logo
Seattle's Mayor Harrell asks for review of permit given for 'far-right rally'

Seattle's Mayor Harrell asks for review of permit given for 'far-right rally'

Yahoo26-05-2025

The Brief
An event put on by Mayday USA in Cal Anderson Park quickly sparked heated reactions from area residents.
Seattle police officers showed up and made several arrests during clashes with counterprotesters.
In response, Seattle Mayor Harrell offered words of support, and caution, to Seattleites while making requests for city reviews into the permitting and policing of Saturday's event.
SEATTLE - Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell issued a statement following a heated protest at Cal Anderson Park on Saturday.
At least 22 people have been arrested after a clash between police, demonstrators, and counterprotesters on May 24, according to the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office.
In a new statement, the mayor remarked on the proud history of Seattleites standing up for their values. He then urged residents to avoid violence during protests and demonstrations.
What they're saying
"When the humanity of trans people and those who have been historically marginalized is questioned, we triumph by demonstrating our values through our words and peaceful protest – we lose our voice when this is disrupted by violence, chaos, and confusion," read Mayor Harrell's weekend statement, in part.
The rally was held at the historic Cal Anderson Park on Capitol Hill. Speaking yesterday on the emerging events, Mayor Harrell said, "today's far-right rally was held here for this very reason – to provoke a reaction by promoting beliefs that are inherently opposed to our city's values, in the heart of Seattle's most prominent LGBTQ+ neighborhood."
What's next
Mayor Harrell is now directing the Parks Department to review the circumstances of the rally organizer's application. He says he aims to "understand whether there were legal location alternatives or other adjustments that could have been pursued."
Up next, the mayor's office said in the statement that the Seattle Police Department will complete an after-action report of this event, "including understanding preparation, crowd management tactics, and review of arrests and citations."
Mayor Harrell ended his full statement with the following:
"I am grateful for those who make their voices heard in support of our neighbors without resorting to violence. In the face of an extreme right-wing national effort to attack our trans and LGBTQ+ communities, Seattle will continue to stand unwavering in our embrace of diversity, love for our neighbors, and commitment to justice and fairness."
The Source
Information in this story came from the Office of the Mayor of Seattle.
Luxury Seattle hotel sues 'nuisance' building next door
Firefighters in western WA train for possibility of 'above average' wildfire season
Shawn Kemp lawyers claim bias in Tacoma Mall shooting case as trial nears
Federal judge blocks Trump's dismantling of the Department of Education
'Where is Teekah?': Mother speaks out after Tacoma, WA cold case
Activist marks 2 weeks in tree to protest logging near Port Angeles
Driver arrested after deadly crash in Kent, WA
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' includes some that support his immigration policies
Trump's list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' includes some that support his immigration policies

Washington Post

time3 days ago

  • Washington Post

Trump's list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' includes some that support his immigration policies

