logo
Court orders Costa Rican government to release Asian migrants deported by Trump

Court orders Costa Rican government to release Asian migrants deported by Trump

NBC News4 hours ago

Costa Rica's Constitutional Court on Tuesday ordered the government of Rodrigo Chaves to release Asian migrants deported by the Trump administration who have been held in a temporary shelter in the south of the Central American country since February.
The majority vote (4-3) of the justices found that the Costa Rican government violated the migrants' rights by failing to provide them with 'timely and sufficient information' about their immigration status or give them access to legal counsel. 'Nor was free contact with the media permitted, nor was there any information from the outset about the possibility of requesting asylum,' the constitutional court said in a statement.
The judges gave the Costa Rican government 15 days to release the deported migrants and ordered it to determine their immigration status 'individually' and based on the law, according to the statement.
In February, the Donald Trump administration sent 200 Asian migrants to Costa Rica on two deportation flights, including nearly 100 children. The deportees came from countries such as China, Afghanistan, India, Pakistan, Russia, and Uzbekistan. More than 70 were minors.
The agreement between the two countries was reached as Costa Rica feared that President Donald Trump would retaliate if it refused to accept the migrants, according to statements made to the press by the president and the foreign minister.
The deportees were immediately taken to the Temporary Migrant Care Center (CATEM), located in the canton of Corredores, seven miles from the border with Panama. They slept cramped in shared, poorly ventilated bunks in a hot, humid region where temperatures often exceed 90 degrees Fahrenheit.
As of Tuesday, 28 people remained deported, including 13 minors, from Armenia, Russia, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, Turkey, and Iran, Omer Badilla, Costa Rica's Deputy Minister of the Interior and Police, told Noticias Telemundo.
The vast majority of the deportees, 107, were repatriated to their countries of origin. Another 35 left the center on their own, and 30 requested asylum in Costa Rica, Badilla said.
Costa Rican authorities described the Constitutional Court's ruling as a 'serious error' and assert that the migrants still there 'enjoy complete freedom; they can leave and move freely,' according to Badilla.
'(The constitutional ruling) makes no sense. For months, these people have had regular immigration status and complete freedom of movement,' the official said.
"From our perspective, the Constitutional Court is mistaken and making a serious error. It clearly doesn't understand the current situation at CATEM,' he added.
The constitutional ruling responds to a habeas corpus petition against the Costa Rican government filed by the country's former Minister of Communications, Mauricio Herrera.
In late April, Costa Rica granted humanitarian immigration status to the migrants held at the shelter after a group of human rights lawyers filed a lawsuit against the country before the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, alleging that the government violated the rights of 81 migrant minors by detaining them at the shelter without legal counsel or access to education or psychological services.
At the time, Costa Rican authorities announced that the migrants, whose passports were confiscated upon arrival in the country, would receive their documents back and were free to leave the shelter and seek options to leave Costa Rica or seek asylum if they so desired.
In April, Noticias Telemundo visited CATEM and spoke with some of the migrants, including 36-year-old Russian German Smirnov, who was deported with his wife and 6-year-old son. The man, originally from St. Petersburg, said he worked in his country as an electoral official and witnessed how elections were manipulated in Russia. He said he sought out the organization of opposition leader Alexei Navalny, who died in a Siberian prison in 2024, to report fraud in the 2024 elections, but authorities under Vladimir Putin's regime discovered him.
["If I return to Russia] they'll put me in jail or send me to war. It's simple, because my country is at war with a neighboring country,' he said.
Help the powerful brother of the north
In announcing the agreement with the United States, Costa Rican President Rodrigo Chaves said the country was helping its 'economically powerful brother to the North' and indicated that they feared punishment if they did not accept the migrants.
'If they impose a tax on our free trade zones, they'll screw us,' Chaves said. 'I don't think they'll do it, thank God... love is repaid with love... 200 come, we treat them well, and they leave...' he stated at a press conference.
Costa Rican Foreign Minister Arnoldo André Tinoco also expressed the country's fear of Trump's 'pressure,' although he denied that it had materialized.
'What the president [Rodrigo Chaves] meant was that, through a gesture of goodwill, we would somewhat alleviate the pressure if the United States were thinking of imposing some kind of restriction that doesn't interest us. Of course, we're not interested,' André said in an interview with Noticias Telemundo in late March.
'There's no pressure. Possibility? Of course it exists. Yes. Look at what the new US administration is doing around the world [...] You're not going to get me to say that I was pressured by the United States because that's not true,' he asserted.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran's Khamenei resurfaces to warn against future US attacks in first statement since ceasefire
Iran's Khamenei resurfaces to warn against future US attacks in first statement since ceasefire

