
An old Capitol Hill troublemaker is trying to clinch a megabill deal
It's a scene jarringly familiar to many Republicans on Capitol Hill: a high-stakes piece of legislation, a tense standoff between GOP leaders and conservative hard-liners — and Mark Meadows in the middle of it all.
The former North Carolina congressman and Donald Trump chief of staff has been lying low in recent years. But he's re-emerged as a behind-the-scenes sounding board for Republican hard-liners, who view him as an informal conduit with the White House as they try to shape the president's 'big, beautiful bill.'
It's just the latest turn for Meadows, who played a central role in ousting John Boehner as speaker, then served as conservative gadfly in Paul Ryan's House GOP before leaving for the White House. He was at Trump's side through 2020 until the ignominious end of his first term.
His most recent headlines have concerned his role in the 'stop the steal' efforts that followed the 2020 election and his interactions with Trump during the Jan. 6 Capitol riots. Reports of an immunity deal and his testimony to a federal grand jury made him persona non grata in some MAGA circles.
But Meadows, who declined to comment for this story, has maintained a foothold on the hard right as a senior partner at the Conservative Partnership Institute — a conservative think tank in Washington headed by former South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint. It's where the current iteration of the House Freedom Caucus, which Meadows once led, huddles for its weekly meetings, and he keeps in frequent touch with the group's members.
Those conversations have heated up in recent weeks as the GOP megabill has moved to the top of the Capitol Hill agenda.
This past Tuesday evening, for instance, Meadows ventured into the Capitol complex to meet with a small cadre of hard-liners from both chambers: GOP Sens. Rick Scott of Florida, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Mike Lee of Utah, as well as Reps. Chip Roy of Texas and Scott Perry of Pennsylvania.
The meeting in Lee's office, which was first reported by POLITICO, focused on how the right flank could hang onto some of its biggest priorities in the House version of the megabill, while trying to eke out some new wins in the Senate.
'He's just trying to figure out how to thread the needle here,' Johnson said in an interview.
Added Scott, 'Mark is trying to help get a deal done.'
All five sitting lawmakers who attended the Tuesday evening meeting have threatened to oppose Trump's domestic-policy package if it doesn't meet their demands, a strategy Meadows is no stranger to.
He played a key role, for instance, in shaping the first attempt at major party-line legislation in Trump's first term — a 2017 attempt to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. He pushed as Freedom Caucus chair to make the bill much more aggressive in undoing the 2010 law's mandates.
Meadows helped broker deals that ultimately got a bill through the House, but it went too far for key senators, and the effort fizzled.
Now, according to Republicans who have spoken with him, Meadows has been helpful in brainstorming ideas for hard-liners as they seek to force as many of their demands into the bill as possible. He's also viewed by others as eager to stay in the mix on Capitol Hill — akin to a sort of MAGA Zelig who likes to be where the action is.
'He wants to be involved,' said one House Republican, who was skeptical that Meadows is serving a GOP interest larger than himself.
It's unclear whether Meadows' role has been blessed by the White House, where opinions about 'The Chief's Chief' — as Meadows titled his memoir — vary widely. Administration officials are aware of Meadows' quiet shuttle diplomacy in the name of the president's signature policy item. Even if the Trump administration hasn't formally sanctioned his role, GOP lawmakers see him as someone who still has the ear of the president and his advisors.
Scott noted that Meadows has 'a good working relationship with the White House.' Johnson said it was his impression that Meadows is still actively engaged with the administration, even though he's technically out of government.
'It's my understanding that President Trump's former chiefs stay in touch with him,' Johnson said, adding that Meadows is trying to play a 'helpful role.'
Meadows grew so loyal at one point that Trump publicly lauded Meadows during a 2020 rally for physically staying by his side when he contracted Covid. But after Trump lost the election and amid the post-Jan. 6 flurry of congressional and federal investigations, the president and some top MAGA figures increasingly saw Meadows as an unreliable ally given reports about a possible federal immunity deal.
