What to know about Trump's latest student visa crackdown
Higher education in America has been plunged into chaos following President Donald Trump's order for all US embassies to stall student visa applications - so what does that mean if you are applying for one? Although details on the new order are ever-changing, foreign students should take these steps to help them through the process following Tuesday's major announcement.
Those who already have a student visa appointment have been urged to keep it as the halt only applies to new interviews for applicants, according to a cable obtained by Politico. People should also stay up to date with their specific embassy following the halt - as cancellations could start happening soon.
To do that, users can monitor their local embassy website, checking the visa section for appointment details and updates. General delays should also be expected as many have been affected by the announcement. Foreign students should also take a close look at their social media accounts as the administration said they are preparing 'for an expansion of required social media screening and vetting.'
Those affected should also work to coordinate with their American institution for updates on their end, especially if you are still waiting for an appointment. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has directed officials to stop scheduling appointments with student visa applicants as they prepare to implement a social media vetting process, according to the directive.
'Effective immediately, in preparation for an expansion of required social media screening and vetting, consular sections should not add any additional student or exchange visitor (F, M, and J) visa appointment capacity until further guidance is issued septel, which we anticipate in the coming days,' the cable states. The Institute of International Education Open Doors data report found that in the 2023-2024 academic year, the United States hosted a record-breaking 1.1 million international students.
These students generated $43.8 billion through tuition, housing and living expenses, according to NAFSA: Association of International Educators. Donald Trump has waged war on elite universities, accusing them of antisemitism and blasting their 'woke' ideology. Harvard has borne the brunt of Trump's fire but is also fighting back just as hard and has sued the administration.
The Department of Homeland Security announced on Thursday its revocation of Harvard's ability to host and enroll students from other countries. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem published a letter she sent to the Ivy League university last week instructing the thousands of current students to either transfer to other schools or leave the country.
Trump has demanded to know all of the names and countries of origin of all nearly 7,000 foreign-born students attending Harvard University. The president said it was unacceptable that 31 percent of the students who attend the famous Ivy League school are 'from foreign lands.'
Harvard filed on Friday a lawsuit against the Trump administration for revoking its right to host foreign students. The school said in a court filing Trump's action will have an 'immediate and devastating effect for Harvard and more than 7,000 visa holders.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
36 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump's new travel ban is a gratuitously cruel sequel
I'm not much for horror movies, but I have just read that the film Black Phone 2 'will creep into cinemas' in October and that, compared to the original, it's supposed to be a 'more violent, scarier, more graphic' film. I'll pass on the movie, but that description seems pretty apt to what living under this Trump administration feels like: a gratuitously more violent sequel to a ghoulish original. Consider the Muslim ban. Back in late 2015, candidate Donald Trump called for 'a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on'. He signed the first version of the Muslim ban on 27 January 2017, and protests erupted at airports across the nation at the revival of a national policy, similar to the Chinese Exclusion Act, that bars entry of whole swaths of people based on our national prejudices. It took the Trump administration three attempts at crafting this policy before the supreme court tragically greenlit it. While Joe Biden later reversed the policy, congressional moves to restrict the president's ability to institute these blanket bans – such as the No Ban Act – have not succeeded. And on the first day of his second term, Trump indicated he was prepared to institute a wider-reaching travel ban. He has now done just that. The new executive order will 'fully restrict and limit the entry [to the US] of nationals of the following 12 countries: Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen' and will also 'partially restrict and limit the entry of nationals of the following 7 countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela'. Yes, there are key cutouts in the latest travel ban that make it a different animal from the original 2017 ban, but it still derives from the same family. Green-card holders, those with valid visas issued before the executive order was proclaimed, and professional athletes representing their countries in the forthcoming World Cup, for example, are exempt, illustrating how the administration has learned to write more litigation-resistant immigration