logo
Following significant debate, National Guard deployment bill fails reading in House

Following significant debate, National Guard deployment bill fails reading in House

Yahoo06-03-2025

Rep. Lee Deming, R-Laurel defense HB 404, regarding National Guard deployment, during floor debate on Wednesday, March 5, 2025.
A bill that would have required a Congressional act for the Montana National Guard to be released from the state into 'federal duty' did not pass a second reading on Wednesday afternoon, but only after a spirited and lengthy debate on the floor.
House Bill 404, brought by Rep. Lee Deming, R-Laurel, sought to avoid sending Montanans to 'active combat duty' in countries where the United States Congress hadn't approved soldiers to be sent.
The bill created controversy over possible loss of funding, allegations by bill proponents that opponents of the bill were giving out free helicopter rides, and assumptions that soldiers didn't know what they signed up for when they joined the guard.
In 2024, a drone attack against a U.S. military outpost in Jordan, called Tower 22, killed three U.S. soldiers and injured many National Guardsman. Roughly 3,000 U.S. troops were stationed in Jordan at the time, despite the Biden administration repeatedly saying the United States was not actively at war — a position they maintained following the withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Currently, National Guardsman from any state can be deployed to active duty, even though the U.S. is not in a declared war.
'The US has seen abuse of all of our military forces for decades,' Deming told the Daily Montanan. 'The Tower 22 attack is just a symptom of a larger problem that legislation of this kind has tried to address for two decades. There are quite a few examples. The men whose organization first began to sponsor legislation of this type are combat veterans who try to limit the damage done to our service men and women by these undeclared wars.'
Deming argued his bill would prevent needless harms, but legislators also debated over the cost.
Deming called a $132 million fiscal note attached to the bill 'bogus' and said it was based on 'completely fabricated assumptions.'
The note assumes the state would lose federal funding over the bill, $132 million annually over the next four years. It also valued the gear and buildings the Montana National Guard has and said the state could lose 'federal dollars, equipment, cooperative agreements, and funding for state personnel.'
Deming said that even if it was true, the result of the bill could be worth it.
'Let's say the fiscal note is correct,' Deming said. 'How much does the mental and physical health problems suffered by our veterans cost the state? The devastation created by deploying our forces into foreign conflicts with no goal and no end brings immense costs.'
Rep. George Nikolakakos, R-Great Falls, who was active duty in the Air Force before a seven-year stint in the Montana Air National Guard, spoke against the bill. He derided the assumption that National Guard soldiers didn't have agency and were victims.
'We have this idea that somehow we're sending our boys and girls overseas to die, and they didn't want to go,' Nikolakakos said. 'It's just false. It's a false notion.
A blast motion to get the bill out of committee failed on March 3. However, on Tuesday, the committee voted to push it out on its own and it reached the House floor Wednesday morning.
During Wednesday's floor session, House Majority Leader Rep. Steve Fitzpatrick, R-Great Falls, made a motion to send the bill to the House Appropriations Committee. Rep. Caleb Hinkle, R-Belgrade, objected to this motion, and Deming said it was an obvious attempt to kill the bill.
'I find this motion to be highly irregular, and frankly, insulting to the National Guard people that we are supposed to protect,' Deming said on the floor. 'Sending this down to Appropriations is killing this bill.'
His argument got him time on the floor.
'That was very passionate, so I'm going to put that up on second (reading),' Fitzpatrick said. 'Let's put this up on second, right now.'
Following almost an hour of debate, and two separate votes to end debate on the bill, HB 404 failed 58-41.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blue state governors to testify on "sanctuary policies" amid L.A. protests over immigration raids
Blue state governors to testify on "sanctuary policies" amid L.A. protests over immigration raids

CBS News

time20 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Blue state governors to testify on "sanctuary policies" amid L.A. protests over immigration raids

Washington — Three Democratic governors are defending their responses to the migrant crisis and dispute claims of failing to cooperate with federal authorities, according to prepared remarks that will be delivered Thursday before a House oversight panel. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz are among the witnesses scheduled to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on so-called "sanctuary policies". "Let me be clear: Sanctuary policies don't protect Americans. They protect criminal illegal aliens," Oversight Chair James Comer, a Kentucky Republican will say in his opening statement. The governors' appearances come as President Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom remain embroiled in a legal and political standoff over the deployment of the National Guard troops and Marines to quell immigration protests in Los Angeles. Demonstrations have spread to other U.S. cities, including New York and Chicago following a series of deportation raids. "Minnesota is not a sanctuary state," Walz will tell lawmakers. "It is ridiculous to suggest that Minnesota — a state that is over 1,500 miles away from the Southern border and a thousand miles from lawmakers in Washington, D.C. who decide and implement border policy is somehow responsible for a failure of immigration enforcement." The former vice presidential candidate has drawn intense scrutiny not only over immigration policy but also for his handling of social justice protests that broke out in Minneapolis following the death of George Floyd in 2020. Trump administration officials have cited Walz' actions to justify the president's decision to federalize troops in California. While Walz does not appear to directly address the controversy in his testimony, he says he is "disappointed" in the federal government's overall approach. "As governor of Minnesota, it is incumbent on me to use the state's resources to help Minnesota families—not turn those resources over to the administration so they can stage another photo-op in tactical gear or accidentally deport more children without observing due process," Walz is set to say. Ahead of the hearing, the GOP-led panel released a video compilation of various news clips accusing the governors of "shielding" undocumented immigrants and "causing chaos" in their states. A memo from Hochul's office suggested the hearing could be "derailed by wild accusations" and "twisted characterizations" but noted the governor's position is "clear" when it comes to supporting strong borders and comprehensive immigration reform. "New York state cooperates with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in criminal cases," Hochul says. "And our values as New Yorkers demand that we treat those who arrive here in search of a better life with dignity and reject policies that tear law-abiding families apart." Hochul also addresses the influx of more than 220,000 migrants to New York City since early 2022, many of whom were bussed from border states, calling it "an unprecedented humanitarian crisis." "We have responded to this crisis with both compassion and pragmatism," Hochul states."And as a result, we largely prevented what could have become an additional crisis — one of street homelessness and tent cities." Pritzker says Illinois also stepped up to the challenge, and blamed the lack of federal intervention and cooperation from border states for exacerbating the problem. "As governor, my responsibility is to ensure that all Illinoisans feel safe in their homes, their businesses, and their communities," Pritzker is prepared to say. "That is why my administration continued to make significant investments in public safety, even as our resources were strained because of the lack of federal support during the crisis — expanding our state police force and investing in efforts to reduce gun violence." Thursday's session follows a March hearing on sanctuary cities with four Democratic mayors: Eric Adams, of New York, Mike Johnston of Denver, Brandon Johnson of Chicago and Michelle Wu of Boston. Comer launched an investigation in January into "sanctuary jurisdictions", including states, counties or cities, to examine their impact on public safety and federal immigration enforcement. President Trump has vowed to crack down on localities that don't back his immigration agenda. Earlier this month, the Department of Homeland Security removed its list of sanctuary jurisdictions after several cities challenged the findings.

