The Countess of Wemyss, trepanning enthusiast who researched the medical benefits of psychedelics
The Countess of Wemyss and March, better known as Amanda Feilding, who has died aged 82, spent decades as a lonely voice crusading for the legalisation of LSD and its rehabilitation as a medical treatment, and claimed that the war on drugs had caused 'more suffering worldwide than any other act'.
Once ridiculed as 'Lady Mindbender' or the 'crackpot countess of Brainblood Hall', she lived to see her life's work vindicated in the 'psychedelic renaissance' of recent years, with acid microdosing now evangelised in Silicon Valley and psychedelics heralded by regulators as a breakthrough in treating severe depression.
When Amanda Feilding first encountered LSD in the mid-Sixties, she discovered with her friends that small doses – enough to feel 'sparkly' but not high – sharpened their faculties, helping them to win at the Chinese strategy game Go, or bowl better in cricket. 'We used to call it a psychovitamin,' she recalled.
But the international flourishing of medical research into LSD was squashed in 1968 when a panicked US government classified psychedelics as 'Schedule 1 substances', designated as having the highest potential for abuse, and no medical value whatsoever.
This anti-psychedelic backlash would last until the late 1990s, a combination of stigma and prohibitive red tape putting off any serious scientist interest. During those decades Amanda Feilding's campaign on behalf of psychedelics – 'the flesh of the gods' – was largely pursued through art, which she admitted was 'an uphill struggle'.
It did not help that she was easily characterised as a batty aristocrat, living in her family's triple-moated Tudor hunting lodge, Beckley Park, which lent her pronouncements on legalising drugs a touch of 'de haut en bas'. She was also given to unguarded comments such as: 'I have always considered myself my own best laboratory.' As the Daily Mail once asked: 'Is the countess just an amusing and irrelevant eccentric? Or could she be a real danger to society?'
But perhaps the greatest hindrance to her credibility as a drug policy reformer was that, between the 1960s and the 1990s, she had been more visible as a trepanning enthusiast, who in 1970 was filmed in a floral shower cap, boring a hole into her shaven skull with a dentist's drill to create more room for blood to pulse through her brain. She then ate a rare steak to replace the lost iron and went out to a party in Chelsea.
The resulting documentary, Heartbeat in the Brain, was later screened in New York, where – as one reviewer put it – the fainting audience members could be seen 'dropping off their seats one by one like ripe plums'.
Amanda Feilding went on to stand twice for parliament, in 1979 and 1983, on a platform of free trepanation on the NHS, but she was later canny enough to distance herself from the practice, which the new science of brain imaging had failed to support.
For the rehabilitation of psychedelics, on the other hand, brain imaging proved a watershed, giving 'you a visual perspective that you can't deny,' she said.
Realising that she would have 'to use science as a tool to prove what one was saying was true, not part of a kind of druggy fantasy,' in 1998 Amanda Feilding launched the Beckley Foundation as a 'trojan horse' to infiltrate the establishment. She assembled a board of leading neuroscientists and borrowed her family crest for its double-headed eagle logo, 'to make it look like a college,' she recalled.
She converted a 17th-century cowshed knee-deep in manure into the nerve centre of her operation – nicknamed 'World Consciousness House' by her husband Jamie Charteris (Lord Neidpath, and later Earl of Wemyss) – and from it she built the Beckley Foundation into one of the largest organisations campaigning for drug reform around the world.
The rarefied atmosphere of Beckley Park lent the organisation a gravitas not ordinarily to be found in drug reform circles. Amanda Feilding was able to give seminars at the House of Lords and in 2011 the foundation's open letter calling for an end to the war on drugs attracted the signatures of Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Desmond Tutu and Mario Vargas Llosa.
In 2008 she co-founded the psychedelic research programme at Imperial College London with Professor David Nutt, who shortly afterwards was fired as government drugs czar for observing that alcohol and tobacco did more public harm than LSD, cannabis or ecstasy – a decision Amanda Feilding likened to the Vatican's treatment of Galileo.