exclusion orders. But make no mistake. Such a policy is alienating, counterproductive and simply racist. For one thing, Trump claims that the ban is necessary because the selected countries exhibit either 'a significant terrorist presence', a lack of cooperation in accepting back their nationals, or high rates of visa overstays. According to the Entry/Exit Overstay Report for fiscal year 2023 (the last one available), the number of people from Equatorial Guinea, a small African country, who overstayed their B1/B2 visas (travel to the US for business or pleasure) was 200. From the United Kingdom, it was 15,712. It's true that the percentage (as opposed to the number) of people overstaying their visas from Equatorial Guinea is significantly higher than UK overstays. But Djibouti, which hosts the primary US military base in for operations in Africa, has an even higher percentage of B1/B2 visa overstayers than Equatorial Guinea – yet it isn't part of the ban, illustrating how much it is based on narrow political calculations and cheap theatrics. The capriciousness of the policy was immediately evident after Trump released a video explaining his decision. 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed for our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstayed their visas,' he said, adding: 'We don't want them.' Yet, as everyone knows, the suspect in the Boulder, Colorado, attack is an Egyptian national, another key US ally. And Egypt is not on the list. Nor should it be, because these lists of banned countries collapse individuals into vague categories of suspicion and malfeasance. Why should the actions of one person from any given country mark a completely different person as inadmissible? Trump may sound tough to his supporters when announcing the ban, but such broad-brush applications against basically all the nationals of comparatively powerless countries is hardly the flex that Trump thinks it is. In the eyes of the rest of the world, the new policy mostly makes the administration look like a bully, picking on a handful of Muslim-majority countries, a few African and Asian states, a couple of its traditional enemies, and Haiti. Meanwhile, the rest of the world also sees how the Trump administration has withdrawn temporary protections from more than 500,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela and Nicaragua, suspended refugee resettlement from around the world, and yet welcomed in dozens of white Afrikaners from South Africa to the United States as refugees. The ethnocentrism of the policy is as naked as it is opportunistic. The truth is that the damage from Trump's first-term Muslim ban was long-lasting and had all kinds of collateral impact, including on the mental health of family members living in the United States. And immigrant advocacy organizations are already sharply criticizing this latest version. AfghanEvac, a non-profit organization that facilitates the resettlement of Afghans who worked with American troops, stated that the new ban 'is not about national security – it is about political theater'. To include Afghanistan among the banned countries, even as thousands of Afghans worked alongside American forces, is to Shawn VanDiver, the group's founder and president, 'a moral disgrace. It spits in the face of our allies, our veterans, and every value we claim to uphold.' Trump's latest travel ban, his ramped-up immigration deportation regime, his international student crackdown, and his all but ending asylum in the United States add up to a clearly a concerted attempt to stave off the inevitable while vilifying the marginal. Demographers have been telling us for years now that the US will be a 'majority minority' country around 2045, a prospect that has long frightened many of the white conservatives who make up Trump's base. In response, Trump is pursuing a policy that draws on the most basic kind of nativism around, and one we've seen before in the United States. The 1924 Immigration Act severely restricted immigration to the US to keep America as white and as western European as possible. Only in 1965 were the laws finally changed, with the national immigration quotas lifted, laying the foundation for the multicultural society we have today. That earlier movie of epic exclusion lasted some 41 years. So far, this sequel is violent, scary and authoritarian. It had better be a short film. Moustafa Bayoumi is a Guardian US columnist
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump-Musk meltdown: key moments in the billionaires' spectacular split
Breaking up is hard to do, and even harder if you are a billionaire who decides to break up with another billionaire on the two social media platforms you own, while the world watches in real time. Here are the key moments as the relationship between the US president, Donald Trump, and his former senior adviser Elon Musk unravelled in spectacular fashion, precipitated by a dispute over a colossal spending bill that could have major consequences for years to come. CBS previewed an interview, scheduled for that weekend, in which Musk said Trump's proposed tax and spending bill 'undermines' the cost-cutting efforts of the 'department of government efficiency' (Doge), which he led. Musk announced on social media that he was leaving his role in the Trump administration, a departure that the White House confirmed was in process on the same evening. 