
Art Is a Powerful Tool to Fight Racial Injustice
Larcenia Floyd died in 2018, two years before George. But when her son was being asphyxiated to death by Derek Chauvin, he screamed for her. It was the 'Mama!' heard around the world, an anguished incantation that called millions into the streets to protest.
That wail of loss—the sound of a ripped-apart parent and child—to the cold hands of premature death has been a commonplace of Black American life throughout history. Scholar Ruth Wilson Gilmore has described it this way: 'Racism, specifically, is the state-sanctioned or extralegal production and exploitation of group-differentiated vulnerability to premature death.' Poet laureate Gwendolyn Brooks put the same thought in these terms: 'we jazz June/we die soon,' she wrote in her seminal poem 'We Real Cool.'
In 2010, fine artist Titus Kaphar completed the painting Father and Son. It depicts scholar W.E.B. DuBois—arguably the greatest thinker of the 20th century—with a cutout where his son might have been, lying across his lap. Kaphar's piece is a contemporary pieta, one not based in the story of Mary cradling the body of Jesus after his descent from the cross, but instead, one from Black history. In DuBois' 1903 classic, The Souls of Black Folk, he included the autobiographical essay 'Of the Passing of the First Born' about the death of his toddler son Burghardt, a death that might have been avoided had the diphtheria vaccine been made available to Black people in Atlanta where DuBois was working as a professor at Atlanta University. DuBois carried that grief with him as he wrote essays, fiction, and pageants, as he edited The Crisis, the journal of the NAACP, as he rose and fell as a leader when the nation and many of his peers grew to consider him too strident, too far left, too unflinching. Kaphar's stirring portrait was completed 107 years after Souls and 47 years after DuBois' death. It followed, but it also foretold. Father and Son preceded what we think of as the beginning of the Black Lives Matter era by three years, which we tend to date to the acquittal of George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, in 2013. Kaphar continued to paint portraits of parents without children in the second decade of this century as we saw the parade of sonless mothers who came to be known as 'Mothers of the Movement,' a chilling redux of images of the 1960s.
These repetitions reveal a harrowing truth. Such a portrait is timeless as long as racial inequality far too frequently sinks life and chances of life in this country. And despite the shrill denials heard in anti-DEI and anti-'woke' platforms, the evidence is clear: Racial inequality is as it ever was in the United States.
Art is a particularly powerful tool in this moment because it can offer more than just points for debate. Art can engage not just the intellect, but the soul, hence the aptly titled DuBois classic. It resonates with our greatest hopes and deepest frustrations. Above all, it buoys the spirit, enabling us to continue to press for a better future, but also to imagine what that future might be by refusing the idea that our bodies are fated for abuse and destruction.
I have often attested to the beauty of raising Black children because I believe we deserve to feel something more than the fear of raising children in a dangerous and unequal world. I want to affirm that joy keeps us going when terror feels overwhelming using my art—writing—and my intellect as the vehicle for truth.
But, having lived through the mass death of COVID-19 and now living in the age of backlash against everything that made my life possible as a Black woman professor, it is undeniable that notwithstanding the multimillion-strong season of protest in honor of George Floyd's life, we aren't on more solid ground. In fact, we have been pushed off land and find ourselves treading water. Ours is a living inside a cascade of crises that have compounded over the past 15, 10, five years, despite the moments of respite and promises of transformation. We have marched and sung. We have voted, protested, and pleaded. And yet, suffering persists, the water deepens. It makes you wanna holler a 'mama' of your own. (And perhaps you heard the echo of Marvin Gaye's 1971 track 'Inner City Blues.')
