to introduce the Supplementary Planning Document, it does not mean there was nothing in place document integrates UNESCO Guidance on Heritage Impact Assessments and advice from Historic England with the National Planning Policy Framework and Local Plan requirements."There is a World Heritage Site Partnership which has had a management plan for the site which we last compiled in 2015," he said."It has an action plan which is reviewed every year."But this new document would give extra information and detail which, if adopted, will be used to ensure that any developments do not adversely impact the internationally significant monuments. The Supplementary Planning Document was created between the council, Chris Blandford Associates and has had input from the World Heritage Site can comment on the consultation online until 17 June, when there is also a recorded webinar to watch. There are also two more drop-in events to speak to people face-to-face being held at Amesbury Library on Monday 9 June and Marlborough Library on 12 June, both from 16:00 BST until 19:00 the council has been through the comments, it will consider the final version in October.