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Iran's Khamenei resurfaces to warn against future US attacks in first statement since ceasefire

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Thursday that his country had delivered a 'slap to America's face' by striking a U.S. air base in Qatar and warned against further attacks in his first public comments since a ceasefire agreement with Israel. Khamenei's prerecorded speech that aired on Iranian state television, his first appearance since June 19, was filled with warnings and threats directed toward the United States and Israel, the Islamic Republic's longtime adversaries. The 86-year-old, a skilled orator known for his forceful addresses to the country's more than 90 million people, appeared more tired than he had just a week ago, speaking in a hoarse voice and occasionally stumbling over his words. The supreme leader downplayed U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites Sunday using bunker-buster bombs and cruise missiles, saying that U.S. President Donald Trump — who said the attack 'completely and fully obliterated" Iran's nuclear program — had exaggerated its impact. 'They could not achieve anything significant,' Khamenei said. Missing from his more than 10-minute video message was any mention of Iran's nuclear program and the status of their facilities and centrifuges after extensive U.S. and Israeli strikes. His characterization of Monday's strike on the U.S. air base in Qatar contrasted with U.S. accounts of it as a limited attack with no casualties. The White House responded to Khamenei's video, accusing him of trying to 'save face.' "Any commonsense, open-minded person knows the truth about the precision strikes on Saturday night," press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday. "They were wildly successful.' UN nuclear watchdog confirms damage to Iran sites The head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog, International Atomic Energy Agency Director Rafael Grossi, reiterated Thursday that the damage done by Israeli and U.S. strikes at Iranian nuclear facilities 'is very, very, very considerable" and that he can only assume the centrifuges are not operational. 'I think annihilated is too much, but it suffered enormous damage,' Grossi told French broadcaster RFI. The IAEA has not been allowed to visit any of the Iranian facilities to do an independent assessment of the damage. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, also conceded Wednesday that "our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure.' Khamenei has not been seen in public since taking shelter in a secret location after the outbreak of the war on June 13 when Israel attacked Iranian nuclear facilities and targeted top military commanders and scientists. After Sunday's attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, Trump was able to help negotiate a ceasefire that came into effect Tuesday. Iranian leader warns US against further attacks Khamenei claimed the U.S. had only intervened in the war because 'it felt that if it did not intervene, the Zionist regime would be utterly destroyed.' 'It entered the war to save them, yet it gained nothing,' he said. He said his country's attack Monday on the U.S. base in Qatar was significant, since it shows Iran 'has access to important U.S. centers in the region and can act against them whenever it deems necessary.' 'The Islamic Republic was victorious and, in retaliation, delivered a hand slap to America's face,' he said, adding, 'This action can be repeated in the future." 'Should any aggression occur, the enemy will definitely pay a heavy price,' he said. Trump has dismissed the retaliatory attack as a 'very weak response,' saying that the U.S. had been warned by Iran in advance and emphasizing that there had been no casualties. With the ceasefire, life slowly returns to normal in Iran On Thursday, Iran partially reopened its airspace, which had been closed since the war began, and shops in Tehran's capital began to reopen, with traffic returning to the streets. Majid Akhavan, spokesperson for the Ministry of Roads and Urban Development, said Iran had reopened its airspace for the eastern half of the country to domestic and international flights, including those transiting Iranian airspace. Earlier this week, Tehran said 606 people had been killed in the conflict in Iran, with 5,332 people wounded. The Washington-based Human Rights Activists group released figures Wednesday suggesting Israeli strikes on Iran had killed at least 1,054 and wounded 4,476. The group, which has provided detailed casualty figures from multiple rounds of unrest in Iran, said 417 of those killed were civilians and 318 were security forces. At least 28 people were killed in Israel and more than 1,000 wounded, according to officials there. During the 12-day war, Iran fired more than 550 missiles at Israel with a 90% interception rate, according to new statistics released by Israeli authorities Thursday. Israel, meantime, hit more than 720 Iranian military infrastructure targets and eight nuclear-related sites, Israel said. Trump has also asserted that American and Iranian officials will talk next week, giving rise to cautious hope for longer-term peace. Iran has not acknowledged that any such talks would take place, though U.S. Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff has said there has been direct and indirect communication between the countries. A sixth round of U.S.-Iran negotiations was scheduled for earlier this month in Oman but was canceled after Israel attacked Iran. Iran has insisted that it will not give up its nuclear program. In a vote underscoring the tough path ahead, its parliament agreed Wednesday to fast-track a proposal that would effectively stop the country's cooperation with the IAEA, which has monitored the program for years. ___ Associated Press writer John Leicester in Paris; Natalie Melzer in Nahariya, Israel; and Aamer Madhani in Washington contributed to this report.

