logo
Israel and Iran bomb each other as nuclear talks tank

Israel and Iran bomb each other as nuclear talks tank

In Israel, at least six people, including two children, were killed when a missile hit an apartment building in Bat Yam, near Tel Aviv. Daniel Hadad, a local police commander, said 180 people were wounded and seven were still missing.
An Associated Press reporter saw streets lined with damaged and destroyed buildings, bombed out cars and shards of glass. Responders used a drone at points to look for survivors. Some people could be seen leaving the area with suitcases.
Four people were killed when a missile struck a building in the northern Israeli town of Tamra and another 24 were wounded. A strike on the central city of Rehovot wounded 42 people.
The Weizmann Institute of Science, an important centre for research in Rehovot, said 'there were a number of hits to buildings on the campus.' It said no one was harmed.
Israel has a sophisticated multi-tiered missile defence system that can intercept most projectiles fired at it, but officials have always said it is imperfect.
Loading
Urgent calls to deescalate
World leaders made urgent calls to deescalate. The attack on nuclear sites set a 'dangerous precedent,' China's foreign minister said. The region is already on edge as Israel seeks to annihilate Hamas, an Iranian ally, in the Gaza Strip, where the war is still raging after Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu brushed off such calls, saying Israel's strikes so far are 'nothing compared to what they will feel under the sway of our forces in the coming days.'
Israel, the sole, though undeclared, nuclear-armed state in the Middle East — said it launched the attack to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.
Iran has always said its nuclear program was peaceful, and the U.S. and others have assessed it has not pursued a weapon since 2003. But it has enriched ever larger stockpiles of uranium to near weapons-grade levels in recent years and was believed to have been able to develop multiple weapons within months if it chose to do so.
The U.N.'s atomic watchdog censured Iran last week for not complying with its obligations.
Semi-official Iranian news agencies meanwhile reported that an Israeli drone strike had caused a 'strong explosion' at an Iranian natural-gas processing plant, in what could be the first Israeli attack on Iran's oil and natural gas industry. Israel's military did not immediately comment.
The extent of damage at the South Pars natural gas field was not immediately clear. Such sites have air defence systems around them, which Israel has been targeting.
Iran calls nuclear talks 'unjustifiable'
The Arab Gulf country of Oman, which has been mediating indirect talks between the U.S. and Iran over Tehran's nuclear program, said a sixth round planned for Sunday would not take place.
'We remain committed to talks and hope the Iranians will come to the table soon,' a senior U.S. official said on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive talks.
Iran's top diplomat, Abbas Araghchi, said Saturday that the nuclear talks were 'unjustifiable' after Israel's strikes, which he said were the 'result of the direct support by Washington.'
In a post on his Truth Social account early Sunday, Trump reiterated that the U.S. was not involved in the attacks on Iran and warned that any retaliation directed against it would bring an American response 'at levels never seen before.'
'However, we can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict!!!' he wrote.
'More than a few weeks' to repair nuclear facilities
In Iran, satellite photos analysed by AP show extensive damage at Iran's main nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz. The images shot Saturday by Planet Labs PBC show multiple buildings damaged or destroyed. The structures hit include buildings identified by experts as supplying power to the facility.
U.N. nuclear chief Rafael Grossi told the Security Council that the above-ground section of the Natanz facility was destroyed. The main centrifuge facility underground did not appear to have been hit, but the loss of power could have damaged infrastructure there, he said.
Israel also struck a nuclear research facility in Isfahan. The International Atomic Energy Agency said four 'critical buildings' were damaged, including its uranium conversion facility. 'As in Natanz, no increase in off-site radiation expected,' it added.
An Israeli military official, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with official procedures, said that according to the army's initial assessment 'it will take much more than a few weeks' for Iran to repair the damage to the Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites. The official said the army had 'concrete intelligence that production in Isfahan was for military purposes.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump due in Canada as G7 confronts Israel-Iran crisis
Trump due in Canada as G7 confronts Israel-Iran crisis

