What parts of RFK Jr.'s MAHA agenda are resonating? See poll results
Public opinion of Kennedy Jr. is also divided: 51% of the respondents said it was favorable and 48% picked unfavorable for the former 2024 presidential candidate who ran as a Democrat and then as an independent before dropping out to endorse Trump.
More: RFK Jr. suspends campaign; endorses former President Trump
A majority of Democrats (82%) say their opinion of Kennedy is either strongly "unfavorable" or "somewhat unfavorable," while 84% Republicans view Kennedy as either "strongly favorable" or "somewhat favorable." Among independents, 52% have a favorable view of Kennedy, the son of former Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and the nephew of former President John F. Kennedy.
The poll was conducted online from May 30-June 10 among a national sample of 19,410 adults age 18 and up. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.1 percentage points. Among the poll participants, 37% described themselves as Democrats, 37% as Republicans and 26% as "Independent or something else."
Asked about the use of vaccines to prevent diseases, 69% of Republicans, 93% of Democrats and 76% of independents responded to the NBC poll that they support immunizations to protect public health.
Kennedy has repeatedly called into question the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Earlier this month, he fired the entire committee that advises the federal government on vaccine safety, implying that it was not conducting "adequate safety trials" before recommending new vaccines to children. Kennedy later appointed to the panel a physician criticized for spreading COVID-19 misinformation and conspiracy theories. Vaccine experts widely dispute Kennedy's characterizations.
More: RFK Jr.'s MAHA movement is coming to a state near you
NBC's pollsters also asked who deserved the most blame for America's chronic health problems, including obesity and heart disease. A majority at 35% blamed the food industry, followed closely by the "choices of individuals" at 32%.
Kennedy has been a big critic of Big Food and Big Pharma, blaming them for Americans' high rates of chronic ailments like Type 2 Diabetes and accusing the industries of profiting by keeping Americans sick. In April, he announced that eight artificial dyes will be eliminated from medications and the nation's food supply by the end of 2026, including those found in candy, ice cream, soft drinks and jams.
Only 6% of respondents blamed environmental toxins - which Kennedy has blamed a host of ailments on - as a reason for chronic diseases.
The MAHA Commission report released by Kennedy last month identifies various toxins and environmental factors as potential contributors to chronic disease in American children. He has also announced a series of studies aimed at studying possible environment causes behind autism, which scientists continue to push back on.
Last month, the right-leaning think tank Foundation for Government Accountability released a poll showing a similar pattern to NBC's results. It found more than 80% of Democrats and Republicans said they were in support of a U.S. prohibition on certain dyes and chemicals from foods in the same way they were banned in some European countries.
Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House Correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
23 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Work to get US steel tariffs removed to go on in coming ‘days, weeks and months'
US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer signed off a US-UK deal that will slash trade barriers on goods from both countries at the G7 on Monday. But US tariffs for the steel industry will stand at 25% for now rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. This is less than the US global rate of 50% for steel and aluminium. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said the UK Government is keen for the site to be part of a commercially-operated business (Chris Radburn/PA) The two leaders pledged to 'make progress towards 0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed', the Department for Business and Trade said. The Chinese ownership of the British Steel could be a sticking point in the deal on steel as the executive order signed by Mr Trump suggests the US wants assurances that the metal originates in the UK. 'The United Kingdom also committed to working to meet American requirements on the security of the supply chains of steel and aluminium products intended for export to the United States and on the nature of ownership of relevant production facilities,' the order states. After signing it, the US President was asked whether steel tariffs would be eliminated, to which he replied: 'We're gonna let you have that information in a little while.' In April, the UK Government used emergency powers to take control of British Steel and continue production at the site after Chinese owners Jingye proposed shutting the Scunthorpe site's two blast furnaces and other key steelmaking operations. But its future is still uncertain, with Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander saying the Government is eager for it to be 'part of a commercially-operated business with private investment'. 'We're talking to a number of third parties about that. At the moment, no options are off the table,' she told Sky News. She said there was still 'more work to do' to get steel tariffs eliminated, including on 'technical detail'. 'We're working through some technical detail around steel because we want to bring that 25% tariff that applies at the moment obviously down further,' she told BBC Breakfast. She said the UK is 'working on getting that implemented'. 'And we're determined to go further and we'll be working on those issues around steel in the coming days, weeks and months,' she added. Alasdair McDiarmid, assistant general secretary of the Community union, said it was 'absolutely vital' to secure a deal on steel as quickly as possible. Mr Trump did not say when the tariffs would be eliminated (Suzanne Plunkett/PA) 'Our steel producers and their US customers need an end to the current state of uncertainty to allow normal business to resume. 