Firm part owned by mega rich UK family wants taxpayer cash to save factory
Firm part owned by mega rich UK family wants taxpayer cash to save factory

Daily Mirror

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Firm part owned by mega rich UK family wants taxpayer cash to save factory

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds hit out at conglomerate Associated British Foods as it launches closure plans while talks continue An industry giant part owned by one of Britain's richest families yesterday ratcheted-up pressure on the government for taxpayers' money to save one of its factories. Associated British Foods, better known for owning high street fashion chain Primark, kicked off a consultation to close its Vivergo Fuels plant near Hull, with the loss of 160 jobs. The site makes bioethanol, which is used in petrol. ABF says the plant is losing £3million a month and blamed the government for failing to tackle an influx of cheap bioethanol from abroad, which to set to worsen under Labour 's trade deal with US President Donald Trump. ‌ ‌ But the move to an 'orderly wind-down' drew criticism from Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, given negotiations are ongoing. Speaking to reporters at the British Chambers of Commerce annual conference in London, he said: 'We are willing to engage with them and potentially put government money into a restructure. I regret Vivergo's decision to start consultations as to let the workforce go and close the plant. It is premature because we are in good faith in those negotiations.' The plea for government money comes despite ABF having a stock market value of £14.6billion, and making more than £1.9bn profit last year. The Weston family was ranked sixth in this year's Sunday Times Rich List, worth £17.7bn. They own a just under 21% stake in conglomerate ABF's majority shareholder. George Weston is chief executive of ABF. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said last week "the answer can't always be yes" when industries request support. But it comes days after the government revealed its flagship Industrial Strategy to boost investment in the UK. Insiders said the timing of the consultation was that ABF wanted to conclude the process, if needed, by the end of its financial year. ‌ Bioethanol is a "green" alternative used in fuels such as petrol and diesel. It is a plant-based material that is produced by fermenting and distilling crops such as wheat and corn. The Vivergo plant began operating in late 2012. The future of Britain's other major bioethanol producer, German-owned Ensus in North Yorkshire, is also unclear. In a statement, ABF later added: 'ABF cannot continue to absorb losses at the plant. That is why a timely solution is vital. Our clear preference is to find that solution through this process and to get back to running a business that can thrive in the long term."