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Trump due in Canada as G7 confronts Israel-Iran crisis

Group of Seven leaders including US President Donald Trump headed Sunday to the Canadian Rockies for a summit that takes on new urgency after Israel attacked Iran. The three-day gathering in the mountain town of Kananaskis marks the return to the international diplomatic calendar by Trump, who in his second term has been even more emboldened to shatter norms than in his first stint. Trump is visiting Canada despite his mockery of the United States' northern neighbor, which he has said would be better off as the 51st state. Tensions have eased since Prime Minister Mark Carney, a former central banker known more for his competence than pizzazz, took over in March from Justin Trudeau, an erstwhile star on the global stage whom Trump made no secret of despising. Carney had designed an agenda aimed at minimizing disagreements during the summit of the club of major industrial democracies -- Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States. But the leaders will likely see divisions as they discuss Israel's stunning military campaign that began Friday and is aimed at Iran's nuclear program and security apparatus. Iran has hit back with a barrage of missiles and drones against Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched the attack despite public calls by Trump to step back, as the United States and Iran had been holding talks on a diplomatic resolution over the cleric-run state's contested nuclear work. Trump nonetheless has since praised Israel's strikes, while also calling on the two sides to "make a deal." European powers have been cautious. French President Emmanuel Macron has called for restraint and urged Iran to re-enter talks with the United States, while blaming Tehran for escalating tensions over its nuclear program. Japan, which historically has maintained cordial ties with Iran, made an unusually forceful break with Western allies and denounced Israel's strikes as "completely unacceptable and deeply regrettable." - Disagreement just below surface - Another war will also be under discussion in Kananaskis. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is among the invited guests and hopes to speak to Trump, who publicly derided him when they met at the White House on February 28. Trump had hoped to force Ukraine into a quick deal with Russia but he has grown frustrated after President Vladimir Putin refused US-led appeals for at least a temporary truce. Trump spoke by telephone with Putin on Saturday both about the Israel-Iran conflict and Ukraine. Neither issue is expected to figure in a joint G7 communique, with Carney instead seeking only statements on low-controversy issues such as improving supply chains. Trump, when he last visited Canada for a G7 summit in 2018, bolted out early and from Air Force One tweeted insults about Trudeau and disassociated the United States from the final statement. G7 leaders have all voiced eagerness to engage Trump but in some cases have made clear their boundaries. Macron headed to the summit after stopping in Greenland, where he denounced Trump's threats to seize the Danish autonomous territory. "That's not what allies do," Macron said. Trump for his part is heading to the summit after attending an unusual military parade in Washington that coincided with his birthday, prompting nationwide protests over steps seen as increasingly authoritarian. - Trade deadline looms - European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen also spoke by telephone Saturday with Trump and called for pressure on Russia over the Ukraine invasion. She also voiced hope for progress in trade talks. Trump, seeking a radical transformation of a global economic order centered on free trade, has vowed to slap sweeping tariffs on US friends and foes alike on July 9, a deadline he postponed once. Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council, expected US allies to tread lightly on the tariffs as previous experience showed the "huge risk" if they push Trump too hard. "If it was a ganging up, I think that would backfire," he said. Other leaders invited to Kananaskis include Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as Canada hopes to ease tensions. Trudeau had accused Modi's government of masterminding the assassination of a Sikh separatist in Canada, which expelled the Indian ambassador, prompting New Delhi to take punitive action of its own. sct/bgs

Israel's attacks on Iran hint at a bigger goal: toppling the regime
Israel's attacks on Iran hint at a bigger goal: toppling the regime

