International students weigh in on the revocation of Chinese student visas
On Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio released a statement saying they will be working with Homeland Security to 'aggressively' revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with potential connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying critical fields.
'The United States, I further can say here, will not tolerate the CCP's exploitation of US universities or theft of US research, intellectual property, or technologies to grow its military power, conduct intelligence collection, or repress voices of opposition,' State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce said.
'The Trump administration is focused on protecting our nation and our citizens by upholding our national security and public safety through our visa process, obviously very openly and transparently applied by Secretary Marco Rubio,' she continued.
The news of this has spread quickly at the University of Washington, especially among international students. According to the school, there are over 8,000 international students on campus; 3,886 are from China, which makes up 7.5% of the entire student population.
'...if we don't have international students from China, I feel like that would be a huge detriment to the diversity to the school,' Nancy, a second-year student from Washington, said.
KIRO7 spoke with international students about the State Department's announcement. Even those who aren't from China are very worried about the ripple effects this could have.
'But the fact that could become a reality…..it kind of sucks. Like I don't know how else to put it,' Shota, a student from Thailand said.
Many students at UW would argue that what makes the school great is its dedication to diversity.
'I really value to be able to interact with people of different backgrounds,' Nancy said.
'Basically having a melting pot of different people and all that stuff,' Shota said. 'I mean, that is kind of what the US is known for, right?' he continued.
The University of Washington sent KIRO7 this statement on how the school is addressing the State Department's decision:
'At this time, it is not known what criteria or legal justification will be used, or what fields are considered 'critical.' The University is closely monitoring this situation and international student services offices will communicate directly with potentially affected students.' – Victor Balta
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
O'Leary bashes Trump's ‘stupid' Harvard foreign student crackdown
Investor Kevin O'Leary seemingly bashed the Trump administration's recent crackdown on Harvard's international student population, calling the actions 'stupid' during a Friday Fox News interview. 'Harvard's taken a lot of heat for other stuff, but they shouldn't be taking heat for curating amazing cohorts,' the 'Shark Tank' star said while appearing on 'Outnumbered.' 'These kids are amazing, and we gotta keep them here.' President Trump recently upped his attacks on the Ivy League institution, suggesting a 15 percent cap be imposed on the percentage of foreign students that Harvard University and other U.S. higher education institutions can admit. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in recent days also threatened to revoke student visas for all Chinese scholars. 'And I'll tell you what, many of those students didn't go anywhere. Many of those students were troublemakers caused by the radical left lunatics in this country,' Trump said of international students while speaking to reporters Wednesday from the Oval Office. O'Leary, who teaches at Harvard as an executive fellow, shot down Trump's claims without mentioning the president directly. 'They don't want to leave America. They don't hate America,' O'Leary said of the students he's encoutered. 'They want to get a passport, stay here and start a business. I think I'm one of the lone voices pointing that out.' O'Leary continued, 'Why would we want to brightest and the smartest people on earth and kick them out of the country after we spend millions teaching them? It seems stupid to me.' Trump's actions against Harvard have been stymied recently, as a federal judge sided with Harvard in its fight against Trump's international students cap. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
New York Times
36 minutes ago
- New York Times
Experts Who Warn of Risks Posed by Chinese Students Are Skeptical of Trump Plan
The F.B.I. has spent decades investigating some professors and students from China suspected of using their studies to secretly spy for their home country. As the Trump administration tries a new, more aggressive effort to stop such activity, experts fear it will do more harm than good for American research. The plans the State Department announced this past week to revoke visas of some Chinese college students strike even some former spy-hunters as a heavy-handed attempt to solve a more complicated problem. 'The overall number of People's Republic of China students that actually pose some type of national security risk is relatively low compared to the number of students that will continue to support and further U.S. research,' said Greg Milonovich, a former F.B.I. agent who managed the counterintelligence division's academic alliance program as well as the national security higher education advisory board. In announcing the move late Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio gave few specifics, offering only that the U.S. government would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' How that vaguely defined standard will be enforced is not yet clear, but the directive is part of a broad campaign by the Trump administration to force major changes in American higher education. College campuses, administration officials say, are in crisis, and only the federal government is willing and able to fix the problems. The senior White House adviser Stephen Miller outlined on Friday what the administration viewed as a threat to its interests. 'We're not going to be awarding visas to individuals who have a risk of being engaged in any form of malign conduct in the United States, which of course would include espionage, theft of trade secrets, theft of technology or other actions that would degrade the security of our industrial base,' he said. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Pentagon chief says ready to 'fight and win' against China, urges Asian allies to boost defense spending
