Coalition MPs should embrace net zero policies or risk alienating voters, Liberal senator warns
Coalition MPs should stop questioning climate change science and instead fully embrace emissions policies to deliver net zero by 2050, the Liberal senator Maria Kovacic says, warning Australia's environment and economy is at risk.
After its historic drubbing at the 3 May election, some Coalition MPs are preparing for a protracted brawl over climate targets, leaving support for net zero policies under the opposition leader, Sussan Ley, in significant doubt.
Nationals including Matt Canavan and Barnaby Joyce, as well as Liberal frontbencher Andrew Hastie, have questioned net zero plans ahead of a policy review ordered by Ley. The shadow environment minister, Dan Tehan, told Guardian Australia this week the financial cost may shape the Coalition's decision on whether to abandon the target.
But the New South Wales moderate and newly appointed shadow assistant minister, Kovacic, said the Coalition needed to maintain support for net zero, first agreed by the former Morrison government.
'Ultimately, we believe, as the Liberal party, in reducing emissions and ensuring that we are part of a global effort,' Kovacic said.
'In terms of developing further policies … that's going to be a matter for the party room, but I think it's really important that we don't talk about, 'Oh, is it real, or isn't it real?'
'It's real, and our job is now to determine how we're going to reduce emissions and ensure that we don't leave a significant problem for future generations, in terms of how they're going to manage the impacts of climate on our environment and on our economy.'
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
She made the comments in an interview for Guardian Australia's Australian Politics podcast released on Friday.
'This is not just an environmental imperative. It's an economic imperative, and we have some great opportunities with our solar and wind resources in Australia to actually become global leaders in that space.
'Let's find a solution for people that ensures we get our emissions down and we have clean and cheap energy. I think that's what Australians are looking for us to do.'
Kovacic called for respectful and constructive discussions in the Coalition joint party room about the topic.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'We need to ensure that the people who vote for us feel that what we're going to do is aligned with what's important to them. Otherwise, guess what? They're not going to vote for us again.
'If we don't listen it's not going to get better for us. It will get worse.'
Ley has appointed Kovacic shadow assistant minister to the opposition leader, as well as shadow assistant minister for women, child protection and the prevention of family violence.
The former prime minister Scott Morrison on Thursday said he believed Australia should stick with net zero.
'My view hasn't changed and the reasons for saying it at the time hasn't changed,' he told Sky News.
'I didn't want us to become an island when it came to investment of capital, which was becoming a pretty serious problem, so I thought we took the right approach.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
US appeals court refuses to vacate Biden approval of Alaska's Willow oil project
A federal appeals court panel on Friday refused to vacate the approval of the massive Willow oil project on Alaska's petroleum-rich North Slope though it found flaws in how the approval was reached. The decision from a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals comes in a long-running dispute over the project, most recently greenlit in March 2023 by then-President Joe Biden's administration and under development in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska by ConocoPhillips Alaska. The court's majority opinion found what it called a procedural error — but not a serious or substantive one — by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management as part of the analysis in approving Willow. The court sent the matter back to the agency for additional work. The majority determined that vacating the project's approval would be unwarranted and its consequences severe, though Judge Gabriel P. Sanchez dissented on that point. A prior version of the project approved late in President Donald Trump 's first term was overturned in 2021, leading to the environmental review process completed under Biden that drew the latest legal challenges from environmentalists and a grassroots Iñupiat group. Alaska's Republican governor and its congressional delegation and state Legislature have backed Willow. The project also has broad support among Alaska Native leaders on the North Slope and groups with ties to the region who see Willow as economically vital for their communities. But critics cast the project as being at odds with Biden's pledges to combat climate change and raised concerns that it would drive further industrialization in the region. Trump expressed support for additional drilling in the reserve as part of a broader, Alaska-specific executive order he signed upon his return to office aimed at boosting oil and gas drilling, mining and logging in the state. During the cold-weather seasons, ConocoPhillips Alaska has worked to build infrastructure such as new gravel roads, bridges and pipelines at the project site, and it has laid out a timeline for producing first oil in 2029. In a statement Friday, the company said it welcomed the ruling and looked forward to 'continuing the responsible development of Willow.' J. Elizabeth Peace, a spokesperson with the U.S. Department of the Interior, said the agency doesn't comment on litigation. The Bureau of Land Management falls under Interior. The appeals panel ruling comes more than a year after it heard arguments in the case. Environmental groups and the grassroots Sovereign Iñupiat for a Living Arctic had appealed a lower-court ruling that upheld Willow's approval. Attorneys representing the groups on Friday were evaluating next steps. Arguments before the appeals court panel focused largely on claims the land management agency did not consider a 'reasonable' range of alternatives in its environmental review, as well as the groups' contention the agency had limited its consideration of alternatives to those that allowed for full-field development of the project. Attorneys for ConocoPhillips Alaska argued the leases in the company's Bear Tooth Unit in the northeast part of the petroleum reserve are in areas open to leasing and surface development — and that the agency committed the unit to development in issuing leases there over a number of years. Willow is in the unit. Friday's ruling said the agency during the environmental review process took a stance that it needed to screen out alternatives that stranded an economically viable quantity of oil but then never explained whether the pared-back plan it ultimately approved satisfied the full-field development standard. The agency 'framed its environmental review based on the full field development standard and had a rational explanation for doing so,' the ruling states. 'But that does not permit BLM to potentially deviate from the standard without explanation.' ConocoPhillips Alaska had proposed five drilling sites for Willow but the Bureau of Land Management approved three, which it said would include up to 199 total wells. Erik Grafe, an attorney with Earthjustice who represented some of the groups that challenged Willow, saw the ruling as a partial victory. 'They found a fundamental flaw that led them to conclude that the BLM acted arbitrarily in approving the Willow project and have sent that back to the agency to reconsider in a non-arbitrary way and make a new decision,' he said.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Deaths in San Antonio flooding rise to 10 and some are still missing, officials say
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Catastrophic floods kill dozens in South Africa as photos show receding waters revealing more bodies
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
