logo
Trump's military parade rare in peacetime, but rooted in US tradition

Trump's military parade rare in peacetime, but rooted in US tradition

Troops marching in lockstep. Patriotic tunes filling the air. The commander in chief looking on at it all.
The military parade commemorating the US Army's 250th anniversary and coinciding with President Donald Trump 's 79th birthday will be a new spectacle for many Americans.
This will not be the first US military parade. However, it is unusual outside of wartime, and Trump's approach stands out compared to his predecessors.
The Army had long planned a celebration for its semi-quincentennial on June 14. Trump has wanted to preside over a grand military parade since his first presidency from 2017 to 2021. When he took office a second time, he found the ideal convergence and ratcheted the Pentagon's plans into a full-scale military parade on his birthday.
The president, who is expected to speak in Washington as part of the affair, pitches the occasion as a way to celebrate US power and service members' sacrifice. But there are bipartisan concerns about the cost as well as concerns about whether Trump is blurring traditional understandings of what it means to be a civilian commander in chief.
Early US troop reviews
Ceremonial reviews troops looking their best and conducting drills for top commanders trace back through medieval kingdoms to ancient empires of Rome, Persia and China. The pageantry continued in the young US republic: Early presidents held military reviews as part of July 4th independence celebrations. That ended with James K. Polk, who was president from 1845 to 1849.
President Andrew Johnson resurrected the tradition in 1865, holding a two-day Grand Review of the Armies five weeks after Abraham Lincoln's assassination. It came after Johnson declared the Civil War over, a show of force meant to salve a war-weary nation though more fighting and casualties would occur.
Infantry, cavalry and artillery units 145,000 soldiers, and even cattle traversed Pennsylvania Avenue. Johnson, his Cabinet and top Army officers, including Ulysses S. Grant, Lincoln's last commanding general and the future 18th president, watched from a White House viewing stand.
Spanish-American War and World War I: An era of victory parades begins
The Spanish-American War was the first major international conflict for a reunited nation since the Civil War. It ended in a US victory that established an American empire: Spain ceded Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Guam, and the US purchased the Philippines for $20 million. Puerto Rico and Guam remain US territories.
New York City hosted multiple celebrations of a new global power. In August 1898, a fleet of warships, including the Brooklyn, the Texas, and the Oregon, sailed up the North River, more commonly known today as the Hudson River.
American inventor Thomas Edison filmed the floating parade. The following September, New York hosted a naval and street parade to welcome home Rear Adm. George Dewey, who joined President William McKinley in a viewing stand.
Many US cities held World War I victory parades a few decades later. But neither Washington nor President Woodrow Wilson were the focal point. In Boston, a million civilians celebrated 20,000 troops in 1919. New York honoured 25,000 troops marching in full uniform and combat gear.
New York was the parade epicentre again for World War II
On June 13, 1942, as US involvement in World War II accelerated, about 30,000 people formed a mobilisation parade in New York City. Participants included Army and Navy personnel, American Women's Voluntary Services members, Boy Scouts and military school cadets. Scores of floats rolled, too. One carried a massive bust of President Franklin Roosevelt, who did not attend.
Less than four years later, the 82nd Airborne Division and Sherman tanks led a victory parade down Manhattan's Fifth Avenue. Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, the Allied commander during World War II, rode in a victory parade in Washington, DC. In 1952, Eisenhower would join Grant and George Washington as top wartime commanders elevated to the presidency following their military achievements. Other World War II generals were honoured in other homecoming parades.
A long parade gap, despite multiple wars
The US did not hold national or major city parades after wars in Korea and Vietnam. Both ended without clear victory; Vietnam, especially, sparked bitter societal division, enough so that President Gerald Ford opted against a strong military presence in 1976 bicentennial celebrations, held a year after the fall of Saigon.
Washington finally hosted a victory parade in 1991 after the first Persian Gulf War. The Constitution Avenue lineup included 8,000 troops, tanks, Patriot missiles and representatives of the international coalition, led by the US, that quickly drove an invading Iraq out of Kuwait.
The commander in chief, George H.W. Bush, is the last US president to have held an active-duty military post. He had been a World War II combat pilot who survived his plane being shot down over the Pacific Ocean.
Veterans of the second Iraq and Afghanistan wars that followed the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks have not been honoured in national parades.
Inaugurations and a flight suit
Inaugural parades include and sometimes feature military elements.
Eisenhower's 1953 inaugural parade, at the outset of the Cold War, included 22,000 service members and an atomic cannon. Eight years later, President John F. Kennedy, a World War II Naval officer, watched armoured tanks, Army and Navy personnel, dozens of missiles and Navy boats pass in front of his reviewing stand.
More recent inaugurations have included honour guards, academy cadets, military bands and other personnel but not large combat assets. Notably, US presidents, even when leading or attending military events, wear civilian attire rather than military garb, a standard set by Washington, who also eschewed being called General Washington in favour of Mr. President.
Perhaps the lone exception came in 2003, when President George W. Bush, who had been a National Guard pilot, wore a flight suit when he landed on the USS Abraham Lincoln and declared the end of major combat operations in Iraq, which US forces had invaded six weeks earlier.
The aircraft carrier was not a parade venue but the president emerged to raucous cheers from uniformed service members. He put on a business suit to deliver a nationally televised speech in front a Mission Accomplished banner.
As the war dragged on to a less decisive outcome, that scene and its enduring images would become a political liability for the president.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘It's A War': Israel's Strikes On Over 30 Targets Different From Earlier Iran Attacks
‘It's A War': Israel's Strikes On Over 30 Targets Different From Earlier Iran Attacks

