UK police examining 'death to the IDF' chant at Glastonbury Festival
British police are considering whether to launch an investigation after a member of punk duo Bob Vylan chanted "death, death to the IDF" at Glastonbury Festival on Saturday.
Avon and Somerset Police said on X late on Saturday that it was aware of the remarks made on the festival's West Holts stage.
"Video evidence will be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation," the police statement said.
The punk artist said "death, death to the IDF" multiple times while on stage, in reference to the Israeli army, prompting many in the crowd to echo the words back. Several people in the crowd were waving large Palestine flags.
Glastonbury Festival said it was "appalled" by Bob Vylan's remarks.
"Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence," it said in a statement.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Police said they were also examining comments made by Irish rap trio Kneecap, who are highly critical of Israel's war on Gaza, during their performance later on Saturday evening.
During the set, one member of Kneecap wore a T-shirt in support of Palestine Action.
Palestine Action is a direct action group the UK government is set to ban as a terrorist organisation after activists broke into RAF Brize Norton, the largest airbase in Britain, last week and spray-painted two planes while on electric scooters.
The activists then evaded security and escaped the base, which they said they targeted because flights leave there daily "for RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, a base used for military operations in Gaza and across the Middle East".
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said earlier this month that it was "not appropriate" for Kneecap to appear at Glastonbury.
The band's frontman, Liam Og O hAnnaidh, was charged with a terrorism offence last month for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Lebanon's Hezbollah and saying 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah' at a concert in November. He has denied the charge.
Hezbollah and Hamas are proscribed organisations in the UK.
During Saturday's performance, O hAnnaidh accused Israel of committing war crimes, stating: "There's no hiding it."
UK Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy contacted the BBC's director general to seek an explanation as to how the Bob Vylan show was allowed to be broadcast, according to a government spokesperson.
Meanwhile, Wes Streeting, the health secretary, said it was appalling that the chant was made on stage.
"I think the BBC and Glastonbury have got questions to answer about how we saw such a spectacle on our screens," he told Sky News.
The Israeli embassy said it was "deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival".
Streeting took aim at the embassy, telling it to "get your own house in order".
"I think there's a serious point there by the Israeli embassy. I wish they'd take the violence of their own citizens towards Palestinians more seriously," he said, citing Israeli settler violence in the occupied West Bank.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
11 minutes ago
- The National
Lebanon pressured to approve Hezbollah disarmament in cabinet, sources in Beirut claim
Lebanon is under pressure from the US to include Hezbollah's disarmament in its official government agenda as soon as possible, Lebanese political sources confirmed. The sources said Washington is also seeking to link the future of Lebanon and Syria's relations with Israel, pushing for a form of truce that would fall short of full normalisation, something that could be pursued in the near future. 'According to a document recently presented by US envoys, Lebanon is expected to hand over Hezbollah's weapons within a set timeframe, with the cabinet required to formally approve the process to give it legal weight,' said a parliamentary source familiar with the document. 'The demand for Lebanon to implement the US document may be a prelude to raising the issue of normalisation with Israel or, at the very least, to concluding a new armistice agreement to replace the current one,' added the source. A government official said the US is indirectly linking commitment to this process with progress on the return of Syrian refugees and the resumption of reconstruction and aid efforts. 'What is happening in Syria and Lebanon is similar: attempts to exert military pressure to extract political concessions, as is being done with the Syrian government, which seeks international legitimacy, and with the Lebanese government, which is in need of economic assistance,' added the official who spoke on condition of anonymity. Hezbollah was severely weakened during a year-long war with Israel that ended in November. Israel's military campaign destroyed much of Hezbollah's infrastructure, eliminated the group's leader and senior commanders, and infiltrated its security network. Under the terms of a ceasefire, Hezbollah must pull all military equipment and fighters out of southern Lebanon, and all non-state militant groups must be disarmed across the country. Despite the truce, Israel continues to bomb southern Lebanon almost daily and maintains control over five military posts along the southern border. It has also struck Beirut four times since the ceasefire agreement was sealed. Meanwhile, Lebanon remains under international pressure to reassert full state sovereignty. President Joseph Aoun has repeatedly said the decision to centralise arms under state authority has been taken, but insists this can be achieved only through dialogue rather than force. Rephrasing the demands Lebanon, seeking international aid to rebuild, is not rejecting the process completely, said the sources. 'Consultations between the government and the parliament are focusing on the idea of rephrasing the US document to make it more acceptable to the Lebanese side, specifically by emphasising mutual steps from both Lebanon and Israel,' explained the parliamentary source. 'This would prevent it from appearing as a list of demands imposed solely on Lebanon, and would also include the principle of Israeli withdrawal from occupied points in the south, even if done gradually.' A source close to Hezbollah claimed that the US demand, which calls for the Lebanese government to agree to disarmament before securing Israeli withdrawal from occupied positions and halting 'aggression against people', risks pushing Lebanon into 'a major internal crisis'. 'It is no coincidence that the US envoy to Lebanon, Tom Barrack, is the same as the one assigned to Syria. This reflects a unified US vision that sees the movement on both tracks as intertwined and aiming towards similar goals, particularly securing an agreement with Israel and safeguarding its interests,' said the source. Last week, after 12 days of war, US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Throughout the fighting, Hezbollah – once considered Iran's most powerful proxy – offered only verbal support to its patron, without intervening militarily. Hezbollah's decision to stay out of the Iran-Israel war was the result of internal and external pressures as the Lebanese militant group faces growing vulnerabilities, a senior US official told The National. 'The resistance force – I'll call them that – is now under pressure to preserve themselves. They've taken a knee,' said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'There's nothing that would stop the country to the south [Israel] from carrying out much greater aggression if they [Hezbollah] were to get involved at this point,' he added. The US official said that Tehran had asked the group not to enter the war to retain 'what is left of their strength'.
