
How today's cheap clothes, wind turbines and plastic bottles will become the fossils of the future
Summary
Human-made objects will leave "technofossils" for future paleontologists to study, according to a new book.
Plastics, including bottles and synthetic clothing, will likely become the most common preserved artifacts.
Items in landfills and sinking cities have higher preservation potential than organic materials.
Future civilizations may struggle to understand smartphone function despite their abundance in fossil records.
Landfills, mass-produced items and decreasing biodiversity will become humanity's distinctive geological signature. Imagine the planet tens of millions of years from now. Homo sapiens as a species is likely long gone, wiped out by a mass extinction it helped unleash.
What traces will humanity leave embedded in ancient strata of rock for future paleontologists to detect, study and puzzle over? It's a question two scientists aim to answer in a new book.
Humankind's defining testament will be dramatically different from the skeletons, bones and other biological traces that inform today's fossil record, according to authors Sarah Gabbott and Jan Zalasiewicz, both paleontologists at the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom.
A completely new range of fossils, and a new style of fossilization, is already emerging on Earth, they say. Manufactured objects — plastic bottles, ballpoint pens, concrete buildings, teabags, wind turbines, cell phones, T-shirts, aluminum cans — outweigh the living world and will form distinctive, if sometimes hard to interpret, clues to our existence.
CNN spoke to the authors of 'Discarded: How Technofossils Will Be Our Ultimate Legacy' to understand which items from our technology-driven civilization are likely to form the fossils of the future and our everlasting geological signature.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
CNN: What was the starting point for this book?
Jan Zalasiewicz: Sarah has spent a career looking at some of the most weird and wonderful and best-preserved fossils, ranging half a billion years back and more, to see exactly how they preserve. I'm also a paleontologist, and I'm involved in this idea of the Anthropocene: that humans are changing the geology of the Earth in a big way.
We worked on the question of what kind of fossils we will leave behind from all the things that we do and make, and what will that tell us? And what might it tell some hypothetical, other beings, let's say, 100 million years in the future, who might happen upon what we leave behind?
CNN: What are the fossils of the future going to be?
Sarah Gabbott: I think in terms of common items, we have to think about plastics. They are going to be not just found in landfills but found in ocean sediments and pretty much everywhere. Plastic water bottles, for example, we make loads and loads of those. We make 100 billion garments every year, and about 60% of those are plastics-based. In terms of what's going to be really common, I think things like plastic bottles, plastic bags, ballpoint pens, and so on and so forth. And then also clothing. I think that will be a very distinctive signature.
Clothing is mostly invisible in the archaeological record, and we're really changing the odds by, instead of wearing stuff that is eminently digestible for all kinds of insects and microbes, suddenly making stuff that is almost completely indigestible. There will be this explosion of stuff, which will be very hard to destroy and will fossilize really easily.
CNN: How easy is it for something to be fossilized?
Gabbott: In terms of fossils of plants and animals, a lot of it is luck. Fossilization is rare. However, you can kind of prime your luck by dying in certain environments. You want to die and get buried in an environment where you get buried really quickly. And if you want to become a super-duper, exceptionally lovely preserved fossil, where all of your soft tissues are preserved, then you want to die in sediments that are anoxic (lacking oxygen) or hypersaline.
I would say that most of the materials that we make actually have a higher preservation potential than organic materials. We're making these objects and these materials to be super durable, to resist weathering, to resist sunlight, to resist abrasion and not to be eaten by other animals. We're really giving all these materials a fighting chance of being fossilized. And then we end up sticking loads of them in giant landfills, where we take away water and we wrap them in plastic, and we make them into giant sarcophaguses, which have got really fabulous conditions to help things become fossilized.
CNN: Will it be possible for whole cities to fossilize?
Zalasiewicz: If you're from a city up in the hills like Manchester, where I come from in northern England, it's on the Pennines (a UK mountain range), which are very slowly going up. Eventually, no matter what, everything will erode and break down. The detritus will be washed into the sea. There will be clues in that, but you know they'll be hard (for future paleontologists) to read.