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

Israel's attacks on Iran hint at a bigger goal: toppling the regime

But despite the damage inflicted by the unprecedented Israeli attack, decades of enmity towards Israel – not only among Iran's rulers but its majority-Shiite population – raises questions about the prospect for fomenting enough public support to oust an entrenched theocratic leadership in Tehran backed by loyal security forces. Loading Singh cautioned that no one knows what conditions would be required for an opposition to coalesce in Iran. Friday's assault was the first phase of what Israel said would be a prolonged operation. Experts said they expected Israel would continue to go after key Iranian nuclear infrastructure to delay Tehran's march to a nuclear bomb – even if Israel on its own does not have the capability to eliminate Iran's nuclear program. Iran says its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only. The UN nuclear watchdog concluded this week that it was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty. Israel's first salvoes targeted senior figures in Iran's military and scientific establishment, took out much of the country's air defence system and destroyed the above-ground enrichment plant at Iran's nuclear site. 'As a democratic country, the State of Israel believes that it is up to the people of a country to shape their national politics, and choose their government,' the Israeli embassy in Washington said. 'The future of Iran can only be determined by the Iranian people.' Netanyahu has called for a change in Iran's government, including in September. US President Donald Trump's administration, while acquiescing to Israel's strikes and helping its close ally fend off Iran's retaliatory missile barrage, has given no indication that it seeks regime change in Tehran. The White House and Iran's mission to the United Nations in New York also did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the matter. Israel has much further to go if it is to dismantle Iran's nuclear facilities, and military analysts have always said it might be impossible to totally disable the well-fortified sites dotted around Iran. The Israeli government has also cautioned that Iran's nuclear program could not be entirely destroyed by means of a military campaign. 'There's no way to destroy a nuclear program by military means,' Israel's National Security Adviser, Tzachi Hanegbi, told the country's Channel 13 TV. The military campaign could, however, create conditions for a deal with the US that would thwart the nuclear program. Analysts also remain sceptical that Israel will have the munitions needed to obliterate Iran's nuclear project on its own. Loading 'Israel probably cannot take out completely the nuclear project on its own without the American participation,' said Sima Shine, a former chief Mossad analyst and now a researcher at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies. While setting back Tehran's nuclear program would have value for Israel, the hope for regime change could explain why Israel went after so many senior military figures, potentially throwing the Iranian security establishment into confusion and chaos. 'These people were very vital, very knowledgeable, many years in their jobs, and they were a very important component of the stability of the regime, specifically the security stability of the regime,' Shine said. 'In the ideal world, Israel would prefer to see a change of regime, no question about that.' Loading But such a change would come with risk, said Jonathan Panikoff, a former US deputy national intelligence officer for the Middle East who is now at the Atlantic Council. If Israel succeeds in removing Iran's leadership, there is no guarantee the successor that emerges would not be even more hardline in pursuit of conflict with Israel. 'For years, many in Israel have insisted that regime change in Iran would prompt a new and better day – that nothing could be worse than the current theocratic regime,' Panikoff said. 'But history tells us it can always be worse.' Reuters

Will Israel's conflict with Iran draw in the US?
Will Israel's conflict with Iran draw in the US?

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Will Israel's conflict with Iran draw in the US?

