Fact check: Yes, MPS does indeed have a larger tax levy than the City of Milwaukee
Milwaukee Public Schools has been making recent headlines as a judge on Feb. 18, 2025, said the school board overseeing MPS and the city of Milwaukee must split the cost of a school police program down the middle and put police in schools with a deadline of Feb. 27, according to a Feb. 19, 2025, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article.
On deadline day, a judge held the city of Milwaukee in contempt of court for failing to comply with his previous order to have school resource officers in Milwaukee Public Schools by Feb. 27.
Milwaukee Circuit Judge David Borowski stayed that order, however, giving the city until March 15 to get the officers in schools or face a $1,000-per-day fine, according to a Feb. 27, 2025 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel news report.
In the run-up to the earlier court decision, Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson discussed his January meeting with GOP legislative leaders at the Capitol during a Jan. 12, 2025, appearance on WISN-12 News 'UpFront' program. Johnson spoke of his support for getting 25 Milwaukee police officers back into Milwaukee Public Schools.
'Well, you have to have the funding in order to get the officers,' Johnson said. 'When you go to a restaurant and you order a meal, the chef doesn't prepare your meal and then pick up the check. That's what MPS is asking. I think that's wrong for taxpayers in the City of Milwaukee, especially given the fact that presently, right now, after the referendum, Milwaukee Public Schools has a larger tax levy than the City of Milwaukee.'
The deadline is the latest development in a lawsuit seeking to force the MPS school board and city of Milwaukee to comply with a state law known as Act 12. Since Jan. 1, 2024, the law has required the presence of 25 police officers in MPS during school hours, among other things.
In April, Milwaukee voters narrowly approved a referendum that will increase property taxes to prevent major budget cuts at Milwaukee Public Schools, according to an April 3, 2024 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article.
The referendum was crafted to allow MPS to gain an additional $140 million for the next school year, then ramp up to $252 million annually by the 2027-28 school year, according to the Journal Sentinel report. Without the referendum money, MPS projected that it would face a $200 million budget shortfall in the next school year because of rising costs. Those costs include: inflationary raises for staff, filling vacant positions and retaining staff who were funded by sunsetting pandemic-relief aid.
The mayor's claim that Milwaukee Public Schools has a larger tax levy than the City of Milwaukee after the referendum, piqued the interest of PolitiFact Wisconsin, so let's take a look.
When asked to support the mayor's statement, Jeff Fleming, Johnson's communications director,
expanded on the statement.
'The mayor's point was, with the school referendum passed last year, MPS has more budgeting flexibility than city government,' Fleming said in an email to PolitiFact Wisconsin. 'The statement was not offered as a criticism of MPS.'
A chart prepared by the office of City of Milwaukee Comptroller Bill Christianson shows the total citywide tax levies for 2023 at $855.5 million and 2024 at $963.7 million, an increase of 12.6%.
A breakdown of the citywide tax levies divided into five units of government:
Milwaukee Public Schools $320.2 million in 2023; $414.8 million in 2024, increase of 29.5%
City of Milwaukee $317.7 million in 2023; $324.2 million in 2024, increase of 2.0%
Milwaukee County $132.1 million in 2023; $136.3 million in 2024, increase of 3.2%
Sewerage District $51.8 million in 2023; $53.7 million in 2024, increase of 3.7%
Milwaukee Area Technical College $33.7 million in 2023; $34.7 million in 2024, increase of 3.0%
Breaking it down into a share of a one dollar bill, here's how much each entity received in 2024:
Milwaukee Public Schools, 43 cents
City of Milwaukee 34 cents
Milwaukee County 14 cents
Sewerage District 5 cents
MATC 4 cents
Andrew Reschovsky, Professor Emeritus of Public Affairs and Applied Economics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, in an email, said 'the mayor's statement is true,' and attached a table illustrating data that includes property tax revenue of the city government and the Milwaukee Public School District for the years 2000 through 2021.
The data shows that in 2009 and 2010 and again in 2024 and 2025, school property tax revenue (or levies) exceeded city property tax revenues, Reschovsky said in the email.
Johnson said 'After the referendum, Milwaukee Public Schools has a larger tax levy than the City of Milwaukee.'
Data from the City of Milwaukee Office of the Comptroller shows citywide tax levies divided into five units of government with Milwaukee Public Schools at $320.2 million in 2023; $414.8 million in 2024, an increase of 29.5% and the City of Milwaukee at $317.7 million in 2023; $324.2 million in 2024, an increase of 2.0%. An independent economist backs that up.
For a statement that is accurate and there's nothing significant missing, our rating is True.