But let's say you're in New Orleans and Amsterdam. They are on bits of crust that are sinking in what we call a downward tectonic escalator. At the same time, sea level is rising, so those cities are going to be drowned. What you'll have is certainly all the kind of substructure stuff, all the pilings, the subway systems and so on. They have a really good chance of surviving more or less intact. Once you're buried, once you've got sediment accumulating on top of you, then the chances of fossilization are really good.
The stuff on top, the skyscrapers and things like that, you would imagine that they would break down into masses of rubble over time. You'd have a kind of rubble layer, part of which will be preserved again, because that'll be underwater. You will have these megafossils, mega technofossils, which will extend for thousands of square kilometers. I mean, extraordinary.
CNN: Will paleontologists of the future understand what they are seeing when they come across technofossils?
Gabbott: It depends on what they come across. I think they'll work out pretty quickly there is this enormous kind of junkyard of stuff. And some of the stuff in there will be fairly easy to work out what it was and what it was used for. But other stuff that might be common might actually be really difficult to work out what it was.
A good example of this might be a mobile phone. If you take a smartphone, it's just a sort of a rectangular object. It's got a plastic backing, so that will preserve beautifully. It's got a glass front, but over time, just a couple of thousand years, glass basically starts to go cloudy.
And, in fact, it starts to look quite ceramic. So, there will be this rectangle, and then inside they'll see different metals. But the smartphone gives very little away in terms of what it was actually used for. They'll see loads and loads of these things. They will know that it was important to the civilization, but what the hell was it used for? It's interesting to think they will have an evolutionary series going from old mobile phones that were like bricks, the clamshell ones and then smartphones. Will they figure it out?
Another big signal that our future civilization may come across is where diversity is decreasing. They are going to see masses and masses of the animals that we grow to eat: chickens and the cows. We now know that only 4% of mammals on the planet are wild mammals. It's astonishing. In fact, in terms of weight, there are more domestic dogs on our planet now than there are wild mammals. They'll see this massive reconfiguration of the diversity of life.
CNN: Will recycling make the fossils of the future harder to identify?
Gabbott: I think we will start to recycle more and more, and there are plans, or at least some research going on, to look at trying to dig up landfills and take out the materials and recycle those. I think this period of time at the moment is, I hope, going to be the most wasteful time. An aluminum can is a brilliant thing to recycle, but a lot of things are actually quite difficult to recycle. A lot of the plastics that we now use can be recycled once and that's it, so we're still going to be getting rid of them. They'll take those difficult-to-recycle materials and use them for something else. So we're now grinding up plastic and making roads out of them. There will be this evolution of the way the materials are used.
CNN: What will be the most spectacular technofossils?
Zalasiewicz: The kind of fossil that causes us to catch our breath and start writing the press releases is when you find the feathers trapped in rock, dinosaurs; not just bones, but blood vessels preserved in the bones and things like that. I suspect that we're creating lots of circumstances where you can get this amazing preservation. We make and throw away lots of stuff like epoxy resin, which will work like amber. We do throw lots of materials into conditions where there is a lack of oxygen, so you slow down decay. One would guess (there will be) wonderful and exceptional preservation here and there that they will happen upon because of the circumstances we've produced entirely by accident.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
A ‘dragon prince' dinosaur is redrawing the tyrannosaur family tree
