
‘We are all terrified': Mass General Brigham to lose millions in medical research grants under Trump cuts
The latest cuts will affect research programs awarded at least $70 million at MGB hospitals' labs over multiple years, with most of that money already paid but at least $18 million still untapped, a federal
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Related
:
Advertisement
Far more devastating cuts could loom. On Monday, the Trump administration
Advertisement
While research-funding agencies offered only vague reasons for the cuts, some terminated studies focused on the COVID pandemic or on LGBTQ or transgender health issues, subjects of partisan rancor in the Trump era. It also wasn't clear whether grant applications are being penalized for stating how they will include women and minorities in their programs, information required by a law passed
'We've been hit by a wave,' said Dr. Duane Wesemann, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School and associate physician at Brigham and Women's, who got word last week that the NIH canceled funds for the last two years of a five-year, $10 million flagship program he headed on pandemic readiness. 'The impact is devastating.'
A spokesperson for NIH released a statement Monday saying the agency 'is taking action to terminate research funding that is not aligned with NIH and [Department of Health and Human Services] priorities.'
The statement didn't address how NIH decided to terminate programs. 'We remain dedicated to restoring our agency to its tradition of upholding gold-standard, evidence-based science,' it said.
Related
:
Researchers at some MGB labs fear the cuts have only begun.
'We are all terrified,' said Dr. Bruce Fischl, professor of radiology at Harvard Medical School who
Millions of more dollars have been cut from funding at other Massachusetts research universities and hospitals, including the University of Massachusetts' Chan Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Boston Medical Center. Many of those research labs are appealing the NIH funding cuts, but in the meantime, their money has stopped coming in.
Advertisement
Boston Children's has had five grants terminated, totaling $11.3 million. One was for a program studying how the COVID pandemic affected mental health among LGBTQ people. In its termination note, NIH said the award 'no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities.'
'I was shocked and devastated,' said Ariel Beccia, principal investigator on the mental health study and an instructor at the LGBTQ Health Center of Excellence at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 'If this continues, we are going to lose a generation of scientists.'
"If this continues, we are going to lose a generation of scientists," said Ariel Beccia, an instructor at the LGBTQ Health Center of Excellence at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health who has had her NIH funding terminated.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
Wesemann's lab was exploring the viability of a vaccine that could fight all coronaviruses, not just COVID-19. At another Brigham and Women's lab run by principal investigator Dr. Abraam Yakoub, the team was studying the root causes of 'long COVID,' including neurological problems lasting long after the infection appears to pass. Both labs received letters from NIH saying their funding was no longer needed because 'the [COVID] pandemic is over.'
In an appeal, Wesemann argued that his research was meant to study the immune system to develop a vaccine that could protect people against a future coronavirus pandemic, not specifically for COVID.
'COVID won't be the last coronavirus to go into humans,' he said. 'There's a continued worry about other coronaviruses and other viruses that will jump into humans and cause havoc. I said, 'The whole point of this research is that the questions have not been answered.''
Related
:
Yakoub, assistant professor at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's, took issue with the NIH assertion that the pandemic is over, noting that COVID
Advertisement
'To us, as scientists who have dedicated their lifetime to research, each of these research projects is like our very own babies,' he said. 'Each big discovery we make is five or more years of our lifetime. This is my life's mission and what I live for — to understand why disease happens and/or find ways to treat it.'
For the past century, money from agencies such as the NIH and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been the lifeblood of medical research, bankrolling the basic discoveries that underpin lifesaving therapies such as vaccines and cancer drugs.
Related
:
While funding levels have ebbed and flowed in the past, the Trump administration cuts are 'entirely unprecedented and vicious beyond any precedent,' said Don Berwick, the former administrator of the
Berwick said Massachusetts labs are being disproportionately hurt because the state has 'been not just a national, but an international leader in biomedical research for decades.'
The full impact of the cuts on Mass General Brigham, which drew more than $655 million in NIH funding at Mass. General and more than $388 million at Brigham and Women's last year, wasn't clear.
In a recent federal document, NIH only listed as terminated about seven grants to the hospitals, though researchers say there are far more canceled
awards not yet reflected on the document. Most are for multiyear research programs in which some or most of the funding was already paid. Some were in collaboration with other hospitals that drew part of the funding.
Advertisement
Ellie Dehoney, senior vice president of policy and advocacy at the nonpartisan alliance
'Those are the last grants you want to see terminated,' she said. 'That is throwing good money away. That's not something anyone wants to see.'