It is no wonder, then, that in African American culture, art has flourished in the worst of times. In 1900, for instance, three years before DuBois published The Souls of Black Folk, civil rights leader and poet James Weldon Johnson and musician J. Rosamund Johnson composed 'Lift Every Voice and Sing'—the song we now know as the Black National Anthem. One hundred and twenty-five years ago, 500 Black schoolchildren in Florida first sang it to celebrate President Abraham Lincoln's birthday. The song became incredibly popular with Black Americans in the first decades of the 20th century. It resonated because it told the story of Black Americans' struggle in epic terms, detailing endurance and fostering hope and collective responsibility. In 1926, when Carter G. Woodson formally declared 'Negro History Week' in February (a ritual that would grow to become Black History Month in the 1970s), the song became an integral part of that annual ritual celebrated in school, religious, and civic life. The effect of singing that anthem together deepened the faith of students and their communities in the possibility of justice and strengthened the conviction that each one had a hand in transformation. A noble inheritance demanded as much.
1926 was also the year in which DuBois published the article 'Criteria of Negro Art' in which he famously said 'all Art is propaganda' speaking directly to Black American artists. The message was that artists had a hand in the struggle for human and civil rights, and therefore, should put their gifts in service to that duty. Though I would not be as heavy-handed as DuBois—I don't believe all art must be propaganda—it is certainly clear to me that art (visual art, music, literature, and dance) is essential for freedom dreaming. This is no less true in 2025 than it was in 2020, 1926, or 1903.
Still, like many I suspect, I wonder if my words work—if my art matters in these moments of struggle. I need only look to others to be reminded.
Mario Moore's painting Henry Bibb and/or Mary Ann Shadd hangs on my wall. In it, a Black woman in a purple embroidered robe faces the water. The title is powerful. Mary Ann Shadd was an abolitionist, a suffrage activist, the first Black woman publisher in North America and the second Black American woman to graduate from law school. Henry Bibb was born into slavery, escaped, and made his way to freedom through Detroit (Moore's hometown) to reach Canada. After emancipation, he would write an important abolitionist narrative. The woman in Moore's painting gazes at the Detroit River. In the antebellum era, crossing that watery border was a near-certain passage to freedom. The painting is for me, and I think for many who see it when it circulates in museums or on computer screens, a reminder of the once treacherous and even deadly pathways to freedom. Even more, it begs us to seek inspiration from those who traveled them as we face treachery today.
I learned this implicitly in my own life course, too. I frequently say that as a writer I haunt the past. By that I mean I gaze into it to find the content through which we might craft our moral imaginations today. So many of the neglected and abused of generations past have a great deal to teach us. And if we can recognize the full ugliness in our past, we might be better at creating beauty in its stead for the future.
It wasn't only in my studies that I learned this, but also in my encounters with art. Like so much of Generation X, I grew up on Stevie Wonder's Songs in the Key of Life double album. His song 'Love's in Need of Love Today' was a particularly potent teacher. It gave credence to the ever-present terror that existed in a world filled to the brim with disasters. And yet, it also issued a belief that a disposition toward love—a discipline of hope, to borrow words from abolitionist Mariame Kaba—makes the difference.
Recently, I have spent a lot of time listening to Milton + Esperanza, an album pairing octogenarian Brazilian jazz singer and multi-instrumentalist Milton Nascimiento and American bassist and vocalist esperanza spalding. Nascimiento has influenced generations of musicians across the globe. spalding is a contemporary phenom. Watching their NPR Tiny Desk Concert, I was as moved by the lush, exhilarating music as I was by their obvious deep friendship and love across generations. From Nascimiento to spalding there is inheritance, from spalding to Nascimiento there is homage. They are, like me, both descendants of the transatlantic slave trade, and generations turned from centuries of racial violence and injustice. And through the current hysteria-inducing political chaos that engulfs us, I reach for the space they create, one where love and care are apparent. It is a salve and also a reminder of who we are and what we come from.
It is hard to avoid cynicism, especially now. Especially with so much behind us and possibly even more before us. To bolster ourselves, many of us who do creative and intellectual work have been holding fast to a quote from Toni Morrison. It seems to be in constant circulation on social media platforms: '…This is precisely the time when artists go to work—not when everything is fine, but in times of dread. That's our job!'
