Department of Education seek parents' views on integrated education
The Department of Education (DE) is to ask parents in Northern Ireland if they want more integrated schools.It will also commission a call for more schools to transform to become integrated.That is despite a recent controversial decision by Education Minister Paul Givan to turn down bids by two schools in North Down to become integrated. The commitments are contained in a new five-year strategy from DE for integrated education called Vision 2030. But the strategy has been criticised by an organisation representing former pupils from integrated schools.
'Is this strategy already redundant?'
The head of Integrated AlumNI, Dr Matthew O'Neill, said the department had "achieved so little in moving integrated education forward"."If schools that go through the democratic process to transform can still be blocked, what does this mean for the future of the sector and whether this strategy can be fully implemented?"We have recently seen the biggest school in Northern Ireland blocked from becoming an Integrated school, despite overwhelming parental demand."If political decisions can overturn parental choice, is this strategy already redundant?"More young people should have access to these benefits that integrated education provides, and above all, parental choice must be respected and supported," he said.
The Vision 2030 strategy also said that the department expects to spend about £500m on integrated school buildings by 2030.Part of the strategy is assessing the demand for integrated education and places in integrated schools.It said there was a "gap" between broad support for the idea of integrated education and the availability of places in integrated schools.To find out the level of demand from parents, the department is to survey them in April 2025 to assess "the level of societal inclination for integrated education," according to the strategy.It said research had shown that contact between Catholics and Protestants was associated with "lower levels of prejudice and increased trust". But the strategy said that "comprehensive evidence on demand" for integrated education was needed to enable informed decisions.
'Society emerging from conflict'
There are currently 71 integrated schools in Northern Ireland, educating about 27,000 pupils.However only about 8% of schoolchildren in Northern Ireland go to integrated schools despite the first integrated school, Lagan College, being set up more than 40 years ago.Overall, according to DE, about a third of pupils in integrated schools are Protestant, a third are Catholic and a third are from a non-Christian or non-religious background.Previous analysis from the department suggested there were not enough places at integrated post-primary schools to meet demand in several areas of Northern Ireland."Integrated education has much to offer the school system and society as a whole," the Vision 2030 strategy said."We live in a society emerging from conflict," it said."Therefore, building a strong and shared community is a key objective for government."It also recognised that "public understanding of integrated education could be improved" and would commission research on the public's knowledge of integrated education.The department's strategy aims "to set out clear targets and benchmarks for the development of Integrated Education" from 2025-2030.But a previous Department of Education (DE) strategy on integrated education was also criticised by Integrated AlumNI, who called it "an action plan with no action".
The department has a legal obligation to give more support to integrated education, since Stormont voted in favour of a new law in March 2022.The law was the result of a bill brought by the Alliance MLA Kellie Armstrong.It means DE has to grow the number of integrated school places and the number of children being educated in them.But earlier this year the Education Minister Paul Givan turned down a bid by Northern Ireland's largest school Bangor Academy, and a nearby primary school, to become integrated.In doing so he cited the new law and said that there was not enough evidence that there would be enough Catholic pupils at Bangor Academy, or Rathmore Primary School, for them to provide integrated education.But those decisions are due to face legal challenges.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
18 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Outrage as Trump's Education Department forced to pay $7 million per MONTH to 'idle employees'
The Department of Education is reportedly spending $7 million a month on employees who are not even working according to a shocking new report. The department has spent over $21 million on idle employees over the last three months per calculations made by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Local 252. Part of the employees collecting checks include those that accepted the Trump 'buyout' at the start of his second term. The Trump administration offered federal workers a chance to voluntarily vacate their government posts while remaining on the payroll for months, with many opting to get checks through September 2025. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, chair of the Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) a subcommittee of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability told the Daily Mail in that 'President Trump gave federal workers an incredible offer—8 months of pay to walk away. Hardly anyone gets that kind of deal.' 'But now, thanks to the courts, $7 million a month is being wasted on idle employees at the Department of Education. If the courts had respected the will of the American people when they voted for DOGE, we wouldn't be in this mess,' Greene continued. 'President Trump ran on cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from the federal government, which included defunding the Department of Education, and that's exactly what Americans voted for.' 'The people want DOGE cuts. The courts are forcing wasteful spending,' Greene concluded. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), who heads up DOGE government slashing efforts in the Senate told the Daily Mail in a statement that federal employees wasting taxpayer funds in such a manner is a 'complete slap in the face to the hardworking Americans footing the bill.' 'From attending Mardi Gras to engaging in union activities and even appealing creepy personal misconduct violations, federal employees have long abused paid administration leave to escape work,' Ernst stated. 'For years, I have exposed how do-nothing bureaucrats cost taxpayers millions every year. It is a complete slap in the face to the hardworking Americans footing the bill.' 'I am working with the Trump administration to undo the years of backwards bureaucratic policy in Washington to ensure that anyone collecting a taxpayer-funded paycheck is spending their day serving the American people,' Ernst added. Senator Ernst has worked to expose the billion dollar cost of do-nothing bureaucrats in her $2 trillion roadmap for the Trump administration to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse. Trump's education secretary Linda McMahon pushed during her confirmation hearing earlier this year for her Department to be completely shut down, a move in line with promises made by the president on the campaign trail last year. At her February confirmation hearing, McMahon noted that 'in conjunction with [Trump's] fervor to shut down the bureaucracy of the Department of Education, he has also stated that he will work with Congress to make that happen.' Back in February, the Trump administration also moved to decrease the size of the federal government by announcing a voluntary deferred resignation program for federal employees. An estimated 75,000 federal employees across agencies took the differed resignation offer under which they were promised to be paid and provided with benefits until September 30th, 2025 or until they accepted a new job. In March, the Department of Education cut nearly half of its workforce, a total of nearly 1,300 employees. After the reduction in DOE staffing levels was announced, Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight Government Reform and House Committee on Education and Workforce sent a letter to McMahon expressing their disapproval with the move. 'The approximately 1,300 employees who you wish to leave the Department are dedicated public servants who have devoted their careers to serving their country and ensuring that all students are able to learn and to thrive, regardless of race, gender, disability, or zip code,' the Democrats noted. 'Discarding thousands of civil servants without regard for their job performance is an attack on those hardworking and passionate individuals as well as our government and the critical services it provides,' they continued.
The Herald Scotland
19 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Does Labour have the guts to ditch the trans activism and Gaza-ology?
Mr Swinney seems a bright chap, but even he seems to have been dulled by daily proximity to his cabinet. Responding to the SNP's loss of the seat, he'd wisely declared that supporters of Reform UK in Scotland were not racist. It's just that ordinary people had opted for them out of their concerns about Brexit, he claimed. If this is the quality of the advice he's getting from his battalion of spin merchants then he needs to start culling them now. The loathing that his party and some prominent independence activists have for working class communities was also on display in the immediate aftermath of the by-election. What intensified their fury was that their votes were more or less evenly split between a Labour candidate whom they associated with Scotland's white Protestant working class and a Reform candidate who also appealed to this community. In diverse, progressive and enlightened Scotland there can be many cultures but some are less equal than others. Read more One tweet from a high profile independence activist characterised the loathing for working class Scots that has been evident in nationalist circles recently. 'Congratulations to all the loyalist North Britons who voted Labour, Tory, Libdem & Reform yesterday for Scotland to remain a provincial backwater. Well done. The bigots will have even more of a swagger on their orange marches led by an MSP as ignorant as themselves. No Surrender!' And nor was this a sudden burst of intemperate fury. The SNP's revulsion for every-day, working-class Scots has been building for years throughout the Sturgeon/Yousaf/Swinney era. It's been visible in their callous attitudes to Scotland's annual addiction mortality rates and their Hate Speech legislation. In the last week or so, I've spent time in Edinburgh's Wester Hailes neighbourhood; walked the streets of Larkhall and chatted to students at Glasgow University. In Wester Hailes High School, the head teacher and his staff are working closely with community groups to secure real jobs and careers for pupils, many of whose families are menaced daily by health inequality and in-work poverty. In Larkhall, working-class people who come from a sound Labour and trade union background never mentioned Brexit or immigration. They had simply begun to realise how much Scotland's so-called progressive, left-wing elite actually despises them. In Glasgow University I listened to a young student journalist, among the best of his generation, talk about how working-class Glaswegians on campus are often viewed with class contempt. The new fraudulent Left who have hollowed out the independence movement; the Labour Party and trade union activism have abandoned these people. They have contrived a suite of no-risk, arms-length credos by which they judge whether you can be admitted to their platinum lounges. In no particular order they are trans activism, climatism and Gaza-ology. A Stop The War coalition march against the war in Gaza at Queen's Park in Glasgow (Image: Gordon Terris) None of them entail anything more than proclaiming slogans on social media, some flag-waving on marches and assembling the odd firing squad to harass those not deemed to be true believers. Lately, a little dose of