
Justice Department closes investigation into Muslim-centered community near Dallas
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The U.S. Department of Justice has closed a federal civil rights investigation into a Muslim-centered planned community around one of the state's largest mosques near Dallas without filing any charges or lawsuits.
The Justice Department had opened the investigation after U.S. Sen. John Cornyn called for it, arguing that the development could discriminate against Christian and Jews.
The developers of the proposed EPIC City community tied to the East Plano Islamic Center, have complained they are being bullied by multiple federal and state investigations because they are Muslim.
A June 13 Justice Department letter to Community Capital Partners, the group developing the project, noted the department is closing the investigation.
'CCP has affirmed that all will be welcome in any future development,' the letter said. The group wrote that they plan to revise and develop marketing materials to reinforce that message.
A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment further. The letter was first reported Wednesday by the Dallas Morning News.
Community Capital Partners had said the development would adhere to the Fair Housing Act and any other state and federal guidelines, and that the community would be open to members of all religions.
The federal investigation had escalated pressure on the proposed EPIC City, which has faced steady criticism and multiple investigations. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and other GOP state officials have claimed the group is trying to create a community that excludes non-Muslims and would impose Islamic law on residents.
The developers have said they are not seeking to impose religion on anyone, and that the community would follow state and federal law.
Among its chief critics has been the state's hard-right Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is challenging Cornyn for his Senate seat in 2026.
Dan Cogdell, an attorney for EPIC City who defended Paxton in his 2023 impeachment trial when he was acquitted by the state Senate, noted how quickly federal officials had wrapped up their probe.
None of the investigations would be happening if the community was planned around a Christian church or Jewish temple, Cogdell said.
'The false accusations that have been swirling around the development were based solely on misinformation, lies and false rumors,' Cogdell said. 'Frankly, the politicians that have repeated them without ever bothering to look at any fact should be embarrassed.'
The state investigations include whether the development is violating financial and fair housing laws and whether funeral practices at the mosque were done legally. The status of those investigations remained unclear Wednesday. Cogdell said the developers will cooperate with anyone who asks.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations has criticized the federal and state probes as bullying the Muslim community and a violation of constitutionally protected religious expression.
'We welcome the dropping of this investigation and hope the DOJ's actions send a clear message to the governor and other officials in Texas that they should similarly drop their Islamophobic witch hunt targeting Muslims in that state,' said CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad.
Plans for the mixed-used development include more than 1,000 homes and apartments, a faith-based school for kindergarten through 12th grade, a community college, assisted living for older residents and athletics fields.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
24 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Justice Department sues Orange County registrar for access to noncitizen voting records
Federal authorities sued Orange County's top elections official Wednesday, alleging the county registrar violated federal law by refusing to disclose detailed information about people who were removed from the voter rolls because they were not citizens. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, alleges that Orange County Registrar Bob Page is 'concealing the unlawful registration of ineligible, non-citizen voters' by withholding sensitive personal information such as Social Security and driver's license numbers. The 10-page lawsuit does not allege that any noncitizens voted in Orange County. 'Voting by noncitizens is a federal crime,' said Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division. 'States and counties that refuse to disclose all requested voter information are in violation of well-established federal elections laws.' The lawsuit stems from a June 2 letter from the Justice Department to Orange County election officials, seeking information on people who had been removed from the county's voter rolls because they weren't eligible to vote. According to the lawsuit, federal officials were acting on a complaint made by the relative of a noncitizen who received a mail ballot. Over a five-year period, Orange County identified 17 noncitizens who had registered to vote, Page told the federal agency in a June 16 letter, sent in response to the June 2 request. Those people either 'self-reported' that they were not citizens or were deemed ineligible by the Orange County district attorney's office, Page said. The registrar sent the names, dates of birth and addresses of those 17 people to federal officials, but redacted some sensitive information, including Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, voter identification numbers and scans of their signatures, according to a letter from the county's lawyers. County lawyers argued that withholding more sensitive personal information struck a balance between federal disclosure laws and state laws that limit how election officials can share private information. Leon Page, the county counsel for Orange County, who is not related to Bob Page, said in an email that federal officials hadn't produced a subpoena or identified a 'substantive legal authority' for why the registrar's office should disclose sensitive personal information protected by state law. County lawyers also offered to draft a 'confidentiality agreement that would limit disclosure to a governmental purpose,' he said, but the Justice Department didn't respond to the offer. 