Supreme Court sides with family of man killed by police after he was pulled over for toll violations
The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed the family of an unarmed 24-year-old man who was killed after being pulled over for suspected toll violations to continue his case for damages, ruling that appeals courts need to more thoroughly review an officer's actions before a police shooting.
The decision marked a rare instance of the conservative high court siding with the victim of a police shooting.
Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion for a unanimous court.
The excessive force suit from the family of Ashtian Barnes is one of many to make its way to the high court at a time when the nation and federal courts continue to wrestle with when to hold police accountable for split-second decisions that wind up being lethal.
Roberto Felix Jr., a traffic enforcement officer in Harris County, Texas, pulled Barnes over after a camera flagged his license plate for unpaid tolls. Seconds after Felix asked Barnes to step out of his Toyota Corolla, the car instead lurched forward with Felix standing on the door sill, firing.
The question was whether courts may consider the moments leading up to the threats police face – including, in this case, Felix's decision to step into the car's open door – when they're reviewing excessive force claims or whether courts can review only the 'moment of threat' and an officer's response.
The conservative 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that it could consider only the two-second span during which Barnes' car moved forward, potentially threatening Felix's life. Barnes' family asserted the court should have also considered what happened in the preceding three seconds.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Utah judge rules a convicted killer with dementia is competent to be executed
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A convicted killer in Utah who developed dementia while on death row for 37 years is competent enough to be executed, a state judge ruled late Friday. Ralph Leroy Menzies, 67, was sentenced to die in 1988 for killing Utah mother of three Maurine Hunsaker. Despite his recent cognitive decline, Menzies 'consistently and rationally understands" what is happening and why he is facing execution, Judge Matthew Bates wrote in a court order. 'Menzies has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that his understanding of his specific crime and punishment has fluctuated or declined in a way that offends the Eighth Amendment,' which prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, Bates said. Menzies had previously selected a firing squad as his method of execution. He would become only the sixth U.S. prisoner executed by firing squad since 1977. The Utah Attorney General's Office is expected to file a death warrant soon. Menzies' lawyers, who had argued his dementia was so severe that he could not understand why he was being put to death, said they plan to appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court. 'Ralph Menzies is a severely brain-damaged, wheelchair-bound, 67-year-old man with dementia and significant memory problems,' his attorney, Lindsey Layer, said in a statement. 'It is deeply troubling that Utah plans to remove Mr. Menzies from his wheelchair and oxygen tank to strap him into an execution chair and shoot him to death.' The U.S. Supreme Court has spared others prisoners with dementia from execution, including an Alabama man in 2019 who had killed a police officer. Over nearly four decades, attorneys for Menzies filed multiple appeals that delayed his death sentence, which had been scheduled at least twice before it was pushed back. Hunsaker, a 26-year-old married mother of three, was abducted by Menzies from the convenience store where she worked. She was later found strangled and her throat cut at a picnic area in the Wasatch Mountains of northern Utah. Menzies had Hunsaker's wallet and several other belongings when he was jailed on unrelated matters. He was convicted of first-degree murder and other crimes. Matt Hunsaker, who was 10 years old when his mother was killed, said Friday that the family was overwhelmed with emotion to know that justice would finally be served.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Democrats celebrate return of suspected human trafficker Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., who has led the party's advocacy for suspected gang member Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, is celebrating his return to the U.S., saying, "This is not about the man, it's about his constitutional rights." "For months, the Trump administration flouted the Supreme Court and our Constitution," Van Hollen asserted in a statement sent to Fox News Digital via email. "Today, they appear to have finally relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and with the due process rights afforded to everyone in the United States." Van Hollen was the first of several Democratic lawmakers to fly to visit Abrego Garcia after he was deported to a high-security prison in his home country, El Salvador, in March. Federal Judge Delivers One-two Punch To Trump In Abrego Garcia Case Abrego Garcia, 29, has been returned to the U.S. and is facing charges in a sealed federal indictment in Tennessee for alleged conspiracy to unlawfully transport illegal aliens for financial gain and unlawful transportation of illegal aliens. Read On The Fox News App Though many Democrats claim Abrego Garcia is an innocent man who was wrongly deported, the administration has pointed to considerable evidence he is a member of the MS-13 gang. Abrego Garcia allegedly moved illegal immigrants