CNN's MAGA Panelist Panics When Confronted Over Trump's ‘Genocide' Talk
CNN's token Republican Scott Jennings had a hard time defending President Donald Trump's South African 'genocide' talk when confronted with the facts on NewsNight with Abby Phillip.
At the top of the show Wednesday evening, the host dived into the big story of the day: Trump's 'Oval Office ambush' of a visiting South African delegation, including President Cyril Ramaphosa.
Ramaphosa and his delegates thought they were coming for a meeting about a reset in relations between the two nations. Instead, South Africa's most famous white man, Elon Musk, watched on as Trump went on a rant about the 'genocide' allegedly being committed against white farmers in the country.
'This is straight out of the conspiracy land of the far right, and it is not based in fact,' Phillip said on her show of the MAGA 'genocide' claim. 'It's amazing that this has actually become the foreign policy of the United States,' she went on. 'We have the numbers, it's completely unsubstantiated.'
Jennings, who had watched on with a furrowed brow, then intervened. 'You're saying it's not true that some white farmers have been murdered?' he asked.
Phillip responded to clarify that she was saying it is not true that there is a genocide of white farmers in South Africa, as Trump claimed. Genocide, according to Merriam-Webster, is 'the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group.'
'OK, whatever you call it, white farmers have been murdered?' Jennings continued.
As Jennings pressed, Phillip hit back by simply ask him about the facts. 'Hold on a second,' she demanded, 'How many white farmers have been murdered?'
This forced Jennings to admit: 'I don't know. Several…'
'No, no, how many?' the host continued. 'How many?'
Jennings repeated that he didn't know the figure. 'I know why you don't know,' Phillip said. 'Because those numbers don't exist broken down by race.'
'I mean I wouldn't trust the South African government to tell me, I know that,' Jennings said.
'How many Black farmers have been murdered in South Africa?' Phillip asked.
'Look, you guys are so triggered over 59 people...' Jennings said, again unable to answer the question.
'I haven't even brought up the people, the white people that Trump picked out because they were white and told them they could come to the country,' Phillip said, referring to the 59 white South Africans who moved to the U.S. to resettle earlier this month after Trump granted them refugee status, claiming they faced racial discrimination.
'How much racial killing are you going to condone?' Jennings said, scrambling for a comeback.
Phillip then displayed statistics from South African authorities showing that, from April to December in 2024, a total of 19,696 murders were committed in South Africa. Only 36 were committed on farms, and just seven victims were farmers. Official data is not broken down by race, so it is not known how many victims were white or Black.
'According to who?! According to who?!' Jennings demanded as Phillip read out the stats contradicting Trump's claims.
Phillip later responded that 'the vast majority of people killed on South African farms are Black,' adding, 'Where's the concern about them?'
Jennings spluttered: 'The concern is that there are white farmers who have had violence committed against them and they're being threatened every single day… there's 59 people and you're triggered about 59 people and I don't know why…'
'I haven't mentioned anything about 59 people,' Phillip pointed out. 'Why are you only concerned about white people?' she then pointedly asked.
'I'm only concerned about this story because these 59 people asked for status, they're getting status and now everybody's freaking out about it,' he said, changing the subject.
Phillip later accused Jennings of 'taking a fringe movement and trying to make it a characteristic of an entire nation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
34 minutes ago
Can Trump fix the national debt? Republican senators, many investors and even Elon Musk have doubts
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump faces the challenge of convincing Republican senators, global investors, voters and even Elon Musk that he won't bury the federal government in debt with his multitrillion-dollar tax breaks package. The response so far from financial markets has been skeptical as Trump seems unable to trim deficits as promised. 'All of this rhetoric about cutting trillions of dollars of spending has come to nothing — and the tax bill codifies that,' said Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a right-leaning think tank. 'There is a level of concern about the competence of Congress and this administration and that makes adding a whole bunch of money to the deficit riskier.' The White House has viciously lashed out at anyone who has voiced concern about the debt snowballing under Trump, even though it did exactly that in his first term after his 2017 tax cuts. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt opened her briefing Thursday by saying she wanted 'to debunk some false claims" about his tax cuts. Leavitt said that the "blatantly wrong claim that the 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill' increases the deficit is based on the Congressional Budget Office and other scorekeepers who use shoddy assumptions and have historically been terrible at forecasting across Democrat and Republican administrations alike.' But Trump himself has suggested that the lack of sufficient spending cuts to offset his tax reductions came out of the need to hold the Republican congressional coalition together. 'We have to get a lot of votes,' Trump said last week. 