In 2016 the Beckley/Imperial partnership produced the first ever images of a brain under LSD. It was still hand-to-mouth, but a crowdfunded appeal for £25,000 to process the images met its target within 36 hours. The findings suggested that the drug limited the brain's 'ego' mechanism, known as 'the default mode network', and might be able to rewire the repetitive cycles associated with depression, addictions and obsessive compulsive disorder.
That year another Beckley/Imperial study, published in The Lancet Psychiatry, became the first of its kind to demonstrate that psilocybin – the LSD-like active ingredient in magic mushrooms – in conjunction with psychotherapy could be effective against treatment-resistant depression. By 2019 US regulators had fast-tracked further research by designating psilocybin a 'breakthrough therapy' for treatment-resistant depression.
Despite being, in her own words, 'a female with no letters to my name', Amanda Feilding was widely judged to have contributed to a step change in our understanding of the brain mechanism of psychedelics and in laying the foundations for a new era of clinical research. 'I am very, very happy to be proved wrong,' she said. 'What I want to do is know.'
Amanda Claire Marian Feilding was born on January 30 1943, the fourth child of Basil Feilding and his wife – and distant cousin – Margaret (Peggy), née Feilding; both were descended from the Habsburgs, and from two illegitimate children of Charles II.
Amanda's early life was reminiscent of I Capture the Castle: money and fuel were forever running out, while she ran wild in the topiaried garden, her greatest delight being to coax laughter out of her private god: 'that kind of orgasm experience that I think a lot of young children have and then forget'.
Her father, a great-grandson of both the Earl of Denbigh and the Marquess of Bath, farmed at night so that the day could be free for painting. 'Violent-tempered, very eccentric, charming and mercurial,' he had an anarchist temperament, and advised her: 'Whatever the authorities or the government tells you to do – do the opposite.'
The Tudor house, seemingly adrift in a sea of mist, inspired free-thinking, like 'an island outside culture in which you are free to explore,' Amanda recalled. Aldous Huxley was said to have been inspired to write his debut novel Crome Yellow after visiting Beckley Park for tea in 1921. Her own father read to her at bedtime from The Seven Pillars of Wisdom and The Third Eye. There was, Amanda Feilding recalled, 'a deep feeling that one didn't need to follow society because one was slightly above it'.
Although her father was an atheist, her mother was a Catholic and sent her to convent school. Amanda abandoned formal education at 16, however, when she won the science prize but the nuns refused her request to be given as a reward a book on Buddhism.
With £25 in her pocket she set off for Ceylon to visit the godfather she had never met, a Buddhist monk called Bertie Moore, but lost her passport in Syria and instead lived for a time with the Bedouin. On her return to England she studied comparative religion with an Oxford professor and became an art student at the Slade.
Her first encounter with LSD was not auspicious. Michael Hollingshead, an unhinged associate of Timothy O'Leary, spiked her cup of coffee with a thousand-fold dose of acid. She took three months to recover, finally venturing out to go to a party where a Ravi Shankar performance was promised. There she met Bart Huges, a bright young Dutch doctor who converted her to the cause of trepanation and with whom she began controlled experiments with LSD.
She lived for a time in a 'threesome' with Huges and another of his disciples, Joe Mellen, who remained her partner for 30 years and the father of her two sons, Rock Basil and Cosmo Birdie. Huges, however, was too vocal about trepanation and found himself on the front page of a Sunday tabloid under the headline: 'This dangerous idiot should be thrown out of the country.' A knock on the door duly came from two burly government officials and Huges was barred from Britain for the remainder of his life.
She would have followed him to Holland had it not been for her tame pigeon, Birdie, whom she had saved as a pigeon chick and fed on bits of Weetabix from the end of a paintbrush. They lived together for 15 years, communicated telepathically and were, she said, 'madly in love'.