'UpFront,' Mayor Cavalier Johnson, Jan. 12, 2025
Email, Jeff Fleming, mayor's office spokesman, Jan. 13, 2025
Email, Andrew Reschovsky, UW-Madison, Feb. 18, 2025
Email, City of Milwaukee, Office of the Treasurer, Jan. 14, 2025
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 'Voters narrowly approve MPS referendum, preliminary results show,' April 3, 2024
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 'Judge orders MPS and city of Milwaukee to equally split cost of school police program,' Feb. 17, 2025Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 'City will pay $1,000 a day if it can't name police who work in MPS schools by March 15,' Feb. 27, 2025
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Mayor Cavalier Johnson says MPS has larger tax levy than City of Milwaukee
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
37 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Speaker Johnson Downplays Musk's Influence, Suggests Republicans Will Pass Budget Bill
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on June 8 downplayed tech billionaire Elon Musk's critical comments and said that House Republicans will pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act backed by President Donald Trump. Last week, Musk and Trump got into a heated back and forth after the Tesla CEO repeatedly bashed the spending bill on social media. Trump suggested that it was because of its cuts to electric vehicle mandates, and at one point floated cutting federal money to Musk's companies. Meanwhile, Musk took credit for Trump and the GOP winning the 2024 election and threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans gather in Mackinaw City with message of unity ahead of 2026 battleground
U.S. Rep. Jack Bergman (R-Watersmeet) speaks to Michigan Republican Party donors, elected officials and activists at the Straits Area Lincoln Day Dinner event in Mackinaw City on June 7, 2025 | Photo by Ben Solis MACKINAW CITY – Hopped up on a series of fresh wins and with their man in the White House, Michigan Republicans on Saturday said they need to hold it together over the next year if they want to achieve a full sweep of key offices in 2026. With momentum at their backs, it appeared that nothing less would satisfy the nearly 150 donors and elected officials who met to dine at Audie's Restaurant in Mackinaw City for the Straits Area Lincoln Day Dinner. The guest list included two members of the state's congressional delegation – one who may very well seek the open U.S. Senate seat – the Michigan Legislature and many more local officials. Two GOP candidates for governor – former Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox and current Senate Minority Leader Aric Nesbitt (R-Porter Township) – were also in attendance, who stumped before the crowd with speeches heavy on potential policy for the state. Michiganders in 2026 will not only select a replacement for retiring Democratic U.S. Sen. Gary Peters, but also a new governor, secretary of state and attorney general. Control of the Michigan Senate is also up for grabs, with Republicans hoping the wind in their sails from President Donald Trump's 2024 victory will help them win back control of the entire state Legislature after Democrats swept races in 2022. Sen. John Damoose (R-Harbor Springs) said that fight is starting early and that he hoped his colleagues understood the measure of the moment. Looking out on the packed banquet hall in the back of Audie's Restaurant, Damoose said the energy was palpable. 'It made me think back to the dark days after 2020, where we just felt kicked in the teeth and we broke up and went into different corners, and we fought amongst ourselves,' Damoose said. 'We were downtrodden and we didn't really have a clear path forward. We were worried that the election wasn't fair.' Damoose said he then thought of his son, who was in high school at the time, and that if he had come home with a poor test score, he likely would have all kinds of excuses about why he failed that test. 'Even if that were true, I would tell him that I didn't care about that. I want to know what you are going to do to do better next time,' Damoose said. That parable was also indicative of what the kind of soul searching Republicans need to do heading into 2026. 'It hurt us to sit and fight. We saw the results of that in 2022, but we did a little better last year,' Damoose said. 'We want the same good things, but the bottom line is, if anybody's out there wondering whether we're divided, look at this [room] and look at the list of people who are here today, ready to win in 2026.' A family sometimes gets into arguments, but the bottom line is that they love each other, Damoose added. He also spoke highly of Sen. Jim Runestad (R-White Lake), chair of the Michigan Republican Party, whom Damoose said was committed to bringing them back together. Sen. Ed McBroom (R-Vulcan) said there will be challenging races for the MIGOP in the Upper Peninsula and it would take a lot of support to get across the finish line. The big prize, however, would be the top three executive offices, all currently held by Democrats. In a jab at Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Attorney General Dana Nessel and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson – the latter of whom is running for governor in 2026 – McBroom said it wouldn't take much to have candidates better than what Michigan has. U.S. Rep. Jack Bergman (R-Watersmeet), who attended the event along with headlining speaker U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-Zeeland), said Trump not being on the ballot means Republicans must focus on voter turnout. If they don't get the turnout equation right in 2026, Republicans could lose the U.S. House, and that would render the last years of Trump's presidency dead in the water. 'The Democrats will veto the Trump agenda, with all the impeachment and stuff that they will choose to do,' Bergman said before adding that he doesn't believe Democrats have a handle on their own platform. 