'As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending,' the billionaire wrote on X, his social media platform. As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending. The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government. In the Oval Office, Trump praised Musk for his service, presenting him with a golden key and lauding the 'colossal change' he brought through Doge – which in four months entered dozens of federal departments, accessed sensitive data and led to the elimination of thousands of jobs, though the ultimate savings were far, far less than Musk had promised. Standing alongside Trump in the Oval Office, Musk, who faced a 130-day limit in his tenure as a special government employee that had ended two days prior, vowed that his departure was 'not the end' of Doge, and that it would 'only strengthen over time'. Musk seemed to release a pent-up frustration on X. He said: 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore', then derided the administration's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, calling it a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill' that was 'a disgusting abomination'. I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it. Musk doubled down in the early hours, claiming the bill 'more than defeats all the cost savings achieved by the Doge team at great personal cost and risk'. It more than defeats all the cost savings achieved by the @DOGE team at great personal cost and risk While hosting the freshly appointed German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, Trump skimmed over the diplomatic niceties and instead used the opportunity to engage in a freewheeling discussion about Musk that started positively but got progressively less pleasant. He began by needling Musk for appearing in the Oval Office with a black eye. 'You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval desk. And even with the black eye. I said: 'Do you want a little makeup? We'll get you a little makeup.' But he said: 'No, I don't think so.'' (Musk claimed last week that he got the black eye when his five-year-old son, X Æ A-12, punched him in the face.) Trump then said he had 'had' a great relationship with the Tesla boss, but 'I don't know if we will any more', adding: 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' He then accused Musk of being upset that the bill would take away subsidies for electric vehicles. It got worse. 'If you saw the statements he made about me, which I'm sure you can get very easily, it's very fresh on tape, he said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally,' Trump said, but then added, presciently: 'But I'm sure that'll be next.' He went on to accuse Musk of missing the glamour of being in the Oval Office, saying that sometimes people leave his administration and become 'hostile' because of 'Trump derangement syndrome'. 'They leave and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone. The whole world is different, and they become hostile, I don't know what it is,' the president added. Merz's face during all this was a picture. (.) Musk, who somehow despite running multiple companies never seems to be offline, was watching the Oval Office meeting and responding in real time. Trump's claim that Musk had known what was in the bill was false, Musk said. He wrote that it 'was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it'. False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it! But what appeared to really get under his skin was Trump saying on Thursday he would have won the presidential election without Musk's help or money. Replying to an X user, Musk said: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. Such ingratitude.' Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. Such ingratitude Less than two hours after the White House event, Musk posted a poll on X, asking: 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle? At the time of writing, 80% of X users who responded had said 'Yes'. He then gave us all something to chew on: 'Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years …' Elon Musk is 53 years old. Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years … Ashley St Clair, a rightwing influencer thought to have had a baby called Romulus with Musk, popped up to offer the president some counselling. hey @realDonaldTrump lmk if u need any breakup advice Trump was not having any of this: what billionaire narcissist would? He took to the social media platform he owns to claim that he had asked Musk to leave his work with the 'Doge' office because he was, Trump said, 'wearing thin'. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy electric Cars that nobody else wanted … and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote, then brazenly suggested he would 'terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts'. Musk immediately responded: 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.' Such an obvious lie. So sad. Then he upped the ante. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files,' referring to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote, adding in a separate post: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' Time to drop the really big bomb:@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made a nice day, DJT! Musk, of course, has himself been pictured with Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who was found guilty of sex-trafficking in 2021. Both men deny any wrongdoing. Ye, an erstwhile ally of both men – who has been dropped by sponsors and fans over his antisemitic outbursts – posts: 'Broooos please noooooo,' adding: 'We love you both so much.' Broooos please noooooo 🫂 We love you both so much Musk had earlier been reposting the House speaker, Mike Johnson, criticising the Joe Biden administration in 2023 for 'an endless cycle of out-of-control deficit spending'. 