
High Court ruling expected in UK arms to Israel challenge
The British High Court is expected to deliver a verdict on Monday morning in the legal challenge over the UK government's continued supply of F-35 fighter jet parts to Israel.
The ruling in the case brought by the UK-based Global Legal Action Network (Glan) and Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq is the most anticipated in the arms control community since the government was taken to court over its arms sales to Saudi Arabia during its bombing campaign in the Yemen war.
The challenge over UK arms exports to Israel was first filed in late October 2023, soon after Israel launched an attack on Gaza following the Hamas-led attacks in Israel earlier in the month.
Under the Tory government, UK arms exports to Israel continued without any apparent change, despite concerns raised as early as November 2023 by the Foreign Office unit assessing Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law.
Last September, the newly elected Labour government suspended around 30 export licenses for UK-made arms that the government assessed could be used in Gaza.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The legal case then shifted to focus on the UK-made F-35 fighter jet parts sent to a global F-35 programme spare parts pool which the government exempted from suspension.
UK-made F-35 components make up 15 percent of every F-35, one of the world's most sophisticated fighter jets which Israel has used extensively in its campaign in Gaza, as well as in Lebanon and more recently in Iran.
Israeli and US officials concerned Trump could push F-35 sale to Saudi Arabia Read More »
The government has argued that there is no way the UK could unilaterally halt the export of UK-made parts without impacting the worldwide fleet of F-35s and threatening global peace and security.
Glan and Al-Haq, and three British human rights organisations which are parties to the case, argue that under the Arms Trade Treaty and the Genocide Convention, the UK, as a state party to both, is obligated to stop sending the parts and that, by failing to follow its obligations, is threatening the rule of law globally.
The ruling is expected to appear online on the National Archives website at 10:30am.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
41 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli military officials admit to shooting at Palestinians waiting for humanitarian aid
Israeli military officials admitted they fired at Palestinian civilians lining up for aid in Gaza even though they posed no threat, according to a report by Haaretz newspaper on Monday. The admission follows a report by the newspaper on Friday in which Israeli soldiers admitted they were directed to fire at starving civilians at the five distribution points in Gaza, where the US-Israel backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) has been delivering limited aid since 27 May. Nearly 600 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces seeking aid since then. The officials in the Southern Command unit said they were 'ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near food distribution sites in Gaza, even when no threat was present' and said 'that civilians had been killed due to 'inaccurate and uncalculated' artillery fire', according to the report. They said that in the most serious incident, between 30 and 40 people were targeted.


Middle East Eye
42 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump lifts bulk of US sanctions against Syria
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Monday to end the US sanctions programme on Syria. He had initially made the surprise announcement during a speech in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in May, and also met with interim Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa while there. "This is in an effort to promote and support the country's path to stability and peace," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters ahead of the signing. "The order will remove sanctions on Syria while maintaining sanctions on the former President Assad, his associates, human rights abusers, drug traffickers, persons linked to chemical weapons activities, ISIS and their affiliates, and Iranian proxies," she added. Trump, she said, is "committed to supporting a Syria that is stable, unified and at peace with itself and its neighbours... this is another promise made, and promised kept by this president to promote peace and stability in the region'. Syria's Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani welcomed the move in a post on X. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "This decision represents an important turning point that will help propel Syria toward a new phase of prosperity, stability, and openness to the international community," he wrote. "By removing this major obstacle to economic recovery, the doors to long-awaited reconstruction and development will be opened, along with the rehabilitation of vital infrastructure, creating the conditions necessary for the dignified and safe return of displaced Syrians to their homeland." The text of the order was made public late on Monday afternoon local time in Washington, and stipulated that the circumstances that initially gave rise to the programme "have been transformed by developments over the past 6 months, including the positive actions taken by the new Syrian government under President Ahmed al-Sharaa." The lifting of the sanctions and the issuance of waivers that permit the relaxation of export controls, it added, are moves that support "US national security and foreign policy goals". Anyone who has "materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of the former regime of Bashar al-Assad" will continue to be sanctioned, the text said. Other parties who are designated as terrorists in the US will remain on those lists. Sharaa himself had a $10m bounty on his head until it was lifted in December. When Trump met with Sharaa in Riyadh, he said he was impressed by the leader, a former al-Qaeda fighter who fought against US forces in Iraq. Decades of punitive measures The sanctions regime on Syria was five decades in the making, predating even the 2011 Arab Spring and Syrian Civil War. When Hafez al-Assad took power in Syria in a 1970 coup, Syria was receiving financial and military aid from the Soviet Union. The elder Assad was renowned for keeping channels open to the US and its Cold War foes, but in 1979, he fell out with the US over Lebanon, and Syria was designated a state sponsor of terrorism. The designation put Syria in the same group as Cuba and Iran. It imposed sweeping new restrictions on US foreign aid, a ban on defence sales, export controls for dual-use items and