Starmer signals he has duty to stop channel crossings following record weekend
Sir Keir Starmer has signalled it is his duty to ensure no one is crossing the English Channel in small boats after more than a thousand migrants made the journey in a single day for the first time this year.
Some 1,194 migrants arrived in 18 boats on Saturday, according to Home Office data.
It was the first time daily crossings topped a thousand in 2025, and prompted Defence Secretary John Healey to claim Britain had 'lost control' of its borders over the last five years.
As he made a major defence speech in Glasgow on Monday, the Prime Minister was asked if the Government was failing to keep the UK safe in the English Channel.
He told journalists: 'In relation to border security, I want to be really clear: nobody should be making that journey across the channel and it's our duty to make sure that we ensure that they don't.
'We are working very closely with our counterparts in France and elsewhere to take further action in northern France, and of course, we are giving enhanced powers to our own law enforcement through the Borders Bill, which is currently going through Parliament.'
Speaking about the previous Government's Rwanda plan, Sir Keir insisted it 'didn't deter anybody', after his decision to scrap it was highlighted.
He added: 'I'm not up for gimmicks. I'm up for the hard work of working with partners, enhancing the powers that law enforcement have, in my determination to take down the gangs that are running this vile trade.'
Saturday's crossings brought the provisional annual total so far of migrants who have made the journey to 14,811.
This is 42% higher than the same point last year (10,448) and 95% up from the same point in 2023 (7,610), according to PA news agency analysis of the data.
It is still lower than the highest daily total of 1,305 arrivals since data began in 2018, which was recorded on September 3 2022.
On Sunday, Mr Healey said the scenes of migrants being picked up by smugglers 'like a taxi' to be brought to the UK were 'shocking'.
Britain has 'lost control of its borders over the last five years,' he added.
The Defence Secretary said it is a 'really big problem' that French police are unable to intervene to intercept boats in shallow waters.
French police officers were seen watching as migrants, including children, boarded at a beach in Gravelines, between Calais and Dunkirk, and authorities were then pictured escorting the boats.
Some 184 people were rescued, the French authorities said.
The UK agreed a £480 million deal with France to beef up its efforts to stop migrants in 2023 under former prime minister Rishi Sunak.
It was the latest in a series of agreements with France since 2014 aimed at cracking down on crossings.
This year is on course to set a record for channel crossings, with the 14,811 total arrivals so far the highest recorded for the first five months of a year.
It has also surpassed the highest total recorded for the first six months of the year, which was previously 13,489 on June 30 last year.
In 2024, the number of arrivals did not reach more than 14,000 until July 9 (14,058).
Sir Keir Starmer's Government has pledged to 'smash the gangs' behind people-smuggling operations to bring down crossings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ubisoft sexual harassment trial: Up to three years suspended prison sentences requested
The trial of three former top executives from French video game giant Ubisoft – the maker of games like Assassin's Creed and Far Cry - took place this week in Bobigny, France. Serge Hascoët, Thomas François and Guillaume Patrux appeared before the Bobigny criminal court on charges of psychological abuse, sexual harassment and attempted sexual assault. The prosecutor called for suspended prison sentences of up to three years and fines for all three, describing the accusations as 'extremely serious'. The public prosecutor's office requested an 18-month suspended prison sentence and a €45,000 fine against the company's former No. 2, Serge Hascoët; one year's imprisonment and a €10,000 fine against game designer Guillaume Patrux; and a suspended sentence of three years in prison as well as a €30,000 fine against the former vice-president of the editorial department, Thomas François. The verdict is expected on 2 July. The trial, seen as a landmark #MeToo moment in the male-dominated video game publishing industry, followed the publication of an in-depth investigation by Libération and Numerama in 2020. It highlighted working conditions plagued by harassment, humiliation and discriminatory comments, as well as the psychological, sexist and sexual harassment that had been going on at Ubisoft for around ten years. The testimonies that poured in painted a damning picture of what went on behind the walls of the Ubisoft studios. When François was questioned about a sexual assault that a former colleague had accused him of committing, and for which she had testified on the stand the previous day, he replied that he had 'no recollection.' The three defendants pleaded amnesia and their denial was roundly rebutted by the civil parties' lawyers. According to them, the trial was really about the 'extremely virile and childish culture' at Ubisoft, the French flagship of an 'industry built by men and for men.' The civil parties and the defence also deplored the fact that no proceedings have been brought against the legal entity Ubisoft, its CEO Yves Guillemot and Marie Derain, the head of human resources. 'This trial could have been exemplary,' according to Marc Rutschlé, union delegate at Solidaires Informatique. He told L'Humanité: 'It wasn't three isolated individuals who created this atmosphere of widespread harassment. Their impunity was organised. There are no defendants and many victims. The whole structural aspect has been evacuated.' Previously, Guillemot allegedly referred to some of the accusations as 'generational differences of opinion' and 'creative friction'.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Britain's biggest steelmaker warns it faces Trump tariffs hit