What too often is left out in the meme-ing, however, is that Morrison attributed those words to a friend of hers. This friend was responding to Morrison's depression about national politics in 2004. That friend's words reminded Morrison of the dangerous conditions in which so much great art has been made. Morrison concluded the essay she wrote for the Nation that described this interaction by saying, 'I know the world is bruised and bleeding, and though it is important not to ignore its pain, it is also critical to refuse to succumb to its malevolence. Like failure, chaos contains information that can lead to knowledge—even wisdom. Like art.' Indeed, she kept creating until her final days, like DuBois, through war and injustice and even after the passing of her second-born son, Slade.
Morrison's remarkable courage is a reminder that the value of art in these times is much greater than how it might inspire people to action alone. It exists in art's power to allow us to find meaning notwithstanding mourning, to imagine our way out of the morass of our present moment or personal challenges, and to keep us living rather than frozen in fear and anguish. Take, for example, the Blues—that foundational American music born on plantations and in penitentiaries—and how it insisted upon the full humanity of Black people in the harshest of conditions. Indeed, the Blues tradition might explain why George Floyd himself turned to one of Blues' musical descendants, hip-hop, when he was trying to turn his life around, an effort that ultimately brought him to Minneapolis, where he was killed.
Art does not forestall injustice. It does not shape policy or create law. It is not the same work as political organizing or protest. But it is indispensable. One need only to look at the joy of line dancing on social media and the majesty of Mardi Gras krewes in New Orleans for current examples. Each season we find new iterations of old habits, ones that refresh culture but also keep tradition alive. That combination allows us to more deeply contemplate our condition— to meditate on that which would be right and good. Most of all, it helps us find and nourish love. Love is indeed in need of love today. For our children. For all of us.
Over 20 years ago, when I first embarked on parenthood, I thought of all the music, all the dancing, all the literature, all the museum exhibitions, all of the folk wisdom, the seeds of folklore, and the creative language that I had to offer my children from my tradition. My heart was full with gifts. Despite the inevitability of racism, they were born to an abundant inheritance that I insisted upon affirming at every turn. That is what I was given, that is what I gave, that is what we must continue to give, even as our hearts are broken. Again.
There are and will be more empty-armed parents and children. In my own family, we've embraced the empty-armed and felt empty-armed in the past two years with the deaths of two of my cousins who are survived by parents and children. I believe that, albeit indirectly, losing them, both men under age 60, is a legacy of the persistent seeping force of racial injustice, snaking like smoke through our lives.
The question is not whether we will grieve (we are, mightily) but whether we will find the means to survive the grief and live to fight the injustice. Art is a way.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Corrupt Cop Who Leaked To Proud Boys Learns His Fate
Shane Lamond, the former leader of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department's intelligence division, will spend 18 months in prison for leaking information ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol to Henry 'Enrique' Tarrio, the leader of the far-right Proud Boys. U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson sentenced Lamond on Friday morning. Tarrio is a free man after President Donald Trump pardoned him in January. Tarrio had been sentenced to serve 22 years in prison for seditious conspiracy charges but instead was in the courthouse on Friday, watching the proceedings. Also present was Oath Keepers leader Elmer Stewart Rhodes. Like Tarrio, Rhodes was charged and convicted of seditious conspiracy. Trump commuted Rhodes' 18-year sentence. Lamond was found guilty last year of obstruction of justice and lying to federal investigators at the FBI and Department of Justice after a bench trial before Jackson in Washington, D.C. He waived his right to a jury trial. Prosecutors originally sought a sentence of four years. The FBI and DOJ opened a probe into Lamond's conduct in 2021 after the December 2020 burning of a Black Lives Matter banner at a historic Black church in Washington, D.C. Tarrio was charged with destroying the banner and sentenced to five months in prison. At Lamond's trial, prosecutors said it was thanks to Lamond that Tarrio was tipped off about the banner investigation and learned that a warrant for his arrest was incoming. At trial, prosecutors accused Lamond of telling Tarrio that police had footage of Tarrio burning the banner and warning him that the FBI and Secret Service were 'all spun up' about the Proud Boys' presence in