Trump and Netanyahu are victors in the war against Iran, Islamic terror
US President Donald Trump and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have emerged as victors in the war in the Middle East, notwithstanding the mainstream media's claims to the contrary. Both have neutralised—at least for a long time—the nuclear threat from Tehran. The latter's resolute leadership has resulted in the serious degradation of terror outfits like Hamas and Hezbollah, the ouster of the Assad regime in Syria, and a considerable weakening of Iran, the head of the octopus of terror in the region. On his part, Trump has achieved the goal of bringing peace to the Middle East without entering into war; the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities a few days ago helped end the hostilities rather than make the US belligerent. This was in keeping with his promise to his MAGA (Make America Great Again) base, which is against Washington's involvement in global wars. MAGA's isolationist proclivity being against America's direct involvement in global affairs, Trump also made it clear that his administration's goal in the region was limited to stopping Iran from going nuclear; his goal was not to oust the present government.
'I'd like to see everything calm down as quickly as possible. Regime change is chaotic and ideally, we don't want to see so much chaos,' he has clarified. After orchestrating a major strike on Iran and successfully persuading the US to target key Iranian nuclear facilities, Netanyahu finds himself in a significantly stronger position. With the immediate threat from Tehran weakened, Netanyahu can now turn his full attention to the conflict with Hamas in Gaza. His tough stance against Iran has generated a wave of popular support across Israel, bolstering his political standing. In fact, Netanyahu's approval ratings are now among the highest they have been since the war in Gaza erupted after the barbaric attack on the Jewish state by Hamas on October 7, 2023. The shift in public sentiment has changed the political landscape. If his government were to collapse today, Netanyahu would stand a reasonable chance of securing re-election—a prospect that had seemed far less likely even a few months back. This surge in popularity has also fueled cautious optimism among some Israelis and political observers.
They hope that Netanyahu, now less dependent on the hardline factions of his coalition for political survival, might be more inclined to show flexibility regarding the Gaza war and go in for diplomatic avenues to end the prolonged fighting. The strengthened position could give him space to override the concerns of his coalition partners, who have previously resisted compromises of any sort. However, Netanyahu himself has shown no public indication of a shift in policy. For months, he has maintained an uncompromising position: the war in Gaza will not end until Hamas agrees to disarm, surrenders its authority in Gaza, and its leadership leaves the territory—terms Hamas has consistently rejected. When asked to clarify Israel's stance, his office reiterated this hardline position. In a brief statement, his office said, 'Hamas is the only obstacle to ending the war. It must release all the hostages, surrender, give up control of Gaza, and get out. The choice is theirs.' Netanyahu's determination against the jihadist outfit will go a long way in the war against Islamic terror all over the world. This will undoubtedly help India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
26 minutes ago
- News18
White House Joins Buzz Around Trump's Latest Nickname, Shares 'Daddy's Home' Video
Last Updated: The video, shared by the White House, playfully embraces the nickname, which emerged from an exchange between Trump and Rutte. The White House on Thursday joined the buzz around US President Donald Trump's latest 'Daddy" nickname, given by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte at the recent summit, sharing a minute-long video showing Trump's interactions with Rutte and other leaders at the summit, set to the track Daddy's Home by Usher. The video, shared by the White House, playfully embraces the nickname, which emerged from an exchange between Trump and Rutte. 🎶 Daddy's home… Hey, hey, hey, Donald J. Trump attended the NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands. — The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 26, 2025 NATO Secretary-General praised Trump's military strikes on Iran, describing the US President as a firm parental figure stepping in during a crisis. Trump compared Iran and Israel to 'two kids in a school yard". 'They've had a big fight, like two kids in a schoolyard," Trump said. 'You know, they fight like hell. You can't stop them. Let them fight for about two, three minutes, then it's easier to stop," he added. To this, Rutte extended the metaphor, saying, 'Then daddy has to sometimes use strong language." Trump laughed at Rutte's 'Daddy" remark and acknowledged the use of his unexpected expletive. 'Everyone said 'Well, you have to use a certain word'," he said. Rutte was referring to Trump's angry reaction earlier in the day at the White House, where the president was visibly upset about the possibility of the Iran-Israel ceasefire falling apart. 'The two countries have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing, do you understand that?" Trump had told reporters. When asked later about the nickname, Trump said he didn't mind it. 'He did it very affectionately," Trump said. The exchange also drew laughter from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was present when Trump responded to Rutte's comment. The Dutch leader also credited Trump for pushing NATO members toward higher defense spending. 'Would you ever think this would be the result of this summit if he would not have been re-elected president?" he asked rhetorically. First Published: June 26, 2025, 10:37 IST
India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump Labels Zohran Mamdani 100% Communist Lunatic Following NYC Mayoral Primary Win
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump launched a scathing attack on Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old Democratic socialist who won the New York City mayoral primary election. Mamdani secured 43.5% of the vote with 90% of ballots counted, defeating former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. Trump took to his Truth Social platform, labeling Mamdani a "100% Communist Lunatic" and mocking his appearance and intelligence. He also criticised other progressive leaders who support Mamdani, including Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and Senator Chuck Schumer. "It's finally happened, the Democrats have crossed the line. Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor," Trump wrote. "We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous. He looks TERRIBLE, his voice is grating, he's not very smart, he's got AOC+3, Dummies ALL, backing him, and even our Great Palestinian Senator, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, is groveling over him. Yes, this is a big moment in the History of our Country!" Trump didn't stop there. In another post, he mocked the Democratic Party's performance and made fun of other progressive politicians. "I have an idea for the Democrats to bring them back into 'play.' After years of being left out in the cold, including suffering one of the Greatest Losses in History, the 2024 Presidential Election, the Democrats should nominate Low IQ Candidate, Jasmine Crockett, for President, and AOC+3 should be, respectively, Vice President, and three High Level Members of the Cabinet – Added together with our future Communist Mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani, and our Country is really SCREWED!" Trump said. Mamdani's campaign focused on progressive policies, including establishing city-run grocery stores, freezing rent increases in rent-stabilized housing, and providing free city buses. These initiatives would be funded by a $10 billion tax increase on businesses and wealthy residents. As a democratic socialist, Mamdani's platform resonated with many New Yorkers seeking bold change. Mamdani has been outspoken on foreign policy, taking a strong pro-Palestinian stance. He has vowed to have Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrested if he visits New York City, citing International Criminal Court arrest warrants. Mamdani has also supported the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement during pro-Palestinian protests. Trump's criticism of Mamdani has sparked debate, with some defending Mamdani's policies and others echoing Trump's concerns. Mamdani's supporters view him as a bold and much-needed progressive voice for New York. Former Governor Andrew Cuomo has conceded the election, congratulating Mamdani on his victory. If Mamdani wins the final election, he will become New York City's first Muslim mayor. His victory signals a potential shift in the city's governance, with a focus on progressive policies and social justice. The outcome also highlights the growing popularity of progressive ideas in New York City.