good, old-fashioned anti-Semitism has been added to the mix. Ordinary Scots recoil at authentic transphobia and want to be kind to the environment. They are not racists and they're appalled at the death and destruction in Gaza. However, despite being dismissed as ill-educated by the salonistas of the Scottish Left, they deploy nuance to these debates. They also wonder why, after 25 years in which Scotland's devolved government has been solely in the hands of left-wing parties we still have a housing crisis, stubbornly high child poverty rates and the worst drugs deaths figures in Europe. The communities who appeared at the top of the first Multi-Deprivation Index still stubbornly cling to their places nearly two decades later. In the endless struggle against workplace inequality and profiteering they would normally expect the trade union movement to be their champions. You can forget about that, though. The STUC is currently led by an international property tycoon with five homes across Scotland and Spain and a recently-purchased £100k plot of land. As long as Roz Foyer remains in place anything the unions say about homelessness or redistribution of wealth is rendered meaningless. Ms Foyer was also a panellist earlier this month in an anti-racism event to stop Reform. It also featured one campaigner whose inchoate rant featured the word scum a lot and a London-based activist who was shouting so loudly all through her infantile diatribe that the permanent residents of the nearby Ramshorn kirk-yard were in danger of being roused from their eternal slumbers. Read more In almost two hours of this the only rational contribution was from a working-class Labour councillor who reminded the audience that 25 years of class-shaming by Scotland's political establishment were driving multitudes to Reform. In Hamilton last week, one senior Labour activist, though jubilant at Davy Russell's triumph, was refusing to get carried away by it. 'What's been really interesting is that there's been stuff around class and elitism on the doorsteps,' he said. It's been evident the massive disconnect between these people and the groups they've traditionally relied upon to fight for them. 'All the parties of the Left have lost their ability to communicate with everyday people. They're all focusing on identity politics and other issues that are of no concern to working people. Labour especially needs to do some deep thinking about what we stand for and what it means to be on the Left.' Until recently, the election of a man like Davy Russell in the West of Scotland would have passed unremarked. It's just that we've grown so accustomed to a Holyrood dominated by shallow chancers reading from scripts prepared by their £1.7m spin section that the victory of someone who doesn't fit that mould seemed so startling. Kevin McKenna is a Herald writer and columnist. He is Features Writer of the Year and writes regularly about the working-class people and communities of Scotland.
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Trump wants to shrink the cap on Pell Grants. It could have a major impact on paying for college
Donald Trump is asking Congress to slash federal financial aid for low-income students as he works to offset the expected multi-trillion-dollar cost of his flagship tax cuts. In its annual budget request for 2026, the Department of Education proposed reducing the maximum payout of Pell Grants by 22 percent, from $7,395 to $5,710. Meanwhile, more stringent college credit requirements proposed in Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' would reportedly affect more than half of all Pell Grant recipients and deny access completely for around 10 percent. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the Bill in its current form would add roughly $2.4tn to the U.S. government deficit between now and 2036 — largely due to extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts, which were skewed towards the richest Americans. The White House has pushed back on that figure, claiming that merely renewing previous tax cuts should not be counted as an extra hit to the deficit. Who receives Pell Grants? A Pell Grant is a permanent financial award for first-time undergraduate students with few monetary resources, established in 1965 by the Higher Education Act. Unlike student loans, they never need to be repaid. While Pell Grants by themselves rarely pay for a full undergraduate degree, they can be supplemented by other programs and form a key part of low-income students' overall aid package. Nearly 40 percent of undergraduate students received Pell Grants in the 2019-20 academic year, according to the Department of Education. Of those recipients, at least 20 percent are estimated to attend community college. Who would Trump's cuts affect? Technically, the DoE's new budget request merely keeps Pell Grant funding at the same level as it was in 2024 and 2025. But because the number of people seeking grants has risen since then, that would mean cutting the maximum award to $5,710. Mark Kantrowitz, an independent higher education expert, told CNBC the change would add about $6,500 on average to the debt burden of Pell Grant recipients who earn bachelor's degrees. The DoE is also proposing to cut its federal work-study program, which helps eligible low-income students keep and maintain part-time jobs by subsidizing their wages. Instead of covering up to 75 percent, the government would now pay only 25 percent. Separate provisions in the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' would reportedly increase the number of course credits required to get the maximum Pell Grant from 12 per semester to 15 for part time students and from 24 to 30 for full time students, as well as cutting off less than half-time students completely. According to the Budget Office, that would reduce grants for more than half of Pell recipients and render about 10 percent of current recipients entirely ineligible. Unlike Trump's budget request, the Bill also proposes additional funding for Pell Grants overall, so it's not clear how these two sets of provisions would combine.