'Crucially, we must see a full exemption for all UK steel exports to the US – without that guarantee some of our leading steel businesses could be left behind, with a threat to jobs and livelihoods.' It comes as a £500 million five-year deal has been struck between Network Rail and British Steel, which Ms Alexander said was a 'vote of confidence'. Workers at the British Steel site in Scunthorpe will make rail tracks (Danny Lawson/PA) British Steel is to supply 337,000 tonnes of rail track, with a further 80-90,000 tonnes to be provided by other European manufacturers. The Network Rail contract will start on July 1 and is set to provide the company with 80% of its rail needs. Jingye, which bought British Steel in 2020, launched a consultation in March which it said would affect between 2,000 and 2,700 jobs, despite months of negotiations and a £500 million co-investment offer from the Government. The Scunthorpe plant has been producing steel for Britain's railways since 1865. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is finalising the deal (Joe Giddens/PA) The Network Rail agreement is the first major public procurement since the Government's emergency legislation was passed. Network Rail's group director for railway business services Clive Berrington said: 'We are committed to buying British where it makes economic sense to do so and British Steel remain extremely competitive in the provision of rail and will remain our main supplier in the years ahead.' Craig Harvey, British Steel's commercial director for rail, added: 'The contract represents a huge vote of confidence in UK workers and British industry, underpinning the vital role we play in ensuring millions of passengers and freight operators enjoy safe, enjoyable and timely journeys on Britain's railways.' Charlotte Brumpton-Childs, national officer at the GMB union, said it was a 'crucial first step in securing the future of our steel industry' and urged ministers to make sure British Steel has a 'constant flow of orders' from other infrastructure projects.
Spectator
27 minutes ago
- Spectator
The good and bad news about the UK-US trade deal
Donald Trump and Keir Starmer's transatlantic trade deal has finally been signed. Before making an early exit from the G7, the US president approved an executive order giving legal effect to parts of the US-UK deal. The outline of the agreement was settled weeks earlier during a conference call, with Trump in the White House and Peter Mandelson, the UK ambassador in Washington, standing, slightly creepily, over his shoulder, as Starmer dialled in from 4,000 miles away. If the deal is to progress further, an almighty row could be brewing The delay in any further announcement left conservatives, and businesses, wondering whether the deal outline a month ago was turning into a fiction. But the executive order Trump signed on Monday gives effect to the agreement at the end of the month. There are, however, some changes to what had originally been trailed one month ago. Tariffs on UK car exports to the United States (the UK's biggest goods export) will come down from 27.5 per cent to 10 per cent. But the 100,000 limit on the number of cars we can export to the US effectively puts a cap on growth within that part of the industry, as we already export roughly that amount of cars anyway. There was a bonus announcement too with Britain's aerospace sector exempted from even the baseline 10 per cent tariffs. It was bad news for steel, though. The agreed reduction of tariffs from 25 per cent to zero was absent from the president's executive order. Civil servants working on the deal say talks are ongoing, with disputes remaining over quotas on the amount of steel we'd be allowed to send before steeper tariffs kick in. Fingers crossed. There also seem to be complications surrounding Chinese ownership of British steel – something the Americans clearly don't like. Trump wasn't his best as he announced the singing of the deal alongside Starmer outside the G7 meeting in Canada. A slip of the tongue led him to say the deal was with the EU, rather than the UK. He then managed to drop the papers everywhere before Starmer helped pick them up. The Prime Minister fared better with Trump saying: 'He's slightly more liberal than I but for some reason we get along.' The deal finally being given legal effect by the president is clearly good news for Britain and undeniably a Brexit win. Had the UK had a closer relationship with the EU we'd be lumped in with the higher tariffs they're having to put up across all goods; we'd also get carried along with any retaliatory measures imposed by Brussels. These might please voters but they are, in reality, economic self harm. We shouldn't pretend this deal is more than it is though. This is not a wide-ranging free trade agreement – something which the government says it is still striving towards – but measures that mitigate the tariffs Trump unleashed on the world on his 'liberation day' in April. We are certainly better of, both compared with much of the world and with when those tariffs were initially announced. But we are still in a worse position than at the start of the year. What's also clear is that the White House is calling the shots. They feel under no pressure to further the deal with us and will only sign incremental steps as and when it suits them. If the deal is to progress further, an almighty row could be brewing. One of the aspects of global trade that reportedly enrages Trump is how much Americans – and American hospitals – pay for drugs, even those produced domestically. The NHS, as a single buyer purchasing in bulk on a massive scale, secures medicines at far lower prices. Trump sees that as unfair. He can't do much to force companies to lower prices for US customers, but he can try to push them up for the UK. Indeed, documents released after the agreement was outlined in May say the NHS will 'look at the concerns of the president' on this issue. But it's hard to see how any British Prime Minister or Health Secretary could agree to anything that increases NHS costs – politically or fiscally. This aspect of the deal may be flying under the radar for now, but it could well stop further progress towards free trade in its tracks.
