logo
Who will Knicks tap to replace Tom Thibodeau? Nine names to know

Who will Knicks tap to replace Tom Thibodeau? Nine names to know

USA Today2 days ago

Who will Knicks tap to replace Tom Thibodeau? Nine names to know
Show Caption
Hide Caption
New York Knicks move on from Tom Thibodeau and here's why
USA TODAY Sports' Lorenzo Reyes explains why the Knicks chose to move on from head coach Tom Thibodeau after years of improving franchise.
Sports Pulse
The New York Knicks fired head coach Tom Thibodeau on Tuesday, June 3, three days after the team lost to the Indiana Pacers in the Eastern Conference finals, despite his leading the team to their deepest run in 25 years. During the next few weeks, fans and players alike will talking about who will replace him.
The move comes a little less than one year since the Knicks had signed Thibodeau to a three-year contract extension that was supposed to keep him with the franchise through the 2027-28 season.
Conventionally speaking, teams would like to have a head coach in place by the time the NBA Draft arrives June 25. The team won't be much of a player in the draft, as they don't have a first-round pick and their second-round pick is No. 50 overall.
MORE: Knicks fire coach Tom Thibodeau following loss in Eastern Conference finals
MORE: Ben Stiller, NBA react to surprising move
The roster is mostly intact and signed for next year, with the only unrestricted free agents being reserves Precious Achiuwa and Landry Shamet.
There will be a number of candidates whom the team could go after, starting with one who used to be on their bench.
Johnnie Bryant
Bryant was an associate head coach with the Cleveland Cavaliers last season and spent four years with the Knicks under Thibodeau. The 39-year-old started his coaching career in 2012 with the Utah Jazz as a player development assistant before being promoted to assistant head coach two years later. Bryant is reportedly a candidate for the open Phoenix Suns job.
Jordan Ott
Another hot Cavaliers assistant is Ott, and he is also a finalist for the Suns job. Under the tutelage of head coach Kenny Atkinson, who won the NBA Coach of the Year award, Ott helped a Cleveland team that had the league's top offensive rating and No. 8 defensive rating, led by Defensive Player of the Year, Evan Mobley.
Michael Malone
The no-nonsense Malone led the Denver Nuggets to the title in 2023, but was fired just a week before the playoffs in a move that stunned the league. Malone stresses defense, and the Knicks had glaring deficiencies at times when Jalen Brunson and Karl-Anthony Towns were not on the floor, but despite that, New York had a 113.3 defensive rating in the regular season, good for fifth in the league.
Taylor Jenkins
Another head coach who was unceremoniously given the boot before the playoffs, Jenkins led Memphis to a 44-29 record and the fifth seed in the Western Conference. He is the franchise leader in wins with 250. Memphis made the play-in tournament and was subsequently swept in four games by the top-seeded Oklahoma City Thunder this season.
Mike Brown
Knicks fans are certainly familiar with Brown as he was a possible head coach candidate with the team twice in the past 10 years. Brown is a two-time NBA Coach of the Year, and was fired by the Sacramento Kings in December after the Kings got off to a 13–18 start.
Mike Budenholzer
Budenholzer was just let go by the Phoenix Suns after one season, but the two-time Coach of the Year has championship experience, leading the Milwaukee Bucks to a title in 2021. He has coached in the conference finals three times, twice with the Bucks and once with the Atlanta Hawks.
Terry Stotts
Stotts, an assistant for Golden State, knows stars and knows offense – he coached Damian Lillard in Portland where Stotts regularly produced top-10 offenses. Stotts was 402-318 in nine seasons with the Trail Blazers, including three 50-win campaigns. He led them to the Western Conference finals in 2019.
Adrian Griffin
Griffin had a short run as head coach of the Milwaukee Bucks and was 30-13 when the Bucks fired him midway through the 2023-24 season. The former NBA player and longtime NBA assistant is expected to get another chance with an NBA team.
Darvin Ham
Ham lasted two seasons with the Los Angeles Lakers, going to the conference finals in 2023 and losing in the first round last season. Ham, who spent several seasons as an assistant for Budenholzer in Atlanta and Milwaukee, returned to the Bucks this season as an assistant for Doc Rivers.
Wild cards