'Who's your party leader? What's your party platform? What is your plan? When you don't have [all three], you're getting what you're getting.' Several protesters greeted Bergman with signs and chants as they walked along the sidewalk outside Audie's Restaurant. Undeterred, Bergman said that aside from holding the U.S. House, getting back control of Lansing in the Legislature and the executive branch should be donors and activists' main priority. The state House fell back into Republican control last year mostly due to Trump's resurgence and a plan executed by Michigan House Speaker Matt Hall (R-Richland Township). That has already had consequences for the Democrats who controlled both chambers last session as Republicans seek to roll back their legislative agenda and trim the budget with an ethos similar to that of DOGE, the Trump administration effort that has sought to slash, if not eliminate outright, the budgets of federal agencies and departments. Although the Democratic-controlled Michigan Senate has put forward its 2025 fiscal year budget, the state House has been slowwalking theirs, with members of the House Appropriations Committee noting how they're going through it with a fine-toothed comb every chance they can in statements or press conferences. Case in point: When speaking to the crowd on Saturday, Rep. John Roth (R-Interlochen) talked about his work thus far on appropriations, and said he had 10 items that he 'killed immediately' when he took over his budget. 'One was the water affordability bill that nobody could tell me why there was money in there for anything,' Roth said. 'So, $10 million, gone. We're having a lot of fun with that.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
LA unrest marks latest clash of US presidents, states over National Guard
Donald Trump's deployment of California's National Guard marks the first time in decades that a US president openly defied a state governor and sent troops to an emergency zone. By ordering 2,000 guardsmen to Los Angeles to help quell protests against raids by US immigration agents, Trump essentially mounted a takeover of the state's military regiments to address "lawlessness" on the city's streets. The National Guard is a reserve military rooted in the 17th century local militias created in the American colonies before the country's founding. Since then the guard has had multiple responsibilities: domestic disaster relief and security, homeland defense and prevention of civil unrest; and acting as reserve forces for US military deployments overseas. Presidential orders to deploy guardsmen domestically are not uncommon. But clashes between a president and governor over deployments -- or the lack thereof, such as during the US Capitol riot by Trump supporters on January 6, 2021 while he was still in office -- have been rare. - Los Angeles, 2025 - The White House said Trump relied on a seldom used law, known as Title 10, that permits National Guard federalization in times of "a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." California Governor Gavin Newsom called the decision "purposefully inflammatory." But Trump's order proceeded, and the guard troops were on LA streets Sunday. "This is the first time since 1965 that a president has deployed the National Guard without a request by a state governor," Kenneth Roth, a longtime former Human Rights Watch executive director, posted on X. "Then it was (president Lyndon) Johnson protecting civil rights protesters. Now it's Trump creating a spectacle so he can continue his immigration raids." Elizabeth Goitein of the Brennan Center for Justice warned of a "shocking abuse of power" by Trump, whose memorandum authorizes federalization of National Guard troops "at locations where protests against (federal immigration) functions are occurring or are likely to occur." "Trump has authorized the deployment of troops anywhere in the country where protests against ICE activity might occur," Goitein posted on X. "That is a huge red flag." - Alabama, 1965 - A landmark civil rights moment led to a National Guard clash between a president and a segregationist governor. With demonstrators led by Martin Luther King Jr on a five-day march from Selma to Alabama's capital Montgomery, governor George Wallace pledged National Guard security -- but then reneged. The U-turn incensed Johnson who, in defiance of Wallace, called up the guard. The march was protected by thousands of Army soldiers and federalized guard members. - Arkansas, 1957 - When the Little Rock school system was ordered desegregated, Arkansas' pro-segregationist governor Orval Faubus deployed the National Guard to surround a high school and prevent nine Black students from entering. President Dwight Eisenhower bristled at the standoff and told Faubus the guard must maintain order so the Black students could attend. Instead, Faubus pulled the guardsmen, leaving security to local forces. Eisenhower issued an executive order federalizing the Arkansas National Guard, and ordered 1,000 US Army troops to join them. - Kent State, 1970 - Perhaps no anti-Vietnam war protest was more pivotal than at Ohio's Kent State University, where students slammed Richard Nixon's war expansion. As unrest swelled, the National Guard opened fire, killing four students and wounding nine others. The shootings sparked outrage, but also led to reforms regarding how the guard handles civil unrest and use of force. - Hurricane Katrina, 2005 - The massive hurricane left much of New Orleans underwater, leading to the largest-ever peacetime deployment of the National Guard. But critics accused then-president George W Bush of favoring a militaristic response over humanitarian relief. Louisiana's governor, Kathleen Blanco, warned that many among the thousands of National Guard and federal troops were battle-tested Iraq war veterans. "These troops know how to shoot and kill and I expect they will," she reportedly said. - Outside White House, 2020 - June 1, 2020 saw a brutal crackdown on demonstrators following the police murder of African-American George Floyd. With people aggressively protesting near the White House, the National Guard joined police to maintain order. Flash grenades and tear gas were deployed. Unlike in the nation's 50 states, the DC National Guard is under direct command of the US president, who at the time was Trump. mlm/st