Sam Hawley: Benjamin Netanyahu insists his sweeping attacks on Iran are a necessity to protect Israel from a nuclear holocaust. But why has the Israeli leader decided to strike now and what is his ultimate aim? Today, Hussein Ibish from the Arab Gulf States Institute on the risk of a further escalation and America being drawn into the conflict. I'm Sam Hawley on Gadigal land in Sydney. This is ABC News Daily. News report: After weeks of threats, explosions across Iran. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister: Moments ago Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, a targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival. News report: Israel striking what it says were dozens of Iranian military and nuclear sites as well as key officials and scientists. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister: If not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very short time. This is a clear and present danger to Israel's very survival. News report: Explosions and plumes of smoke have filled the Tel Aviv skyline as a barrage of retaliatory strikes rains down. News report: The Israeli government has said that it expects this offensive is going to ramp up and continue perhaps for as long as two weeks. Sam Hawley: Hussein, this is the most fierce fighting between Israel and Iran in decades. Do we describe it as a war at this point? Hussein Ibish: Yeah, definitely it's a war. It's the first war between Israel and Iran ever. Those two countries had never exchanged direct kinetic military blows before last year when they had more limited missile strikes against each other. In this case, it seems to be with the Israelis hitting the Iranians as hard as possible and then something like that in return. The Israelis appear to be trying to strike Iran with some form of a knockout blow. Although how they would calculate the success or failure, what the metric is for that is not yet clear. But it's definitely a war. Now, it's the kind of war that's very much in the modern era. This is a war that isn't likely to involve ground forces. This is a war that's going to be conducted by air. Sam Hawley: Well, Rising Lion, which is what the Israelis have dubbed this operation, it's pretty sophisticated, isn't it? Not many militaries could pull something like this off. Hussein Ibish: No, I think that's right. I think it is sophisticated. I mean, first, it's sophisticated in terms of targeting and accuracy. They are able to hit the targets they want to hit with more accuracy than most militaries could dream of having. And so that's one aspect. And another aspect is not only can they hit what they want to hit, they know what to hit in Iran. A lot of times, countries would have a general sense of, well, there's this buildup here and there's this installation there, but we don't really have the details there. In the case of Israel and Iran, I think that's not the case. Sam Hawley: So they have, of course, Israel damaged Iran's nuclear facilities. I guess the question, Hussein, is can Israel actually destroy Iran's nuclear program? Is that actually possible? Hussein Ibish: Well, the working assumption until now has been probably not. And I'm not sure we've seen anything that changes our minds on that. I mean, the general sense, my sense, certainly, going into this was Israel could give Iran a bloody nose, possibly a few broken bones, and really harm the nuclear program and do great damage to it, but not kick it back, say, 20 years, not make it so badly damaged that it's non-functional for a generation. And I think my sense was the United States had the bunker-buster capabilities to do that, and to do it in a few days through round-the-clock bombing with huge-scale conventional weapons. The U.S. has not given these in large numbers to Israel or anybody else. So the question is, is Israeli intelligence so sophisticated and thoroughgoing? And is their capability just barely sufficient to carry them over the threshold? And I have to say I'd be surprised. I think the Israeli plan must be either to force the Iranians into a humiliating and damaging agreement with the United States that renders it non-nuclear for a generation or two, or to instigate regime change in Iran. The idea is to force a still robust elite in Iran to say, these guys, this Islamic Republic crew, has mishandled Persian national interests that has a 6,000-year history so badly. They've got to go or be radically reformed in ways that will change policies and attitudes. Sam Hawley: Benjamin Netanyahu, of course, in a video address, spoke directly to the Iranian people, saying this is your moment to overthrow this brutal regime. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister: The time has come for you to unite around your flag and your historic legacy by standing up for your freedom from an evil and oppressive regime. Brave people of Iran, your light will defeat the darkness. I'm with you. The people of Israel are with you. Hussein Ibish: Yeah, that's I think the Israeli hope, is that they could either engineer street-level unrest that's sufficient to bring down the regime or force radical change. And I think that's very unlikely. That really doesn't usually happen. Like a foreign power smashes up your national resources. And most Iranians agree with the nuclear program, by the way. It's not about the nature of the regime. This is something that Iranians generally feel deeply about. So I think it's unlikely that people will pour out into the street. The bigger target of Netanyahu and the Americans is the Iranian elite. And saying to them, you