SINGAPORE — Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth on Saturday warned that the U.S. was prepared to "fight and win" against China if deterrence efforts failed, while urging Asian allies to strengthen military coordination and raise defense spending. Speaking at the annual defense summit Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, U.S. Defense Secretary Hegseth stressed Washington's resolve to bolster defense capabilities at a time when regional warfare has flared up around the world, including Russia's war in Ukraine and the military conflict in Gaza. While playing up the U.S.' commitment to the Indo-Pacific region, Hegseth took swipes at the absence of China's defense minister. "We are here this morning. Somebody else isn't," he said. Hegseth urged political and defense leaders in the audience to act with urgency in pushing back against China's mounting military pressure in the South China Sea and around Taiwan. "China has demonstrated that it wants to fundamentally alter the region's status quo. We cannot look away and we cannot ignore it. China's behavior toward its neighbors and the world is a wake up call and an urgent one," said Hegseth. "We ask, and indeed, we insist that our allies and partners do their part on defense," said Hegseth, adding that "our defense spending must reflect the dangers and threats that we face today, because deterrence doesn't come on the cheap." The sharp rhetoric comes against the backdrop of increasing trade frictions between Washington and Beijing as optimism over a deal following a temporary tariff truce secured earlier this month wanes. U.S.-China trade talks "are a bit stalled," and would warrant the two countries' heads to weigh in Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News Thursday. China's activities in the South China Sea undermine sovereignty and threaten freedom of navigation and overflight while its ongoing military operations near Taiwan signal a clear intent to escalate pressure on the island, the Pentagon leader said. He also vowed to step up security nearer to the U.S., eliminating China's "malign" influence over Panama Canal. "It is key terrain, after all, China did not build that canal. We did, and we will not allow China to weaponize it or control it." China in March said it was prepared to fight "any type of war" with the U.S., as President Donald Trump ratcheted up economic and political pressure on the country. "If war is what the U.S. wants, be it a tariff war, a trade war or any other type of war, we're ready to fight till the end," the Chinese Embassy in the U.S. said in a post. China's Defense Minister Dong Jun was absent from this year's summit — the first time Beijing's top military official has skipped the event since 2019. Beijing instead sent a lower-ranking delegation, led by Major General Hu Gangfeng, Vice President of National Defense University of People's Liberation Army. Major General Hu is expected to participate in a special session later Saturday on cooperative maritime security in the Asia-Pacific. The absence of China's top military official has cast doubts over whether there will be a bilateral meeting between Chinese and the U.S. defense officials. Last year then-U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Dong held a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the security forum, where both sides agreed to maintain military dialogue. The absence of Beijing's defense minister could be an attempt to avoid engagement and conflict with the U.S. on flashpoints like Taiwan and the South China Sea, experts said. "Beijing always wants to control the narrative and discourse. Shangri-La does not enable that," said Drew Thompson, senior fellow at RSIS Rajaratnam School of International Studies and a former U.S. official at the Defense Department. "When I was at DoD, my PLA counterpart once explained to me what they didn't like. He said, 'we don't like being made out to be gladiators fighting one another for others' entertainment. We want to deal with our differences bilaterally, in channels, not in public forums,'" he added. Beijing sees limited strategic benefits in sending its top defense officials to the annual summit, instead it is focused on deepening ties through alternative forums without U.S. presence, Wu Xinbo, director of the Center for American Studies at Fudan University, told CNBC earlier this month. That's according to CNBC's translation of his comments in Mandarin. The U.S. government plans to ramp up weapon sales to Taiwan to a level beyond the $18.3 billion authorized during Trump's first term, surpassing the $8.4 billion approved under President Biden, according to Reuters. The proposed arms packages will focus on cost-effective systems such as missiles, munitions, and drones, as part of an effort to enhance Taiwan's deterrence capabilities as Beijing ramps up pressure on the democratic island. The U.S. has been an important ally and arms supplier to Taiwan for decades, with Beijing calling on Washington to halt such actions and stop creating tensions in the Taiwan Strait. Beijing claims Taiwan as its territory and has vowed to "reunify" with the democratically governed island, by force if necessary. Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims. For years, China has been steadily ramping up its military pressure to assert its sovereignty claims over Taiwan, regularly sending aircraft and naval vessels near the island. Dong warned at the Shangri-La Dialogue last year that any forces aimed at separating Taiwan from China would face "self-destruction" and stressed the Taiwan issue as "the core of our core interest." Concerns have mounted over Trump's commitment to the island too. On the election campaign trail, Trump had suggested Taiwan should pay for U.S. protection and accused it of siphoning off America's semiconductor industry, raising alarm in Taipei.