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Analysis: After refusing to bottom out, the top is near for Pacers
Analysis: After refusing to bottom out, the top is near for Pacers

Miami Herald

time9 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Analysis: After refusing to bottom out, the top is near for Pacers

As an exasperated NBA continues its never-ending quest to stamp out tanking, here come the Indiana Pacers rising from the debris of mediocrity, right on cue. There is a long-held belief in the NBA that the worst place to be is stuck in the middle: never bad enough to be in a position to draft top talent, but never quite good enough to compete for championships. It's Interstate 405 in Los Angeles, and it's rush hour. The league has increased its efforts in recent years to abolish tanking. It can use the Pacers as proof that it is possible to win big without it. Indiana is returning to the finals for the first time in 25 years after plenty of seasons spent stuck in the middle, but it has never entered a season trying to lose. Oh, there have been plenty of losses along the way. Indiana won 25 games in Rick Carlisle's return season, but it was a year derailed by injuries. In this case, intent matters. The Pacers began the 2021-22 season with playoff aspirations but became sellers at the trade deadline, sending Caris LeVert to the Cleveland Cavaliers for picks and acquiring Tyrese Haliburton from the Sacramento Kings in a separate deal that reshaped their future. At no point did the franchise enter a season with the idea of playing for lottery odds instead of wins. Not when Larry Bird was there as an executive, not when Frank Vogel coached, not when Carlisle was there the first time, and certainly not now. They have been tempted. The Pacers came close to acquiring Russell Westbrook's massive expiring contract in 2022 and picking up a first-round pick for the team owner Herb Simon's willingness to pay him. But such a move would have been a concession that the Pacers were giving up and bottoming out. The deal collapsed when the Lakers refused to add another first-rounder, and Myles Turner remained in Indianapolis. Now they are thrilled to still have him. Players never compete intending to lose, of course. But front offices can rig rosters so winning is nearly impossible. The Pacers never did that. In fact, throughout the last quarter-century, they have been more of a model for exactly how not to compete for an NBA championship. They made the playoffs in nine of the 10 seasons from 2010-11 to 2019-20 but advanced to the conference finals only twice. They were eliminated in the first round five consecutive years -- the definition of milquetoast. That was during the era of superteams and when LeBron James reigned in the East. Now the Pacers are thriving with healthy organizational development. Bennedict Mathurin and Jarace Walker were top 10 selections. The rest of this roster was constructed with midround picks or lower, aggressive trades, economical free-agent signings and a touch of patience. They resisted the urge to give up on Turner too soon. They gambled on Haliburton when they traded away Domantas Sabonis, who made a pair of All-Star Games while with the Pacers. They gambled on Pascal Siakam, trading three first-round picks for a player who was close to free agency. Siakam was the most valuable player of the conference finals and is still wearing Pacers colors. The Pacers have not paid the luxury tax since 2006. They have not picked in the top five since 1988. Yet they played for the NBA Cup and advanced to the conference finals last season, and now they are four wins from an NBA championship. Rarely have teams beaten a pair of 60-win teams to win a title. The Houston Rockets were the last to do it, in 1994. If the Pacers conquer the Thunder -- Game 1 of the NBA Finals is Thursday night in Oklahoma City -- Indiana will become the first team in NBA history to beat a pair of 64-win teams on the way to a ring. They eliminated the 64-win Cavaliers in the second round, and the Thunder won 68 games this season. Similarly, Indiana can eliminate seven All-NBA players in this postseason. It ended the seasons of Giannis Antetokounmpo, Donovan Mitchell, Evan Mobley, Jalen Brunson and Karl-Anthony Towns. Still to come are Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Jalen Williams. Considering Haliburton was a third-team All-NBA selection, the Pacers could eliminate half of the remaining All-NBA players this postseason. They might not be the dominant monsters of dynasties past, but this has a chance to become a historic run of success nonetheless. This is exactly how the league wants teams to build now. What did not seem feasible when stars were teaming up in desirable markets now might be the best path forward: try hard, compete, draft wisely and organically develop talent the hard way. It is how the Denver Nuggets won two years ago. It is how the Pacers are doing it now. The last two lottery winners cashed in odds of 3% or less to win the No. 1 pick, an indication the current system is working as the league intended since flattening the lottery odds again in 2019. In the seven lotteries since, a team with the best odds won the first pick four times. The other three winners were long shots. Losing assures nothing. Tanking will probably never be abolished, but the NBA is much closer to its end goal than it was a decade ago. The Pacers never tried to lose. Now they're on the cusp, finally, of winning big. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025

