Curling swept aside? Windsor mulls ice shortage options after arena fire
The short-term fate of curling in Windsor, Ont., once again up in the air.
A new city report headed to council next Monday outlines a recommendation that would see the curling ice at the Capri Pizzeria Recreation Complex reconverted to ice skating — leaving local curlers temporarily out of luck for the next season.
This after just last year curling was forced to move from Roseland Golf Course grounds — so the clubhouse and curling could be demolished — into the twin-pad south Windsor arena. That move lowered the city's public skating rinks from nine to eight.
Ice schedulers across the border city have now been thrown for another loop following the loss of one rink at the WFCU Centre. City officials believe it will take at least 10 months to repair the AM800 pad after hundreds of solar panels were destroyed in a rooftop fire on federal election day, April 28.
"It is unsafe to allow anyone on the damaged area, and it has been deemed unsafe to allow the public to walk beneath," the report states.
The city report also outlines water damage in the insulation above the rinks while other mechanical systems are still being investigated.
Michael Chantler, the city's commissioner of community services, calls the situation "completely unfortunate," and "devastating" to their programming.
"There's no perfect scenario where we can satisfy everyone," he told CBC News. "It puts us in a very difficult position as administration and we're just going to try and do what we can do best for most people in the community."
The city says it would cost $10,000 to change the curling ice back to regular skating ice at Capri. The move would put curling on pause, temporarily, until the 2026-2027 season.
CBC News reached out to a local group focused on saving the future of curling in Windsor and has yet to hear back.
The main tenant of the AM800 rink is the Riverside Minor Hockey Association (RMHA), which serves more than 600 young people and uses about 53 hours of ice each week on the pad — across all rinks at the WFCU it's more like 80 hours and $441,000 of revenue for the city, according to association president Anne Marie Schofield.
"It makes clear and logical sense from a disaster recovery perspective," she said, as it relates to getting the bulk of affected users back up and running to maintain their business.
According to Schofield, curlers have every right to be upset but that is a short-term thing.
"This is one season, hopefully. No one wants to remove curling completely. We adapted to that change a year ago and we'll adapt again," she said. "We're looking for them to adapt now to this."
Municipal staff said in the report that curling books around 14 hours of ice each week at the current Capri arena complex and generated around $155,000 during the 2024-2025.
Chantler says the revenue generated by the skating groups versus curling was a factor in their decision with such a "decent disparity" between the two.
"This caught us obviously completely by surprise. You can't plan for a fire," he said.
Schofield said keeping her hockey association and Riverside's skating club at "home" during any ice adjustment was critical for them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
18 minutes ago
- CBC
Experts warn of Bill C-2 as "anti-refugee" and "anti-immigrant" giving Canada "unchecked powers" like the U.S.
Mbonisi Zikhali came to Canada in 2009 from Zimbabwe to pursue a master's in journalism at Carleton University. Post-graduation, the international student found himself homeless in Windsor and applied for refugee status – a privilege soon unavailable if Bill C-2 becomes the law. "The bill is unnecessary and not sympathetic at all to people's well-being," Zikhali said. Many experts and community groups working with newcomers in Canada agree. They are calling on the Liberal government's sweeping new legislation, Bill C-2 or the Strong Borders Act, "anti-immigrant and anti-refugee" hoping the legislation is not voted on to become law. Zikhali said he came on scholarship and in 2012 found himself in Windsor picking tomatoes at a greenhouse. Soon enough, he was living on the streets, and lost his passport which also had his study permit in it. Applying for refugee status, Zikhali said, was his saving grace and worries this bill will deprive vulnerable people of a safe haven. What is Bill C-2? The legislation proposes changes to a number of laws including the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Specifically it allows officials to cancel, suspend or change immigration documents immediately, pause the acceptance of new applications and cancel applications already in process if deemed in the public interest. Critics say new border legislation aligns Canada's immigration system with the U.S. 20 hours ago Duration 2:43 Asylum claims would also have to be made within a year of entering the country, including for international students and temporary residents. For example, an Afghan international student came to study here in July 2020 .The Taliban takes over in August 2021 and things become scary back home. That student could have applied for asylum. But with this bill, the one-year time period would have lapsed and they would be ineligible. Zikhali said had the bill been around when he was applying for asylum, it would have been "devastating" as he would have been denied. The immigration changes would also require irregular border crossers, people who enter Canada between official ports of entry, to make an asylum claim within 14 days of arriving in Canada. "Very U.S.