The pigeon would jealously attack her partner Joe Mellen whenever his hands were occupied and he was unable to fight back. Birdie would also peck her on the eyeball but this was, she said, 'how they show love'. 'I have two obviously wonderful children, but this? It was a unique type of love,' she recalled.
She was a talented painter, and as well as immortalising Birdie in oils, she earned a living for a time selling hand-coloured prints on the Portobello Road; she and Mellen also ran The Pigeon Hole Gallery in Chelsea.
After four years of failing to find a doctor to trepan her, she decided to go it alone. 'I was trained as a sculptor, so I thought, 'I spend all my time making holes in objects, I might as well make one in my own head.'' When asked whether she was scared, she replied: 'Well, skiing is terrifying.'
Four hours later she experienced a feeling of peace and an uplifting. 'You remain the same personality, with the same hangups, character defects, et cetera, et cetera,' she observed. 'But we all have our neurotic bag we carry around. I think trepanation, by increasing the brain-blood volume, it lessens that bag.'
When in 1995 she married Jamie Charteris, she persuaded him to be trepanned in a Cairo hospital, which he claimed cured him of his lifelong headaches.
Amanda Feilding worked 15-hour days for her cause. Among her supporters was the 'father' of LSD, the Swiss scientist Albert Hofmann, who was president of the Beckley Foundation until his death in 2008 aged 102, but who lived to see her fulfil her promise to him that she would obtain permission to carry out the first LSD research on human subjects since the early 1970s.
Amanda Feilding is survived by her husband, who in 2008 succeeded as 13th Earl of Wemyss and 9th Earl of March, and by her two sons by Joe Mellen.
The elder, Rock, is involved with Beckley Retreats, which organises psilocybin retreats; the younger, Cosmo, is CEO of Beckley Psytech, which aims to develop psychedelic medicines for the market, and has received a $50 million investment from the Peter Thiel-backed Atai Life Sciences.
Amanda Feilding, born January 30 1943, died May 22 2025
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Obese patients denied knee and hip replacements to slash NHS costs
Obese patients are being denied life-changing hip and knee replacements and left in pain in a bid to slash spiralling NHS costs, The Independent can reveal. One third of NHS areas in England and multiple health boards in Wales are blocking patient access based on their body mass index (BMI). The move, deemed 'unfair' and 'discriminatory', goes against guidance from the National Institute for Care Excellence (Nice), which states BMI shouldn't be used to restrict patients' access to joint replacement surgery. Patients are instead being told they must lose weight before they are eligible but waiting lists for NHS weight loss programs have ballooned, with some people waiting up to three years to be seen while other services have shut, unable to cope with demand. The Royal College of Surgeons criticised the policy, saying that denying patients care could cost them their mobility and cause their health to deteriorate, while Tory peer and former health minister James Bethell called on the government to do more to tackle the obesity crisis and end the 'misery for millions'. More than 64 per cent of adults in England were overweight or living with obesity in 2022-23, up from 63 per cent the year before, the most recent data from the Office for National Statistics shows. The news comes as 7.4 million people were waiting for NHS treatments in March, while health service leaders have warned they are being forced to cut services to meet tough savings demands from the government. The shocking revelation of surgery refusals was uncovered in an audit of referral criteria used by NHS bodies in England by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). It found 15 of 42 areas are restricting access to surgery by BMI, while The Independent discovered at least two health boards were doing the same in Wales. Thresholds varied by area, with some limiting access to those with a BMI of less than 35 (patients who are obese) or 40 (severely obese). Dr Joanna McLaughlin, lead researcher and NIHR clinical lecturer at the University of Bristol, told The Independent that through her research, policymakers, commissioners and surgeons 'acknowledged that NHS financial pressures were a main driver for BMI threshold policy use, and that they didn't have confidence that the policies were based in evidence of health benefits'. The research also found that NHS weight management support services were 'inadequate' and could not ensure that those excluded from surgery could be supported to lose enough weight. Some patients had resorted to paying privately for surgery. Dr McLaughlin said: 'The variety in the BMI limits and in the requirements to prove patients have made attempts at weight loss chosen by different ICBs [integrated