'Some people would make [an immunity] deal, but they are weaklings and cowards,' Trump wrote in 2023. 'I don't think that Mark Meadows is one of them, but who really knows?'
In the end, Meadows was never charged federally and Trump's indictment on conspiracy changes related to the 2020 election never went to trial. Then, after Trump's re-election, Meadows assumed his quiet role as power broker.
Meadows has popped up in the House at several big moments in recent months. He huddled with hard-liners and House GOP leaders separately during speaker election fights, including when a small group of conservatives ousted Kevin McCarthy in October 2023.
He emerged from Speaker Mike Johnson's office just a few days before Trump's inauguration before being spotted on the House side of the Capitol multiple times later in the spring. Asked if he was working on Trump's behalf, Meadows replied: 'Oh no, I'm just here for a brief meeting.'
He headed into the speaker's office late last month hours before the Louisiana Republican pulled off what many believed to be impossible — passing the House version of the megabill with the support of every Freedom Caucus member, save Chair Andy Harris of Maryland, who voted present.
Unlike with Boehner, Ryan and McCarthy, Meadows is more ideologically aligned with Mike Johnson. The two men were both part of a group of House Republicans who took on the role of Trump's unofficial defenders during his first Senate impeachment trial, and Johnson — while never a member — has long had close ties to the Freedom Caucus, including when Meadows chaired the group.
Now members of the Freedom Caucus are still in regular contact with Meadows, and the House GOP is studded with old Meadows allies, such as fellow HFC co-founder and current Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), who estimated he still talks to Meadows once a week. Many of them see his low-key involvement in megabill talks as being in line with his general approach.
Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.), who said he sees Meadows regularly, said he wouldn't be surprised if Meadows was 'facilitating' conversations, summing up his general approach as 'like, how do you get this done?'
Rachael Bade contributed to this report.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
12 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Sen. Padilla's removal from Noem event indicative of Trump's cynical policies
The slam down, handcuffing and forceful removal of Sen. Alex Padilla from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference on Thursday flows from the violence and unrest caused by President Donald Trump's policies to go after the undocumented immigrants where they work, shop and go to school. Immigrants are not criminals but hard-working people (often in jobs others would not consider) who pay taxes and contribute significantly to our economy. They have been allowed to stay in the United States, often for generations, because they are needed Both political parties have failed to pass legislation that would deal with immigration in an efficient and humane way. The most recent attempt, before the presidential election, would have passed but for the opposition of candidate Trump, who cynically sought to exploit the issue. I fear he is now exploiting the unrest he is causing to use it as a means to declare martial law and gain absolute power. Tom Miller, Oakland Deport the worst I am somewhat appalled by the media describing the disruptions in Los Angeles as mostly peaceful demonstrations protected by free speech, accompanied by pictures of burning cars, looting and attacks on police. If these people want to peacefully join our society, why are some of them waving Mexican and, in a few cases, BLM flags? If they intend to intimidate me, they should return to their own country, self-identified by the flag they are waving. Most of our forebears came here legally and peacefully, including, in my case, some from Mexico. I would be happy with a system that screens potential citizens, and excludes those who want to commit crimes or intimidate those around them. I approve of President Donald Trump's stated goal of deporting the worst first. We need to get rid of those who commit crimes. I would be happy to see new citizens, but not the thugs who intimidate us through their demonstrations. Peter Behr, San Anselmo Newsom is right Regarding 'Trump vs. Newsom an ugly skirmish that benefits both politicians' (Politics, June 10): The story suggests that President Donald Trump's search for dictatorial powers through intimidation, fear and escalating violence, and Gov Gavin Newsom calling this out is simply a tit-for-tat play for the attention of an uninformed public. It is becoming more obvious that Trump is trying to tear down the guardrails of civil society, trash the Constitution and eliminate all opposition. If Gov. Newsom did not express his strong, powerful and articulate opposition to this despicable behavior, he would not be doing his job. The Chronicle must not be afraid to illuminate the fact that Trump is a mortal danger to our democratic way of life. Kanda Alahan, Concord


