Anger as US blocks Gaza ceasefire resolution at UN Security Council
UNITED NATIONS: UN Security Council members criticized the United States Wednesday after it vetoed a resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza, which Washington said undermined ongoing diplomacy.
It was the 15-member body's first vote on the situation since November, when the United States -- a key Israeli ally -- also blocked a text calling for an end to fighting.
'Today, the United States sent a strong message by vetoing a counterproductive UN Security Council resolution on Gaza targeting Israel,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement after Wednesday's 14 to 1 vote.
He said Washington would not support any text that 'draws a false equivalence between Israel and Hamas, or disregards Israel's right to defend itself.
'The United States will continue to stand with Israel at the UN.'
The draft resolution had demanded 'an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties.'
It also called for the 'immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups,' and demanded the lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza.
Hamas, whose unprecedented attack inside Israel on October 7, 2023 sparked the war, condemned the 'disgraceful' US veto, reiterating accusations of 'genocide' in Gaza, something Israel vehemently rejects.
The veto 'marks a new stain on the ethical record of the United States of America,' the group said in a statement, accusing Washington of 'legitimizing genocide, supporting aggression, and rationalizing starvation, destruction, and mass killings.'
'Moral stain'
Pakistan's ambassador to the UN Asim Ahmad meanwhile said the failed resolution would 'remain not only a moral stain on the conscience of this council, but a fateful moment of political application that will reverberate for generations.'
China's ambassador to the UN Fu Cong said: 'today's vote result once again exposes that the root cause of the council's inability to quell the conflict in Gaza is the repeated obstruction by the US.'
The veto marks Washington's first such action since US President Donald Trump took office in January.
Israel has faced mounting international pressure to end its war in Gaza.
That scrutiny has increased over flailing aid distribution in Gaza, which Israel blocked for more than two months before allowing a small number of UN vehicles to enter in mid-May.
The United Nations, which warned last month the entire population in the besieged Palestinian territory was at risk of famine, said trickle was far from enough to meet the humanitarian needs.
'Judged by history'
'The Council was prevented from shouldering its responsibility, despite the fact that most of us seem to be converging on one view,' said France's ambassador to the UN Jerome Bonnafont.
Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian ambassador to the UN, said after the Security Council vote he would now ask the General Assembly to pass a resolution calling for a ceasefire.
Israel's ambassador to the UN Danny Danon however said that the Palestinian plan to put the resolution to a vote at the General Assembly, where no country can veto it, was pointless, telling countries 'don't waste more of your energy.'
'This resolution doesn't advance humanitarian relief and undermines it. It ignores a working system in favor of political agendas,' he said.
'The United Nations must return to its original purpose-promoting peace and security-and stop these performative actions,' Rubio said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
A student at Brown University channelled Elon Musk. Then he got in trouble
Thousands of administrative employees at Brown University woke up this spring to an email with pointed Elon Musk-like questions about their job responsibilities. Please describe your role, it asked. What tasks have you performed in the past week? How would Brown students be affected if your job didn't exist? The March 18 email was from a sophomore, Alex Shieh, who explained that the responses would be included in a story for The Brown Spectator , a new, as yet unpublished conservative newspaper on campus. His questions were undoubtedly sensitive for elite universities like Brown, where the cost of tuition, housing and other fees has risen to US$93,000 (RM 394,785) . Critics, including President Donald Trump, accuse the schools of padding their budgets with redundant layers of deans and associate deans, bloated diversity programs and niche academic divisions. Many recipients of the email, including those in the Office of Student Conduct and Community Standards, were not amused – no doubt aware that Musk, whose Department of Government Efficiency was ripping like a hacksaw through the federal bureaucracy, had asked government employees similar kinds of questions. Two days later, Brown notified Shieh that he was under investigation for possible violations of the university's code of student conduct, including its prohibitions on invasion of privacy, misrepresentation and emotional or psychological harm. With that, his case – and that of two Spectator students who were later placed under investigation – became the latest flashpoint in the free speech wars on American college campuses. Brown eventually cleared all three students of wrongdoing. But their case is yet another example of how universities continue to struggle with protecting the rights of students to express themselves on campus, after years of trying to adjudicate just when political expression tips into harassment. The story quickly became a cause on the right – more evidence, conservatives said, that higher education is stacked against them and needs the government to step in to force reform. Fox News, Charlie Kirk and The New York Post ran with stories about what they saw as this new affront. And on Wednesday, Shieh testified before a House committee investigating high tuition costs. Brown was already under political pressure. The Trump administration is threatening to block US$510mil (RM2.16bil) in federal contracts and grants for the Providence, Rhode Island, university – part of a campaign to hold universities accountable for tolerating pro-Palestinian activism that many Jewish students and faculty saw as antisemitic. A spokesperson for Brown said that the university followed a standard procedure for students accused of conduct violations, and that this case was no different. 