News18

time17 minutes ago

  • News18

‘It's A War': Israel's Strikes On Over 30 Targets Different From Earlier Iran Attacks

Last Updated: Israel expects 'Operation Rising Lion' to last for weeks, if not months, depending on the scale of retaliation, according to intelligence sources and the media briefing Israel's Operation Rising Lion against Iran is different from its previous operations against Iran, according to intelligence sources who studied the briefing of the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF). Israel launched a full-scale coordinated attack against Iran at around 0300 hrs on June 13. Multiple waves of airstrikes deep inside Iranian territory targeted military installations, particularly nuclear facilities, and conducted assassination attacks against numerous high-ranking officials and persons of interest. Israel's intelligence unit Mossad likely established a base for attack drones in the heart of Iran. Among those killed in the operation were Iran's highest-ranking military officer Major General Hossein Salami, the head of its elite Revolutionary Guards Corps Mohammad Bagheri, former national security chief Ali Shamkhani and Chief of Emergency Command Gholam-Ali-Rashid. ⭕️ IAF fighter jets, guided by precise intelligence, struck the Iranian regime's uranium enrichment site in the Natanz area overnight. This is the largest uranium enrichment site in Iran, which has operated for years to achieve nuclear weapons capability and houses the… — Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) June 13, 2025 WHAT MAKES THE ATTACK DIFFERENT Israel expects 'Operation Rising Lion' to last for weeks, if not months, depending on the scale of retaliation. The Israeli Air Force (IAF) has so far carried out five waves of strikes in Iran since morning. The IDF statement reported that jets completed the first stage, including strikes on dozens of military targets, notably nuclear targets in various areas of Iran. PM Benjamin Netanyahu stated the attack will continue as long as necessary. 'It is a declared war against the state of Iran. The IDF has stated its objective is to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons capability," they said. While the IDF emphasised the operation targeted the aggressive regime and its commanders, and not the people of Iran, a large-scale retaliation is expected. THE NUCLEAR TALK Mossad separately executed targeted assassinations, according to media reports. The IAEA confirmed it is closely monitoring the deeply concerning situation in Iran, with the Natanz site among the targets. The IDF revealed that the Iranian regime was advancing a secret plan to obtain nuclear weapons. As part of this plan, senior nuclear scientists in Iran have been working to secretly develop all components needed for a nuclear weapon. US SUPPORT When asked about the US support at the briefing, the IDF deflected, stating they were capable and undertaking operations with their own resources. The US Secretary of State clarified that the US is not involved in Israel's unilateral action against Iran, with the top priority being the protection of American forces in the region. THE TARGETS Qeytariyeh, Tehran Niavaran, Tehran West Tehran and Chitgar East Tehran Mehrabad, Tehran Several attacks on Tehran's Mahallati neighbourhood Shahid Chamran Town, Nobonyad, in Tehran A tower in Kamraniyeh, Tehran Narmak, Tehran Saadat Abad, Tehran Andarzgoo, Tehran Orchid Complex in Sattarkhan, Tehran Shahid Daghayeghi Town, Tehran (widespread attacks) Farahzadi, Tehran Armed Forces General Command Headquarters Ozgol, Tehran Ali Shamkhani's residence Shahraara, Tehran Saadat Abad KETAB Square University profs residential Complex Garmdareh Several attacks on the Natanz nuclear site Parchin facilities Several military bases in Tehran Qom Khorramabad Hamedan Parchin Qasre Shirin Tabriz Piranshahr, West Azerbaijan Kermanshah Ilam Arak About the Author Manoj Gupta Group Editor, Investigations & Security Affairs, Network18 Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : israel iran news18 specials Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 13, 2025, 16:34 IST News world 'It's A War': Israel's Strikes On Over 30 Targets Different From Earlier Iran Attacks | Exclusive

Post-Degree Jobs Won't be Available Any More in the US, But It is Still the Best Option
Post-Degree Jobs Won't be Available Any More in the US, But It is Still the Best Option

The Wire

time18 minutes ago

  • The Wire

Post-Degree Jobs Won't be Available Any More in the US, But It is Still the Best Option

Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute Now India sends students to the US in record numbers, but this academic year, applicants are feeling anxious before they head out. The changing policies of the Trump administration is likely to cause delays and tougher immigration questioning, among other things. Moreover, it is likely that the Optional Practical Training (OPT) programme, which allows F-1 visa holding students to work for a year or more, will be modified if not terminated. That was one of the great attractions for foreign students in the US. So is it still worth going to the US to study? 'Absolutely' says Viral Doshi, who has advised Indian students heading to the US for the last 20 years. 'No other country can match up to the US,' he says, in sheer number of colleges, in the kinds of courses it offers and in the experiences one can have. He acknowledges that parents have anxieties but 'I tell them, have patience,', he says in a podcast discussion with Sidharth Bhatia. 'Almost 50 percent students have already got visas and others will too, maybe a few weeks late for the first semester.' He says universities depend foreign students and are saying they will allow students to come late.' 'America is not the same as it was some years ago. Things have changed. 'No more internships and no more jobs or work experience'. And most important, he adds, 'Avoid political activism.' The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

How Trump's America is driving away the brightest minds in the world
How Trump's America is driving away the brightest minds in the world

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

How Trump's America is driving away the brightest minds in the world

In a recent call, I spoke with a student from Mumbai who had just been denied a US student visa — despite an Ivy League admit, full funding, and a spotless academic record. The reason? 'Potential immigration intent.' No explanation. No second chance. Unfortunately, this isn't an isolated case — it's the new normal. As someone who has spent nearly two decades helping students around the world access top-tier education , I'm witnessing a dangerous shift: America, once the epicenter of academic opportunity, is now sending a different message - you're not welcome here. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Kulkas yang belum Terjual dengan Harga Termurah (Lihat harga) Cari Sekarang Undo Columbia & Harvard : The campus crackdown (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Late 2024 saw student-led protests erupt at Columbia University , calling for a ceasefire in Gaza and institutional divestment from Israeli-linked companies. These demonstrations sparked national outrage particularly among conservative lawmakers and pro-Israel groups who accused the university of allowing 'anti-Semitic hate speech' to flourish. Live Events In early 2025, the Trump administration responded with a formal investigation, citing potential Title VI violations for failing to protect Jewish students. Education Secretary Linda McMahon even threatened to strip Columbia of its federal funding and accreditation: a move seen by many legal experts as political overreach aimed at silencing campus dissent. Harvard didn't fare any better. After student groups released a statement criticizing Israeli policy, the university found itself under federal scrutiny. Trump officials questioned not just free speech on campus, but also Harvard's DEI programs and alleged 'left-wing indoctrination.' Civil rights lawsuits are being considered. Anti-terrorism statutes are being explored. The message is clear: campuses are being punished not for lawbreaking, but for ideological divergence. Visas: A bureaucratic wall Meanwhile, outside these campuses, international students are struggling just to get in. According to the 2025 INTO Global Survey, 28% of South Asian students, including many from India, cited visa processing delays as their top challenge. In major cities like New Delhi and Mumbai, wait times stretch 180 to 300 days, causing students to miss orientations, housing deadlines, and even entire semesters. Despite advocacy from leading bodies like NAFSA and the American Council on Education, the US government has yet to reinstate the COVID-era interview waiver program. Consular staffing remains unchanged, even as Indian students now make up the second-largest international student population in the U.S. (over 270,000 in 2024). Add to this the alarming rise in F-1 visa rejection rates — 36% globally in 2023 — with disproportionately higher rejections in India, Nigeria, and the Middle East. Many denials are issued to students with admits from top-ranked universities, often under vague justifications like 'intent to immigrate.' This isn't due diligence. It's systemic gatekeeping. From your feed to your future In April 2025, the Trump administration added another layer of scrutiny: mandatory social media vetting for all F, M, and J visa applicants. Consular officers are now directed to examine five years of social media activity. Applicants have been penalized for: Sharing anti-war posts. Supporting campus protests. Liking or following pages critical of US foreign policy. There's no transparent rubric for these decisions. Legal experts warn this practice threatens free expression, especially when students are held accountable for content that would be constitutionally protected for American citizens. Revocations without recourse Perhaps most alarming is the surge in SEVIS deactivations and visa revocations. In early 2025 alone, over 1,300 international students — largely from China and the Middle East — had their valid US visas retroactively cancelled, often due to alleged links to institutions tied to the Chinese government. No appeal process. No compensation. Just abrupt exits and lost semesters. Indian students aren't yet targeted, but the anxiety is palpable. In an increasingly unstable geopolitical climate, one controversial post or political affiliation could be enough to unravel years of academic planning. What's at stake Top faculty at MIT have raised the alarm: 'We're training the best minds in the world only to lose them to other nations because they feel unwelcome or unsafe here.' They're right. Students are already choosing Canada, Australia, and Europe — countries rolling out fast-track visas, transparent policies, and public commitments to international education. America's loss is their gain. Universities are fighting back. Institutions are launching legal aid clinics, financial support for disrupted students, and workshops on rights and documentation. Advocacy groups are lobbying hard for transparency and reform. But time is running out. The US must decide whether it wants to remain the beacon of global education — or watch that light dim, student by student, dream by dream.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store