Buzz Feed
14 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
18 People Reacted To Trump Possibly Pardoning Diddy
As you probably know by now, Sean 'Diddy' Combs was indicted in 2024 on federal charges including sex trafficking and racketeering. Recently, HuffPost and BuzzFeed wrote about how Fox News reporter Peter Doocy asked the president if he would consider pardoning Diddy. Trump told Doocy, "I haven't spoken to him in years. He used to really like me a lot, but I think when I ran for politics, that relationship busted up, from what I read." "I don't know, he didn't tell me that. But I'd read some … nasty statements in the paper all of a sudden." Trump, who once ran in the same wealthy social circles as Diddy, continued, "You know, it's different. You become a much different person when you run for politics, and you do what's right. I could do other things, and I'm sure he'd like me, and I'm sure other people would like me, but it wouldn't be as good for our country." In other words, Trump didn't give a definitive answer on whether he would pardon Diddy. People in the comments had a lot to say on the topic. Here are some of the best replies: "If Diddy is found guilty, he should not be pardoned. Stop pardoning people who were found or plead guilty." —cole Melton "When considering whether to pardon someone, Trump couldn't care less about whether a person is guilty. As long as the person has some kind words for Trump and/or helped Trump get even richer, the person has a good chance of getting a pardon." "Ask Trump voters if they voted for this corruption of the pardon system."—Carl Hayman "The fact that Trump commented on pardoning Diddy during an active, ongoing trial…I am just speechless. It completely undermines the entire justice system." "Always follow the money. Trump is using the power to pardon as an ATM. He only cares about the next money making opportunity, not law and order, justice, the Constitution, or keeping the guilty in jail. And most assuredly not you and me." —d icard "Even MAGA people on Fox and Breitbart are exploding over this. They hate this idea. Democrats need to keep the topic of Trump possibly pardoning Diddy front and center. Talk about it whenever they can. Keep it in the headlines." —TACO Trump "He says, 'I would certainly look at the facts.' And then what? Ignore them like he did with the results of the 2020 election? It used to be that if you wanted to win a high political office, you had to have character. Now all it takes (at least if you're a Republican) is to be a character." —Carl Olson "'You are the company you keep' has never been more true than as it relates to these two." "There is no justice system if anyone can simply prove love to their president and get a pardon." —Cory Crete"Pardons are now for sale."—James Gettings "Well, being liked is obviously the most important factor in any pardon." —Les Vogt "This isn't just grotesque; it's the rot made visible. Trump floating a pardon for a man indicted for sex trafficking, while reminiscing about party invitations and wounded egos, is less a statement of justice than a confession of moral bankruptcy. It's not about innocence or guilt — it's about whether someone 'used to really like' him." "In Trump's world, the law isn't sacred; it's a velvet rope outside a nightclub, waved aside with the casual shrug of a man picking names from a guest list."—Miles West "If our Republic is still standing in a few years, a different Congress must amend the Constitution to limit presidential pardons." "No more presidential pardons. I would let them commute death sentences, but nothing more. Enough of this abuse. These people had their day in court and have had chances to appeal. I don't trust anyone with that power anymore. Get rid of it." —Charles James "It's so weird (but so typical) that Trump has to tell everyone that Diddy 'used to like me a lot,' as if that's the most relevant thing about the issue. What a terrible thing it must be to live a life actually believing inside that you're incapable of being loved. That's the overriding reality that has made Trump who he is — an immensely insecure, flawed man." —David Hardy "'When you're president you do what's right.' I can't believe he said that because he certainly doesn't abide by that whatsoever." —Jenny Tayla "Whenever he talks about anyone — and I mean anyone — he always comments on if that person likes him or not. Narcissistic dictator." "I pray that Trump does not pardon Diddy. He's just as bad as Jeffrey Epstein and R. Kelly." —smileyzombie492 "Trump is sans empathy. He is a woman-hating dumpster fire." —jamesnylan And finally, "At least he didn't say he would. I was relieved to not read even that. The bar is low. 😭" The article people commented on originally appeared on HuffPost.

