After Starship's 9th test, astronaut shares unique view of earlier flights
SpaceX's massive Starship rocket roared skyward for the ninth time on Tuesday, with the test flight delivering mixed results.
The upper-stage Starship spacecraft coasted for around 40 minutes before breaking up on reentry, a performance that beat the seventh and eighth tests when the vehicles broke up soon after stage separation. The first-stage Super Heavy booster, meanwhile, exploded on its descent, though SpaceX had said beforehand that this could happen as it was trying out a new system for the return flight that put extra pressure on the booster.
Recommended Videos
Tuesday's test flight inspired NASA astronaut Don Pettit to share his two favorite shots of earlier Starship launches, captured from the unique perspective of the International Space Station (ISS) as it passed close to the launch site at an altitude of around 250 miles.
'My two best Starship photos from space station,' Pettit, whose most recent ISS stay lasted just over seven months before ending last month, wrote in a message on X. 'Left shows flight 6 launch over Starbase. Right is the flight 8 exhaust trail and debris field after breakup in orbit.'
My two best Starship photos from space station.
Left shows flight 6 launch over Starbase. Right is the flight 8 exhaust trail and debris field after breakup in orbit. pic.twitter.com/ivqYcfCrjZ — Don Pettit (@astro_Pettit) May 27, 2025
Commenting back in December about his photo of the sixth Starship launch, Pettit put it down to 'dumb luck' for being in the right place at the right time, adding that if the launch had been delayed by 20 minutes, the ISS would have traveled far enough that he wouldn't have been able to see the rocket lift off.
He said that once he realized that the ISS was going to be flying over SpaceX's Starbase launch site, it was 'just a question of knowing how to use your your photography equipment, which lens to use, what kind of shutter speeds, exposures, ISO, that kind of stuff.'
During his time in orbit, Pettit shared some amazing images, including this absolute stunner of the Betsiboka River estuary in Madagascar, and another showing Earth as you've never seen it before.
Want to see more of Pettit's space-based work? Then check out this collection of his best images from his most recent ISS mission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The man who orchestrated a British medical scandal
Joanne Briggs's debut, The Scientist Who Wasn't There, is an astonishingly original memoir about truth, identity and the ethics of science. It's thrilling, unsettling – and really rather odd. Winner of the inaugural Bridport Prize for Memoir in 2023, the award that cinched the book's publication, it explores the enigmatic – if not completely bizarre – life of Briggs's father, Professor Michael Briggs, a man whose illustrious, globe-trotting scientific career concealed a vast labyrinth of deception. Born in Manchester, Professor Briggs became a research scientist who worked at NASA, an advisor to the World Health Organisation, and a successful executive in the pharmaceutical industry. On paper, his was a classic rags-to-riches story: he was a self-made, charismatic visionary who surfed the post-war technology boom. But in 1986, his career imploded when a Sunday Times exposé linked him to the hormone pregnancy test Primodos, which worked by triggering menstruation in non-pregnant women, and was alleged to have caused serious birth defects. It seemed Professor Briggs had been faking results. Things get stranger. Professor Briggs not only appears to have forged his qualifications, laundered research funds and bullied sceptical colleagues and anyone who doubted him – he may also have been a spy. He appears to have worked for the British government, possibly connected to Cold War intelligence gathering; may have been involved in espionage in East Berlin, and then somehow got caught up in the making of Stanley Kubrick's film 2001: A Space Odyssey. His death abroad, aged 51, was so sudden that Briggs speculates that there may have been some kind of cover-up. What begins, then, as a daughter's ostensibly simple search for the truth about her absent father, soon becomes a forensic and yet also fantastical investigation – part legal inquiry, part philosophical meditation. A trained lawyer, Briggs approaches the evidence as a prosecutor would: poring over professional records, interviewing colleagues and meeting with the victims of her father's lies and misconduct. Primodos involved high doses of synthetic hormones and though the causal link has never been confirmed, women who used it reported children with defects such as spina bifida, limb abnormalities, and heart issues. Briggs reveals that her father manipulated or suppressed data about these effects while being professionally involved with the pharmaceutical company producing it. But the book is also wildly surreal: Briggs imagines conversations with her father in which they debate the boundaries between science and science fiction, and the book eventually resolves into musings and reverie. The overall effect, frankly, is dizzying – pleasantly so. Briggs often hints that she herself doesn't know the difference between fact and fantasy; in a rather cryptic, ambivalent author's note, she writes: 'My memory of the past is as much made up of dreams, impressions, false beliefs, fantasies, feelings and notions as it is of facts [...] which I hope makes my memoir authentic. But is that a true story? Well, yes, it is to me.' True or not, the book defies neat categorisation. It's certainly a book about a very peculiar, unsavoury man, but it's also a vivid depiction of a world in which ambition and imagination collide, with devastating human consequences. Briggs does, at various points, express deep moral ambivalence about writing the book: she wrestles with the ethics of exposing her father's legacy, particularly given the trauma already borne by his victims. She describes a childhood overshadowed by confusion, secrecy and emotional neglect, but also moments of awe and admiration for her father. Their relationship, as reconstructed here, was fraught and complex – marked more by absence than presence, but never entirely devoid of connection or longing. The Scientist Who Wasn't There is not only an indictment of one man's lies and deceit and his descent into moral oblivion, therefore, but a study of duplicity; personal, institutional, even national and international. Briggs slowly assembles a counterbalanced, complex kind of truth, one that acknowledges the impossibility of total objectivity but which nonetheless insists on the value of the attempt. 'He only ever travelled in one direction,' Briggs writes of her father. 'Forwards, away from the smoke of burning bridges.' She, in contrast, with admirable insight and considerable nerve, turns back – to sift through the still smouldering ruins. The Scientist Who Wasn't There is published by Ithaka at £20. To order your copy for £16.99, call 0330 173 0523 or visit Telegraph Books Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
CNET
25 minutes ago
- CNET
Get Your Hands on These Anker Soundcore Open-Ear Earbuds While They're Down to Just $53
There are a lot of options for good running earbuds out there, so finding the one that fits you can be tricky. One really good option is to go with an open-ear style though, as it can help you feel a bit cooler and more comfortable. Well, right now you get your hands on the Soundcore C30i by Anker for $53 as long as you use the on-page coupon to save yourself 25%. This is a great chance to grab these buds for less, and they've got loads of features that make them really good for all kinds of workouts. These open-ear earbuds are available in two colors, black and white. Their firm-shell design is lightweight and comfortable. It also has a secure clip-on design so they won't fall out. You can take them anywhere you go, as they're water-resistant. We haven't tested these specific buds, but they promise clear and high-quality audio, giving you the best listening experience. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. If you're looking for more listening options, check out our list of the best deals on earbuds and headphones going on right now. Why this deal matters Anker's Soundcore open earbuds are designed to fit comfortably in your ears with a tight grip so it doesn't fall out while exercising. The $53 earbuds are now significantly cheaper than Bose's Ultra Open Earbuds which run around $299.