'We can't be cutting.' That has left the administration betting on the hope that economic growth can do the trick, a belief that few outside of Trump's orbit think is viable. Tech billionaire Musk, who was until recently part of Trump's inner sanctum as the leader of the Department of Government Efficiency, told CBS News: 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing." The tax and spending cuts that passed the House last month would add more than $5 trillion to the national debt in the coming decade if all of them are allowed to continue, according to the Committee for a Responsible Financial Budget, a fiscal watchdog group. To make the bill's price tag appear lower, various parts of the legislation are set to expire. This same tactic was used with Trump's 2017 tax cuts and it set up this year's dilemma, in which many of the tax cuts in that earlier package will sunset next year unless Congress renews them. But the debt is a much bigger problem now than it was eight years ago. Investors are demanding the government pay a higher premium to keep borrowing as the total debt has crossed $36.1 trillion. The interest rate on a 10-year Treasury Note is around 4.5%, up dramatically from the roughly 2.5% rate being charged when the 2017 tax cuts became law. The White House Council of Economic Advisers argues that its policies will unleash so much rapid growth that the annual budget deficits will shrink in size relative to the overall economy, putting the U.S. government on a fiscally sustainable path. The council argues the economy would expand over the next four years at an annual average of about 3.2%, instead of the Congressional Budget Office's expected 1.9%, and as many as 7.4 million jobs would be created or saved. Council chair Stephen Miran told reporters that when that growth is coupled with expected revenues from tariffs, the expected budget deficits will fall. The tax cuts will increase the supply of money for investment, the supply of workers and the supply of domestically produced goods — all of which, by Miran's logic, would cause faster growth without creating new inflationary pressures. 'I do want to assure everyone that the deficit is a very significant concern for this administration,' Miran told reporters recently. White House budget director Russell Vought told reporters the idea that the bill is 'in any way harmful to debt and deficits is fundamentally untrue.' Most outside economists expect additional debt would keep interest rates higher and slow overall economic growth as the cost of borrowing for homes, cars, businesses and even college educations would increase. 'This just adds to the problem future policymakers are going to face,' said Brendan Duke, a former Biden administration aide now at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank. Duke said that with the tax cuts in the bill set to expire in 2028, lawmakers would be 'dealing with Social Security, Medicare and expiring tax cuts at the same time.' Kent Smetters, faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model, said the growth projections from Trump's economic team are 'a work of fiction.' He said the bill would lead some workers to choose to work fewer hours in order to qualify for Medicaid. 'I don't know of any serious forecaster that has meaningfully raised their growth forecast because of this legislation,' said Harvard University professor Jason Furman, who was the Council of Economic Advisers chair under the Obama administration. 'These are mostly not growth- and competitiveness-oriented tax cuts. And, in fact, the higher long-term interest rates will go the other way and hurt growth.' The White House's inability so far to calm deficit concerns is stirring up political blowback for Trump as the tax and spending cuts approved by the House now move to the Senate. Republican Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky have both expressed concerns about the likely deficit increases, with Johnson saying there are enough senators to stall the bill until deficits are addressed. 'I think we have enough to stop the process until the president gets serious about the spending reduction and reducing the deficit,' Johnson said on CNN. The White House is also banking that tariff revenues will help cover the additional deficits, even though recent court rulings cast doubt on the legitimacy of Trump declaring an economic emergency to impose sweeping taxes on imports. When Trump announced his near-universal tariffs in April, he specifically said his policies would generate enough new revenues to start paying down the national debt. His comments dovetailed with remarks by aides, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, that yearly budget deficits could be more than halved. 'It's our turn to prosper and in so doing, use trillions and trillions of dollars to reduce our taxes and pay down our national debt, and it'll all happen very quickly,' Trump said two months ago as he talked up his import taxes and encouraged lawmakers to pass the separate tax and spending cuts. The Trump administration is correct that growth can help reduce deficit pressures, but it's not enough on its own to accomplish the task, according to new research by economists Douglas Elmendorf, Glenn Hubbard and Zachary Liscow. Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale University, said additional 'growth doesn't even get us close to where we need to be.' The government would need $10 trillion of deficit reduction over the next 10 years just to stabilize the debt, Tedeschi said. And even though the White House says the tax cuts would add to growth, most of the cost goes to preserve existing tax breaks, so that's unlikely to boost the economy meaningfully. 'It's treading water,' Tedeschi said.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Can Trump fix the national debt? Republican senators, many investors and even Elon Musk have doubts