Politico
27 minutes ago
- Politico
Florida plans for peak hurricane season amid storm of FEMA reforms
TALLAHASSEE, Florida — The Trump administration's talk about drastically altering FEMA's role in disaster recovery has generated heavy uncertainty. But hurricane season is now in full-swing, and with more experience in storm recovery than any other state, Florida's local emergency management officials are trying to stay focused on staying prepared. Florida's storm season began June 1. With the most active, historically volatile stretch a couple months away, county emergency managers have no time to plan for changes that FEMA, the White House and conservative allies have been discussing for some time. Instead, the state's disaster recovery network has decided to rely on itself — even if they may need federal assistance down the road. Jonathan Lord, president of the Florida Emergency Preparedness Association, said most county managers determined the risk of a powerful storm is greater than six months of talk about ways to cut federal disaster funding. 'Emergency managers can't let that noise blur what they need to do for their community,' Lord said. 'Whatever our federal government decides to do, we at the local level will just morph or evolve our programs to adjust to that new reality.' Florida has the history to back up their prep work: The devastation from Category 5 Hurricane Andrew in 1992 prompted officials to create a statewide emergency network that became a model for other states to follow. This safety net is fine-tuned after every hurricane season, from evacuation and sheltering plans managed by counties, to new training and education requirements for county emergency managers recently finalized by the state Legislature. But despite Florida's experience and expertise, the state historically has also relied on tens of billions of recovery dollars provided by FEMA. In most cases, the agency will agree to reimburse 75 percent of recovery costs incurred by the state, counties and municipalities impacted by a hurricane. But in many cases, FEMA has also agreed to cover 100 percent of the costs if the loss was deemed catastrophic, or if the community had no other means to cover repair bills. In 2022, Category 4 Hurricane Ian left Lee County with the largest cleanup bill in state history. A FEMA database of the $2.2 billion in funding requests awarded to Ian-impacted communities shows the agency agreed to cover 100 percent of Lee County's bills from the first several weeks after landfall. The days of 100 percent coverage from FEMA are expected to be far less frequent as the White House continues to review wasteful government spending. Florida Division of Emergency Management Director Kevin Guthrie told a joint-legislative budget committee meeting in June a similar message. 'Instead of us getting 100 percent disaster declarations for a period of time, those days are probably over,' Guthrie said as he defended his request for $850 million to cover costs from the hurricanes, flooding and tornadoes that hit the state last year. FEMA's case-by-case decision to award 100 percent funding has been a lifesaver for Florida's rural counties. After Category 5 Hurricane Michael tore through the Panhandle in 2018, FEMA had initially only agreed to cover 75 percent of the recovery costs incurred by counties impacted by the storm. Calhoun County was faced with millions in critical cleanup costs, but the county only had about $3 million on hand to front the millions more in cleanup costs that FEMA had agreed to pay. Those terms changed after Gov. Ron DeSantis took office three months after Michael made landfall and negotiated with the then-Trump White House to cover 100 percent of the costs that came up in the first several weeks after landfall. Guthrie's prediction on future federal disaster funding mirrors an April memo drafted by then-acting FEMA Administrator Cameron Hamilton. The memo, which Hamilton sent to the White House Office of Management and Budget, summarizes options to cut federal disaster spending, including increasing the share of the costs left to states and localities, and no longer agreeing to cover more than 75 percent. 