JFK-created Peace Corps preps for ‘significant restructuring efforts' as DOGE targets humanitarian group
Peace Corps staffers have been warned about 'significant restructuring efforts' following a review by the Department of Government Efficiency as the Trump Administration focuses on bringing American resources back home.
The agency has been given a second opportunity for a government buyout as the Washington, D.C., headquarters, with nearly 800 employees, prepares for departmental cuts ranging from 50 percent to 80 percent, according to an email sent to staffers from chief executive Allison Greene, as reported by The Guardian.
Greene referred to the second deferred resignation program as "DRP 2.0,' while DOGE leader Elon Musk called it a 'fork in the road' buyout. The program was offered to direct hire and expert staff from April 28 to May 6. This option allowed employees to resign or retire while on paid administrative leave until September 30.
The Peace Corps may reduce its global staff by 25 percent, potentially closing some of its 60 international posts, which supporters warn could weaken the agency's core mission of supporting over 3,000 volunteers.
Greene's memo said the cuts will only affect Peace Corps staffers, not volunteers.
'The agency will remain operational and continue to recruit, place, and train volunteers, while continuing to support their health, safety and security, and effective service,' a Peace Corps spokesperson told The Guardian on April 28, confirming DOGE started the cuts that day.
The Independent has connected representatives for the Peace Corps for comment.
Founded by President John F. Kennedy in 1961, the Peace Corps sends volunteers to partner with communities in other countries to promote development and foster goodwill with focuses on education, health, and economic development.
With a 2024 fiscal year budget of around $430 million, the Peace Corps makes up less than a tenth of a percent of the total federal budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
29 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Winter fuel payment to be restored in full for most Scots pensioners by SNP Government
The First Minister announced the change to the scheme in the wake of a rethink by the UK Government. Scots pensioners will receive the same winter fuel payment as people south of the border after a u-turn by First Minister John Swinney. Most pensioners will now pocket a payment after a UK Government decision that will see extra funding come to Holyrood. Speaking to public sector leaders on Monday morning, Swinney said "no pensioner will receive less than they would under the new UK scheme." The changed policy originates from Chancellor Rachel Reeves' controversial decision last year to strip millions of pensioners of a payment worth up to £300. SNP Ministers initially responded by offering a more generous scheme of a full payment for pensioners on benefits and £100 for everyone else. After a fierce backlash, Reeves binned her own scheme and restored the full payment to all pensioners earning up to £35,000. Her u-turn will lead to extra funding for Swinney and he confirmed today his Government will mirror the Reeves system south of the border. Pensioners will qualify for either £200 or £300 depending on age. This is a breaking news story - we'll bring you updates, pictures and video as it happens. Here you can get your must-see news, features, videos and pictures throughout the day from the Daily Record, Sunday Mail and Record Online. Get all the big headlines, pictures, analysis, opinion and video on the stories that matter to you. You can also check out our social media channels for live us on Twitter @Record_Politics for the latest news. Or you can catch all the action by following our team: @paulhutcheon, @andrewjquinn97 and @dennynews.
Daily Mirror
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Campaign for free bus passes for over 60s in England passes key threshold
Support has soared as a parliamentary debate is a step closer as campaigners say it's unfair English travellers don't get the same as those in Wales, Scotland and NI A public outcry is mounting as campaigners push for the government to introduce free bus passes for over 60s in England, mirroring benefits already available in Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. A parliamentary petition has surged past the 75,000 mark, edging closer to triggering a debate on what many see as an unfair policy that leaves English seniors out of pocket. While residents in Merseyside and London enjoy free travel from 60, elsewhere in England, the age threshold is set at 66, with cash-strapped local authorities left to foot the bill. The campaign, created by Karen Hickman, is gaining momentum, with MPs raising questions and ministers indicating that funds exist for councils willing to tap into them. Hickman's petition demands: "We call on the Government to extend free bus travel to all people over 60 years old in England outside London. We believe the current situation is unjust and we want equality for everyone over 60. "Currently, people in England who do not live in London are not entitled to free bus travel until they reach the state pension age, which we believe has changed dramatically. As people get older some over 60s drive less and less, therefore we believe we need equality on public transport. It would mean England had the same provision as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland." Just last week, an MP raised a question on this matter, receiving a response that explained how one source of funding was already available. Liberal Democrat MP Pippa Heylings posed a new question to the Secretary of State for Transport Heidi Alexander: "if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of extending the eligibility criteria for an older person's bus pass to include people over the age of 60 in England.", reports Lancs Live. Simon Lightwood, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport, responded yesterday (June 10): "The English National Concessionary Travel Scheme (ENCTS) provides free off-peak bus travel to those with eligible disabilities and those of state pension age, currently sixty-six. The ENCTS costs around £700 million annually and any changes to the statutory obligations, would therefore need to be carefully considered for its impact on the scheme's financial sustainability. "However, local authorities in England have the power to offer concessions in addition to their statutory obligations, such as lowering the age of eligibility. Additional local concessions are provided and funded by local authorities from local resources. "The government has confirmed £955 million for the 2025 to 2026 financial year to support and improve bus services in England outside London. This includes £243 million for bus operators and £712 million allocated to local authorities across the country. Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority have been allocated £10.5 million of this funding. Funding allocated to local authorities to improve services for passengers can be used in whichever way they wish. This could include extending the discretionary concessions available." In England the over 66s can get concessionary travel which allows them to travel: To view the petition, sign up, and read the full DfT response click here.
Reuters
36 minutes ago
- Reuters
UN rights chief urges US to not use military force in anti-Trump protests
GENEVA, June 16 (Reuters) - The U.N. human rights chief on Monday urged U.S. authorities to respect the right to peaceful assembly and refrain from using military force in the context of large protests against President Donald Trump's actions while in office. "I urge the authorities to respect the right to peaceful assembly and to uphold human rights in law enforcement, including by refraining from any resort to military force when civilian authorities are capable of maintaining public order," Volker Turk told the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva in a broad opening speech. His comments come after Trump sent U.S. marines to Los Angeles to square off against protesters as part of a rare use of military force to support domestic police.