MADISON, Wis. — Officials in communities from rural to urban and red to blue blasted the Trump administration's list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' with many saying they've been outspoken supporters of the president and his stringent immigration policies. Officials who back President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown questioned how their jurisdictions wound up on a list of more than 500 that the Department of Homeland Security says are obstructing enforcement. Several communities were misspelled, including Cincinnati, which was spelled Cincinnatti. Jim Davel, administrator for Shawano County, Wisconsin, said the inclusion of his heavily Republican community must be a clerical error. 'We have no idea how we got on this list whatsoever right at this point,' Davel said. 'I think it was just a big mix up, probably some paperwork or something.' Meanwhile, those with policies protecting immigrants also pushed back, saying they are doing right by their communities. 'This is simply the latest attempt by the Trump administration to strong-arm cities like Seattle into changing our local policies through bluster and threats to critical federal funding for public safety and homelessness,' Bruce Harrell, the city's mayor, told The Associated Press in an email. 'It's not going to work — the law is on our side — and we will not hesitate to protect our people and stand up for our values.' The list was published as the Trump administration ramps up efforts to follow through on the president's campaign promises to remove millions of people who are in the country illegally. It came out as Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced major leadership changes, and after a White House official said the administration wanted to drive daily immigration arrests significantly higher. The administration says each jurisdiction on the list will receive formal notification that the government has deemed them noncompliant and if they're believed to be in violation of any federal criminal statutes. The list was compiled using a number of factors, including whether the localities identified themselves as sanctuary jurisdictions, how much they complied with federal officials enforcing immigration laws, if they had restrictions on sharing information with immigration enforcement or had any legal protections for people in the country illegally, according to Homeland Security. But communities said the list doesn't appear to make sense. In California's Orange County, the city of Huntington Beach is on the list even though it has sued the state over its policies that protect immigrants and its City Council supports Trump. But the nearby city of Santa Ana, which has policies to protect members of its sizable immigrant community, is not. In North Dakota, seven mostly small, rural counties wound up on the list, including Slope County, which has about 700 people and overwhelmingly voted for Trump in 2024. County officials reached out to Republican Gov. Kelly Armstrong's office to see what steps to take next, and plan to discuss the matter next week with the county state's attorney, County Commission Chairman Scott Ouradnik said. Communities supportive of immigrants said their policies aren't just about immigrants but all residents by ensuring anyone who is a victim or witness feels they can come forward and report crime. States including California, Illinois and Washington, which have such policies, are on the list. In Hartford, Connecticut, Mayor Arunan Arulampalam said the capital city's laws and policies have enhanced the vibrancy and safety of the community. The city bars people's immigration status from being used to deny city services and police can't arrest people solely because of immigration status. 'While my administration remains laser-focused on real solutions that protect our community, it is clear that current federal policies do not share this commitment to safety and threaten to undermine the gains we have made,' Arulampalam said in a statement. Nithya Nathan-Pineau, an attorney with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, said it's unclear what criteria were used to formulate the list or define the concept of sanctuary nor what legal action the government plans to take against the jurisdictions. 'It seems quite arbitrary because not all of these states or specific jurisdictions have a policy that limits cooperation with ICE,' Nathan-Pineau said. 'It's pretty clear that this is another attempt to intimidate and bully.' There's no clear definition of what a sanctuary jurisdiction is, but the term generally applies to state and local governments that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. It originated in the 1980s with U.S. churches that housed Central Americans who fled civil wars. Last month, Trump signed an executive order requiring the secretary of Homeland Security and the attorney general to publish a list of states and local jurisdictions that they considered to be obstructing federal immigration laws. The list is to be regularly updated. Federal departments and agencies, working with the Office of Management and Budget, would then be tasked with identifying federal grants or contracts with those states or local jurisdictions that the federal government identified as 'sanctuary jurisdictions' and suspending or terminating the money, according to the executive order. ICE, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security, enforces immigration laws nationwide. The agency often seeks state and local help in alerting federal authorities of immigrants wanted for deportation and holding them until those authorities are able to take custody. ___ Taxin reported from Santa Ana, California, and Bellisle from Seattle. Associated Press writers Jack Dura in Bismarck, North Dakota, David Collins in Hartford, Connecticut, Gisela Salomon in Miami and John O'Connor in Springfield, Illinois, contributed.

Trump's list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' includes some that support his immigration policies
Trump's list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' includes some that support his immigration policies

Associated Press

time3 days ago

  • Associated Press

Trump's list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' includes some that support his immigration policies

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Officials in communities from rural to urban and red to blue blasted the Trump administration's list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' with many saying they've been outspoken supporters of the president and his stringent immigration policies. Officials who back President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown questioned how their jurisdictions wound up on a list of more than 500 that the Department of Homeland Security says are obstructing enforcement. Several communities were misspelled, including Cincinnati, which was spelled Cincinnatti. Jim Davel, administrator for Shawano County, Wisconsin, said the inclusion of his heavily Republican community must be a clerical error. 'We have no idea how we got on this list whatsoever right at this point,' Davel said. 'I think it was just a big mix up, probably some paperwork or something.' Meanwhile, those with policies protecting immigrants also pushed back, saying they are doing right by their communities. 'This is simply the latest attempt by the Trump administration to strong-arm cities like Seattle into changing our local policies through bluster and threats to critical federal funding for public safety and homelessness,' Bruce Harrell, the city's mayor, told The Associated Press in an email. 'It's not going to work — the law is on our side — and we will not hesitate to protect our people and stand up for our values.' The list was published as the Trump administration ramps up efforts to follow through on the president's campaign promises to remove millions of people who are in the country illegally. It came out as Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced major leadership changes, and after a White House official said the administration wanted to drive daily immigration arrests significantly higher. The administration says each jurisdiction on the list will receive formal notification that the government has deemed them noncompliant and if they're believed to be in violation of any federal criminal statutes. Some communities don't know why they were included The list was compiled using a number of factors, including whether the localities identified themselves as sanctuary jurisdictions, how much they complied with federal officials enforcing immigration laws, if they had restrictions on sharing information with immigration enforcement or had any legal protections for people in the country illegally, according to Homeland Security. But communities said the list doesn't appear to make sense. In California's Orange County, the city of Huntington Beach is on the list even though it has sued the state over its policies that protect immigrants and its City Council supports Trump. But the nearby city of Santa Ana, which has policies to protect members of its sizable immigrant community, is not. In North Dakota, seven mostly small, rural counties wound up on the list, including Slope County, which has about 700 people and overwhelmingly voted for Trump in 2024. County officials reached out to Republican Gov. Kelly Armstrong's office to see what steps to take next, and plan to discuss the matter next week with the county state's attorney, County Commission Chairman Scott Ouradnik said. Other communities defend their policies that protect immigrants Communities supportive of immigrants said their policies aren't just about immigrants but all residents by ensuring anyone who is a victim or witness feels they can come forward and report crime. States including California, Illinois and Washington, which have such policies, are on the list. In Hartford, Connecticut, Mayor Arunan Arulampalam said the capital city's laws and policies have enhanced the vibrancy and safety of the community. The city bars people's immigration status from being used to deny city services and police can't arrest people solely because of immigration status. 'While my administration remains laser-focused on real solutions that protect our community, it is clear that current federal policies do not share this commitment to safety and threaten to undermine the gains we have made,' Arulampalam said in a statement. Nithya Nathan-Pineau, an attorney with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, said it's unclear what criteria were used to formulate the list or define the concept of sanctuary nor what legal action the government plans to take against the jurisdictions. 'It seems quite arbitrary because not all of these states or specific jurisdictions have a policy that limits cooperation with ICE,' Nathan-Pineau said. 'It's pretty clear that this is another attempt to intimidate and bully.' What is a sanctuary jurisdiction? There's no clear definition of what a sanctuary jurisdiction is, but the term generally applies to state and local governments that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. It originated in the 1980s with U.S. churches that housed Central Americans who fled civil wars. Last month, Trump signed an executive order requiring the secretary of Homeland Security and the attorney general to publish a list of states and local jurisdictions that they considered to be obstructing federal immigration laws. The list is to be regularly updated. Federal departments and agencies, working with the Office of Management and Budget, would then be tasked with identifying federal grants or contracts with those states or local jurisdictions that the federal government identified as 'sanctuary jurisdictions' and suspending or terminating the money, according to the executive order. ICE, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security, enforces immigration laws nationwide. The agency often seeks state and local help in alerting federal authorities of immigrants wanted for deportation and holding them until those authorities are able to take custody. ___ Taxin reported from Santa Ana, California, and Bellisle from Seattle. Associated Press writers Jack Dura in Bismarck, North Dakota, David Collins in Hartford, Connecticut, Gisela Salomon in Miami and John O'Connor in Springfield, Illinois, contributed.

