Hegseth says ‘lean and mean' military requires cutting officers
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered a reduction of the U.S. military's highest-ranking officers — potentially setting up a clash with Congress, which must approve any such adjustments.
In a memo released Monday, Hegseth called for slashing 20% of four-star positions in the active-duty military, 20% of all general officers in the National Guard, and a further reduction by at least 10% of generals and admirals.
'More generals and admirals does not equal more success,' Hegseth said in a video posted to social media Monday afternoon while clarifying that 'this is not a slash-and-burn exercise meant to punish high-ranking officers.' He added the proposed changes were the result of 'a deliberative process' done in coordination with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and intended to maximize the military's preparedness for and effectiveness in a potential conflict.
He described a phased approach that would first address the current structure of the military, then conduct 'a strategic review of the Unified Command Plan' that helps to organize military operations and responsibilities around the world.
'It's going to be done carefully, but it's going to be done expeditiously,' Hegseth said of the review, which he predicted would rival the 1986 reorganization of the Defense Department directed by Congress. 'We confront an evolving threat environment. We cannot afford to wait.'
Hegseth has long criticized what he sees as redundancy and inefficiency at the senior levels of the Pentagon.
As part of a broad overhaul of the Army, the secretary directed the service to stop buying certain aircraft and ground vehicles and to consolidate several commands, potentially clearing the way to eliminating some four-star general positions.
In Monday's video, Hegseth dubbed the policy directive, 'less generals, more GIs,' saying the military had to be 'lean and mean' to face the challenges ahead.
'We're going to shift resources from bloated headquarters elements to our warfighters,' Hegseth said, adding that in World War II, the American armed forces of 12 million troops was led by 17 four- and five-star officers.
'Today, we have 2.1 million service members, with 44 four-star' generals and admirals, he said.
There were 37 total four-star officers as of September 2023, according to a March 2024 report by the Congressional Research Service.
Several senior officers hold multiple positions simultaneously — for example, the head of U.S. European Command is also NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe. One four-star officer serves simultaneously as commander of United Nations Command, Combined Forces Command and U.S. Forces Korea.
Hegseth's plan may face scrutiny in Congress, which according to the congressional website 'has enacted an array of laws that govern important aspects of military officer personnel management, including appointments, assignments, grade structure, promotions, and separations.'
The Defense Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday evening.
___
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Readers sound off on Keir Starmer, orange air and a handheld fan ban
Edinburgh, Scotland: It was only a matter of time before U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer went down the predictable Tony Blair route of mistaking himself for a latter-day military messiah. 'Peace through strength' (Starmer at a Dublin steel factory, backed by unimpressed workers) is word-waffle, mind-bending nonsense, up there with Blair's weapons of mass destruction as a motive for diverting significant tax income from helping people to hurting people. Recent shameful figures show that Starmer's refusal to move the two-child benefit cap has plunged even more children into poverty. Add to that the betrayal of the elderly, women done out of pension entitlement, the young (Starmer abandoned a previous pledge by the Labour Party to ease student debt) and Labour's shocking role in the slaughter of Gaza — Starmer's ridiculous saber-rattling is clearly a WMD moment. Whereas the lunatic drunkard woman-abuser U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is touting China as the existential threat, Starmer has Vladimir Putin as the main bogeyman already under our beds. That would be the same Putin who has entirely failed to overrun Ukraine, despite thinking he'd have it all done and dusted in a couple of months. Instead, he has — yes — killed many thousands of innocent people, but also decimated Russia. We should all worry, but not because of Starmer's fear-mongering. We should remember just how far weak leaders are prepared to go to cover their failures. Amanda Baker Bronx: Voicer Tal Barzilai thinks Zionists shouldn't be criticized for their reprehensible behavior, but their genocide speaks for itself, and the efforts to starve Gazans is further cruelty. This has been the terrorist Zionist plan all along. Tal then makes specious claims about Jews being the so-called true indigenous people of the region. By that reasoning, since I have Celtic heritage, I should be given free rein to kick a Jewish family out of a European home simply because Celts occupied that area 3,000 years ago. Tal, for 2,000 years it wasn't your land. Time moves on. Please stay relatively safe and secure in New York, the real promised land. You are the unreasonable one. Nick Smith Bronx: To Voicer Jessica Balter: You got it all right on 'actions speak louder' than Mayor 'Avarice' Adams' rhetoric. He runs as an 'Independent' to give folks like me a bad name, skip debates that might show the truth of his corrupt administration and disinvite media events