Sign up for CNN's Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more. Scientists have identified a previously unknown 86 million-year-old dinosaur species that fills an early gap in the fossil record of tyrannosaurs, revealing how they evolved to become massive apex predators. Researchers analyzing the species' remains have named it Khankhuuluu mongoliensis, which translates to 'dragon prince of Mongolia,' because it was small compared with its much larger relatives such as Tyrannosaurus rex, whose name means 'the tyrant lizard king.' The newly identified dinosaur was the closest known ancestor of tyrannosaurs and likely served as a transitional species from earlier tyrannosauroid species, according to the findings published Wednesday in the journal Nature. Based on a reexamination of two partial skeletons uncovered in Mongolia's Gobi Desert in 1972 and 1973, the new study suggests that three big migrations between Asia and North America led tyrannosauroids to diversify and eventually reach a gargantuan size in the late Cretaceous Period before going extinct 66 million years ago. 'This discovery of Khankhuuluu forced us to look at the tyrannosaur family tree in a very different light,' said study coauthor Darla Zelenitsky, associate professor within the department of Earth, energy, and environment at the University of Calgary, in an email. 'Before this, there was a lot of confusion about who was related to who when it came to tyrannosaur species. What started as the discovery of a new species ended up with us rewriting the family history of tyrannosaurs.' Tyrannosaurs, known scientifically as Eutyrannosaurians, bring to mind hulking dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus rex and Tarbosaurus, which weighed multiple metric tons and could take down equally large prey. With short arms and massive heads, they walked on two legs and boasted sharp teeth, Zelenitsky said. But tyrannosaurs didn't start out that way. They evolved from smaller dinosaurs before dominating the landscapes of North America and Asia between 85 million and 66 million years ago, the researchers said. While Tarbosaurus, an ancestor of T. rex, clocked in at between 3,000 and 6,000 kilograms (6,613 pounds and 13,227 pounds), the fleet-footed Khankhuuluu mongoliensis likely weighed only around 750 kilograms (1,653 pounds), spanned just 2 meters (6.5 feet) at the hips and 4 meters (13 feet) in length, according to the study authors. Comparing the two dinosaurs would be like putting a horse next to an elephant —Khankhuuluu would have reached T. rex's thigh in height, Zelenitsky said. 'Khankhuuluu was almost a tyrannosaur, but not quite,' Zelenitsky said. 'The snout bone was hollow rather than solid, and the bones around the eye didn't have all the horns and bumps seen in T. rex or other tyrannosaurs.' Khankhuuluu mongoliensis, or a closely related ancestor species, likely migrated from Asia to North America across a land bridge between Alaska and Siberia that connected the continents 85 million years ago, Zelenitsky said. Because of this migrant species, we now know that tyrannosaurs actually evolved first on the North American continent and remained there exclusively over the next several million years, she said. 'As the many tyrannosaur species evolved on the continent, they became larger and larger.' Due to the poor fossil record, it's unclear what transpired in Asia between 80 million to 85 million years ago, she added. While some Khankhuuluu may have remained in Asia, they were likely replaced later on by larger tyrannosaurs 79 million years ago. Meanwhile, another tyrannosaur species crossed the land bridge back to Asia 78 million years ago, resulting in the evolution of two related but very different subgroups of tyrannosaurs, Zelenitsky said. One was a gigantic, deep-snouted species, while the other known as Alioramins was slender and small. These smaller dinosaurs have been dubbed 'Pinocchio rexes' for their long, shallow snouts. Both types of tyrannosaurs were able to live in Asia and not compete with each other because the larger dinosaurs were top predators, while Alioramins were mid-level predators going after smaller prey — think cheetahs or jackals in African ecosystems today, Zelenitsky said. 'Because of their small size, Alioramins were long thought to be primitive tyrannosaurs, but we novelly show Alioramins uniquely evolved smallness as they had 'miniaturized' their bodies within a part of the tyrannosaur family tree that were all otherwise giants,' Zelenitsky said. One more migration happened as tyrannosaurs continued to evolve, and a gigantic tyrannosaur species crossed back into North America 68 million years ago, resulting in Tyrannosaurus rex, Zelenitsky said. 'The success and diversity of tyrannosaurs is thanks to a few migrations between the two continents, starting with Khankhuuluu,' she said. 'Tyrannosaurs were in the right place at the right time. They were able to take advantage of moving between continents, likely encountering open niche spaces, and quickly evolving to become large, efficient killing machines.' The new findings support previous research suggesting that Tyrannosaurus rex's direct ancestor originated in Asia and migrated to North America via a land bridge and underscore the importance of Asia in the evolutionary success of the tyrannosaur family, said Cassius Morrison, a doctoral student of paleontology at University College London. Morrison was not involved in the new research. 