-like" bill: refugee help centre Windsor's Matthew House gives refugees a place to live and helps them with resettlement. Mike Morency, their executive director, worries this bill will put more vulnerable people at greater harm. "It continues to align our immigration system with that of the United States," Morency said. "Refugee claimants are not the problem. The one year-ban is a major concern for us. The other major concern for us is the ability of the government to declare an emergency and suspend applications. That one to me feels very US-like." Morency said he understands the government's will to try to cut back on international students and migrant workers making a refugee claim as a way to stay in Canada, but worries for people who have a legitimate need for protection being unfairly targeted. "It also feels very much like a workaround to our commitment to the Geneva Convention. If the government wants to step out of the Geneva Convention, then then we need to do it with integrity and we need to approach the UN and say we're going to withdraw," he said. Syed Hussan, spokesperson for the Migrant Rights Network, agrees saying the bill violates Canada's "most basic legal obligations" and is "immoral". Hussan asserts the bill infringes upon Canada's legal commitments and ethical standards by granting the government excessive authority to cancel permits. "Every refugee gets to have the right to have their case heard. That's now being taken away," he said. "Collectively it's a bill that gives the government unchecked power to take away people's status… This is an anti-immigrant and anti-refugee bill. It's illegal." Without any ability for people to appeal or have their case individually heard, Hussan said, the bill allows the government to "make people undocumented or just throw people out of the country in the hundreds of thousands". The changes also allow the federal immigration department to share information more widely with different agencies within Canada. Hussan said anyone who was not a citizen or later became a citizen will have their data impacted by the bill. Hassan said this is similar to the US immigration policies. "This is Carney's first test and he's failed it. He's no different from Donald Trump." Sharry Aiken, professor of law at Queen's University, also finds the bill troubling. "Very disappointing. It's a betrayal of many Canadians that supported this government in the most recent election," she said, noting these issues weren't part of the Liberal election campaign. The omnibus bill, she said, is quite complicated with 16 different parts and neither serves to reform the asylum system nor address Canadians' privacy rights. Typically, omnibus bills don't get the degree of parliamentary scrutiny and oversight, she said, which is concerning. Aiken said the one year-bar for asylum claimants represents "a major rollback of rights". "No longer are these claimants eligible for a hearing before the Refugee Protection Division," she said. The division of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) hears and decides claims for refugee protection in Canada. Aikens said this "arbitrary" bill will also very quickly develop a backlog. "The bill proposes a legislative fix for a problem that doesn't require new law. It requires operational intervention," she said. "This one year rule mimics what's in place in the U.S. and what has been the subject of extensive international criticism… This bill does a disservice to refugees and betrays the Canadian public's trust in the Liberal government for ensuring a fair refugee determination system consistent with international standards." She urges the MPs to separate out the provisions having the issues desegregated. 'Will make the process more cumbersome': immigration lawyer Toronto-based immigration lawyer, Mario Bellissimo, said with the bill creating "arbitrary distinctions" of 14 days and one year after June 2020, "an individualized assessment" approach is being taken away. While the number of refugee claimants have recently dipped, Bellissimo said the bill signals that Canada wants to potentially limit immigration. "It wants to send messages to individuals who want to traverse the system over many years without legitimate claims that this is not a destination of choice for you," he said. Bellissimo agrees that targeting individuals who impact the immigration system in a negative way is important but the bill will end up targeting individuals in genuine need of assistance.
