
Musk says he regrets some posts he made about Trump
June 11 (Reuters) - Billionaire Elon Musk said on Wednesday that he regrets some of the posts he made last week about U.S President Donald Trump, in a message on his social media platform X.
"I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote.
Trump and Musk began exchanging insults last week on social media, with the Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab and SpaceX CEO describing the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination."
Musk's post comes days after Trump said his relationship with Musk was over.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
10 minutes ago
- Reuters
Goldman Sachs trims US recession probability to 30%
June 12 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs on Thursday trimmed its U.S. recession probability to 30% from 35% on easing uncertainty around Trump's tariff policies.


Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Culver's announces new chicken sandwich lineup
Culver's is diving beak-first into this summer's fast food wars — by launching three revamped chicken sandwiches just in time for this summer's fast food wars. The Wisconsin-based restaurant chain is debuting new Crispy Chicken, Spicy Crispy Chicken, and Grilled Chicken Sandwich recipes on June 16. The sandwiches feature an 'improved' chicken fillet with crunchier pickles, mayo, lettuce, tomato, and all-new toasted buns. The items were inspired by research and guest feedback. Each recipe was part of a multi-year development process to create new chicken sandwiches. Culver's will be celebrating its arrival by giving away free chicken sandwiches to the first 100 customers at each location on launch day. 'We know the love our guests have for chicken, so we wanted to give them new chicken sandwich options that are undeniably delicious,' said Kasey McDonald, Culver's head of culinary. The chain's new crispy and grilled chicken sandwiches will be available at all 1,000-plus restaurants. They cost between about $7.59 and $7.69 per sandwich, a partial factor as to why Culver's is one of the most overpriced fast food chains in America. Several restaurant chains have already introduced new items that are strikingly similar to one another. Chipotle is continuing to offer its limited-time Honey Chicken, which debuted around the same time as a short-lived KFC meal. McDonald's also showed off their competitive side by introducing a new lemonade at participating US locations. The beverage rolled out shortly after Chick-fil-A and Wendy's added new drinks to their menus. Burger King is also offering various specials and plans to offer deals in honor of Father's Day and National Onion Rings Day. Other fast-food chains that are competitively celebrating the summer season include Dunkin' and Sonic Drive-In.


The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Judge to consider California's request for restraining order against Trump over use of troops in LA
A federal judge on Thursday is expected to hear arguments over the request of the California governor, Gavin Newsom, for a temporary restraining order to block Donald Trump from deploying national guard troops and marines to suppress protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles. The hearing, set for 4.30pm ET in federal district court in San Francisco, comes after the presiding judge, Charles Breyer, a Bill Clinton appointee, earlier declined to grant an immediate injunction against the administration. The request for the restraining order is part of a lawsuit filed by the state of California challenging Trump's move to call up more than 4,000 national guard troops and about 700 active-duty marines based at Twentynine Palms in California over Newsom's objections. The complaint is largely aimed at the legitimacy of Trump's order. It sought a judicial declaration to nullify the order and to make clear that it was unlawful for the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, to bypass Newsom in federalizing the state's national guard forces in this instance. The hearing is expected to focus on the Title 10 statute invoked by Trump, which allows the president to federalize the national guard if there is a 'rebellion or a danger of rebellion', or if the president is 'unable with regular forces to execute the laws of the United States'. Although pockets of protests turned violent – some threw rocks at law enforcement vehicles and set alight a series of driverless Waymo cars – local authorities in Los Angeles county did not say they needed federal assistance. The California attorney general, Rob Bonta, is expected to argue that Trump needed Newsom's approval or request for such a mobilization, and that there was no basis to bring in national guard forces because the protests did not rise to the level of a rebellion. But the Trump administration has suggested that decision on whether to federalize the national guard was at the discretion of the president, and that federal courts cannot second-guess decisions by the executive branch as to whether the military was needed. In its 29-page response to the lawsuit, the justice department also said Newsom was misrepresenting the situation because the military was always only going be used in a protective function and not to perform law enforcement functions. The justice department cited memos from the office of legal counsel, written by William Rehnquist before he became chief justice of the United States, which suggested the military could be used to protect federal buildings from anti-war protesters during the Vietnam war. The memos envisioned the president relying upon his inherent authority in the US constitution as the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, possibly to get around the limitations of the Posse Comitatus Act, which makes it illegal for the military to perform a law enforcement function on domestic soil unless the president has invoked the Insurrection Act, which Trump has not. The memos have never been legally tested in court. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion The justice department also contended that the Trump administration had complied with the statute in full with respect to the governor's putative role, because it had notified Newsom of Trump's intentions to deploy the national guard and marines before they were implemented. Trump has been suggesting the idea of deploying troops against Americans since his first term, when some Black Lives Matter protests in the summer of 2020 turned violent. He opted against doing so at the time, but has since expressed regret to advisers that he did not punish the protesters more aggressively. Notably, during a campaign rally in 2023, Trump vowed to respond more forcefully if elected to a second term. 'You're supposed to not be involved in that, you just have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in,' he said of the president's usual role in deciding whether to send in the military. 'The next time, I'm not waiting.'