Why hasn't anyone been charged in Seattle clash arrests? What we know
Why hasn't anyone been charged in Seattle clash arrests? What we know

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Why hasn't anyone been charged in Seattle clash arrests? What we know

The Brief A violent clash at Cal Anderson Park led to 22 arrests, with allegations of counter-protesters pushing officers off bikes, stealing batons, and throwing rocks. The King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office clarifies that no charges have been filed yet, as the Seattle Police investigation is ongoing and requires thorough review of video evidence. Prosecutors emphasize the independence of their investigation despite the involvement of police officers as alleged victims, ensuring transparency in their decision-making process. SEATTLE - A violent clash between counter-protesters and police at Cal Anderson Park over the weekend resulted in 22 arrests, including allegations that demonstrators pushed officers off bikes, stole batons, and threw rocks. Now, the central question is whether those suspects will face criminal charges. FOX 13 Seattle's Lauren Donovan spoke with Casey McNerthney of the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office to clarify the legal process now playing out. While supporters of the arrestees claim the state has declined to charge them, McNerthney says the full picture is more complicated. L: "What exactly happened at court today?" C: "So what folks learned in court this afternoon is the investigation with Seattle Police is still ongoing. It's not correct to say that King County prosecutors have declined cases — because prosecutors have not. We don't have cases to make charging decisions on one way or another. It's still in the investigation phase with Seattle Police. Once those are sent to us, a decision can be made." L: "What's the hold up? How much time do Seattle Police get to look over the evidence?" C: "It's a little different with other cases that make the news, like shootings. With those cases, it's a little more clear cut — where at least you think you know who fired the shot. In a situation like this, what prosecutors want to do is get as much video evidence as possible. "When you see the photos from City Hall and also Cal Anderson, you see almost everyone had their phones up, so we know there's a lot of video out there. There's also body-worn cameras, and we want to see that too. "What police have is as much time as they need under the statute of limitations. Cases don't get better with age, but if they need a week or two to get that information, they can have it." L: "Is there a conflict of interest when the alleged victims in this case are officers?" C: "The investigations will be independent. We're different agencies. We work often with Seattle Police, but we'll be transparent with what our decisions are and why and I think there's enough separation there. I'm not sure everyone will believe that but if they look at our process I think that will come through." The Source Information in this story comes from original reporting by FOX 13 Seattle reporter Lauren Donovan. Ex-Seattle police Chief Adrian Diaz files lawsuit, claims wrongful termination Crews battle Second Creek Fire near Leavenworth, WA 2 injured in separate Seattle shootings Teen, child killed in Lacey, WA mobile home fire Crews investigate explosion at Woodinville, WA hardware store College Inn Pub announces closure after 50 years in Seattle Dave's Hot Chicken to open 4 new locations in Seattle area. Here's where To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter. Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store