from Texas to interior states in what prosecutors say was an organized operation stretching back years. He has also been accused of being a member of the violent Salvadoran gang MS-13. According to court records filed by his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, he also allegedly physically abused her on multiple occasions. Ag Bondi Details 'Very Serious Charges' Facing Kilmar Abrego Garcia Since Abrego Garcia's deportation to his home country, Van Hollen has advocated for his return. After Fox News Digital asked Van Hollen in May whether he was aware of the domestic violence allegations against Abrego Garcia before he went to visit him in El Salvador, the senator became defensive, saying, "What I said here was these issues need to be litigated in the courts." In a statement Friday, Van Hollen doubled down on that sentiment, saying, "As I have repeatedly said, this is not about the man. It's about his constitutional rights, and the rights of all. "The administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along." Tennessee Bodycam Of 'Maryland Man' Traffic Stop Shows Troopers' Hands Tied Despite Smuggling Clues Despite the gravity of his alleged crimes, returning Abrego Garcia to the U.S. has become a major cause for the Democratic Party. Earlier Friday, another Maryland Democrat, Rep. Glenn Ivey, who also made a trip to El Salvador to advocate for Abrego Garcia, used his X account to promote an event to continue the "critical conversation on the fight to return those who are wrongfully imprisoned in El Salvador." Ivey claimed Abrego Garcia's case is "part of a much larger crisis — and we must not look away." Abrego Garcia's Wife Begged Judge For Protection Order, Saying 'He Slapped Me': Audio In a statement to Fox News Digital, Ivey also asserted that the Trump administration "defied the Supreme Court and misled the American people for months, saying they could not bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia back to the United States under any circumstances, knowing that they had the power to do so all along. "I went to El Salvador and advocated for Kilmar's return because he was entitled to due process under our Constitution. Kilmar will now get his day in court. I hope he receives the fair trial that he is guaranteed." Maryland Gov. Wes Moore also celebrated the news of Abrego Garcia's return, telling Fox News Digital, "I want to thank our federal delegation for their efforts to ensure our government adheres to the rule of law." "This was never about one person, but about the due process that governs all people in our country. Today due process prevailed," he said, adding, "The federal government will make its case in court, the courts will make informed decisions, and we expect the Trump administration to obey the courts so every person is afforded their Constitutional rights." Rep. Andy Harris, Maryland's lone Republican congressman, however, responded to the news of Abrego Garcia's return with disgust, posting on X, "What a waste of hard-earned taxpayer dollars. Bringing an already deported illegal alien criminal back to the US to be housed in a US jail at taxpayer expense so he can stand trial and then be deported back to his homeland." Fox News Digital also reached out to representatives Yassamin Ansari, D-Ariz., Maxine Dexter, D-Ore., Maxwell Frost, D-Fla. and Robert Garcia, D-Calif., all of whom have made trips to visit Abrego Garcia in article source: Democrats celebrate return of suspected human trafficker Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'What The F**k...': Watch Joe Rogan And Trump's FBI Director React To Musk's Post
Podcaster Joe Rogan — while recording an interview with conspiracy theorist and FBI Director Kash Patel on Thursday — was stunned as the two learned of billionaire Elon Musk's post linking Donald Trump to the Jeffrey Epstein files. 'What the fuck are they doing?' said Rogan, who's been credited for aiding Trump on his way to victory last year. Rogan read Musk's 'really big bomb' on the president word for word. 'Jesus Christ!' he remarked. Patel swiftly backed away from the topic. 'I'm not participating in any of that conversation between Elon and —,' said Patel, before cutting himself off. 'Someone should take his phone away,' Rogan said of Musk, before noting that Trump declared that he was 'disappointed' in the billionaire. He continued, 'Jesus Christ, that's a crazy thing to say. How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access to the Epstein files?' Patel shrugged off the inquiry. 'I don't know how he would, but I'm just staying out of the Trump-Elon thing, that's way outside my lane,' he said. 'I know my lane and that ain't it.' Rogan has previously described Musk as 'the great and powerful' while promoting the billionaire's appearance on his podcast in early November. He declared at the time that Musk made 'the most compelling case' for Trump just before rolling out his endorsement of the president. On Friday, Trump seemingly acknowledged Musk's post tying him to Epstein by reposting a statement by Epstein's former attorney David Schoen, who wrote that he asked the disgraced financier if he had any information 'to hurt' the president, to no avail. Epstein hired Schoen just nine days before he died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Trump has previously denied being on Epstein's plane or island. The two were spotted together on a number of occasions back in the '80s and '90s. Trump And Musk's 'Public Meltdown' Sparks 1 Gravely Concerning Question, Expert Says Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court To Leave Mass Layoffs At Education Department In Place Seth Meyers Points Out The Strangest Part Of Elon Musk And Trump's Feud