The Print
28 minutes ago
- The Print
Iran was bombed because it didn't have nukes—just what K Subrahmanyam warned India about
Israel's acquisition of nuclear weapons is a tale of long-term planning, strategic focus, espionage, deceit, and brazen thievery. Much of it from the United States. Like all good spy stories, there is even a Hollywood character thrown into the plot. The only, and biggest, difference between the Israeli and Iranian nuclear programmes is that the former violated a treaty it had signed, whereas Tehran has yet to violate one in practice. Israel is an early signatory to the 1963 Limited Test Ban Treaty, which sought to put an end to atmospheric nuclear testing. The tale of Iran and nuclear weapons is like a glass of water—half full or half empty, depending on perspective. What it certainly isn't is an account seeped in morality. Both sides of the conflict have demonstrated that repeatedly, none more so than the United States, which has been hypocritical beyond comparison when it comes to nuclear weapons in West Asia. Even as it has been the source of stolen radioactive material, it has continually condoned the only country in the region that possesses nuclear weapons: Israel. Iran was bombed blue by Israel and the United States of America, simply because it does not have a nuclear weapon. Had Iran developed the atomic bomb, even in single digits, there is no chance that either Israel or the US would have attacked the country. This is the lesson to be drawn from the nearly two-decade-old saga of allegations against Iran, its opaque politico-technical responses, the constant shifting of goalposts by both international agencies and Tehran, and the clandestine pursuit of uranium enrichment, which is not unique to Iran or the region. Perhaps the most striking evidence of the hypocrisy surrounding nuclear weapons, and the security umbrella they provide, is North Korea, one of the most isolated countries in the world. India's reluctant neighbour, Pakistan, has had plenty of dealings with Pyongyang. North Korea joined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in the 1980s and exited in the early 2000s. Since then, it has brazenly violated nuclear protocols, provocatively tested ballistic missiles, and left nothing to perceptions or perspectives while thumbing its nose at the world. And all of it, without retaliation, because it has nuclear weapons. Also read: Iran is learning the hard way that being a nuclear threshold state isn't safe anymore KS Subrahmanyam knew the logic This was precisely the theory long propounded by the doyen of modern India's strategic community, K Subrahmanyam. Following this brief West Asia crisis, one can almost imagine him looking down at us, with that peculiar glint in his thick-rimmed glasses, making his point with that trademark staccato precision, dispassionately declaring: 'To save yourself from attack, get armed with nuclear weapons.' Not a warmonger, but a realist. Subrahmanyam — KS, or K Sub to others — began advocating for India's acquisition of nuclear weapons after China's 1964 test, when he was still a civil servant. Despite the restrictions of the civil service, KS never hesitated to push his realpolitik views, at every platform, on every occasion. But most of all, he wrote. Voraciously. And so, he made generations read. His national security thinking covered every aspect of defence planning and structure, but none more sophisticated than his nuclear power frameworks. His work displayed a finesse that often got the goat of Western, nay American, non-proliferation experts, or 'Ayatollahs of Non-proliferation' as he labelled them, for their racially selective formulation of nuclear restraint: bombs only for the whites. In a private discussion, he once impassively explained how and why the US-led alliance would pulverise Iraq during the first Gulf War: superlative training, a seamless Revolution in Military Affairs, and, above all, the fact that Iraq did not possess nuclear weapons made it a sitting duck in an unequal war. The same fate, of course, has now befallen Iran, albeit without a ground invasion. Both episodes were driven by one certainty: that the targeted Gulf country did not possess nuclear weapons. That's also why North Korea remains untouched, despite threatening South Korea, a US military ally, and testing missiles over Japan, another ally. Israel's possession of nuclear weapons gives it the security to enforce a monopoly in Western Asia. Iran is paying the price. The brazenness with which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attacked Iran is a direct function of nuclear confidence and the power it bestows. It was always clear that Iran had not yet acquired the selectively forbidden weapons, so the attacks went ahead. That they failed to meet their operational objectives wasn't immediately obvious, but now seems evident. This is fairly predictable in any military conflict. What is not the case, and what remains virtually unheard of, is launching such an attack on a nuclear-armed state. KS predicted that, decades ago. Manvendra Singh is a BJP leader, Editor-in-Chief of Defence & Security Alert, and Chairman of Soldier Welfare Advisory Committee, Rajasthan. He tweets @ManvendraJasol. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