care boards] highlights the postcode lottery and inequalities created by these policies.' Several ICBs identified by the study told The Independent that some patients with a high BMI could still access care if they passed an assessment, while others said they would need to prove they were 'fit for surgery'. But medics told The Independent that BMI should not be used as a sole restrictive measure. Tim Mitchell, president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, said losing weight before surgery could reduce the risk of complications, and patients should be supported in this. However, he said that 'BMI alone should not be a barrier', adding: 'We must not penalise those who are less fit but still eligible for surgery, as this approach is unfair and ignores clinical guidance.' Mark Bowditch, president of the British Orthopaedic Association, said: 'Losing weight before surgery can be very difficult for people with limited mobility issues. 'Furthermore, obesity is more likely in people from certain socioeconomically deprived areas or ethnic groups, so care must be taken to avoid unintentionally disadvantaging certain patient groups.' Deborah Alsina, chief executive of charity Versus Arthritis, said: 'We hear heartbreaking stories from people desperate for the pain to stop, and accounts from people who face barriers to access even when they are referred for the surgery they urgently need. 'We frequently hear of people denied a referral, or being taken off the waiting list because of their weight, with body mass index being cited as a rationale. We must make sure this discriminatory practice doesn't become standard.' Lord Bethell said the row over BMI thresholds for operations showed the NHS 'needs to make a choice' over preventing disease with weight-loss jabs, which cost £100 a month, or to treat obesity-related diseases, such as those that lead to hip operations, which can cost £10,000. He said the government has a choice to either crack down on 'Junk Food Britain' with a tough food strategy or to give the NHS a lot more money to pay for the consequences of a sick population. He added: 'It's one or the other. Ducking this choice will cause misery for millions, the bankruptcy of our nation and the end of the Starmer administration.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said it expected ICBs to comply with Nice guidance. They added that the department's 'Plan for Change' for the NHS includes rolling out weight loss drugs to 'those who need it most'.


CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Tariffs, Nvidia and 2 more things that defined the stock market this week
The stock market stumbled into the weekend after President Donald Trump on Friday said China violated the preliminary trade agreement the two sides reached earlier this month. The S & P 500 closed flat Friday after spending most of the session lower. The benchmark index, however, rose for the week and for the month of May. Tariffs were among the four things that defined this week's market. Investors were kept on their toes. Following Trump's Friday morning accusations, a Bloomberg report around lunchtime about Trump administration plans to broaden restrictions on Chinese tech companies took the market a leg lower. Then, hours later, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, Trump said he expects to talk to Chinese Xi Jinping , and stocks cut most of the day's losses. The S & P 500 gained nearly 2% during the holiday-shortened week. A big rally Tuesday, after Trump last Sunday delayed the 50% tariffs on the European Union that he threatened only two days before, carried the week. For the month, the strength was much more pronounced as investors showed a willingness to take good and bad tariff headlines in stride. The S & P 500 jumped more than 6% in May, its best monthly gain since November 2023. There was certainly no "sell in May and go away," which is an old Wall Street adage about selling ahead of seasonally weaker warmer-weather months and buying back in before better-performing colder months. Club name Nvidia was the star of the earnings show Wednesday evening. We raised our price target to $170 per share from $165 after Nvidia delivered a better-than-expected quarter and upbeat guidance despite the export restrictions on what artificial intelligence chips the company can sell in China. Shares on Thursday surged more than 3% on the print but gave back much of those gains in Friday's down market. Also on Wednesday evening, Salesforce reported better-than-expected quarterly results and guidance. However, the Club stock fell more than 3% on Thursday and another nearly 0.5% on Friday. Some on Wall Street argue Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff is focusing too much on AI , rather than the company's core business. Costco on Thursday evening reported what Jim Cramer called the "perfect quarter." We were impressed by Costco's margin improvement and same-store sales growth as other retailers struggled