Al Etihad
35 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
US tariff relief for UK carmakers and aerospace comes into force
30 June 2025 09:31 LONDON (dpa)Tariff cuts for the automotive and aerospace sectors have come into force after UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer finalised parts of a deal for relief from US import manufacturers exporting to the United States will face a 10% tariff quota, down from 27.5%, while the aerospace sector will see a 10% levy removed hailed the "historic trade deal" with the US, clinched after US President Donald Trump imposed the import taxes as part of his "liberation day" tariffs on countries across the prime minister and US president finalised the deal for those sectors at the Group of Seven (G7) summit, but levies on steel have been left standing at 25% rather than falling to zero as originally are ongoing to secure 0% tariffs on core steel products from the executive order signed by Trump suggests the US wants assurances on the supply chains for UK steel intended for export, as well as on the "nature of ownership" of production said: "Our historic trade deal with the United States delivers for British businesses and protects UK jobs. From today, our world-class automotive and aerospace industries will see tariffs slashed, safeguarding key industries that are vital to our economy."We will always act in the national interest - backing British businesses and workers, delivering on our Plan for Change."Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the deal would save hundreds of millions each year and safeguard thousands of jobs."We agreed this deal with the US to protect jobs and support growth in some of our most vital sectors - and today, we're delivering on that promise for the UK's world-class automotive and aerospace industries."The government is also due to update parliament on Monday on ethanol and quotas on US the deal, it was agreed that a 20% tariff on US beef imports to the UK be removed and the quota for US beef raised to 13,000 metric tons.A 19% tariff on ethanol imports from the US is also due to be removed, with a tariff-free quota of 1.4 billion litres of US ethanol applied. The bioethanol industry says the deal has made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised US products. The UK's largest bioethanol plant warned last week that it could be weeks from stopping production.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Children must not remain casualties of war
The most blameless and innocent victims of any war are almost certainly always children. While witnessing death and devastation of war at any age is likely to take its toll, the effect on young people, by all indicators, is especially harrowing. In an annual UN report released earlier this month, 41,370 grave violations against children were documented and verified by the UN last year – a 25 per cent increase since 2023. While in much of the world where peace reigns, schools are now either out or about to close for the summer, there are hundreds of thousands of children in Palestine, particularly in Gaza, and millions collectively in conflict zones around the world, who are excluded from the privilege of even going a day without the terror of violence, hearing the sounds of explosions and encountering bloodshed. Summer holidays then are a far cry for these children, whose regular developmental milestones have been cut and swapped with desperation, tragedy and chronic hunger. 'Unimaginable horrors' is the phrase Edouard Beigbeder, Unicef's regional director for the Middle East and North Africa, used in May to describe the situation where more than 50,000 children have reportedly been killed or injured in the Gaza Strip since October 2023. Given the human cost of war and the resultant extensive suffering that children are left to deal with for the rest of their lives, the notion that modern warfare is targeted or surgical is utterly misleading, as has been evident in several parts of the world. Air strikes and attacks on aid distribution need to stop. Killings need to stop. Children need to be able to live a normal life An unfortunate truth is also that prolonged conflict often brings about a fatigue and desensitisation to such bleak realities to the wider world. But such images must not be allowed to lose their power to compel international stakeholders, including world leaders, to push for a ceasefire and long-term peace, implying then also a better future for children deprived of normality. Already the stunted progress in the five areas of child-related UN Sustainable Development Goals – namely, survive and thrive, learning, protection, and poverty – should be a wake-up call for how adults all over the world are failing children caught in conflict zones, losing their homes and all too frequently their limbs, parents, and their right to normal growing-up years. The other grave crime is the recruitment of children in armed conflict. To prevent this heinous offshoot of war, child protection units must be strengthened so that their remit to protect innocent children from being exploited and given arms can be more effective. To this end, the UN does have an action plan, which includes implementing national campaigns and getting access to military camps and bases to ensure no children are in the ranks. Each day of continued war, with efforts to secure ceasefires being stalled or scuttled, is another strike in the tally of a collective moral failure to protect children from an increased risk of falling into a cycle of aggression and or extremism. The plain fact that bears repeating, after too many months of 'unimaginable horrors', is that the air strikes and attacks on aid distribution need to stop. Killings need to stop. Children need to be able to live a normal life, not being casualties of war. Leaders everywhere must realise this and keep working towards diplomatic solutions to end all conflicts. As Mr Beigbeder said of this unconscionable reality that has continued for far too long: 'How many more dead girls and boys will it take?'