'Where is the Mike Johnson of 2023!?' Musk asked. Johnson took the bait. 'The Mike Johnson of 2023 is the SAME Mike Johnson who has always been a lifelong fiscal hawk,' he said in a lengthy post. X users were unimpressed and the post wound up with a community note disputing its accuracy. The Mike Johnson of 2023 is the SAME Mike Johnson who has always been a lifelong fiscal hawk - who now serves as Speaker and is implementing a multi-stage plan to get our country back to fiscal responsibility and extraordinary economic growth. It begins with the critically… Gnomically, the US president wrote: 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago.' Musk then threatened to withhold the spacecraft that Nasa has used to travel to and from the International Space Station – which would leave astronauts dependent on Boeing or Russia to get them home. 'SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' he wrote. As a reminder, Musk is 53. In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately Musk ratcheted things up even further when he amplified a tweet by Gamergater Ian Miles Cheong calling for Trump to be impeached. (If it happened, it would be for a record third time.) Yes Having backed the US president to the hilt during the election campaign, and joined his administration, Musk then declared: 'The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year.' The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year With an 'eyebrow raised' emoji, Musk posted a well-known NBC video of Trump with Epstein at a party in 1992, dancing, joking and making comments about women. 🤨 The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, described the feud as 'an unfortunate episode from Elon'. Musk posted a meme referring to the persistent online suggestions that he uses ketamine and to his associating Trump with Epstein. In 2024, Musk said he uses the drug on prescription for medical reasons. 😂🎯 … but then shortly before 7am a reporter asked Trump about the supposed phone call he was going to have with Musk later in the day. 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump asked. Here we go again …
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's trade guru rips into Elon Musk for overstaying 'expiration date' and predicts his next financial move
Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro brushed off the exploding feud between President Trump and Elon Musk by comparing the world's richest man to something a consumer might forget about in the back of the fridge. Navarro, a Trump loyalist who served four months in prison for refusing to comply with a congressional subpoena, was among the first Trump Administration officials on camera after the Trump-Musk clash went into meltdown mode. The two men were completely at odds over Trump's tariffs, which prompted a reporter to ask Navarro at the White House whether he was glad to see Musk out of the fray. 'No, I'm not glad. Whatever,' Navarro replied. 'It's – people come and go from the White House. He was a Special Government Employee with an expiration date,' Navarro said. Musk served in government as a 'Special Government Employee,' and the administration cited the 130-day limit when explaining his departure, although Trump had the power to renew it. Trump himself used language Thursday that gave the impression he fired Musk. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave,' Trump wrote in just one of his slams on his former first buddy. Later, Navarro, 75, had something nice to say about Musk's team of programmers and aides who got access to agency computer systems and searched for contracts. 'I work with the DOGE folks a lot here, and I've got a very special project, which at some point I'll come out here and talk about with them,' Navarro said. He claimed to have identified a government computer program that 'is run like a 1950s IBM punch card operation at great expense.' 'We're going to turn that from a Model T into a Ferrari,' he said. But he refused to divulge specifics on a extraordinary intervention. 'Stay tuned,' he said. Navarro has been a key proponent of Trump's tariffs, during both the first and second term, helping promote Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs that the administration calls 'reciprocal' to hit back at countries running a trade surplus with the U.S. In his stunning clash with Trump Thursday, Musk wrote that 'The Trump Tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year.' That put him at odds with Trump's cherished policy – and Trump's 'favorite word' in the dictionary – even while taking on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which is Trump's top legislative priority. Navarro tried to smooth over the policy differences. 'Well, look, Elon Musk does not like tariffs. Full stop. He's made that clear from Day One and going back to the first term, he's not a tariff guy, which is fine. We can have disagreements about it. But I would say that everybody during our first term who said that the tariffs were going to be recessionary and inflationary were obviously, obviously and widely wrong.'