to manage tariff impacts. The stock on Friday opened lower but then shot up 3%. Costco and Nvidia were among the best-performing Club stocks this week. Salesforce was the worst. We sent out one trade alert this week during Tuesday's big rally, trimming Broadcom and booking profits of 170% on stock purchased in August 2023. The small sale does not indicate any change in our long-term view that the custom AI chip designer is poised to keep growing. We did, however, downgrade Broadcom to our 2 rating , meaning we would buy more shares on a pullback, which aligns our short-term view of the stock with the trade. Broadcom stock went on to gain nearly 6% for the week and almost 26% in May. The only other better monthly gain in the portfolio was GE Vernova 's over 27% advance. Our newest stock was also solid for the week. On Tuesday, along with Broadcom, we downgraded GE Vernova to our 2 rating, in recognition of its recent rally back to record highs . But we raised our price target to $500 per share from $460 to account for the recent momentum in its business. Broadcom reports earnings this coming Thursday. Inflation also made its mark this week. The Federal Reserve's favorite inflation gauge on Friday came in cooler than expected for April, adding to the argument that price pressures are easing. The jury is still out, though, because final tariff levels are still up in the air and could rekindle inflation down the line. According to the minutes from its May meeting , the Fed was worried about that. The minutes, released Wednesday afternoon, showed that central bankers felt a "cautious approach" to monetary policy was appropriate as the economy could face "difficult tradeoffs" should inflation heat up. A day later, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell met with Trump at the White House at the president's request. "Powell did not discuss his expectations for monetary policy, except to stress that the path of policy will depend entirely on incoming economic information and what that means for the outlook," the Fed said in a statement following the Thursday meeting. It's no secret that Trump wants Powell to cut interest rates. The last Fed cut was back in December. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starmer's enslavement to woke ideology is a gift to the new axis of evil
When wokeness in Britain went from being a loony Left preoccupation to a way of life, hot on the heels of America's wokeward tack in 2020, only fools, villains and villainous fools insisted that nothing much was happening – apart from a bit of long overdue fairness. Of course, they said, the old Right-wing cis white straight men and women were squealing about the embrace by the virtuous of 'social justice' and 'equity,' but that didn't mean there was a real culture war afoot. It was obvious to me from the start of the woke era, however, that this was not 'just' a culture war but a real one, in a truly modern sense, with real consequences that would be felt far beyond a few workplaces or university seminar rooms. The vaulting from the seminar room into the world of the ideology linking 'white privilege' to empire to colonialism to the immovable fact of white British guilt has led to poisonous politics on the Left, a troubling reaction on the populist Right, and a ruling class who make decisions with our money, our personal safety and the security of the country based on it. If people have been injured or died already thanks to wokeness – for instance in the failure to confidently and properly police Islamist terror suspects or BAME (Black, Asian and minority ethnic knife crime), or in the body-destroying treatments handed out by LGBTQ+ allies to kids who said they were trans in the gender movement that followed Black Lives Matter – then much more is set to come. One of the most flagrant case studies in how the woke mindset can be physically dangerous is Starmer's Chagos islands agreement. The 'deal' is to hand the British territory to Mauritius, and lease back the land on the island of Diego Garcia, on which sits a strategically vital, Anglo-American military base. The lease costs £30 billion, and will be paid over 99 years. The Government's strange argument for the deal was that it would prevent the security risks that could come from instability due to international lawfare on this last 'colonial' outpost of Britain's. Starmer, somehow, did not think that it was more of a security concern that Chinese influence in Mauritius is malign and growing: China has now announced that Mauritius will be joining its power-grabbing Belt and Road initiative. Indeed, Starmer's comments about the handover in a press conference were very odd. He said with confidence that only Britain's enemies were against it. 