The future of e-voting in South Africa: Opportunities and challenges
An illustration of an e-voting machine.
Image: IOL / Ron AI
Although the powers that be are exploring electronic voting (e-voting), its implementation in South Africa cannot be expected anytime soon.
E-voting embraces electronic means of casting votes and counting them.
University of South Africa (UNISA) distinguished professor at the College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Professor Colin Thakur, said a voting machine is a specialised type of computer. Therefore, normal computers and smartphones cannot be used.
He said issues regarding an election include vote secrecy, vote security, transparency, ease of voting, speed and efficiency of counting, and effect on voter turnout and equity of access.
'When we press a button, we expect privacy, we expect security, we expect verification, we expect,' Thakur said about e-voting.
He said paper was slowly losing its gold standard stature because of the logistics of moving 90 million pieces of paper from the central location to the voting districts and then the reversal logistics.
Additionally, instances of 'lost' ballot boxes can cause danger by creating a lingering doubt.
Thakur said the other challenge lies with ballot tabulation, which includes undercounting, overvoting, and none of the above (NOTA).
'One thing paper does that machine doesn't do is, you can spoil your ballot paper,' Thakur said.
Why e-voting?
Thakur said modern devices are becoming more intuitive and they mitigate mobility, illiteracy, people with disabilities (PWDs) challenges and the elderly.
E-voting is quicker and more accurate for vote tallying and announcements.
You can ask electorate-focused questions or percentage-type questions.
'E-voting machines can be used to decide a national non-political question not affecting the Constitution, or be used to gauge if the government has enough public support to go ahead with a proposed action,' Thakur said.
He said e-voting is useful in a fragile, transitional, or a government of national unity democracy.
Additionally, national, provincial, and local elections can be held simultaneously and can be cheaper too.
Election hacking
He said theoretically, things like ransomware, denial of service attacks, latency, 404ed! Page not found and Eskom can happen. However, most hacks happen in the lab and not on-site or during elections.
However, he stated that no technology is insulated from misappropriation. Radio signal interception is possible.
He said hacking needs sustained access to the e-voting machine.
'On voting day, there is no Wi-Fi, no Bluetooth, there's no connectivity, the machine is isolated from the world. So, how do you hack a machine that's secure?'
Thakur stated that to secure the vote, there are zero-knowledge proofs, homomorphic encryption, mix networks, blockchain, and a voter-verified paper audit trail.
He highlighted that e-voting is adopted in a stable, non-violent political climate; fragile or transitional democracy; multi-party democracy with two dominant parties; coalition government; large populations; a level of technical maturity; illiteracy is not seen as a setback; and a mixed economy.
E-voting strengths, opportunities, and advantages
Thakur said e-voting is fast, accurate, and gives an unemotional count. It also has multilingualism.
He said e-voting helps PWDs, the elderly, and illiterate voters through images, audio, graphics, symbols, and speech-to-text touchscreens.
It also provides additional voting options.
He added that human error is reduced by automated transmission and tabulation of errors.
Thakur said electronic transmission is the last thing that happens, and it is important because of denial of service attacks, ransomware, and man-in-the-middle interception. However, blockchain can mediate this challenge.
He said if the IEC decides to pilot or trial e-voting, then the legislation process must start, but information dissemination must start immediately.
'E-voting is not about technology - it's about democracy. We must guard against an election becoming a census of those who vote,' Thakur said.
[email protected]