other financial restrictions. In 2004, the George W Bush administration accused Syria, by then ruled by Hafez's son Bashar, of possessing weapons of mass destruction, supporting militant groups in the region (including Hezbollah and Hamas) and destabilising Iraq and Lebanon. Jordan's king warned US against assassinating Syria's Sharaa before Trump meeting Read More » It further limited economic interactions with Syria, banning most exports and freezing the assets of several individuals and entities. The most extensive set of global sanctions came after 2011, when the Assad government cracked down on peaceful anti-government protests, sparking a civil war. In response to war crimes and serious human rights violations, the EU froze the assets of state-linked individuals and banned them from admission to Europe. It also prohibited the purchase, sale and export of goods in sectors that may be used against civilians, including technology, oil and gas. The US went further still, banning all trade ties, including the re-export of US goods and services to Syria, with the exception of food and medicine. In 2019, under the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act - named after 'Caesar', a Syrian military defector who smuggled out tens of thousands of photos showing torture and deaths in prisons - secondary sanctions were introduced. These allowed the US to punish companies in other countries if they engaged in transactions with sanctioned Syrian companies and entities. In December 2024, after a brutal 14-year civil war, Sharaa's rebel forces, who had been in control of Aleppo, toppled Damascus, ending the Assad dynasty. Assad fled with his family to Moscow. Syria's strategic importance Last month, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers that to attract much-needed foreign investment in Syria, the US will begin by issuing waivers under the Caesar Act. However, waivers have expiry dates, and until further progress is made by the interim government, that seems to be the extent to which the US will issue relief, he indicated at the time. "I don't think the issue with them right now is a matter of willingness or lack of willingness. It's a lack of capability," Rubio said of Sharaa's efforts to rein in armed factions. For Washington, there's also the crucial matter of its primary partner in the region, Israel. "We've had conversations with them about this, what we view as an opportunity for Israel, if, in fact, Syria is stable and has in it a government that has no interest... in fighting a war," Rubio told lawmakers. He said there have been some assurances from Damascus. "Obviously, you have to prove it, but they have said this is a nationalist project. They are seeking to build a nation. They're not viewing themselves as a launch pad for revolution. They're not viewing themselves as a launch pad for attacks against Israel." Israel occupied Syria's Golan Heights, where Sharaa's family comes from, in 1967, and today, Trump recognises it as Israeli territory despite the United Nations asserting its illegality. When Bashar al-Assad's reign collapsed, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered troops into the Golan Heights buffer zone "to ensure that no hostile force embeds itself right next to the border of Israel". He also ordered the bombing of dozens of sites across Syria that he maintained were weapons caches for Hezbollah, an ally of the deposed leader of Syria.


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Saudi Public Investment Fund's profits plunge 60 percent
Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund's net profits plunged 60 percent in 2024, reflecting inflation and lower energy prices along with struggles to complete some of the kingdom's flagship giga-projects. Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF) has more than $1 trillion dollars in assets and generated just $6.9bn in net profits in 2024, according to results it released on Monday. PIF's gross revenue rose 25 percent compared to last year. The jump was added by investments in local Saudi firms maturing, like the Saudi National Bank. But the rise was not enough to offset higher interest rates and what PIF called 'impairments' on select projects. PIF is the main vehicle for Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's bid to diversify his country's economy away from a reliance on energy. PIF has invested in local tech startups, sports, and luxury developments on the Red Sea. But for now, oil still accounts for roughly 61 percent of Saudi Arabia's revenue, according to its 2025 budget. PIF also generates money from owning shares in Aramco, the Saudi state oil company. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Saudi Arabia's spending benefited from higher energy prices after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. But crude has since plunged to around $65 per barrel, despite the war between Israel and Iran. Saudi Arabia has had to scale back some of its more ambitious mega-projects like Neom. The futuristic development was originally billed as a $1.5 trillion project that would be 33 times the size of New York City and include a 170km straight-line city known as "The Line'. Instead of 1.5 million people living in the city by 2030, Saudi officials anticipate fewer than 300,000 residents. Meanwhile, only 2.4km of the city will be completed by 2030. In April, the Financial Times reported that the CEO of the futuristic city had launched a 'comprehensive review' of the kingdom's mega-project, signifying more belt-tightening to come with falling energy prices. Why Saudi Arabia can spend more money than it makes, even as oil prices drop Read More » Saudi Arabia has had trouble luring foreign investors to its programme, and PIF has had to carry the weight. The fund owns US stocks like Uber and Meta and has invested in overseas infrastructure projects with Blackstone. However, PIF governor Yasir al-Rumayyan said in October that the fund would focus more on the domestic Saudi market as it looks to advance the crown prince's Vision 2030 programme. Saudi Arabia has also turned to debt to finance its projects, which makes the kingdom's goals susceptible to rising interest rates. In January, the fund raised $4bn in an international bond sale, and in June rolled out a new special purpose vehicle to issue short-term debt. Saudi Arabia has seen solid demand for its debt among investors and has shown a willingness to run budget deficits. The kingdom's 2025 budget expects a fiscal deficit of $27bn or 2.3 percent of GDP. However, that number could rise. According to a report published in April by the Arab Gulf States Institute, if oil prices were to average $65 per barrel in 2025, the deficit would likely be around $56bn or 5.2 percent of GDP.