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump faces the challenge of convincing Republican senators, global investors, voters and even Elon Musk that he won't bury the federal government in debt with his multitrillion-dollar tax breaks package. The response so far from financial markets has been skeptical as Trump seems unable to trim deficits as promised. 'All of this rhetoric about cutting trillions of dollars of spending has come to nothing — and the tax bill codifies that,' said Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a right-leaning think tank. 'There is a level of concern about the competence of Congress and this administration and that makes adding a whole bunch of money to the deficit riskier.' The White House has viciously lashed out at anyone who has voiced concern about the debt snowballing under Trump, even though it did exactly that in his first term after his 2017 tax cuts. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt opened her briefing Thursday by saying she wanted 'to debunk some false claims" about his tax cuts. Leavitt said that the "blatantly wrong claim that the 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill' increases the deficit is based on the Congressional Budget Office and other scorekeepers who use shoddy assumptions and have historically been terrible at forecasting across Democrat and Republican administrations alike.' But Trump himself has suggested that the lack of sufficient spending cuts to offset his tax reductions came out of the need to hold the Republican congressional coalition together. 'We have to get a lot of votes,' Trump said last week. 'We can't be cutting.' That has left the administration betting on the hope that economic growth can do the trick, a belief that few outside of Trump's orbit think is viable. Tech billionaire Musk, who was until recently part of Trump's inner sanctum as the leader of the Department of Government Efficiency, told CBS News: 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing." Federal debt keeps rising The tax and spending cuts that passed the House last month would add more than $5 trillion to the national debt in the coming decade if all of them are allowed to continue, according to the Committee for a Responsible Financial Budget, a fiscal watchdog group. To make the bill's price tag appear lower, various parts of the legislation are set to expire. This same tactic was used with Trump's 2017 tax cuts and it set up this year's dilemma, in which many of the tax cuts in that earlier package will sunset next year unless Congress renews them. But the debt is a much bigger problem now than it was eight years ago. Investors are demanding the government pay a higher premium to keep borrowing as the total debt has crossed $36.1 trillion. The interest rate on a 10-year Treasury Note is around 4.5%, up dramatically from the roughly 2.5% rate being charged when the 2017 tax cuts became law. The White House Council of Economic Advisers argues that its policies will unleash so much rapid growth that the annual budget deficits will shrink in size relative to the overall economy, putting the U.S. government on a fiscally sustainable path. The council argues the economy would expand over the next four years at an annual average of about 3.2%, instead of the Congressional Budget Office's expected 1.9%, and as many as 7.4 million jobs would be created or saved. Council chair Stephen Miran told reporters that when that growth is coupled with expected revenues from tariffs, the expected budget deficits will fall. The tax cuts will increase the supply of money for investment, the supply of workers and the supply of domestically produced goods — all of which, by Miran's logic, would cause faster growth without creating new inflationary pressures. 'I do want to assure everyone that the deficit is a very significant concern for this administration,' Miran told reporters recently. White House budget director Russell Vought told reporters the idea that the bill is 'in any way harmful to debt and deficits is fundamentally untrue.' Economists doubt Trump's plan can spark enough growth to reduce deficits Most outside economists expect additional debt would keep interest rates higher and slow overall economic growth as the cost of borrowing for homes, cars, businesses and even college educations would increase. 'This just adds to the problem future policymakers are going to face,' said Brendan Duke, a former Biden administration aide now at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank. Duke said that with the tax cuts in the bill set to expire in 2028, lawmakers would be 'dealing with Social Security, Medicare and expiring tax cuts at the same time.' Kent Smetters, faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model, said the growth projections from Trump's economic team are 'a work of fiction.' He said the bill would lead some workers to choose to work fewer hours in order to qualify for Medicaid. 'I don't know of any serious forecaster that has meaningfully raised their growth forecast because of this legislation,' said Harvard University professor Jason Furman, who was the Council of Economic Advisers chair under the Obama administration. 'These are mostly not growth- and competitiveness-oriented tax cuts. And, in fact, the higher long-term interest rates will go the other way and hurt growth.' The White House's inability so far to calm deficit concerns is stirring up political blowback for Trump as the tax and spending cuts approved by the House now move to the Senate. Republican Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky have both expressed concerns about the likely deficit increases, with Johnson saying there are enough senators to stall the bill until deficits are addressed. 