Newsom v. Trump heads to court as protests against ICE raids spread: Updates
Newsom v. Trump heads to court as protests against ICE raids spread: Updates

USA Today

time28 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Newsom v. Trump heads to court as protests against ICE raids spread: Updates

Newsom v. Trump heads to court as protests against ICE raids spread: Updates Show Caption Hide Caption See how Los Angeles protests intensified over one weekend What started as a small protest over immigration raids on Friday ballooned into large demonstrations throughout the weekend. Here's what happened. Nearly a week after protests over federal immigration enforcement raids first broke out in Los Angeles, a showdown between federal and state officials is expected to land in court on Thursday over whether President Donald Trump can use the military to assist the raids against California leaders' wishes. In the hearing, scheduled for Thursday afternoon, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco will hear Gov. Gavin Newsom's motion for a temporary restraining order limiting the activities of the 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines Trump deployed in Los Angeles. Newsom has decried the military intervention as an illegal waste of resources and is asking the court to block the troops' participation in law enforcement activities. He ultimately wants the National Guard returned to state control and Trump's actions declared illegal. Downtown Los Angeles remained under a curfew after days of demonstrations against the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement led to hundreds of arrests. The protests broke out on June 6 in response to ongoing ICE raids that have sparked fear among immigrant communities. While many protests have been relatively peaceful, some have turned into scenes of chaos as police fired with less lethal munitions, tear gas and flash-bangs to disperse crowds. "If I didn't act quickly on that, Los Angeles would be burning to the ground right now," Trump said at an event at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on Wednesday. State and local leaders have disputed Trump's claims, saying the decision has only provoked the unrest, likening the president's actions to "authoritarian regimes." U.S. Northern Command announced on Wednesday that the 700 active-duty Marines had completed their training for the Los Angeles mission, which included de-escalation and crowd control. The Marines were expected to be deployed within 48 hours to protect federal officers and property. National Guard commander Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman said on Wednesday that the troops wouldn't conduct arrests or searches and seizures, but would be authorized to detain protesters temporarily. Protests are planned for 1,800 communities across the country on June 14, the same day Trump holds a military parade in Washington, D.C. For decades, the GOP has claimed most of the symbols of patriotism, including the American flag, but the people protesting Trump, a Republican, say they are the true patriots now. The rallies, named "No Kings Day" to oppose what they see as Trump's power grab, are expected to be the largest and most numerous protests since Trump's second term began, dwarfing the Hands Off protests in early April that drew as many as 1 million Americans to the streets at more than 1,000 rallies. No Kings Day was organized by grassroots groups in cities and towns of all sizes to coincide with the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary celebration, which is also Trump's 79th birthday and Flag Day. Administration officials insist it is a coincidence that the parade falls on Trump's birthday. Read more here. Contributing: Reuters

Bloomberg Daybreak: Plane Crash in India
Bloomberg Daybreak: Plane Crash in India

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Bloomberg Daybreak: Plane Crash in India

On today's podcast: 1) An Air India Ltd. Boeing Co. 787 aircraft traveling from Ahmedabad in India to London's Gatwick airport crashed shortly after taking off, in what stands to be the most serious accident involving the US planemaker's most advanced widebody airliner. The airline said that Flight AI171 was 'involved in an incident' and that Air India is 'ascertaining the details.' Footage shared on social media showed a giant plume of smoke engulfing the crash site, with no reports of fatalities or survivors. The flight was carrying 242 passengers and crew, according to news agency ANI. 2) Los Angeles spends another night under curfew as protests spread to more cities. Protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles have spread to other US cities, including New York, Chicago, and Milwaukee, with clashes between protesters and law enforcement. The federal government has expanded its show of force, deploying National Guard troops and authorizing the use of the Hobbs Act to take over criminal cases, which California officials have criticized as "unlawful, unconstitutional and undemocratic". 3) President Trump says he will set unilateral tariffs on countries in 2 weeks. The president plans to send letters to trading partners in the next one to two weeks setting unilateral tariff rates ahead of a July 9 deadline. President Trump has threatened to impose higher duties on dozens of economies, but has only reached a trade framework with the UK and a tariff truce with China, which was recently threatened.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store