'The new species provides essential data and information in part of the family tree with few species, helping us to understand the evolutionary transition of tyrannosaurs from small/ medium predators to large apex predators,' Morrison wrote in an email. The study also shows that the Alioramini group, once considered distant relatives, were very close cousins of T. rex. What makes the fossils of the new species so crucial is their age — 20 million years older than T. rex, said Steve Brusatte, professor and personal chair of Palaeontology and Evolution at the University of Edinburgh. Brusatte was not involved in the new study. 'There are so few fossils from this time, and that is why these scientists describe it as 'murky,'' Brusatte said. 'It has been a frustrating gap in the record, like if you suspected something really important happened in your family history at a certain time, like a marriage that started a new branch of the family or immigration to a new country, but you had no records to document it. The tyrannosaur family tree was shaped by migration, just like so many of our human families.' With only fragments of fossils available, it's been difficult to understand the variation of tyrannosaurs as they evolved, said Thomas Carr, associate professor of biology at Carthage College in Wisconsin and director of the Carthage Institute of Paleontology. Carr was not involved in the new research. But the new study sheds light on the dinosaurs' diversity and clarifies which ones existed when — and how they overlapped with one another, he said. More samples from the fossil record will provide additional clarity, but the new work illustrates the importance of reexamining fossils collected earlier. 'We know so much more about tyrannosaurs now,' Carr said. 'A lot of these historical specimens are definitely worth their weight in gold for a second look.' When the fossils were collected half a century ago, they were only briefly described at the time, Brusatte said. 'So many of us in the paleontology community knew that these Mongolian fossils were lurking in museum drawers, waiting to be studied properly, and apt to tell their own important part of the tyrannosaur story,' he said. 'It's almost like there was a non-disclosure agreement surrounding these fossils, and it's now expired, and they can come out and tell their story.'


CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
Hear from UFO believers who hope Trump will finally prove them right
CNN's Donie O'Sullivan travels to "Contact in the Desert," the self-proclaimed largest UFO and UAP conference in the world. UFO enthusiasts and experts meet annually here to discuss everything from telepathy to recent sightings.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
What a Spiral in the Oort Cloud Could Mean for Life on Earth
A routine planetarium show at New York's Hayden Planetarium just triggered a potentially historic discovery in astrophysics. While curating scenes for 'Encounters in the Milky Way,' a team of scientists and animators stumbled across something surprising: a spiral structure hidden within the data modeling the Oort Cloud, which is one of the most mysterious regions in our solar system. The Oort Cloud, theorized to be a spherical shell of icy objects orbiting far beyond Neptune, has long remained unseen. Yet when astrophysicist Jackie Faherty noticed the unexpected shape during a simulation, she called in Oort Cloud expert David Nesvorny to investigate, according to a CNN report. It wasn't an animation glitch. It was real data. Nesvorny, who had generated the simulation, admitted he'd never viewed his data in three-dimensional Cartesian coordinates. When he did, the spiral structure emerged clearly. 'Weird way to discover things,' he said. 'I should know my data better.' This accidental find prompted Nesvorny to run weeks of simulations on NASA's Pleiades Supercomputer. Every model confirmed it: a spiral, caused not by the sun's gravity alone, but by the galactic tide—the pull of the Milky Way's own gravitational field acting on the outermost parts of our solar system. Ultimately, he published the findings in The Astrophysics Journal. The discovery reshapes long-held assumptions. While the outer Oort Cloud might still be spherical, the inner part appears to twist in a spiral pattern, suggesting our solar system is more dynamically connected to the galaxy than once thought. Still, verifying the spiral won't be easy. The icy bodies in the Oort Cloud are too small and distant to observe directly. Even with the powerful new Vera C. Rubin Observatory, scientists expect to find only a handful—far short of the numbers needed to fully confirm the structure. But as Faherty put it, the dome of a planetarium can now double as a tool of discovery. 'This is science that hasn't had time to reach your textbook yet,' she said. What a Spiral in the Oort Cloud Could Mean for Life on Earth first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 11, 2025