'I think we have enough to stop the process until the president gets serious about the spending reduction and reducing the deficit,' Johnson said on CNN. Trump banking on tariff revenues to help The White House is also banking that tariff revenues will help cover the additional deficits, even though recent court rulings cast doubt on the legitimacy of Trump declaring an economic emergency to impose sweeping taxes on imports. When Trump announced his near-universal tariffs in April, he specifically said his policies would generate enough new revenues to start paying down the national debt. His comments dovetailed with remarks by aides, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, that yearly budget deficits could be more than halved. 'It's our turn to prosper and in so doing, use trillions and trillions of dollars to reduce our taxes and pay down our national debt, and it'll all happen very quickly,' Trump said two months ago as he talked up his import taxes and encouraged lawmakers to pass the separate tax and spending cuts. The Trump administration is correct that growth can help reduce deficit pressures, but it's not enough on its own to accomplish the task, according to new research by economists Douglas Elmendorf, Glenn Hubbard and Zachary Liscow. Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale University, said additional 'growth doesn't even get us close to where we need to be.' The government would need $10 trillion of deficit reduction over the next 10 years just to stabilize the debt, Tedeschi said. And even though the White House says the tax cuts would add to growth, most of the cost goes to preserve existing tax breaks, so that's unlikely to boost the economy meaningfully.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Is Still Losing It Over Being Called a ‘Nazi'
Elon Musk is still peeved that people likened him to a Nazi after he made an evocative gesture resembling a fascist salute on President Donald Trump's inauguration day. The Tesla CEO said Tuesday that he does not regret going full MAGA. He said it was the 'propaganda' legacy media that turned him into a divisive figure and tanked his company's car sales, not his own words and actions as Trump's temporary No. 2. 'How many legacy media publications, talk shows, whatever, try to claim that I was a Nazi because of some random hand gesture gesture at a rally where all I said was that my heart goes out to you,' Musk told CNBC. 'And I was talking about space travel, and yet the legacy media promote—promoted that as though that was a deliberate Nazi gesture, where, when, in fact, every politician, any public speaker who's spoken for any length of time, has made the exact same gesture.' Musk's response came after his interviewer, David Faber, asked if he had any regrets about how he ran the Department of Government Efficiency, which he no longer leads daily. Faber pointed out that anger with Musk may have stemmed more from his alliance with Trump and his work at DOGE than the gesture. He noted that the hordes of Americans Musk antagonized were current or potential Tesla customers—a reference to the electric car manufacturer's poor first quarter, which saw its sales and revenue drop significantly. 'Unfortunately, what I've learned is that legacy media propaganda is very effective at making people believe things that aren't true,' Musk said. Faber chimed in, 'What would an example of that be?' Musk continued, 'That I am a Nazi.' Tesla's share price dipped sharply at 2:20 p.m., which was around the same time Musk mentioned his 'Nazi' accusations. In 45 minutes, the stock price went from $354 to $342, a 3.39 percent drop. It slightly rebounded after, closing at $343 for the day. Musk, 53, has stringently denied allegations he gave a Roman or Nazi salute in Capital One Arena on Jan. 20, shortly after Trump was inaugurated. Whether people agree or not has largely broken down by political lines. Trump's biggest supporters defended the gesture as accidental, made by an awkward and excited man—a conclusion the Anti-Defamation League also reached, just a day before it had to condemn Musk for making Holocaust jokes on X. Faber said on Tuesday that he spoke to people close to Musk who were adamant that his gesture was not a Nazi salute. Those explanations did not stop America's actual neo-Nazis from celebrating the gesture. It was further condemned by officials in Germany, where such gestures are considered a crime, and by many prominent Democrats. Musk suggested customers should not care about the political views of a company's chief executive, even if that very executive facilitated and celebrated their firing. 'I mean, look, for most you buy a product, I mean, how much do you care about the political views of the CEO, or do you even know what they are?' Musk told Faber. Faber also mentioned to Musk that DOGE, now four months into its official existence, remained well below its savings expectations. DOGE's website says it has made $170 billion in savings, which is well short of the 'at least $2 trillion' that Musk vowed to slash in his first year at DOGE. Musk referenced that figure in Tuesday's interview. In reality, Faber noted that DOGE's savings are likely much lower than that. 'That's your number that's out there,' Faber said. 'A lot of people take issue with it and say, 'Well, you know, taxpayers' expenses, such as paid leave, that's $135 billion that's got to come back. IRS collection may go down as a result of cuts there.' Faber then fact-checked Musk with data he received from Grok, which is Musk's AI company that he hopes can compete with OpenAI's ChatGPT. 'We asked Grok,' Faber said. 'It said between five and 32 billion is what you've actually saved.' Musk countered that Faber likely asked the question wrong before asking, 'So why are you attacking this, given that we've made so much progress?' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