'In favour are all of our allies: the US, Nato, Five Eyes, India. Against it: Russia, China, Iran.' Yet days after it went through, China was celebrating. Beijing's ambassador to Mauritius, Huang Shifang, told guests at the Chinese embassy in Mauritius's capital of Port Louis that China sent 'massive congratulations' to Mauritius on the deal, and that China 'fully supports' Mauritius's attempt to 'safeguard national sovereignty'. It's hard to think of a more cynical, almost joyously so, use of this terminology. China, after all, is a country obsessed with taking by force the democratic, independent Taiwan (Mauritius, China has made clear, supports its doctrine that Taiwan is already part of China); repressing free speech in Hong Kong, where it operates a subtle reign of terror, and subjecting its Uyghur Muslim population in Xinjiang to sadistic treatment in internment camps. And now it gets to set about enjoying all manner of devious proximity to our all-important Eastern base. So yes, Britain's Chagos deal makes delicious sense to China, but makes no sense for us. Unless, of course, you are Starmer and his inner circle, and you're enslaved to the twin ideologies of post-colonialism and 'international law' – which lands you in the awkward and unfortunate position, as we have seen, of ending up in agreement with China on core values like self-determination. It's a mess. All this Chinese gloating disguised as proper appreciation for nations' rights to freedom from colonial shackles serves as a useful reminder of just how suspicious such language has become. Yes, it is mass-peddled by august 'international' bodies, NGOs, courts and the UN. But these have all been corrupted by those with sinister anti-Western agendas. Indeed, the intranational bodies charged with pursuing a kinder world order with 'human rights' pursued through law always seem to favour those who care least about those obligations. It was telling when Lord Hermer, Starmer's attorney general, compared those in favour of withdrawal from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to the Nazi philosopher and jurist Carl Schmitt, when what membership of the ECHR really means, in practice, is having to treat terrorists and foreign mass murderers with the utmost consideration. The greatest, longest-running example of the hijacking of a world organisation is the UN, which has been faking outrage at violations of 'international law' to endanger and ostracise Israel for decades. As Natasha Hausdorff, the international lawyer known for pointing out the legal flaws in the numerous evil smears levelled at Israel, notes : 'Armies of NGOs [have fed] the United Nations system and international bodies like the ICC and ICJ' so that 'pseudo-legal language permeates public discourse about Israel. This has now broken into public consciousness, but it has been building in the NGO world and UN world for a long time.' The once honourable ICJ – the International Court of Justice – was seized by South Africa to bring a case against Benjamin Netanyahu as a war criminal even as Israel sacrificed soldiers fighting Hamas in Gaza, resulting in an arrest warrant for the Israeli PM which Britain refuses to reject. As the famous American lawyer and Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz says of the ICJ: 'It's not international, it's not a court and it doesn't do justice.' The bloc that still determines the balance of power and the fate of countries – just – is the Western one. And we are now in great peril, due to being gullible and ill-informed, anti-Semitic, terror-appeasing and morally confused. Our cultures swallowed whole by Leftist cultural theories that were meant to never leave academia – those of post-structuralism and post-colonialism – and under their influence we turn our faces towards the lies pouring from the Eastern axis of 'resistance' – with lethal consequences. The international human rights community in all its respectable clout gives this evil nonsense the stamp of approval. Older people just about remember when international law meant something. Some saw first-hand the real genocide of the mid-20th century, others spectacular bloodshed under monsters and in the course of war. Some of us just remember hearing about those times and events, from parents and grandparents. To us, the souring of organisations like the ECHR, ICC, ICJ, UN – the whole concept of 'international law' itself – is bitter and clear. The rising generation, though, those who have taken up en masse the garbage of third-rate academic theories about coloniser and oppressor, who misuse terms including racism, apartheid, genocide, settler-colonialism, fascism and even capitalism, seem to genuinely think these corrupted organisations are the end of the moral and geopolitical rainbow. That reference to their motions and cases and objections and votes must end all arguments; that the old animating force behind international courts for human rights and justice was just a relic of a racist age, and now we know better. In some ways we do. But those who still chase after 'international' legitimacy are barking up the wrong tree – either accidentally or, like China, on purpose. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.