Councillor 'appalled and hurt' over cancer remarks
A Labour councillor who is being treated for cancer has said she felt "appalled, hurt and upset" after a Reform councillor told a full council meeting she was unable to represent her constituents effectively.
Carol Hyatt has non-Hodgkin lymphoma and due to her illness City of Wolverhampton Council has given her a dispensation to carry out her duties from home.
At the meeting on Wednesday, councillor Anita Stanley said she did not feel Hyatt's arrangement was "very fair on the residents".
"I'm immunocompromised, I can do everything, but I can't go out because then I'll get sepsis and could die, but I've done my very best still represent my ward," Hyatt told the BBC.
Reform UK and Stanley have been contacted for comment.
During a full council discussion about a proposed extension of Hyatt's dispensation to work from home, Stanley stood up and said: "I do not feel it is very fair on the residents not to have a political representative being able to speak up for them for the period of effectively one whole year.
"It's not fair on taxpayers."
Hyatt said: "The situation is not a party political thing so why would you treat any human being like that when they're fighting cancer and going through treatment?
"I'm really hurt because she hadn't bothered to find out the truth and tell it."
Hyatt attends council meetings virtually due to being immunocompromised.
"I can't turn up in person, I would risk getting neutrophilic septicaemia
"Although I'm expecting to be in full remission there's a possibility I might still have cancer again.
"The extension is usually just automatically agreed on by all the councillors because Wolverhampton is a supportive council," Hyatt said.
Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Council leader steps aside for cancer treatment
Council leader reveals cancer diagnosis on radio show
Charity funds £30m cancer research centre
Dignity 'flushed away' in sanitary bin ban row
City of Wolverhampton Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Legal clarity sought from Belfast High Court on Supreme Court gender ruling
Guidance will be sought from the High Court in Belfast over the effect a landmark Supreme Court ruling on gender will have in Northern Ireland. The Equality Commission in Northern Ireland has said that there is 'significant' legal uncertainty in the wake of the ruling, including how it interacts with existing equality law and with Article 2 of the Windsor Framework. Chief Commissioner of the Equality Commission Geraldine McGahey said they would consult with other parties on whether they wish to join the legal proceedings on the 'nuanced and complicated' issue. Ms McGahey said through referring the issue to the courts, they hoped to avoid 'the toxicity which has sometimes characterised the debate'. The Supreme Court in London declared in April that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'. The ruling has been interpreted to mean that transgender women can be excluded from women-only spaces such as toilets and changing rooms. However, the Equality Act 2010 does not cover Northern Ireland. The Equality Commission was to prepare guidance on the ruling's potential implications on Stormont departments. In a legal paper published by the Equality Commission on Friday, it said it would request legal clarity from the High Court. The Commission said that once the High Court decides on the matter, and subject to any appeals, the Commission will then produce its draft guidance, which will be subject to further consultation. Ms McGahey said: 'After much consideration and analysis, the Commission has concluded that the situation in Northern Ireland, in respect of this matter, is much more nuanced and complicated, and there is significant uncertainty due to our unique legal landscape. 'We have no interest in merely speculating as to how a court might determine these issues in the future. We will not answer these legal uncertainties by weighing the arguments 'for' and 'against'. 'It is important that the Commission shows leadership as people and their lives are at the heart of this issue. 'To achieve greater long-term certainty and clarity for all involved, the Commission will be seeking a declaration from the courts to address several questions regarding the significant legal uncertainties. 'Our equality laws do not sit in isolation; they interact with other laws and regulations for which the Commission does not have a remit. 'We believe other bodies and organisations will also require clarification on the legal position in relation to their own areas of work and may join the Commission in its legal proceedings. 'The Commission will issue Pre-Action Protocol letters to government departments and other public bodies with legal responsibilities potentially affected by the judgment and to other interested parties. 'The Commission will also commence a wider consultation process for all interested stakeholders.' She said the Commission wants to give everyone the opportunity to engage and will welcome input from all stakeholders. 'We fully recognise the challenges faced by employers and service providers as they try to navigate these uncertainties,' she said. 'As this is an evolving area of law, we will keep our interim information for employers and service providers under review and offer advice on a case-by-case basis where the law is clear. 'Ultimately, maximising legal certainty and transparency is at the heart of our strategy. 'We aim to create a robust framework for offering guidance, rather than being subject to numerous legal uncertainties that may be contested in the courts over the coming years at potentially great cost to the public purse. 'By adopting this approach, we hope to avoid the toxicity which has sometimes characterised the debate around how to balance the rights of biological women and transgender women by creating a space for debate and adjudication by the courts. 'We believe our approach will be in the best interests of everyone in Northern Ireland.'