'This is an action the President has already taken and can continue to take to reduce disaster costs,' Hamilton wrote in the memo, later adding, 'The President would retain authority to grant cost share exceptions.' President Donald Trump announced plans to eliminate FEMA shortly after he began his second White House term in January. Hamilton was fired by Trump in May after he told a House committee that FEMA should not be eliminated. He was replaced by now-acting FEMA Administrator David Richardson, who pushed forward with a reorganizational plan that sought to end FEMA's oversight of recovery projects meant to help shield communities from devastation left by future storms. Richardson walked back his plans ahead of the start of this year's hurricane season on June 1, and Trump has since said plans to wind down FEMA will not take place until the season ends at the end of November. Without any concrete decisions from Washington, Florida's county emergency managers have pressed ahead preparing for this year's hurricane season. Eric Poole, director for the Institute of County Government at the Florida Association of Counties, said most county managers are confident the terms of a disaster declaration, which dictate the amount of money FEMA is willing to pay for storm recovery costs, will still be left to the discretion of the president. 'There's always going to be the discretion of the president through FEMA to increase the cost of a disaster,' Poole said. 'It's all going to depend on the severity of the event and the community and its fiscal capacity, and someone in the executive saying we've got to help these guys out.' Plans to slash federal disaster funding are not new to the Trump administration. FEMA's initial offer to only reimburse 75 percent of the devastation left by Hurricane Michael left Bay County, where the storm made landfall, to take out a $50 million loan to cover critical costs such as removing debris from roads. Other impacted counties, which are deemed as 'fiscally constrained' by the state based on low property tax revenue, saw recovery efforts stall for several months. The limited cash assistance from FEMA was part of an effort led in coordination with then-Gov. Rick Scott to make counties and cities pay a larger share of the recovery costs. This tough love approach to cash assistance was reversed by DeSantis, who convinced Trump to cover a significant chunk of recovery costs in the first weeks after he became governor. 'There's definitely trepidation for not knowing what might happen, or concern for something that might have been reimbursable at some level but may not be available come year's end,' Lord, who is also the Flagler County director of emergency management, said. 'That impacts budgets and cash reserves, which there is concern about, but at this point we just don't know.' One chronic problem with FEMA's Public Assistance grant program: The agency sometimes takes months to approve recovery funding requests. To help mitigate the delay, the Legislature in 2022 created a new trust fund that allows the state Division of Emergency Management to front cash for critical cleanup projects on behalf of counties and cities, allowing the recovery work to continue as the state negotiates reimbursements with FEMA. 'That $1 billion allows us to actually respond without having to worry about the federal government,' Guthrie told lawmakers as he explained his recent request for $850 million to cover last year's storms. 'We go out the door, we're ready to do what we need to do without dependency on the federal government.' The state Division of Emergency Management is an offshoot of the governor's office. The new trust fund allows DeSantis' office to draw money to support all executive orders, which includes efforts to combat illegal immigration. But despite concerns from lawmakers, Guthrie said only $9 million of the $850 million he requested was to cover outstanding bills tied to immigration. The rest of the money, which the joint-legislative panel approved, will go toward unpaid bills from last year's flooding, tornadoes and hurricanes. 'We do have flooding and we do have tornadoes and then there's severe hurricanes,' Guthrie said, adding the unpaid immigration enforcement bills, 'came to a very small amount.' State lawmakers will soon present their budget to DeSantis for the next fiscal year, which begins July 1, and talks between the House and Senate included plans by Trump to eliminate FEMA. State Senate budget chair Ed Hooper (R-Palm Harbor) said the prospects of losing the federal agency scared him when considering how to control state spending. One option already under consideration for future state budgets, should FEMA reduce federal recovery spending, was to add more cash to the state budget stabilization fund. 'We just have to take into account how we're going to get things done,' Hooper said. Guthrie was once considered a candidate to become FEMA administrator, but he was instead appointed by Trump to the FEMA Review Council, which will advise the White House as it makes changes to the agency. State House Appropriations Chair Lawrence McClure said Guthrie's role could play to Florida's advantage, especially with freeing up chronic issues with the agency approving recovery funding requests made by the state. 'Although we look further to maybe a reconstruction or recalibration of FEMA, we also have the federal government — I mean this is the United States, right?' McClure said. 'We take care of each other.'