NYC mayoral candidate agrees with Knicks' Tom Thibodeau firing during debate
NYC mayoral candidate agrees with Knicks' Tom Thibodeau firing during debate

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NYC mayoral candidate agrees with Knicks' Tom Thibodeau firing during debate

Aspiring New York City mayoral candidates mostly agreed that the New York Knicks were wrong for firing head coach Tom Thibodeau. Bronx Assemblyman Michael Blake thought otherwise. Eight candidates vying for the highest seat at City Hall participated in the Democratic Mayor Debate on Wednesday. During a rapid-fire "thumbs up, thumbs down" section of the debate, Thibodeau's dismissal was mentioned. Advertisement Joining Blake in the debate were Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, former City Comptroller Scott Stringer, Brooklyn State Senator Zellnor Myrie, Queens State Senator Jessica Ramos and former hedge fund manager Whitney Tillson. While his opposition voted down the firing, Blake raised his thumb and said, "Our goal is to win the Finals, not to get to the Conference Finals." Despite leading the Knicks to their first Conference Finals appearance in 25 years, Thibodeau was relieved of his duties. His dismissal came two days after they lost to the Indiana Pacers in Game 6 of the Eastern Conference Finals on May 30. Advertisement The Knicks had a strong season, finishing third in the East with a 51-31 record. The team took down the Detroit Pistons and dethroned the Boston Celtics both in six games before running into Indiana. The Pacers derailed what would have been the Knicks' first NBA Finals appearance since 1999 — a chance to compete for their first title since 1973. As the Mayoral race continues, so does the Knicks' coaching search during the offseason. Micheal Malone, Mike Brown, Darvin Hamm and Jeff Van Gundy have all been linked to the vacancy.

NBA Wire Roundtable: Who will win 2025 NBA Finals between Thunder, Pacers?
NBA Wire Roundtable: Who will win 2025 NBA Finals between Thunder, Pacers?

USA Today

time31 minutes ago

  • USA Today

NBA Wire Roundtable: Who will win 2025 NBA Finals between Thunder, Pacers?