'Instead, the USDOJ filed a lawsuit,' Leon Page said. He said the county hopes to resolve the complaint through a protective order in court. Such an order could put guardrails around how the Justice Department could use or share the information about noncitizens who registered to vote. Justin Levitt, an election law expert at Loyola Marymount University's law school and a former voting rights lawyer in the Justice Department, said the lawsuit was 'a little weird,' in part because government agencies frequently negotiate over sharing information and rarely go to court to do so. The Justice Department should be able to verify whether Orange County has a process of ensuring that ineligible people are kept off the voter rolls by seeing the full names, addresses and birthdays of those who were removed, he said. A Social Security number or driver's license number should not be necessary, he said, raising questions about how the Justice Department plans to use the information it requested. Federal law requires election officials to maintain voter information for 22 months after an election, Levitt said. Many officials keep those records for longer, but there is no law requiring them to do so. He said he didn't know 'what right the feds have' to request voter information going back to 2020. 'This is a pretty small dispute with pretty small stakes, over a pretty small number of records,' Levitt said. 'But it is another dot in what is becoming a series of rather disturbing dots of this administration's data practices.' Orange County Supervisor Don Wagner, one of two Republicans on the five-member board, said in a prepared statement that 'placing roadblocks and refusing to comply' had 'unfortunately and unnecessarily forced the hand of the Department of Justice.' 'We invited this lawsuit,' Wagner said. 'The county's only interest is in having the cleanest possible voter rolls so that every eligible voter may vote, but only eligible voters may vote.' Supervisor Katrina Foley, a Democrat, defended the county's decision to redact some information, saying that the county 'takes very seriously our duty to protect the private personal information of the people who register to vote in our county.' 'Voter privacy is built into the system and state law prohibits the county from providing private information without a court order,' Foley said. If the Justice Department had secured a court order, Foley said, then the county would provide the requested information. Californians are required to verify their identities when they register to vote, and that information is cross-referenced with Department of Motor Vehicle files. The state also imposes penalties for fraudulent registration. In a Reddit Q&A with the Orange County Register last year, Bob Page said that state law bars the registrar's office from verifying someone's citizenship when they register to vote, beyond the verification done by the state. He said his office makes daily updates to voter registration files and averaged about 60,000 changes each month. His office would contact the Orange County district attorney or California secretary of state if it is provided evidence of someone illegally registering to vote, the registrar said. An Orange County spokesperson said that of the 17 people who were registered to vote and were not eligible over a five-year period, 16 self-reported that they were not citizens. The district attorney's office found that one person had registered to vote despite not being a citizen. That person, a Canadian citizen and legal resident, pleaded guilty in 2024 to three misdemeanor counts of casting votes in the primary and general 2016 elections. He was sentenced to one year of informal probation. Bob Page did not return messages seeking comment about the suit. A spokesperson for the registrar's office said the county does not comment on pending or ongoing litigation. Last year, voters in Santa Ana rejected a measure that would have allowed noncitizens to vote in local races. The measure would have allowed residents of the city, even if they are not citizens, to cast ballots in local measures, but they would still be ineligible to vote in federal and state elections. San Francisco has allowed the parents of schoolchildren to vote in school board races, even if they are not citizens. Voters in Oakland approved a similar measure in 2022 but has not implemented it yet. Some cities in Maryland and Vermont have also moved to allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections, but the measures have met with legal challenges. A New York City law that would have allowed noncitizens to vote was struck down in March by the state's top court, finding it violated the state's constitution.