CBC
21 minutes ago
- CBC
Why finishing 4th has shown this Canadian cyclist he can race with the best of the best
Canadian cyclist Derek Gee has been in bed for three days — perhaps not surprising after completing one of cycling's most gruelling races, the 3,443-kilometre Giro d'Italia. But after finishing fourth, Gee is already looking to the future with a renewed confidence. "I got back on the bike today, although not for very long," he told The Current's Matt Galloway. The Giro d'Italia is one of cycling's most prestigious races, with 200 competitors crossing four countries in three weeks. This year's course took them across mountains, cobblestones — and even through the Vatican, where racers were blessed by Pope Leo. WATCH | Cyclists ride through Vatcian City to recieve Pope's blessing: British rider Simon Yates clinched the overall victory in the final stage Sunday, but Gee was already a fan favourite after a strong showing as the lone Canadian in the 2023 race. He spoke to Galloway about overcoming setbacks in the race, and why finishing fourth has helped him to finally believe that he can compete with the best of the best. Here is part of their conversation. You said that if someone told you a couple of years ago, in your words, that I'd finish top five in my favourite race, the one I've adored since I was a little kid growing up in Ottawa, I would have had a hard time believing it was possible. What did it mean for you not just to ride the Giro but to finish in fourth? It is hard to describe. I mean, it has always been my favourite race. I remember in 2012, watching Ryder Hesjedal, the Canadian, win this race. That was huge for cycling in Canada, and for me as a young cyclist. To be able to top five it, I mean a few years ago, I would have had a hard time believing I was going to turn professional. So to be there and to be able to compete with the best? Yeah, I missed the podium, but not by much. It's definitely a pretty special moment. What do you love about the Giro? I mean, as I said, people often talk about the Tour [de France], but the pink jersey of the Giro is something special for cyclists. The Tour is the biggest race in the world without a doubt, it's one of the biggest sporting events in the world. The Giro is essentially the harder version of that … the stages are longer, the mountains are higher, the weather is worse. It's really, I think, the grand tour for the real cycling enthusiast. You had kind of a rocky start. There was a crash and a [tire] puncture, tell me a little bit about your mindset in this race. It was definitely a roller coaster. My legs weren't great at the start of the race. I wasn't doing very well overall. I had an untimely puncture on one of the stages through Tuscany on some gravel roads, lost some time there. And then crashed in Napoli. I was definitely a little down in the dumps. Luckily I had a good team around me that was basically saying, "Hey, don't worry. It's an incredibly long race. It doesn't matter where you are a week in, two weeks in. It matters where you are three weeks in. How did you find what you needed in yourself, to pull yourself out of where you were in those darker moments? It's a reliance on the work that you've put in so far. Despite how you feel in the moment, you can always think back to the hours you've put in, the work that the team and the staff around you have put in to get to that point. WATCH | Superfan cheers on Gee at 2023 Giro D'Italia: #TheMoment superfan goes viral cheering on Canadian cyclist at Giro D'Italia 2 years ago Duration 1:25 Derek Gee, a cyclist from Ottawa, was a breakout star at the recent Giro D'Italia cycling race. He credits superfan Sean Moretti for boosting his energy with some very enthusiastic roadside encouragement. It's like, "Well, there's a long way to go and I know I've done the work to be good." So it's just a matter of waiting out those rougher times. And also knowing that in a race that long, everyone's going through it, even the winner. No one has a clean three weeks. Were you surprised with what you found in yourself? I mean, you know that you can do this, but at the same time, one of the things that races like this are about is kind of grabbing something in yourself that you didn't even know existed maybe, and moving beyond, pushing yourself beyond the limits that you thought you had. A hundred percent. There is the mental aspect of it, of being able to go day in and day out. But I think it also goes back to where I was a few years ago. It has taken a lot to almost convince myself that I can be competitive with these guys. The people at the front of the Giro are the people that I looked up to as a kid, it's where I always wanted to be. And probably never believed I could be. Those around me the last few years have told me I could, but obviously it's a lot harder to believe in it yourself. But I mean, you need to believe that you belong there in order to race with the best. So there was a lot of that this race, of realizing that I could be up there and competing with the best over a race like this. You believe it now? I definitely believe it now. What's the next goal for you? Fourth exceeded my own expectations, but to be so close to the podium, there is a part of me that believes I can get there. That's, I think, where the focus will be in the coming years.