Trump is making US intelligence parrot his line on Iran – we've been here before
Trump is making US intelligence parrot his line on Iran – we've been here before

The Guardian

time41 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump is making US intelligence parrot his line on Iran – we've been here before

In the run-up to the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, journalists covering the preparations for war became familiar with the concept of 'stovepiping'. The term described the tactic of pushing intelligence to key political decision makers, bypassing checks and balances within the system. A more familiar word would be cherrypicking: in the case of the Iraq war, the administration of George W Bush believed that Saddam Hussein was building weapons of mass destruction, and – minded to act on that belief – sought proof of its proposition. Convinced that it was right, it sought to streamline information that confirmed its bias. What fell by the wayside were conflicting views. Because intelligence is ultimately about assessing the likelihood of things which are difficult to know, stovepiping means a finger is put on the scale – and that process of assessment becomes flawed. If all this sounds uncannily familiar, it is because Donald Trump and some of his most senior officials – including the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, Vice-President JD Vance, the CIA director, John Ratcliffe, and defence secretary, Pete Hegseth – appear to be stovepiping in the crudest way. While the Bush administration, supported by the government of Tony Blair in Britain, turned the intelligence justification for war into a slippery PR exercise that entangled senior intelligence and military officials, Trump has applied the same approach he does to everything. Now, his sweeping statements over the damage done to Iran's nuclear facilities have turned into an inevitable test of loyalty for his officials who have scrambled to toe the line, even as intelligence leaks have raised doubts over the veracity of his claims. After the US airstrikes on Isfahan, Natanz and Fordo, Trump said on Saturday that 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' But on Tuesday a leaked assessment by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) concluded that the attacks probably only set back the nuclear program by a few months – and that much of Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium (HEU) may have been moved before the strikes. His ego piqued, Trump and those around him have made ever more outlandish claims: the attack was historically equivalent to the Nagasaki and Hiroshima bombs; the operation was the most sophisticated in human history. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), also said Iran's stockpile of HEU could not be accounted for. But Trump denied that the HEU had been moved, posting on social media: 'Nothing was taken out of facility'. On Friday, Hegseth followed suit, saying he was unaware of intelligence suggesting the material had been moved. The world has become used to Trump's tantrums, but the trustworthiness of the intelligence – before and after the attack – is profoundly important because it speaks to the credibility of the US on the most important issues of international security. Indicative, and more important than Trump's outbursts over the level of damage, has been the way in which the intelligence justifying the attack has been reshaped. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion In testimony to Congress earlier this year, Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence reflected the intelligence community's official view. She conceded that Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium was of a size 'unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons', but the spy agencies' assessment was that Iran had not recommenced work on building a nuclear weapon since that effort was suspended in 2003. Bullied by Trump, who last week dismissed her assessment, Gabbard quickly fell into line, claiming her remarks had been taken out of context by 'dishonest media' and that Iran could have been on the brink of making a weapon within 'weeks or months'. Trump's attack on Iran, as a Rolling Stone headline memorably put it last week, was based on 'vibes not intel'. Pressed by NBC why the Trump administration had chosen to ignore the intelligence estimate, Vance appeared to confirm this, saying: 'Of course we trust our intelligence community, but we also trust our instincts.' While the vice-president framed it as a collective stance, the reality is that Trump has long distrusted the US intelligence community – a friction that dates back to his first term when he pushed back at claims that Russian hackers had interfered to help him get elected, and appeared willing to believe Vladimir Putin's word over his own spy agencies. In that same period, Trump dismissed intelligence assessments and pulled the US out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the 2015 nuclear deal signed between Iran and other countries. He also appeared to prefer his own 'vibes' over intelligence assessments of North Korea's eagerness for detente. It is that history of trusting his own feelings above the US intelligence community that appears to add weight to the suspicion that Trump was personally swayed by Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, whose claims on Iran's nuclear weapons he has often parroted. Looking forward, Trump's intervention on the issue of the damage done to Iran's nuclear facilities is also crucially important. By setting out the narrative that the spy agencies are loyally expected to adhere to, Trump is slamming shut a door on actual investigation and intelligence-gathering. Proper curiosity and scepticism, Trump and those around him have made clear, will not be rewarded but could be damaging to careers. In the postmortem of the Iraq war, much attention was focused on the shutting down of debate within US and UK intelligence agencies – not least the lack of a culture of oppositional 'red team' analysis designed to challenge orthodox assumptions. As the US president attempts to bend intelligence to his instincts, the problem now is not that there is no 'red team', but that the entire intelligence community is now expected to be Team Trump.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store