'Devastating' felling of ancient oak tree in London park reported to police
An ancient oak tree thought to be more than 400 years old has been cut down in what has been called a "depressing" and "devastating" incident in north London.
The remains of the trunk, surrounded by its severed branches, were discovered by council workers on 3 April in Whitewebbs Park, Enfield.
Adam Cormack, head of campaigning at the Woodland Trust, which supports legal protections for the country's oldest and most important trees, said: "This depressing crime is a reminder to all of us that not every ancient tree is in a safe place.
"It is very unusual to see the felling of an oak tree of this size and age."
The tree, which had a girth of 6.1 metres, was thought to be in the top 100 of London's 600,000 oak trees in terms of its size.
The incident has been reported to the Metropolitan Police and the council has put an emergency preservation order in place on the base of the stump.
Ergin Erbil, leader of Enfield Council, said: "We are treating the matter as criminal damage and have reported it to the police.
"We've now placed a legal protection (Tree Preservation Order) on the tree and are looking at ways to help it grow back."
On Monday, the Tree Council and Forest Research published a report calling for a "robust and effective system" to protect England's most important trees following the Sycamore Gap tree felling in September 2023.
1:07
The trial of the two men, charged in connection with the felling, is due to take place later this month at Newcastle Crown Court.
Ed Allnut, Enfield resident and secretary of the Guardians of Whitewebbs group said: "The tree belonged to Enfield and to our national heritage. I am personally devastated.
"We want answers, and we want guarantees the other trees here are being protected properly."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Three girls admit killing 75-year-old in attack filmed on mobile phone
Fredi Rivero was set upon in Islington, north London, on February 27 and died in hospital the next day. The victim, a Bolivian national, was near a bus stop on Seven Sisters Road when the teenagers got off a bus and surrounded him. The youths, aged 15, 16 and 17, pushed, shoved, kicked and punched him, with one of them filming the incident on her phone and grabbing his glasses. Fredi Rivero died in February after being attacked by three girls (Metropolitan Police/PA) As part of the police investigation, officers recovered CCTV footage of the assault in which the oldest girl was seen to punch the victim in the head causing him to fall backwards. Police were called at 11.25pm to reports of the disturbance and found Mr Rivero unconscious on the pavement with a severe head injury and in cardiac arrest. He was taken to the Royal London Hospital where he later died. On Thursday, the girls, who cannot be identified because of their ages, appeared at the Old Bailey before Judge Judy Khan KC. The girls, who appeared from custody by video link, pleaded guilty to manslaughter. Judge Khan ordered reports and remanded the defendants into custody to be sentenced on September 5. Previously, police have said Mr Rivero was a 'much-loved father' whose family were 'devastated by his death'. Mr Rivero's daughter, ex-wife and cousins attended court for the hearing on Thursday.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Lady Brittan attacks Met Police for dropping sex case review
Lord Brittan's widow has criticised the Metropolitan Police for dropping an investigation into an officer's handling of the paedophile claims against her husband. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said last week it had stopped the investigation into Steve Rodhouse, the former Met deputy assistant commissioner, after a 'large volume of relevant material was recently disclosed to the IOPC by the Metropolitan Police'. Mr Rodhouse was due to face a disciplinary hearing for potentially breaching police professional standards of behaviour for honesty and integrity and discreditable conduct. It followed the Met's 16-month Operation Midland into fake claims of a VIP paedophile ring by fantasist Carl Beech, which saw raids on the homes of Lord Brittan, as well as Lord Bramall, a D-Day veteran, and Harvey Proctor, the ex-Tory MP. Beech was later jailed for 18 years for what a judge called 'cruel and callous' lies. In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Lady Brittan said she had hoped the investigation would bring a sense of 'closure'. She said: 'My husband was a high-profile individual, but at every level of society, there are people who are falsely accused, and for them (also) it's the ruining of reputation, it's the anxiety that goes with it. 'I feel that it would have at least put a closure, to use that odd word, on the whole episode if somebody had been held to account, either for misconduct, or even for incompetence.' The force was heavily criticised for believing Beech too readily despite inconsistencies in his evidence, including naming witnesses who did not exist. The allegations against Mr Rodhouse had centred around comments made to the media in March 2016 concerning his beliefs about the honesty of two witnesses to Operation Midland, a Met investigation into allegations of non-recent sexual abuse. But the IOPC said there was 'no evidence' within the material provided from the Met that there was 'any inappropriate motivation in Mr Rodhouse's comments to the media' or that 'supports that he made those remarks during Sir Richard's review'. Mr Rodhouse said the allegations made against him were 'ill-founded and incorrect'. Mr Proctor said he was 'appalled' by the 'disgraceful decision' not to proceed, adding that he would be writing to Sir Mark Rowley, the Met Police commissioner, to 'demand a meeting and an explanation'. Lady Brittan said she felt her husband's legacy had been permanently tarnished, telling the BBC: 'What I really feel very sorry about is the fact that my husband was a great public servant. 'When he died, his obituaries referred to all of this.'