Globe and Mail
22 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Alarming privacy threats are buried in the Liberal border bill
Michael Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in internet and e-commerce law at the University of Ottawa's faculty of law. A border security bill tabled by the Liberal government this week will have wide reach far beyond the 49th parallel. Buried in the massive bill are provisions to allow law enforcement to access information about internet subscribers without a warrant. While there may be a case for new police powers in the digital era, these should be presented in their own bill and be debated on their own merits. The pressure from Canadian law enforcement for access to internet subscriber data dates back to 1999, when government officials began crafting proposals that included legal powers to access surveillance and subscriber information. What followed were a series of lawful access bills that sparked opposition, both from the public and in the courts. For example, in 2012, then-public safety minister Vic Toews infamously said to Francis Scarpaleggia, now the Speaker of the House but then a critic of an internet surveillance bill, that he could 'stand with us or with the child pornographers.' The comment did not help his case, and the overwhelming negative publicity pressured the government to quickly backtrack by placing the lawful access bill on hold. Border security bill would give law enforcement access to internet subscriber information without a warrant Liberal government's Throne Speech passes as Carney survives first major test of confidence The lawful access campaign was effectively derailed for a decade by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2014, when it ruled that there was a reasonable expectation of privacy in internet subscriber information. It doubled down on that ruling last year, expanding the privacy safeguards by adding that IP addresses were similarly protected. The Strong Borders Act seeks to circumvent these decisions by creating a new 'information demand' power for law enforcement that does not require court oversight. The new power targets information about a subscriber, such as whether they use a particular internet service and if the provider has data about their usage. The provider may also be required to disclose where and when the service was used, as well as information about any other services the subscriber used to communicate. This is akin to law enforcement approaching a bank to demand if a particular person is a client and whether there is information about their account transactions, and which branches were used, but stopping short of asking for the actual account information. There are obvious privacy implications here that are certain to result in a legal challenge, should the bill pass in its current form. In most cases, obtaining further subscriber information will still require a warrant. The government is turning these into global production orders as it seeks to loop in foreign providers as well. This means that potential warrant targets extend well beyond Canadian internet and telecom providers to also include international platforms. Ottawa to overhaul financial-crime laws in new border security bill The standards for obtaining these production orders should give pause. This bill makes it easier to pass the threshold when compared with previous proposals, since law enforcement only needs to suspect that an offence has been or will be committed. Moreover, these orders can be applied to any Act of Parliament, granting law enforcement exceptional powers to pursue internet subscriber information for everything from Criminal Code violations to camping in national parks without the necessary permit. The bill introduces a new term – 'electronic service provider' – that is presumably designed to extend beyond telecom and internet providers by scoping in internet platforms such as Google and Meta. Those international services are now key players in electronic communications (think Gmail or WhatsApp), though some may be beyond this form of regulation, such as Signal. All electronic service providers are subject to obligations to 'provide all reasonable assistance, in any prescribed time and manner, to permit the assessment or testing of any device, equipment or other thing that may enable an authorized person to access information.' Moreover, all are required to keep such requests secret. Electronic service providers that the government views as 'core providers' are subject to additional regulations that effectively grant law enforcement direct access to their systems for the purposes of communications retrieval and interception. This is a revival of old proposals in which law enforcement sought access to the systems of Canada's major telecom and internet providers. These provisions will sound technical to most Canadians, and are seemingly designed to escape notice at the end of a 140-page bill purportedly about a safer border. But Bill C-2 is far from just a border bill. The government and law enforcement are running back a decades-old warrantless access playbook that should be roundly rejected as it trades a border crisis for a privacy one.