Fast Company
26 minutes ago
- Fast Company
The real data revolution hasn't happened yet
The Gartner Hype Cycle is a valuable framework for understanding where an emerging technology stands on its journey into the mainstream. It helps chart public perception, from the 'Peak of Inflated Expectations' through the 'Trough of Disillusionment,' and eventually up the 'Slope of Enlightenment' toward the 'Plateau of Productivity.' In 2015, Gartner removed big data from the Hype Cycle. Analyst Betsy Burton explained that it was no longer considered an 'emerging technology' and 'has become prevalent in our lives.' She's right. In hindsight, it's remarkable how quickly enterprises recognized the value of their data and learned to use it for their business advantage. Big data moved from novelty to necessity at an impressive pace. Yet in some ways, I disagree with Gartner. Adoption has been widespread, but effectiveness is another matter. Do most enterprises truly have the tools and infrastructure to make the most of the data they hold? I don't believe they do. Which is why I also don't believe the true big data revolution has happened yet. But it's coming. Dissecting the Stack A key reason big data is seen as mature, even mundane, is that people often confuse software progress with overall readiness. The reality is more nuanced. Yes, the software is strong. We have robust platforms for managing, querying, and analyzing massive datasets. Many enterprises have assembled entire software stacks that work well. But that software still needs hardware to run on. And here lies the bottleneck. Most data-intensive workloads still rely on traditional central processing units (CPUs)—the same processors used for general IT tasks. This creates challenges. CPUs are expensive, energy hungry, and not particularly well suited to parallel processing. When a query needs to run across terabytes or even petabytes of data, engineers often divide the work into smaller tasks and process them sequentially. This method is inefficient and time-consuming. It also ends up requiring more total computation than a single large job would. Even though CPUs can run at high clock speeds, they simply don't have enough cores to efficiently handle complex queries at scale. As a result, hardware has limited the potential of big data. But now, that's starting to change with the rise of accelerated computing. Breaking the Bottleneck Accelerated computing refers to running workloads on specialized hardware designed to outperform CPUs. This could mean field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) or application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) built for a specific task. More relevant to big data, though, are graphics processing units (GPUs). GPUs contain thousands of cores and are ideal for tasks that benefit from parallel processing. They can dramatically speed up large-scale data operations. Interestingly, GPU computing and big data emerged around the same time. Nvidia launched CUDA (compute unified device architecture) in 2006, enabling general-purpose computing on graphics hardware. Just two years earlier, Google's MapReduce paper laid the foundation for modern big data processing. Despite this parallel emergence, GPUs haven't become a standard part of enterprise data infrastructure. That's due to a mix of factors. For one, cloud-based access to GPUs was limited until relatively recently. When I started building GPU-accelerated software, SoftLayer—now absorbed into IBM Cloud—was the only real option. There was also a perception problem. Many believed GPU development was too complex and costly to justify, especially for general business needs. And for a long time, few ready-made tools existed to make it easier. Those barriers have largely fallen. Today, a rich ecosystem of software exists to support GPU-accelerated computing. CUDA tools have matured, benefiting from nearly two decades of continuous development. And renting a top-tier GPU, like Nvidia's A100, now costs as little as $1 per hour. With affordable access and a better software stack, we're finally seeing the pieces fall into place. The Real Big Data Revolution What's coming next will be transformative. Until now, most enterprises have been constrained by hardware limits. With GPU acceleration more accessible and a mature ecosystem of supporting tools, those constraints are finally lifting. The impact will vary by organization. But broadly, companies will gain the ability to run complex data operations across massive datasets, without needing to worry about processing time or cost. With faster, cheaper insights, businesses can make better decisions and act more quickly. The value of data will shift from how much is collected to how quickly it can be used. Accelerated computing will also enable experimentation. Freed from concerns about query latency or resource drain, enterprises can explore how their data might power generative AI, smarter applications, or entirely new user experiences. Gartner took big data off the Hype Cycle because it no longer seemed revolutionary. Accelerated computing is about to make it revolutionary again.