NBA Wire Roundtable: Who will win 2025 NBA Finals between Thunder, Pacers? The Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers will square off in the 2025 NBA Finals. The championship series will feature a historic juggernaut and a team that caught fire at the right time. The Thunder enters as a heavy favorite. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has translated his MVP season to the playoffs. Meanwhile, Jalen Williams and Chet Holmgren have played better as the postseason has progressed. Meanwhile, Tyrese Haliburton has headlined an unlikely run. The Pacers have utilized late-game heroics and hot outside shooting to get to this point. Before Game 1 begins, Thunder Wire conducted an NBA Finals roundtable with other NBA Wire site managers. Here's who they predicted will win the championship: Clemente Almanza, Thunder Wire: Laying everything out, it's very easy to understand why the Thunder are viewed as the title favorite. They had one of the greatest regular seasons ever with a 68-14 record. That dominance has carried over to the playoffs, besides a couple of hiccups. The Thunder are just on another level. That's been the case all season long. The Pacers deserve credit for getting this far. They got hot at the right time. But OKC is a machine. It made the bloodbath Western Conference look like a swimming pool. They're in the same company as some of the greatest teams ever and should join that NBA pantheon with a championship, barring one of the most surprising upsets in sports history. Prediction: Thunder in 5. Robert Marvi, LeBron Wire: This championship series could be a bit more competitive than some are expecting it to be. The Indiana Pacers surprised plenty of people with the ease with which they got past the New York Knicks in the Eastern Conference finals. They have the ideal offensive style to overcome the Thunder—a hard-core fast-breaking offense that looks to push the pace consistently, even after made baskets. But as good as Tyrese Haliburton has been—and he is a very dangerous player—the Pacers don't have a true superstar. The Thunder, on the other hand, have the regular-season MVP in Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, a borderline All-Star in Jalen Williams and plenty of depth. They also have a defense that many are starting to call historically great. There will be times when the Pacers seriously challenge Oklahoma City. But Oklahoma City should win it all without a ton of difficulty. Prediction: Thunder in 6. Justin Quinn, Celtics Wire: This series is the NBA version of the philosophical thought experiment of which will win, the immovable object vs. the irresistible force. In this finals matchup, we have the best transition offense in the league facing off with the best transition defense. We have a pair of ball clubs that can play several ways with versatile lineups and aesthetically pleasing styles of play. It may not be in big markets, but do we really believe that matters in this digital age? When it comes to the on-court product, it would be a shocker of historic proportions for the Pacers to win this series and hang a banner, but they have also done little else besides shock us in every round of the postseason to date. For that reason, I think Carlisle et al. will find a way to push this series to six or maybe even seven games, but until my eyes are shown evidence to the contrary, I just don't see how Indy will find a way to defend SGA AND keep from being turned over at a fatal rate, even as good as they may be at that wrinkle of the game. Prediction: Thunder in 6. Tommy Call III, Warriors Wire: The Thunder have been the best team in the NBA for a reason. They won 68 games fueled by the rightful MVP and a nasty defensive group in a tough Western Conference, and throughout the playoffs, they've appeared to answer any question you could possibly have about their experience, taking out the likes of Nikola Jokic, Anthony Edwards and others on the way to the NBA Finals. The Thunder deserves to be in this position, and deserve to be the favorite. However, they're running into an opponent that might be just as hot as them. Similar to the Thunder, the Pacers can send five different players at you who can score 20+ points on any evening. The Pacers feel like they have the pieces to match the Thunder in a lot of ways. Yet, what separates the Thunder in this series is that defensive trio ot Lu Dort, Alex Caruso and Cason Wallace. How do the Pacers solve that puzzle? Is Tyrese Haliburton's heroics enough? Maybe for a game or two, but in a seven-game series? It seems unlikely. While this series has all the different moving parts for a fun and exciting series, the Thunder just feel like too much for any team to handle right now, including the Pacers. Prediction: Thunder in 6. Sharif Phillips-Keaton, Nets Wire: To start off, it should be clear that this is the Finals matchup that we may not have predicted, but it's the one we deserve. The Thunder have been the NBA's best team throughout the season and the Pacers have been one of the best teams in the league since the All-Star Break. Much has been made about whether the league is best-served in this series, but it's important to note that the Finals will have the league MVP (Shai Gilgeous-Alexander) in it and will also have an Indiana team that plays at one of the fastest paces in the NBA. With that being said, this matchup will come down to which team can impose their will on the other. The Thunder are arguably the most dominant team in the league on both ends of the floor and the Pacers appear to be in the next tier when it comes to offensive and defensive rating. Ultimately, this series will come down to if Tyrese Haliburton and/or Pascal Siakam can raise their game to match what Gilgeous-Alexander is going to do. Prediction: Thunder in 7.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store