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BBC News Presenters Back Demand For Strike Vote As Colleagues Face Compulsory Layoffs
EXCLUSIVE: BBC News presenters are among those calling on their union to hold a strike ballot over colleagues facing compulsory redundancy. In a letter seen by Deadline, nearly 80 BBC journalists have written to Laura Davison, general secretary of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ), demanding a vote on industrial action. High-profile signatories include presenters Martine Croxall, Samira Ahmed, and Kasia Madera. More from Deadline BBC To Charge U.S. Audiences For News For First Time BBC Boss Tim Davie Tells Staff Not To Fight With Their Families Over Gaza Output UK Culture Secretary Says BBC Should Not Platform Kneecap At Glastonbury: "This Is A Band That Has Thrived On The Oxygen Of Publicity" The letter comes after Deadline reported earlier this month that five seasoned BBC journalists, boasting more than 100 years of combined experience, have been told they will lose their jobs. There are also thought to be a handful of other compulsory redundancies planned on Asian Network News. The NUJ's policy is to ballot BBC union members for strike action if any fellow member is facing compulsory redundancy. However, the NUJ has so far not issued a ballot for those facing layoffs in this latest round of cuts. 'Compulsory redundancy was always a red line for the NUJ — why has that changed and since when?' the letter asked. 'Many of us have been NUJ members for decades — we are all alarmed that the fundamental principle of opposing CR [compulsory redundancy] is not being upheld.' The missive added that some of the journalists affected will be forced to leave the BBC by mid-August after being told by the corporation that redeployment is not an option. 'We are running out of time,' the BBC employees wrote. The NUJ declined to comment. Deadline understands that the BBC's position on redeployment is also contested, with those at risk of redundancy arguing that there are suitable alternative roles being advertised on the broadcaster's jobs board. Four senior BBC journalists have lodged age discrimination complaints as part of the redundancy dispute. The aggrieved employees are all over the age of 50 and have raised an internal complaint as a first step to pursuing an employment tribunal against the BBC. In a previous statement, a BBC News spokesperson said: 'Like all parts of the BBC, News needs to contribute to the savings announced last year. While we do not comment on individual staff issues, restructuring in BBC News is taking place according to established BBC policies; we conduct all processes in a thorough and fair manner, and we are committed to supporting our staff throughout, including through comprehensive redeployment assistance.' The layoffs are part of savings plans announced by BBC News last October. The division said it would cut 130 roles and cancel interview series HARDtalk as part of BBC-wide efforts to save £700M ($943M). BBC News CEO Deborah Turness acknowledged at the time that the changes were 'not easy.' Best of Deadline 'The Buccaneers' Season 2 Soundtrack: From Griff To Sabrina Carpenter 'The Buccaneers' Season 2 Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Come Out? 'Nine Perfect Strangers' Season 2 Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Come Out?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Government climbdown on welfare Bill marks third U-turn this month
Sir Keir Starmer's climbdown on the welfare Bill is the latest in a series of U-turns. Here, the PA news agency looks at three major policy changes this month. – Welfare reforms The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was put in motion to change who could qualify for certain disability and sickness benefits. The package restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, and cut the health-related element of Universal Credit, in a bid to save £5 billion a year by 2030. But a backbench rebellion of more than 120 Labour MPs forced Sir Keir into a U-turn. In an attempt to appease those MPs, planned cuts will now only affect future applications for benefits, rather than existing claimants. – Winter fuel payment The Government scrapped winter fuel payments for pensioners who do not receive pension credits or other means-tested benefits just weeks after it came to power in July. It was described as a 'necessary and responsible' move by Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who argued it would help fill the £22 billion fiscal black hole. The Government said that changing the threshold for the payment would save £1.5 billion each year. But at the start of this month, the Prime Minister announced that the Government would reinstate winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners. The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners who previously received it because anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year will now get the payment automatically. The Government said the change will cost £1.25 billion. – Grooming gangs Sir Keir has also U-turned on holding a national inquiry into grooming gangs. In January, the Prime Minister accused those calling for an inquiry of 'jumping on a far-right bandwagon' after tech entrepreneur Elon Musk criticised the UK for its lack of action on the issue. But following the recommendations of a report by Baroness Louise Casey into the scale of group-based child sexual abuse, Sir Keir announced in June that there would be a full national statutory inquiry. The Prime Minister had initially only promised five local inquiries in the most prevalent areas for grooming gangs. Asked about the change, Sir Keir said: 'I've never said we should not look again at any issue.'