Washington. Tarrio had appeared on Infowars and said members of the extremist group would start prowling public events incognito or dressed up as supporters of Joe Biden. Lamond kept that conversation — and many others — from his colleagues at the department who were pursuing the banner probe. One omission included a meeting of Tarrio and Lamond just three days after the banner burning. Ahead of the meeting, Tarrio pressed Lamond about how the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department perceived the Proud Boys. Lamond wouldn't say over text. Instead, he asked Tarrio to meet him for a beer at a local bar. Lamond denied ever hearing a confession from Tarrio that night at the bar or at any other time in their communications leading up to Jan. 6. When Tarrio took the stand at Lamond's trial, the Proud Boys leader denied ever making a confession to Lamond but stumbled when prosecutors presented him with a secret Telegram chat. The chat showed Tarrio asking Lamond if police would add the hate crime enhancement to the destruction charge and Lamond telling him he had been asking supervisors at MPD about it. The intelligence division chief told Tarrio that if he were going to be charged with a hate crime, then police would have to start investigating hate crime charges for Trump flags burned in the district. From the witness stand, Tarrio smirked and told the courtroom: 'Whoever said this is a genius because he is right.' Records showed that Lamond and Tarrio spoke for months over text, sharing at least 500 texts. They typically used iMessage or Google to chat. But after the 2020 election, Lamond asked Tarrio to move their conversations to an encrypted texting app. A forensic review of Lamond's and Tarrio's devices showed many of the messages in the encrypted app were set to delete automatically, something a law enforcement officer would not typically do, or be encouraged to do, when engaging with a confidential human source. Lamond's supervisors also told the judge during the trial that using Telegram to speak with a source secretly, or disclosing investigators were 'all spun up' was something that would have never been authorized by the department. FBI agents who testified about the texts between the men said the imbalance in Lamond's relationship with Tarrio was clear: Tarrio rarely provided useful information to Lamond about Proud Boys activities or whereabouts that weren't already available through Tarrio's own social media posts. Messages on Tarrio's device showed him telling fellow Proud Boys that he knew the warrant was incoming thanks to his D.C. cop contact. The knowledge, according to prosecutors, allowed Tarrio to coordinate his arrest on Jan. 4, 2021, giving him a helpful alibi for his whereabouts on Jan. 6. He was only held in jail briefly, however, and then he was ordered out of Washington, D.C. Tarrio obliged; he left D.C. and headed to a hotel room in Baltimore, Maryland, where he watched the rioting unfold and cheered on Proud Boys from afar online and in private discussions. As Lamond sat right across from him inside Jackson's courtroom last year, Tarrio said he had lied to fellow Proud Boys about knowing the warrant was coming. It was a sort of 'marketing ploy,' Tarrio said, because he knew it would invigorate and excite members of the extremist group. Lamond has denied being a 'double agent' and denied having any sympathy for the Proud Boys. This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Biden book author reveals how White House staff truly felt about Karine Jean-Pierre as press secretary
CHICAGO - One of the authors of the new bombshell Joe Biden book pulled back the curtain Thursday on how White House staffers truly felt about former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre. During their book tour in Chicago, "Original Sin" authors Alex Thompson and Jake Tapper were asked about the announcement of Jean-Pierre's new book promising to shed light on the "broken White House" she worked in and that she left the Democratic Party to become an independent. "Someone just texted me before I got on stage, a former Biden person, which is, 'It is quite the ballet move to say that you're leaving the Democratic Party because they were disloyal to Joe Biden.' But that is what she's saying," Thompson told the Windy City audience Thursday at The Vic Theatre. Biden-era White House Reporters Express Disbelief On Karine Jean-pierre's Sudden Party Switch Thompson noted that despite "mass bad reviews" within the Biden administration of Jean-Pierre's job performance as White House press secretary, she was seen as "untouchable" due to her allyship with top Jill Biden aide Anthony Bernal. "I think what's really provoking anger from former Biden people… there was mass frustration on how she went about the job, felt that she was not good at it, was not aware she was not good at it, she did not try hard to get better at it. And there's more focus on elevating her own profile than not," Thompson said. Read On The Fox News App "And now for her to then go out after the Democratic Party elevated her to the top spokesperson job in the country and then for her to then try to