'Brown proceeded in complete accordance with free expression guarantees and appropriate procedural safeguards under University policies and applicable law,' Brian Clark, the spokesperson, said. Universities are generally able to impose restrictions on some speech in the name of fostering respect and tolerance. But 'just because the school can regulate something generally doesn't mean they should – or that they can weaponise those regulations against a certain speaker,' said Dominic Coletti, of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a free-speech advocacy group that intervened in Shieh's case and urged Brown to drop its investigation. Shieh, a computer science-economics major, has been something of a campus gadfly, known as 'the Fox News kid' for his involvement in conservative politics and occasional national media appearances. Early in the semester, he and about a dozen other students were discussing the relaunch of The Brown Spectator , which had been defunct for a decade. They agreed to do an article on the increase in administrative positions at the university, an issue throughout academia that critics say illustrates how colleges have strayed from their core educational functions. Then in February, when Musk demanded that federal workers justify their jobs or risk termination, Shieh borrowed the idea. First, he created a database that listed all 3,800 staff and administrative positions at Brown and categorised them based on an artificial intelligence-powered analysis of the work each position entailed. Then, when he sent the email on March 18, Shieh included a link to his website along with the questions about job responsibilities. He also asked employees to comment on his characterisations of their work, since not all of them were flattering. Shieh said that he was trying to make a universal point about the cost of higher education. 'It's not inherently conservative to want to make education more affordable,' he said. The vast majority of the people who received the email ignored it. Some complained to the university. A few replies seemed to forget the Queen's English. But several employees described the value of their jobs: among them, a teaching assistant with 95 students; a financial coordinator who handles office expenses; an actor who role-plays a sick patient for medical students. Brown says its administrative staff of 3,800 has expanded to support a growing number of students and projects it undertakes as a top research university. Between 2014 and 2024, undergraduate enrollment rose by 18%, and graduate student enrollment by 59%. At first, Shieh's email caused some confusion because The Spectator was not known on campus. To ensure their independence, the students said they did not register with the university, nor were they required to. (They did register with the state of Rhode Island, where Brown is located, as a nonprofit corporation in February.) The university had concerns that Shieh, who is listed in public filings as the publisher of The Spectator, had falsely presented himself as a reporter and had improperly accessed university data systems containing staff information, most of which was publicly available. Some employees took umbrage with having their jobs described as wasteful and insignificant. After some discussions with Shieh and representatives from FIRE, Brown decided to drop the misrepresentation charge. But the university also added a new allegation: trademark infringement. It accused Shieh of using the university's name in the Spectator's title without permission. After his colleagues at The Brown Spectator published an editorial arguing that a vibrant campus depended on 'the freedom to ask hard questions, publish unpopular opinions, and hold powerful institutions to account' – hardly a controversial position –the university notified two of them that they could face discipline for a trademark violation as well. Benjamin Marcus, editor-in-chief of The Spectator , said that before publishing its editorial, he and the managing editor joked, 'There's no way they're going to charge us.' Both students soon learned their confidence was misplaced. Even so, Marcus said that his disciplinary experience felt like a relief compared with his experience on campus as an Orthodox Jew and supporter of Israel. Brown, unlike many other schools, called in the police relatively early when student protesters occupied university property, resulting in dozens of arrests. But some students felt that the university had allowed a hostile atmosphere toward Jews to take root. 'I got heckled, spit at, flipped off,' Marcus said. 'It was very rough.' To then face disciplinary action from the university – with finals approaching – was confusing, he said. 'I don't want to pick a fight with the university,' said Marcus, who is also president of the College Republicans. 