CBS News
34 minutes ago
- CBS News
DOJ ends investigation into Muslim-centered EPIC City project in North Texas
The U.S. Department of Justice has officially closed its investigation into EPIC City, a proposed Muslim-centered community in North Texas. The project is affiliated with the East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC), one of the largest mosques in the region. The DOJ's decision comes after U.S. Sen. John Cornyn raised concerns about potential religious discrimination tied to the development. Attorney calls probe political Dan Cogdell, a criminal defense attorney representing both EPIC and the EPIC City organizers, called the investigation politically motivated. "Several politicians have tried to pervert these so-called investigations for their political benefit," Cogdell said. "Ultimately, I think it will backfire." He added that the DOJ's decision to drop the case is a win for the project and reaffirmed that the development will move forward. Community Capital Partners EPIC City still under state review EPIC City is planned for 400 acres in Josephine, pending approval from Collin County Commissioners. The developers, Community Capital Partners, say the community will be open to people of all faiths. However, the project still faces at least three ongoing investigations from state agencies, including the Texas Attorney General's Office and the Texas Workforce Commission. "Never in 42 years of practicing criminal defense have I seen the number and absurdity of the accusations lodged here," Cogdell said. "We will comply fully and completely." New law targets religious developments Last week, Gov. Greg Abbott signed House Bill 4211, which his office says is designed to prevent developments like EPIC City from creating "no-go zones" by restricting land sales or rentals based on religious affiliation. Despite the bill's implications, Dan Cogdell, attorney for EPIC City, said the development supports the legislation. "Anyone is welcome to buy and live there," Cogdell said. "This is nothing more than a political opportunity for Abbott and others to claim they defeated an evil that never existed." CBS News Texas reached out to Rep. Candy Noble, the bill's author, for comment but has not yet received a response. In a statement, Andrew Mahaleris, press secretary for Gov. Abbott, said: "Governor Abbott was proud to sign HB 4211 into law last week to ensure developments like EPIC City are unable to create 'no-go zones' by selling or renting land only to individuals who subscribe to a developer's religious preference. Texas will continue to defend our communities from any threats posed by EPIC City or other entities seeking to create a discriminatory or illegal compound, and we will continue to monitor this proposed development for compliance with all Texas laws." Project delayed but still moving forward EPIC City organizers say they are still in the planning phase and have not yet submitted a permit application to the county. However, they admit the ongoing state investigations have delayed progress by several months. "Community Capital Partners is committed to building an inclusive community that follows the guidelines of the Fair Housing Act and we are glad the DOJ found that to be true in their investigation," Cogdell said.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Mamdani says his platform would be successful with candidates outside of NYC
New York State Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani, who appears to have secured a win in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary, said Wednesday that his platform would be successful with candidates outside of his city. 'Do you think that is a platform that would work for other candidates running in other parts of the country?' MSNBC's Jen Psaki asked Mamdani in an interview on 'The Briefing.' 'Absolutely. I think ultimately, this is a campaign about inequality, and you don't have to live in the most expensive city in the country to have experienced that inequality, because it's a national issue,' Mamdani responded. 'And what Americans coast to coast are looking for are people who will fight for them, not just believe in the things that resonate with their lives, but actually fight and deliver on those very things,' he added. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, shocked American political observers Tuesday as he seemed to be on the path to winning the Democratic nomination for the Big Apple's mayoral race over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. He immigrated to the U.S. from Uganda as a child and has spent most of his life in the nation's biggest city. If Mamdani clinches New York City's top job, he would be its first Muslim and Asian mayor. The results will be final by July 1. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said in a recent interview that former Vice President Harris would be president if she had used the same campaign playbook as Mamdani. 'Look, he ran a brilliant campaign. And it wasn't just him. What he understood and understands — campaign's not over — is that to run a brilliant campaign, you have to run a grassroots campaign,' Sanders told Politico Magazine in a piece published Wednesday.