The Indian owner of the Port Talbot steelworks has warned that a carve-out from Donald Trump's tariffs is 'critical' to its business. Tata Steel's UK operations are at risk of falling foul of American import tariffs even if a pending agreement between London and Washington is formalised, because of a reliance on steel made in India and elsewhere. This is because of American demands that UK steel products can only be exempt from tariffs if they used metal that was 'melted and poured' domestically. Ministers are trying to secure an exemption for Tata, which is Britain's largest steel producer, but the business otherwise faces being hit by Mr Trump's 50pc tariffs on foreign steel. The company closed the last blast furnaces at Port Talbot, south Wales, last year and is currently in the process of building an electric arc furnace at the site, which will recycle domestically-sourced scrap metal. In the meantime, Tata has resorted to importing steel melted in India and Europe for processing into products that are then shipped onwards to America. The temporary measures mean the company risks running afoul of Mr Trump's 50pc tariffs on foreign steel, which are currently scheduled to be imposed on the UK from July 9. British steel products already face tariffs of 25pc, like those from much of the rest of the world, but the trade deal in principle struck by Mr Trump and Sir Keir Starmer would see the tax rate fall to zero. However, despite four weeks of talks, the deal has yet to be implemented. When Mr Trump imposed 50pc steel tariffs on the rest of the world, he gave Britain a reprieve until July 9 – and negotiators are now racing to conclude something before then. Even this poses a problem for Tata, as the deal's framework stipulates that steel products sent from the UK to the US must use steel that was 'melted and poured' domestically to qualify for tariff relief. The Government is seeking to obtain a temporary carve-out for Tata and has reportedly said it is confident of success, but the warning from Tata signalled nervousness within the company on Friday. It is understood that being hit by 50pc tariffs would force Tata to either try to pass some costs on to customers or absorb them itself. If it could not absorb them, production cuts may have to be considered. Rajesh Nair, the chief executive of Tata Steel UK, said: 'Tata Steel UK will need to import steel substrate until Electric Arc Furnace steelmaking is operational in Port Talbot from late 2027 onwards. 'It is therefore critical for our business that melted and poured in the UK is not a requirement to access the steel quotas in any future trade deal. 'Even though we are not currently melting steel in the UK, we remain the largest steel producer in the country and our mills continue to transform imported steel coil and slab into high-value, specialist products which are not available from US producers and are therefore essential to our US customers. 'We urge the Government to secure a deal as soon as possible, and we would be happy to provide the US government with any needed assurances on the provenance and processing of the steel we supply.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Britain ‘faces up to £30bn of tax rises' to hit Nato defence target
Britain faces tax rises of up to £30bn in the autumn Budget to fund greater defence spending, economists have warned. Analysts said higher taxes looked inevitable as without them Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, would struggle to meet promises to increase defence spending while still meeting her self-imposed fiscal rules. Sir Keir has pledged that the UK will spend 3pc of GDP on defence by the next parliament and Nato is expected to demand even higher commitments later this year. Michael Saunders, of consultancy Oxford Economics, said the Prime Minister was likely to ramp up spending gradually over this parliament to make the 3pc and above target easier to meet in future. Mr Saunders said: 'To establish a more credible path to defence spending 'considerably north of 3pc' next decade, the Government may decide in the autumn Budget that it needs to add some extra spending within the five-year OBR forecast horizon. It's not hard to see pressures for extra fiscal tightening of £15bn to £30bn.' Nato is expected to require members to lift defence spending to 3.5 pc of GDP in the coming years. The military alliance is likely to set a new increased target at its June summit, piling additional costs on to the Chancellor. Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, recently said: 'We know that the 2pc pledge – agreed way back in 2014 – just doesn't cut it any more. So in 2025, we are finalising a plan to dramatically increase defence spending across the Alliance.' The demand for additional defence spending comes as Ms Reeves is already under pressure as a result of the recent about-turn on winter fuel payments for pensions and adverse moves in financial markets. Labour pledged not to increase income tax, National Insurance or VAT in its election manifesto last year. However, Mr Saunders and other economists warned that the Chancellor might have to break one or more of these promises as spending commitments mounted. Mr Saunders said: 'The need to raise revenues may require the Government to revisit its manifesto commitments, which seemed to rule out increases in most major taxes.' Earlier this week, the Chancellor repeatedly refused to rule out further tax rises. 'I'm not going to say that I'm not going to take any tax measures in the next four years,' she told an audience of business leaders at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) annual dinner. It follows record increases of £40bn in last year's autumn Budget. Ms Reeves has promised not to repeat a raid on this scale. The Chancellor left herself a margin of £9.9bn to meet her fiscal rules, a wafer-thin buffer that forced her to rip up spending plans in the spring to repair her budget. Ms Reeves also has to grapple with mounting costs from the Government's pledge to restore winter fuel payments and review the two-child benefit cap. There are also concerns that a downgrade to the UK's economic growth by the OBR and increased government borrowing costs caused by rising gilt yields could wipe out Ms Reeves's narrow fiscal headroom. The Treasury was contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