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
41 minutes ago
- IOL News
Western Cape High Court rules against Dr John Hlophe's appointment to Judicial Service Commission
The Western Cape High Court has delivered a significant ruling against Dr Mandlakayise John Hlophe, the impeached former judge, declaring that he cannot be part of the Judicial Service Commission (JSC). The court's decision, handed down on Monday, underscores the imperative of judicial integrity and the constitutional responsibilities of South Africa's legislative body. In a judgement that has reignited debates about the judiciary's independence, the High Court found that the National Assembly (NA) had failed to appropriately exercise its discretion when approving Hlophe's appointment, an oversight that effectively undermined the credibility of the JSC. The court's order reflects a broad consensus that rigorous standards must be upheld in judicial appointments, especially for a body entrusted with safeguarding the country's constitutional commitment. The implications of the ruling are profound, as the JSC is constitutionally mandated to recommend judicial appointments and hold judges accountable. The court stated that failing to act responsibly in Hlophe's nomination could jeopardise the very independence the JSC is supposed to protect. Hlophe was nominated to the JSC last year but subsequently resigned amidst a flurry of controversy. The court explicitly stated that "Dr. Mandlakayise John Hlophe may not be designated to serve on the Judicial Services Commission in terms of section 178(1)(h) of the Constitution," marking a rare judicial rebuke of a parliamentary appointment. The judgment comes after a legal challenge by organisations including Freedom Under Law, Corruption Watch, and the Democratic Alliance (DA). These groups argued that including an impeached judge in the JSC threatened the integrity and independence of South Africa's judiciary. 'The judiciary is essential to the maintenance of constitutional democracy,' they asserted, solidifying their stance against any attempts that could compromise its impartiality. Dr Hlophe became South Africa's first judge to be impeached in its democratic era in February 2024, following charges stemming from a misconduct case dating back to 2008. He faced serious allegations of attempting to improperly influence Constitutional Court Justices Bess Nkabinde and Chris Jafta in a matter concerning then-President Jacob Zuma. After a protracted legal battle, the JSC finally recommended his removal in 2021, with Parliament voting in favour of impeachment only three years later. In response to the court's ruling, DA federal chairperson Helen Zille stated, "The High Court order to bar an impeached judge from serving on the Judicial Services Commission is a victory for the rule of law and the Constitution." She emphasised that the JSC must consist of members who are "fit and proper" and hold the public's confidence, reflecting the broader societal imperative for transparency and accountability within the judiciary. This latest development stands as a testament to the ongoing efforts to reinforce the principles of lawful governance within South Africa, propelling the conversation about judicial integrity into the national spotlight once more. DAILY NEWS

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
News you should know tonight: Top 5 stories you may have missed on June 2, 2025
Rain expected along the southern and eastern coasts midweek, with most inland areas remaining dry and cold. Good evening, IOL News family! It's Monday, June 2, 2025, and it's time for a wrap of the biggest headlines making waves in South Africa and beyond. Don't forget to join the IOL WhatsApp Channel to stay in tune, informed, and in the know SA weather forecast: Expect cooler temperatures and isolated showers this week South Africa will start the week with calm and stable weather, but the South African Weather Service (SAWS) has confirmed that isolated showers and cooler temperatures are expected to arrive by midweek. To read on, click here. Zuma blasts Ramaphosa's US mission: 'South Africa's problems can't be fixed by outsiders' Former President Jacob Zuma has issued a stinging rebuke of President Cyril Ramaphosa's recent diplomatic visit to Washington, asserting that South Africa should not rely on foreign powers to resolve its domestic challenges. To read on, click here. Here's what you're likely to pay for petrol and diesel from Wednesday, June 04 Fuel taxes are set to increase for the first time in three years, but thankfully a stronger rand will shield South African motorists from fuel price hikes in June. To read on, click here. Public safety alert: Gauteng officials warn of rising dangers in online meet-ups The Gauteng Provincial Legislature's Portfolio Committee on Community Safety has issued a serious warning to the public amid a surge in violent crimes linked to online dating and social media mee-tups, particularly in the Maboneng precinct of Johannesburg. To read on, click here. KZN councillor and wife implicated in alleged corruption on R29bn N3 highway upgrade An exclusive investigation by IOL has uncovered disturbing allegations of corruption and financial misconduct involving a local politician and his wife, linked to the multi-billion rand N3 highway upgrade - a critical infrastructure project connecting Durban and Pietermaritzburg. To read on, click here. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL News


Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
Access to details on decision to sign NHI Bill into law is a privilege, argues Ramaphosa
JOHANNESBURG - President Cyril Ramaphosa has argued that access to a record detailing what informed his decision to sign the National Health Insurance (NHI) Bill into law is a matter of privilege. The president has petitioned the Constitutional Court in an application for leave to appeal a High Court judgment over the NHI Act. In May, the court found that his decision to sign the bill into law was reviewable, ordering him to submit to the court the record of what led to his decision. However, the president argues that furnishing the court with the record is not a legal requirement. In papers before the Constitutional Court, Ramaphosa submits says various factors are considered before assenting to and signing a bill into law. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa takes his appeal against high court ruling on NHI to ConCourt Among them are the inputs by legal advisors, which the president says he has never been required to produce before and may be of a privileged nature. He adds that the record is at the heart of his performance in executing his obligations as enshrined in the constitution, and the order that he furnish the court with the record engages issues regarding the office of the presidency. This, Ramaphosa says, breaches the separation of powers doctrine, unnecessarily allowing courts to 'check the homework' of the head of State. The president further submits that the non-disclosure of the record in no way impedes parties from launching a constitutionality challenge, as this is a mechanism provided for by the Constitution.