
Critics slam 'glib', 'vulgar' and 'ludicrously lavish' Great Gatsby musical - and claim West End adaptation is 'disrespectful' to F. Scott Fitzgerald
Jazz, feathers, glitzy flapper dresses and roaring party anthems are all on the menu in the latest Great Gatsby musical adaptation on the West End.
But it seems the glamour has not been enough to wow critics, many of whom have slammed the production at the the London Coliseum - starring Amber Davies and Corbin Bleu - as 'glib', 'vulgar' and even 'ludicrously lavish'.
Some even claimed it was 'disrespectful' to the original F. Scott Fitzgerald novel the play, also a book by American playwright Kait Kerrigan, is based on.
Giving it two stars out of five, Clive Davis of The Times found it 'big, brash, noisy and oddly one-dimensional'.
Elsewhere, offering the same score, Claire Allfree hit out at the 'screechy clodhopping musical that amps up the Roaring Twenties clichés at the expense of anything Fitzgerald had to say about class, money and the scissoring chasms between appearances and reality' in the Telegraph.
And ranking it only one star, The Guardian 's critic Arifa Akbar found that 'despite the glut of vocal and visual crescendos, the peaks of the story flatline'.
Not all were underwhelmed, however, as The Stage, offering a generous four out five praised it as a 'feat of spectacle and seduction'.
Meanwhile, dishing out three stars, the Mail 's Veronica Lee enjoyed how the set design elevated a dazzling array of scenes.
The production is running from April 16 to September 7.
In February, the complete casting for the West End production was revealed.
Joining the previously announced Jamie Muscato as Jay Gatsby and Frances Mayli McCann as Daisy Buchanan are Corbin Bleu as Nick Carraway, Amber Davies as Jordan Baker, Joel Montague as George Wilson, John Owen-Jones as Meyer Wolfsheim, Jon Robyns as Tom Buchanan and Rachel Tucker as Myrtle Wilson.
Adapted from the beloved historic novel, The Great Gatsby follows the mysterious millionaire Jay Gatsby and his quest to win back the heart of married socialite Daisy Buchanan, his former flame.
It's been revered for its commentary on class, Prohibition-era America and portrayal of the Jazz Age.
This musical adaptation arrives in London following its 2024 Broadway premiere, where it won the Tony Award for Best Costume Design.
Clive Davis found that where the original novel is 'concise, understated and allusive', this adaptation is reportedly - not.
'It's not the cast's fault that they struggle to bring the characters to life. Jamie Muscato brings steely charm to the role of the enigmatic businessman who plays master of ceremonies to the revellers that drift from one party to another on what Fitzgerald called 'that slender riotous island',' he penned.
'But beyond scattering the phrase 'old sport' in all directions, this Gatsby is little more than a loner with a taste for yearning power ballads and a spot of tap-dancing.'
Elsewhere, Corbin Bleu's Nick Carraway was a touch too 'cheeky chappie'. However, the Times critic enjoyed the striking set design and found the music to be 'in mood is closer to Billy Joel than George Gershwin, and no worse for that'.
TELEGRAPH
Rating:
Claire Allfree's general feeling was that this gtlizy adaptation 'pounces on the party vibe and misses almost everything else'.
Writing for The Telegraph, she offered: 'A more ambitious creative team might have turned The Great Gatsby's keening lyricism, elusive spirit and sheer tragic beauty to its advantage.
'Instead, we get a screechy clodhopping musical that amps up the Roaring Twenties clichés at the expense of anything Fitzgerald had to say about class, money and the scissoring chasms between appearances and reality.'
THE GUARDIAN
Giving the production only one star out of five, Arifa Akbar of The Guardian felt that 'no amount of Charlestons from a fine cast can put the fizz into this'.
She felt that while the cast is clearly competent, especially as vocalists, the musical as a whole 'looks sterile for the lack of emotional drama around it'.
'Fitzgerald's central couple fizz with charisma on the page, lighting up every room with their smiles, but here they are smoothed to two dimensions, as slick and empty-eyed as those of Doctor TJ Eckleberg's in the advert that looms behind them,' she added.
'That is no fault of the cast – the mood is simply too perky, the pace brisk and breezy, the story's heart subsumed by the mission to put on a high-octane musical.'
Writing for the Independent, Alice Saville found that while the musical is visually stunning - and the cast vocally competent - there is a lack of a 'basic level of respect for F Scott Fitzgerald's elegy for the Roaring Twenties, or an understanding of what makes it more than an excellent theme for a hen do'.
'This take on The Great Gatsby was a flop on Broadway,' she added.
'Perhaps London audiences are more likely to be wowed by a level of all-American fireworks not seen on the West End since 42nd Street. But I suspect not.'
THE STAGE
The Stage praised the musical's portrayal of a 'classic story of dashed American dreams' as 'an impressive glitzy romcom musical'.