sell books by leaving the party, they say that simmering resentment just exploded instantly," the Axios reporter added. Tapper speculated that there would have been less "scorn" aimed at Jean-Pierre if she didn't announce she had become an independent, something the CNN anchor made little sense to him. Credibility Crisis: Karine Jean-pierre's Defense Of Biden's Mental Fitness Over The Years The event moderator, NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik, asked Tapper and Thompson why former Biden staffers by and large "aren't using their names" as they criticize Jean-Pierre. "I totally wonder that too," Tapper reacted. "Because, like, what are you afraid of?" Click Here For The Latest Media And Culture News Thompson responded by insisting many of them don't want to speak publicly because they have since landed new jobs and don't want their employers to be associated with the mudslinging. "I'd also say that the Biden culture was to punish and try to destroy people who spoke out," Thompson said. "And yes, they don't have power anymore, but they are watching very closely. I think some people still fear retaliation." Tapper added that since Jean-Pierre was a trailblazer" as the first Black woman and LGBTQ press secretary, that was another reason why her former colleagues aren't speaking out. Both authors took turns scrutinizing Jean-Pierre's credibility following her loyal defense of Biden before and after his disastrous debate performance. Tapper recalled a 2023 private fundraiser Biden attended in which he didn't have a teleprompter and how he told donors his canned remarks about how the events of Charlottesville inspired his presidential run in 2020 twice in the span of a few minutes, and how at the following press briefing, Jean-Pierre told reporters, "Well, that's how strongly he feels about that moment." "In her defense, she rarely saw him," Tapper article source: Biden book author reveals how White House staff truly felt about Karine Jean-Pierre as press secretary
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
He was 20 when he was sentenced to death. Now he hopes US Supreme Court will hear his case
A man on Mississippi's death row is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to take a look at his case while he continues seeking other federal relief. Terry Pitchford, 39, was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death in 2006 for the death of a man in a Grenada County grocery store during an armed robbery in 2004. In 2023, Terry Pitchford's conviction and death sentence were set aside and a new trial was ordered by a federal district court judge. The state appealed and the conviction and sentence were reinstated after a ruling in favor of the state by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Mississippi: Man whose death sentence was overturned in 2023 is now facing death again. Here's why Now Pitchford is hoping the nation's highest court will review his case while he also continues to work on other aspects of the case in the Mississippi Northern District of U.S. District Court. The state has until July 3 to file a brief opposing Pitchford's petition. The Supreme Court may consider Pitchford's petition at the opening conference of the October term. Pitchford is asking the Supreme Court to review his Batson claim, which refers to jury selection in which race, ethnicity or gender played a role in excluding potential jurors. During jury selection at Pitchford's trial, then-District Attorney Doug Evans "used four of his allotted 12 peremptory strikes to remove four of the five Black venirepersons provisionally seated in the jury's empaneling," court records show. Evans was accused of doing the same during the prosecution of Curtis Flowers, who stood trial six times for the murders of four people at a furniture store in Winona. The U.S. Supreme Court in 2019 overturned Flowers' conviction for the last time, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh "citing a 'relentless, determined effort to rid the jury of Black individuals,'" according to an earlier story. In Pitchford's case, during his appeal, the Mississippi Supreme Court said Pitchford should have raised objections at his initial trial if he wanted to contest the jury selection. The court's decision in favor of the state was not unanimous. Two justices disagreed with the ruling, saying "the record showed that D.A. Evans used peremptory strikes in an intentionally racially discriminatory manner," according to court documents. The federal court agreed with the dissenters and set aside Pitchford's conviction and ordered a new trial. The federal appellate court looked at the case and determined the Mississippi Supreme Court did not err when it considered the Batson claim and reinstated Pitchford's conviction and sentence. Now it will be up to the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in, if it decides to review the case. Lici Beveridge is a reporter for the Hattiesburg American and Clarion Ledger. Contact her at lbeveridge@ Follow her on X @licibev or Facebook at This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Mississippi death row inmate asks SCOTUS for help