where he can't direct the narrative. It is so telling that as he runs NYC as if it is his private taxpayer public zoo, Greta Thunberg, recognizing the intersection of social issues, braves the open spaces with an international group of do-gooders sailing forward with donated aid for Palestinians under the threat of being 'blown out of the water' with them. It is so telling that other N.Y. officials are also speaking the ills of Adams while operating in his same contaminated, incandescent, yet camouflaged dark space. Dale Benjamin Drakeford Howard Beach: If New York truly wants to keep the city more affordable, why don't they stop increasing property taxes twice a year? Victoria Costanza Manhattan: Though we still think Canada and the Midwest are far away and not part of our lives here in New York, thank you, Daily News, for continuing to confront us with our reality ('City girds for bad air from Canada fires,' June 4). Twenty-five thousand Canadians fleeing their homes, air rated as 'very unhealthy' in Minneapolis — 'Eh, tough!' Wait a minute! 'City girds.' Is that New York City? Is that us? You mean our air could be turning orange again because of Canadian fires ignited in too-dry underbrush? Too dry from carbon dioxide emissions bouncing the Earth's heat back to itself? Same old oil and gas at fault? Wait a minute! Our legislators better not return home from Albany without first passing the NY HEAT Act and convincing Gov. Hochul to unleash the Cap-and-Invest program. Thomas A. Caffrey Brooklyn: Does anybody know what the tariff rate is for the smog Canada is exporting to the U.S.? Damo Baliga Wappingers Falls, N.Y.: I am appalled that Direct TV's charming 'chatty pigeons' TV ads were followed by an ad from Dish Network featuring a child gleefully throwing stones at representations of pigeons while an adult urged her on. Indeed, this company's website features targets on the same pigeons. Pigeons were hailed as heroes who played an important role in World War I, relaying vital messages, saving lives and contributing to the Allied war effort. An award for bravery was bestowed on 32 pigeons for their wartime service. Unfortunately, due to ignorance, prejudice and wrong information, pigeons, like many animals, subsequently became subjects of derision and mocking. Think what Dish did is allowable because they only use statues? If Dish showed ads of kids throwing stones at statues of any ethnic group, it'd be shut down immediately. Please boycott Dish for wanting to capitalize on teaching cruelty. Yliana Franco Merion Station, Pa.: Now that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has chosen Pride Month to remove the name of Harvey Milk, a gay Navy veteran, from a ship, will he also remove the names Kościuszko and Pulaski from military assets during October's Polish American Heritage Month? Will he dare erase African-American names during February's Black History Month, women's names during March's Women's Heritage Month, or those of Asian/Pacific Islanders during May's Asian Pacific American Heritage Month? Native Americans should beat Hegseth at his own game and demand that the Defense Department stop using tribal names and symbols on its weaponry. Gone would be helicopters named for Apache, Black Hawk, Chinook, Lakota, Kiowa, Comanche, Creek, Cheyenne, Little Bird and Arapaho tribes as well as Tomahawk missiles. Paul L. Newman Milford, Pa.: I was sorry to read about Voicer Mahatma Kane Jeeves's problems running his business in the current economic climate. I just watched President Trump on Fox News, and he let everyone know the American economy is booming. So hang in there, Voicer Jeeves. The Trump economic boom should be heading your way soon. Trump, the businessman with so many successful business ventures on his resume, surely knows what he is talking about. He would never mislead or lie to the American people. John Hirt Linden, N.J.: Different news sources and S.E. Cupp ('Trump just can't deliver on any of his promises,' column, June 5) keep stating that the Big Beautiful Bill is loaded with 'pork.' How about illuminating these frivolities and their contributors so that we uninformed taxpayers can remember them when it's time for reelection? C. Olbrys Hammonton, N.J.: S.E. Cupp forgot that Trump did fulfill his promise to secure our border and deport illegals. No bill will reduce our deficit because nobody in Congress wants to risk their jobs to save our nation. We need term limits for that. The Ukraine war will only end if Vladimir Putin withdraws or the Russian army is destroyed. Presidents not keeping promises is not our biggest problem; the impotent, self-serving Congress is. Cupp's hatred for Trump really is an unhealthy obsession that undermines her credibility. I have never liked any presidents in my lifetime and certainly have never trusted Congress, but I don't obsess over it. I just work and try to live a productive life. William Cook Whitsett, N.C.: Handheld fans are a newly banned item on ships. If you cruise and plan to line dance with a handheld fan, it's now banned from use in the club on Carnival ships, and I'm sure that if one ship brand does a ban, then others will follow. So no 'Boots on the Ground: Where Them Fans At?' song line dance with a fan in your hand will be allowed. Perhaps the company has either discovered or suffered a liability when someone gets hurts by someone using the fans on the dance floor, which I can imagine if one accidentally hits someone in their eyes, for example. It can cause a lot of potential damage for someone, indeed. Dee Neveu
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Americans are questioning the value of a college degree. Trump is joining the debate.