'Visually, the show is stunning. Paul Tate DePoo III's scenic and projection design is all sumptuous Roaring Twenties, meticulous in its detail,' the review read.
'A truly staggering number of picture-perfect scenes glide in and out, and there is always something fresh to see, a new variation.
'Lighting from Cory Pattak is equally masterly, bringing intense atmospherics along with some retina-frying climactic effects. Linda Cho's costumes are to die for.'
It admitted that 'literary purists' likely won't be pleased - but broader audiences will be delighted by the production.
Writing for What'sOnStage, Alun Hood found the production to be stellar on a technical level - but a touch 'glib' when it comes to the plot itself.
'There's seldom a moment where it's clear why there needed to be a musical of The Great Gatsby beyond the fact that it was there and already spawned a couple of movie versions,' he wrote.
'The plot, which fizzles only periodically into life, probably suits the screen better than the stage, though Bruni's gleaming production, simultaneously garish and elegant, sometimes approaches the cinematic. The storytelling is rudimentary.'
DAILY MAIL
Rating:
The Mail's Veronica Lee found that while the production is lavish and opulent - it's not the perfect day out for Fitzgerald purists.
'Marc Bruni's dazzling production of The Great Gatsby opened on Broadway last year and now – with a mostly British cast – bursts into life in the West End,' she wrote.
'But while the musical adaptation of F. Scott Fitzgerald's great American novel about money and class looks like a million dollars, the creators still struggle to overcome the essential problem of the work: none of the leading characters are likeable, not even narrator Nick Carraway (Corbin Bleu), who may not be nasty or vapid but is still (whisper it) a bit of a sap.
'Paul Tate dePoo III's scenic and projection design and Cory Pattak's lighting create a dazzling array of scenes, conjuring up the 1922 Long Island mansions of old-money socialites Tom and Daisy Buchanan (Jon Robyns and Frances Mayli McCann) and their party-loving new neighbour Jay Gatsby (Jamie Muscato), who has made his fortune from bootlegging and is determined to win Daisy's heart.
'Gatsby in famous film incarnations by Robert Redford and Leonardo DiCaprio is enigmatic. Muscato captures the character's cool detachment, and has a beautiful singing voice in a production that sounds terrific (even if the songs are as ephemeral as the green lamp at the end of Daisy's dock).
'McCann and Rachel Tucker, as Tom's mistress Myrtle, also impress in their solo numbers.
'The creators (script by Kait Kerrigan, Jazz Age-infused music by Jason Howland and lyrics by Nathan Tysen) have taken a few liberties with the novel, so it may not be an evening for hardcore Fitzgerald purists.
'Instead, the show focuses on the Gatsby-Daisy love story, with mere nods to the novel's more nuanced examination of the dark side of the American Dream.
But while it may not fully engage one's emotions, this is a Show with a capital S. It looks fabulous. It has a talented ensemble for the big set pieces – and it offers a lot of bang for its (and your) buck.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Powys actor Tom Cullen to star as BBC hit the Gold returns
Powys actor Tom Cullen will be appearing on our screens this weekend as the BBC's hit show the Gold returns. Tom, who grew up in Llandrindod Wells, will reprise his role John Palmer in the factual drama series which is inspired by the true story of the 1983 Brink's-Mat robbery and the decades-long chain of events that followed. The Gold is the creation of highly acclaimed writer Neil Forsyth the creative force behind 'Bob Servant Independent' and 'Guilt'. The first series was a huge critical success with the Hugo Rifkind of The Times calling it "tremendous – I'm not sure there's been a drama like it in years' while the Evening Standard called it "a truly smart British crime drama with a classic feel and a knockout cast". The first series saw Cullen's Palmer work with Kenneth Noye, played by Jack Lowden, to melt down the stolen gold and launder it in the open market. According to Cullen, viewers can expect a big change in Palmer in the much anticipated second series. In an interview with the BBC ahead of the new series Cullen said: 'There's quite a large leap in terms of John Palmer from series one to series two. 'The themes of the show are a continuation of series one, in that it's about class, it's about money, it's about greed. It's about how money can be like an infection, and it can change the very makeup of a person. 'I also think it is about consequences. What happens if you push beyond your limits?' Help support trusted local news Sign up for a digital subscription now: As a digital subscriber you will get Unlimited access to the County Times website Advert-light access Reader rewards Full access to our app In the same interview with the BBC, creator Neil Forsyth added: 'The second series of The Gold picks up from the first series when the police realise they were only ever chasing half of the gold. 'This series follows the second half of the Brink's-Mat gold and it's also a story of the consequences faced by several of our key characters across the entire show. 'I always saw The Gold as a two series show, following the two halves of the gold, so this will be the final series.'