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Laurence Fox makes dig at police as he arrives in court on sex offence charges
Laurence Fox is has arrived at Woolwich Crown Court today after he was charged over sharing a compromising photo of broadcaster Narinder Kaur on social media. Fox, 47, is due in court today after he was charged under section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. He was charged with two counts under the act. In April, Fox, of Peldon in Essex, previously pleaded not guilty to the offences. He is accused of sharing a 'photograph or film of person in intimate state intending to cause alarm, distress or humiliation', in the first count, while the second alleges he sent a 'photograph or film of genitals to cause alarm, distress or humiliation'. Fox was charged in March over the sexual offence, which is alleged to have taken place in April 2024. The charges came after an 11 month probe into the social media site, X. The police previously said Fox had been 'charged with an offence contrary to section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003' which 'relates to an image that was posted on a social media platform in April 2024'. Section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act relates to 'cyber flashing'. The charge, introduced in 2023, makes it an offence to intentionally share a sexual image of someone without consent, with the aim of causing alarm, distress, humiliation or for sexual gratification. Upskirting, taking pictures of people under their clothes without their permission, became a specific criminal offence in 2019. Offenders can face up to two years in jail and be placed on the sex offenders' register. As Fox's charges were announced in March, A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said: 'A man has been charged with a sexual offence following an investigation by the Metropolitan Police. 'Laurence Fox, 46, of Peldon, Essex, will appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on April 24 charged with an offence contrary to section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. 'The charge relates to an image that was posted on a social media platform in April 2024.' Laurence was photographed arriving in court sporting a cap with the term 'two-tier' emblazoned on. The term 'two-tier policing' is used to infer that police are more harsh or heavy handed with those politically alligned to the right than the left. Laurence Fox arrived in court today ahead of the trial preparation hearing. Walking hand in hand with his partner Elizabeth Baker, Fox wore a white shirt, a black pinstriped blazer, blue jeans, brown boots, and a blak cap with the words 'two-tier' emblazened on. In April this year, Laurence pleaded not guilty to sexual offence charges over the publication of an upskirt photo of TV star Narinder Kaur. He appeared in court last month wearing grey jeans and a light blue shirt. In court, he spoke to confirm his identity and enter not guilty pleas to both charges. Earlier this year, Fox was charged with two counts under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 after an 11 month long investigation. Upskirting, taking pictures of people under their clothes without their permission, became a specific criminal offence in 2019. Offenders can face up to two years in jail and be placed on the sex offenders register. Section 66A was introduced via the Online Safety Act 2023 to address the growing problem of cyberflashing. The law criminalises the act of intentionally sending or sharing a sexual image of genitals without the recipient's consent and with the intention to cause alarm, distress, humiliation, or for sexual gratification. A person commits an offence under Section 66A if: They intentionally send or share a photograph or film of a person's genitals; Without the consent of the recipient; And with the intention of: Causing alarm, distress, or humiliation; or Obtaining sexual gratification.