'I just want the paper to be alive and well.' Last week, the university released a formal values statement that its president said was intended to articulate in 'plain, uncomplicated terms' a commitment to learning 'without interference or censorship.' For the first time, Brown also adopted a formal policy to forgo any public statements 'on topics unrelated to its mission.' Glenn C. Loury, an economics professor at Brown known for his contrarian views, said that it was encouraging to see the campus, and higher education in general, make what he considered small commitments to free speech. Still, he said, 'I don't expect universities to be remade overnight.' In the meantime, he suggested that Brown may have inadvertently lifted the prospects for both Shieh and The Spectator . 'He seems to be having a good time,' Loury said of Shieh, whom he has taught and found to be smart, driven and self-aware. 'Going after these kids wasn't the wisest move.' After a 10-year hiatus, the first issues of The Brown Spectator started appearing on campus last month – 700 copies, according to Marcus. Before distributing them, he said, The Spectator notified the university. – © 2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
PM urges Asean-GCC to act on Gaza
PUTRAJAYA: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has called for stronger cooperation between Asean countries and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) to end Israel's atrocities in Gaza. Speaking to reporters after performing Aidiladha prayers at Masjid Putra here yesterday, Anwar said that regional and international collective efforts are crucial to ending the prolonged conflict and the suffering of the Palestinian people. 'We've conveyed our stance (through a Wisma Putra statement), but this cannot be the effort of just one country. As we saw in recent engagements with Gulf nations, there is a shared consensus. 'So Asean, the Gulf states and a few other countries can come together to provide a clear message and exert strong pressure on the world to put a stop to it (Israel's brutality),' he said, Bernama reported. He was responding to the United States' use of its veto power on a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) draft resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the lifting of restrictions on humanitarian aid. Malaysia has expressed deep regret and disappointment over the repeated failure of the UNSC to adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and lasting ceasefire, as well as the removal of restrictions on humanitarian aid to Gaza. In a statement last Thursday, the Foreign Ministry stressed that the UNSC's repeated failure to act on one of the worst humanitarian tragedies since World War II, due to the use of veto power, is regrettable and deeply disappointing. Anwar also said that the continued actions of countries supplying arms to Israel are unacceptable and go against the principles of international law. 'It's contradictory when they issue statements of condemnation, yet continue to supply or sell weapons to Israel. Such actions violate the principles of international law and humanitarian norms. 'We strongly condemn (the atrocities) and seek diplomatic avenues to support the Palestinian struggle and help them reclaim their legitimate rights, including in Gaza,' Anwar said. Separately, Anwar said during phone conversations with leaders of other Muslim nations, including Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, they had expressed concern over the violence committed by the Zionist regime. 'All of them conveyed a clear stance, and we have agreed to continue consultations to find a resolution to this crisis as soon as possible,' he added.
Daily Express
3 hours ago
- Daily Express
Myanmar slams UN labour resolution
Published on: Sunday, June 08, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jun 08, 2025 Text Size: A UN investigation into Myanmar in October 2023 found far-reaching violations of international forced labour and freedom of association conventions in the South-east Asian nation. BANGKOK: Myanmar's ruling military on Saturday hit back at a UN resolution aimed at curbing labour violations in the war-torn nation, calling it 'politically motivated'. The International Labour Organization (ILO) on Thursday invoked Article 33 of its constitution which could see sanctions imposed against the military authorities which seized power in a 2021 coup. Advertisement The United Nations' labour agency said countries should ensure their relations with Myanmar 'in no way enable, facilitate or prolong the violations of workers' rights in respect of freedom of association and forced labour.' It called on international bodies to 'report any activities... directly or indirectly enabling or abetting' labour violations under Myanmar's junta government. On Saturday Myanmar's labour ministry released a statement saying the resolution had been adopted 'without due partiality and fairness' and was based on 'politically motivated approaches'. A UN investigation into Myanmar in October 2023 urged the country's military rulers to end forced labour in the army and to halt all violence against trade unionists. Advertisement It found far-reaching violations of international forced labour and freedom of association conventions in the Southeast Asian nation. The resolution adopted Thursday at the ILO's 113th International Labour Conference in Geneva said Myanmar's military authorities had not indicated 'any sign of meaningful acknowledgement' of the 2023 report's recommendations. Myanmar said it had been 'actively implementing' the recommendations and had made 'continuous progress' and accused the ILO of 'turning a blind eye' to its efforts. The International Trade Union Confederation – Asia Pacific said it was the third time in the ILO's century-long history that Article 33 has been invoked. Myanmar has been in turmoil since the military ousted the democratically-elected civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi in a February 2021 coup. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