know, these people are mismanaging your national resources to the point of disaster. Do something about it. Sam Hawley: All right. Well, Israel defied, of course, Donald Trump by launching this action. He had warned Benjamin Netanyahu not to do anything that could undermine the US nuclear talks with Iran, which are, of course, now off altogether. Hussein Ibish: I wonder about that. Sam Hawley: Well, what does his disregard for Trump tell us, if anything? Hussein Ibish: Well, OK. So there are many ways of reading this. One is that, yeah, the administration didn't do anything in word or deed that is known to encourage Israel in doing this. But so there was no green light as such. Certainly nothing that is attributable. But there also was no red light. Trump has said he knew the date of the attack, which means he knew about it in advance. And he didn't go to the mat to stop it. He didn't tell the Israelis, if you do this, I will no longer talk to you, etc. In fact, he's been quite nice to the Israelis after this. Not endorsing it, but not condemning it either. So what the Americans are doing is what is known in American diplomatic circles as constructive ambiguity. That's what they call it. What they mean is that they've adopted a position that allows the Israelis to say, well, we have American backing. Because they haven't said no. And so, you know, we're still in good standing with Washington. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister: This is what Israel is doing with the support, the clear support of the president of the United States, Donald Trump, and the American people. Hussein Ibish: And for the Iranians to be able to tell themselves and their own people that, well, the Americans have not been part of this. So if we do end up going back to negotiations with Washington, which they might, let me tell you, then it wouldn't be under duress. And the Americans, similarly, the neo-isolationists around Trump in the kind of fascist wing of his constituency led by Steve Bannon, could say, oh, good, he's staying out of this conflict. No more Middle East wars. Whereas the kind of pro-Israel faction that includes the religious right led by J.D. Vance and also the Jewish right wingers can say, oh, he's got Israel's back. Both readings are plausible. Sam Hawley: All right. Well, Hussein, what are the risks now that this could escalate into a wider regional war? And who would be drawn into that if it did happen? Hussein Ibish: There are serious risks, but the players who would join the Iranian camp are limited. When Bashar al-Assad fell, they lost the linchpin of their network. Everything centered around Syria was their one state ally, state level ally in the Arab world and in the Middle East. And the Turkish engineer downfall of al-Assad. But without Assad, it's these disparate gangs. So you've got the popular mobilization front groups in Iraq with their little missiles. You got the Houthis with the kind of dangerous stuff, but very limited they can do. And Hezbollah still exists in Lebanon. They may try to do some things, but Iran's reach now is going to be much more, I think, you know, restricted to what they can do themselves. And maybe the Houthis, possibly some missile strikes from Hezbollah. But I would look to Iranian proxies and sponsored groups and intelligence services to attack soft targets around the world. You know, engage in classical forms of terrorism that we generally haven't seen for a while. And, you know, so I would beef up security at Israeli and pro-Israel Jewish centers around the world. I would be very cautious. And I think the Iranian regime is of a mentality to do that and has the capabilities to do that. Sam Hawley: Is there a chance America could be dragged into this, do you think? Hussein Ibish: Of course, yes. If the Americans are attacked, they will respond directly. And maybe the biggest threat of that in Iraq, where there are these hot-headed militia groups that Iran has created but doesn't fully control. So you have all these different little groups, some of them bigger like Kata'ib Hezbollah and others that are larger and some of them small. And all of them armed and all of them hopping mad. And who knows who's saying what to whom. And there are lots of American targets around, lots of American military targets and American-related targets. So look to Iraq as one place that could happen. And, of course, the Houthis in Yemen have the capability of doing crazy and dangerous things with regard to shipping. But I think the Iranians, if they get that way, will have the U.S. not get dragged into this. And they will be trying to prevent adding Washington's power to the list of horribles they have to deal with. They don't need more firepower aimed at them right now. Sam Hawley: All right. Well, Hussein, if nothing else, this does show us, doesn't it, that the world can change very slowly. But it can also change very, very quickly, particularly if there's a change or a shift in global power. Hussein Ibish: Oh, yeah. Well, change generally happens in the blink of an eye. The Soviet Union is mighty superpower until it's gone. Apartheid in South Africa is immovable until Nelson Mandela is suddenly the president. Things that seem impossible, until they happen, they are far-fetched. Sam Hawley: Hussein Ibsih is from the Arab Gulf States Institute, a Washington-based think tank. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead. Audio production by Adair Sheppard. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. Thanks for listening.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store