Data from outside researchers tracking funding cuts nationally suggest their economic impact is already being felt. Federal cuts have
Related
:
NIH grant cuts have come in waves since late February and appear to be broadening with each passing week. Initially, they were focused on projects related to the health of transgender and LGBTQ people. More recently, NIH is canceling scores of studies related to COVID-19.
Alan Sager, a Boston University professor of health law, policy, and management, said he has been surprised by the 'lack of public uproar' over the NIH rollbacks. The cuts 'don't appear to be backed by an overriding goal,' he said. 'It feels like policy by muscle spasm.'
Robert Weisman can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
14 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
NIH Scientists Call for Agency to Restore Grants, Reinstate Employees
More than 100 National Institutes of Health (NIH) employees on June 9 released a declaration that calls on the agency's director to roll back terminations of grants and the firings of workers. Alexander Grinberg, a director at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and dozens of other NIH employees signed the so-called Bethesda Declaration using their real names. Others chose to remain anonymous due to what they described as fear of retaliation.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
No drug price pledges in talks with US government, Pfizer CEO says
STORY: Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said Monday that he and other drug companies met with the Trump administration to discuss lowering U.S. drug prices but no commitments have been made. He made the comments at a Goldman Sachs healthcare conference. Last month President Trump issued an executive order directing drugmakers to lower the prices of their medicines to align with what other countries pay. According to the order, the administration was to set "Most Favored Nation" price targets within 30 days. The Department of Health and Human Services has said it expects drugmakers in the U.S. to set prices for their products at the lowest price paid by other high-income countries. Bourla said he didn't know what the companies would hear in 30 days and added the meetings with the administration so far were cordial but (quote) "not digging into the substance." It is unclear what mechanism the U.S. government will use to lower drug prices - analysts and legal experts have said the policy will be difficult to implement. Bourla said he is hopeful that, given U.S. pressure on European countries to pay more, prices there could increase. He said that if the U.S. resorts to price controls, Pfizer could consider not making drugs available for government reimbursement in some countries if prices don't increase there. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
In letter, more than 300 scientists rebuke Trump research cuts, NIH director
June 9 (UPI) -- Hundreds of scientists via the National Institute of Health signed a published letter in protest to NIH leadership and recent cuts by the Trump administration. "We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political moment over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources," more than 300 scientists wrote Monday to NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya in a so-called "Bethesda Declaration" published by Stand Up For Science in rebuke to Trump administration research funding cuts and staff layoffs. They added in the letter to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress overseeing NIH that they "dissent" to Trump's policies that "undermine" the NIH mission, "waste" public resources and harm "the health of Americans and people across the globe." In the open letter, they said the current endeavor to "Make America Healthy Again" referred to "some undefined time in the past." "Keeping NIH at the forefront of biomedical research requires our stalwart commitment to continuous improvement," the letter's writers said, adding that the life-and-death nature of NIH work "demands that changes be thoughtful and vetted." According to the letter, the Trump administration terminated at least 2,100 NIH research grants since January, totaling around $9.5 billion and contracts representing some $2.6 billion in new research. "We urge you as NIH Director to restore grants delayed or terminated for political reasons so that life-saving science can continue," the letter added in part. "This undercuts long-standing NIH policies designed to maximize return on investment by working with grantees to address concerns and complete studies," it said. It further accused the White House of creating a "culture of fear and suppression" among NIH researchers. Bhattacharya, a Stanford University professor and health researcher, called the agency the "crown jewel of American biomedical sciences" and said he had the "utmost respect" for its scientists and mission during his confirmation hearing in March. On Tuesday, Bhattacharya is scheduled to testify before the Senate's Appropriations Committee on Trump's 2026 NIH budget proposal which seeks to cut roughly 40% of NIH's $48 billion budget. "This spending slowdown reflects a failure of your legal duty to use congressionally-appropriated funds for critical NIH research," the scientists penned to Bhattacharya. The letter goes on to characterize it as "dissent" from Trump administration policy, quoting Bhattacharya during his confirmation as saying "dissent is the very essence of science." "Standing up in this way is a risk, but I am much more worried about the risks of not speaking up," says Jenna Norton, a program officer at the NIH's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. "If we don't speak up, we allow continued harm to research participants and public health in America and across the globe," Norton said in a statement, adding that if others don't speak up, "we allow our government to curtail free speech, a fundamental American value."