Daily Record
35 minutes ago
- Daily Record
How to tell if you have hay fever or Covid as Nimbus strain shows key sign
Here's how to tell the difference between Covid and hay fever, as a new coronavirus variant sweeps the UK. Millions in the UK are grappling with the pesky symptoms of hay fever amidst "very high" pollen counts in some areas, as reported by the Met Office. But, at the same time, a new Covid strain is on the rise. Hay fever, an allergic reaction primarily to pollen, triggers sneezing, blocked noses, headaches, and sometimes loss of smell – symptoms that overlap with those of Covid-19. Dr Luke Powles from Bupa clarifies: "Despite hay fever being more common during the spring and summer, some people are affected by pollen from March to September. This can make it harder to tell if sniffs and sneezes are being caused by an allergy or an infection such as coronavirus." With the arrival of the new Covid variant, NB. 1.8.1 or Nimbus, the UK has seen a near 10 per cent increase in coronavirus-related hospital admissions. Around 950 patients were admitted in the week ending May 31, according to the latest data from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Nevertheless, distinguishing between hay fever and Covid is possible, with a high temperature being a key sign of coronavirus but not associated with hay fever, reports the Mirror. The NHS highlights that a high temperature implies "you feel hot to touch on your chest or back (you do not need to measure your temperature)", which could also lead to shivering. Contrasting the symptoms of hay fever, Dr Powles points out that a raised temperature is "not likely" in relation to hay fever. He added: "Although a blocked nose due to hay fever can affect your smell or taste, completely losing your ability to taste or smell is more likely to result from coronavirus." Moreover, those afflicted with Covid may experience a more intense degree of illness. "Hay fever symptoms aren't usually serious and, generally, you won't feel too ill," the health expert explained. However, Covid poses a potential for more severity, with symptoms sometimes lasting significantly longer, even contributing to long Covid complications as per NHS insights. Dr Powles said: "The symptoms [of Covid] are very similar to symptoms of other illnesses, such as colds and flu." While many recover from coronavirus comparatively quickly, the NHS acknowledges that some may need a longer period to convalesce. Gastrointestinal disturbances, uncommon in hay fever cases, are another facet of Covid symptomatology, encompassing nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea. The recommended action if you believe you've caught Covid is to isolate and cut social interactions if you or your youngster manifests symptoms and either: Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Once convalescence begins or the high temperature subsides, the NHS advises that individuals can recommence their "normal activities". Hay fever symptoms commonly include: Sneezing and coughing A runny or blocked nose Itchy, red or watery eyes Itchy throat, mouth, nose and ears Loss of smell Pain around your temples and forehead Headache Fatigue In contrast, Covid symptoms may include: A high temperature or experiencing chills – this implies feeling hot to the touch on your chest or back (there's no need to take your temperature) A new, persistent cough – this refers to coughing excessively for over an hour, or having three or more bouts of coughing within 24 hours A loss or alteration in your sense of smell or taste Breathlessness Feeling fatigued or worn out Bodily aches A headache A sore throat A congested or runny nose Loss of appetite Diarrhoea Feeling nauseous or vomiting