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Prince Harry's 'nonsense' plan for kids amid 'nail in coffin' decision
Royal expert Jennie Bond has questioned Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's reported plan they've hatched for the future for their children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet Prince Harry and Meghan Markle may no longer be working royals or carry out duties for the King. But the couple reportedly don't want to rule out their children opting to support the monarchy, despite their bombshell move to quit their royal roles. Insiders close to the Sussexes have said they want Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet to retain their titles and HRH styles so they can choose to become working royals if they so wish when they are adults. It came after the source spoke out and claimed the Sussexes feared passports for their children were being held up due to the use of their royal titles. The couple are said to have been left exasperated as they waited months for British passports to arrive and reportedly believed it was due to the fact they included their children's royal titles on the application. But former BBC royal expert Jennie Bond has questioned why Harry and Meghan appear so keen to cling onto titles for their children - even though they have previously railed against the institution of monarchy. She told the Mirror: "I really don't understand why, having extricated themselves from a life they did not enjoy and in which Harry has publicly spoken of 'feeling trapped', they want to give their children the option of re-joining. It makes no sense. "Who knows what's going to happen in the future? But it's very hard to see how two children who are clearly now more American than British would want to change their whole way of life and become working members of the royal family." Archie and Lilibet got prince and princess titles when their grandfather King Charles became monarch in 2022. The first time their titles were formally announced was after Lilibet's christening in March 2023. Due to the reported hold-up in their British passports, it is said that Harry started to explore the possibility of changing his family surname to Spencer in a nod to his late mother, Princess Diana. And Jennie added: "I think Harry has always been more Spencer than Windsor, so if he was ever going to change his name, it would be to Spencer. "But this would be a final nail in the coffin of his relationship with his father and his brother. It would amount to a public declaration that he no longer saw himself as part of the royal family." There has been continued controversy over the Sussexes' HRH titles since the pair quit their royal roles five years ago. As part of their Megxit negotiations with the Palace, Meghan and the Duke of Sussex agreed to stop using 'Her Royal Highness' and 'His Royal Highness' at the end of March 2020. They still retain the styles, with Harry having had his since birth, but they are essentially held in abeyance. However, earlier this year, it emerged Meghan had used her HRH style on a gift basket sent to make-up entrepreneur Jamie Kern Lima last year, with a monogrammed card reading: 'With Compliments of HRH The Duchess of Sussex'. Kern Lima showed an image of the present in footage of her podcast interview with Meghan. It contained a jar of Meghan's jam which she has started selling as part of her As Ever lifestyle business brand. A source described the basket as a 'personal gift'. The duchess's representatives denied that the couple used them, but a source later said that the Sussexes did not use HRH publicly but retained the style, and did not use it for commercial purposes.


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Ginny and Georgia fans fume at Netflix as awkward age leap 'ruins' new series
Fan favourite show Ginny and Georgia has returned to Netflix for an all new series which sees more dramatic storylines than ever but not all viewers are happy with the new episodes Ginny and Georgia fans have all said the same thing about brother's age leap in new series. The show has returned to Netflix for its third series, which viewers have waited two years for. Season three picks up just hours on from season two's finale - but not everyone looks the same. Many have pointed out that Ginny's brother Austin has grown up a lot since the last season. Fans have noticed that the actor who plays Austin looks a lot older than nine-years-old which is what he is meant to be in the show. Actor Diesel La Torraca who plays Austin is actually 14-year-old in real life so is five years older than the character he is playing. Many took to social media to point out the ridiculous age gap thanks to the huge break between filming the two series. The show has not aired for two years but has picked up where it left off in season two meaning there should be no age change in the character. Taking to X, one viewer wrote: "I fear ginny and georgia is going to have to recast the little brother because this is deeply unserious." As a second said: " #ginnyandgeorgiaS3 know they wrong for having this 14 year old boy play his 9 year old character. They let too much time pass in between filming and it's p***ing me off." "It's so ridiculous cause austin being so young made georgia's reckless choices hit harder. Now he looks the same age ginny's supposed to be playing and it just doesn't give the same effect," a fan pointed out. As a fourth added: "Netflix should stop taking 2+ years between seasons because wdym these two scenes are supposed to be only a few months apart? #ginnyandgeorgia." Diesel took to his own TikTok page back in May and shared a video of himself which he captioned: "My tryna convince people that Austin is still 9." The Australian-American actor has acted in several roles already despite just being in his teens which include in The Secrets She Keeps, Lambs of God, La Brea and Little Monsters. Actress Antonia Gentry who plays the main character of Ginny commented on how quickly the actor who plays her little brother has grown up. When season 3 filming began in 2024 she shared a side-by-side photo of herself and Diesel after filming season 1 compared with now which showed how much he had grown. He was originally much shorter than the actress and now he towers above her. Ginny and Georgia first arrived on Netflix back in 2021 and quickly became a fan-loves show. It is now in its third series and has got even more dramatic than before. Series two left off with a murder which mum-of-two Georgia is now being accused of, despite it actually being her son who committed the crime.