President Donald Trump wants to tweak a traditionalfeature of the American dream: a college degree. Trump has continued to escalate his battle with Harvard University, threatening to cut off the Ivy League school from federal funding if it does not meet the administration's demands, which include eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and cracking down on campus activism. The latest threat against Harvard, however, floated shifting funding to trade schools, an alternative path to a four-year college degree. "I am considering taking Three Billion Dollars of Grant Money away from a very antisemitic Harvard, and giving it to TRADE SCHOOLS all across our land," Trump wrote in a May 26 post on Truth Social. "What a great investment that would be for the USA, and so badly needed!!!" The White House's press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, added onto the president's comments in an interview with Fox News: "Apprenticeships, electricians, plumbers, we need more of those in our country, and less LGBTQ graduate majors from Harvard University. And that's what this administration's position is." Over the past few years, a growing number of Americans have started to question the value of a college degree due to high costs and a tough labor market, making trade schools and apprenticeships a favorable alternative. It marks a shift in the standard American dream, in which a four-year college degree had been viewed as a step to middle-class success. However, Jon Fansmith, assistant vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education, told Business Insider that taking funding away from Harvard and other research institutions isn't the answer to boosting investment in trade schools. "The money that he is talking about withholding from Harvard is money that Congress provided to research agencies to perform advanced scientific and biomedical research," Fansmith said, adding that Harvard earned grant money because "they had the best researchers, the best laboratory facilities, the best understanding of how to advance that science," he continued. "You can't simply take that money and use it for another purpose." Madi Biedermann, deputy assistant secretary for communications at the Department of Education, told BI that "American universities that are committed to their academic mission, protect students on campus, and follow all federal laws will have no problem accessing generous taxpayer support for their programs." 'Two very separate stories' Higher education doesn't have the same draw that it once did. Some Gen Zers previously told BI that despite being taught that college was the primary path to success, they felt they could make a living by directly entering the workforce or going to trade school. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. What is your job title? (1 of 2) Entry level position Project manager Management Senior management Executive management Student Self-employed Retired Other Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . That's why Trump's push to invest more in trade schools is important, Fansmith said — they help Americans get a stable career to support themselves and their families, and the federal government can help support those schools by asking Congress to approve more funding, not redirecting the funding unilaterally. "There are two stories here. One is this administration's attack on Harvard, and the other is, what is the role of trade schools, and is there a need for more support for trade schools? And as much as the president's trying to conflate the two, those are two very separate stories," Fansmith said. While Trump's big spending bill proposes some provisions to expand Pell grant eligibility to short-term programs, it does not detail a significant funding increase for trade schools. The Trump administration's rhetorical focus on trade schools isn't new. Before he won the 2024 election, Linda McMahon, now Trump's education secretary, wrote an opinion piece in The Hill advocating for the expansion of Pell Grant eligibility to workforce training programs. "Our educational system must offer clear and viable pathways to the American Dream aside from four-year degrees," she wrote. Trump also signed an executive order on April 23 to strengthen and expand workforce development and apprenticeships programs, which McMahon called a "significant step in ensuring every American can live their American Dream." Congress' role in rethinking education For years, Democratic lawmakers have been pushing for greater access to postsecondary education options, like free community college, and there has been bipartisan agreement on the need to boost apprenticeships and workforce programs without redirecting funding from higher education institutions. Amid the heightened focus on alternatives to a four-year college degree, the New York Federal Reserve said in a recent report that college still pays off; the median worker with a college degree earns about $80,000 a year, compared to $47,000 for a worker with just a high school diploma. Trump hasn't yet implemented his idea to redirect Harvard's federal funding to trade schools, and it's unclear how, or if, he will attempt to follow through. While he has already withheld billions of dollars from Harvard and other schools across the country for failing to meet his administration's political demands, the moves have been met with lawsuits, and Fansmith said it's likely more legal action would ensue should Trump attempt to move around funding without congressional approval. "We're talking about spending money that Congress said would go to support really critically needed research into things like cancer and Alzheimer's and diabetes, and other things that impact everyday Americans' lives, and give it to trade schools," Fansmith said. "Trade schools are great schools. They have lots of benefits. They deserve a lot of federal support, but not just to make a political point at the expense of Harvard." Jason Altmire, president and CEO of Career Education Colleges and Universities — a group that represents for-profit colleges — said in a statement that Trump's focus on trade schools "is an investment in America's workforce." "The best way to support trade schools is to reduce the regulatory burden facing private career schools while increasing funding that allows students interested in the trades to choose the highest quality school," Altmire said.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
My father helped create public media. He'd say we need it now, more than ever
Now the Trump administration is not only trying to end public media but also attempting to claw back more than $1 billion in public media funds that Congress has already approved. Those who support this move Advertisement But there are problems with that argument. First, commercial media executives understand that attention is currency, and Advertisement Second, paid subscriptions are expensive, and many Americans simply can't afford them. Public media is a bargain by comparison. Third, commercial media companies don't have the incentive to operate in the public's best interest; they do have the incentive to convert eyeballs into revenue sources. For example, in youth programming, the focus is often on the commercials, selling toys and sugary snacks to kids. And content for kids on platforms such as YouTube can range from vapid to dangerous at a time when busy parents often use screen time to supplement entertainment or education. For these parents, it has become exhausting to choose what's OK for their children, and even more exhausting to know which platforms are trustworthy. The truth is, at a time when half of kids don't have access to preschool, federally funded, responsible content is a great investment in the next generation. Lastly, the commercial market has also collapsed for news. According to the Advertisement Access to reliable information is crucial in a democracy. As Bill Moyers once Like libraries and schools, public media offers access to knowledge and critical thinking, which is essential for learning and for democracy. The government should strengthen — not undermine — nonprofit educational media, especially now. I hope that my Dad's call for 'public interest' media prevails, rather than the alternative: an expensive wasteland even more vast — and dangerous — than he could have ever imagined.
