
A US senator's X posts after the Minnesota shootings were horrific – and predictable
National tragedy used to bring national unity. If only momentarily, partisanship was put aside, and people of all political persuasions came together.
No more. The nation received a startling reminder of that sad fact on Sunday when Republican senator Mike Lee went online to share his reaction to the weekend's horrible shooting of two Minnesota state lawmakers and their spouses.
'This is what happens,' Lee wrote in a since-removed post on X, 'When Marxists don't get their way.' Accompanying this ugly, unfounded comment was a photo of the suspect in the shooting, Vance Boelter, wearing what appears to be a latex face mask.
As if that wasn't enough, Lee posted another picture of Boelter under the caption 'Nightmare on Waltz Street', an apparent reference to the Minnesota governor and former Democratic nominee for vice-president, Tim Walz. During the 2024 campaign, Republicans accused him of being soft on crime and mishandling the riots after the murder of George Floyd.
So why not suggest that he is somehow to blame for the shootings?
Shameful. Lee has dishonored the institution in which he serves, and he knows it.
Republican Senate leaders should censure their colleague. If they do not, they will further shred whatever dignity is left in that body.
Put in context, Lee's posts show how far we have come from the vision and hopes of the founders of the American republic. Recall that James Madison, co-author of the Federalist Papers and fourth president of the US, warned that government by the people could become what he called a 'spectacle … of turbulence and contention', driven by passions to make decisions 'adverse to the rights of others or the permanent and aggregate good of the community'.
Madison preferred what he called a republic, a government in which representatives would display the wisdom necessary to 'discern the true interest of their country, and whose patriotism and love of justice will be least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial considerations'.
Oddly enough, in October 2020, Lee channeled Madison when he insisted 'that our form of government in the United States is not a democracy, but a republic … Insofar as 'democracy' means 'a political system in which government derives its powers from the consent of the governed', then of course that accurately describes our system'. He continued: 'But the word … is often used to describe … the view that it is the prerogative of government to reflexively carry out the will of the majority of its citizens.
'Our system of government,' Lee noted, 'is best described as a constitutional republic. Power is not found in mere majorities, but in carefully balanced power.' In that system, the job of the Senate, Lee suggested – citing Thomas Jefferson – is to cool 'hot passions … It's where consensus is forged, as senators reach compromise across regional, cultural, and partisan lines.'
Perhaps the senator has forgotten those lines.
His posts about the Minnesota shootings seem designed to further fuel the 'hot passions' of our political moment, rather than to 'cool' them. They surely do not help build consensus across party lines.
Now Lee's agenda seems different. He wants to show his Maga scapegoating bona fides by conjuring leftist plots as an explanation for every problem.
And he is not the only member of the Maga crowd to do so. He was joined by Elon Musk, who wrote on X: 'The far left is murderously violent.' Musk reposted the following from a person who identifies herself with these words: 'GOD | #MAGA | Freedom |#Trump2024 | Constitutionalist | America First | Shall Not Be Infringed | USMC Wife'.
'The left kills the CEO of United Healthcare. Kills two Israeli ambassadors staffers. Attempts twice to assassinate the President. Doxes and attempts to murder federal ICE agents and Police - all week. And now kills a MN state rep and her husband and injures a Senator and his wife. The left has become a full blown domestic terrorist organization.'
Madison must be turning over in his grave.
And, as to the evidence that supports Lee's or Musk's claims about the Minnesota suspect? There is none.
Don't forget that the president himself has frequently demonized 'radical left lunatics' and labelled people Marxists. Last September, he blamed a 'violent, radical-left monster' for the second attempt on his life.
Using tragedy to demonize others and stoke fears about adversaries has become a new normal. No more rallying around the flag and doing the job that Madison thought political leaders in a representative democracy should and would do.
In 2016, the Washington Post's Karen Tumulty, writing in the wake of what was then the deadliest mass shooting in American history, suggested that 'not since 9/11 has a moment like this brought the nation together, and that evaporated quickly. Since then, calamity seems only to drive the left and the right further apart, while faith in the nation's institutions deteriorates further.'
We know that Lee knows better than to do what he did on Sunday. He demonstrated that in 2020.
So why, five years later, would he go after Walz or Marxists after a national tragedy? We can only speculate.
Politicians like Lee live for and on social media. Legislating is hard; accumulating 'likes' with a quick post is easier.
Getting attention by being outrageous or provocative is the name of the game in what is now referred to as the attention economy. Madison, who thought that any damage done by what he called 'fractious leaders' would be limited to their local area, could never have imagined the gravitational pull of that economy or its global reach.
Sadly, Lee's posts are making him a winner in that economy. By Monday morning, the first of them had been viewed 5.3 million times, and the second attracted 7.8 million views.
Not bad for someone with 799,000 followers on X.
In a deeply divided nation riven by political sectarianism, Lee did what his partisan supporters expect him to do. Give no quarter. Be on the offensive. Push your point.
These are the rules, even when a tragedy occurs. In fact, it increases the 'opportunity for free publicity' that people like Lee crave.
But let's be clear. While we can understand the forces that might explain why Lee turned tragedy into disinformation, that doesn't mean we should accept or forgive him for doing so.
In the kind of constitutional republic that Madison imagined and Lee once praised, tragedies like the murders in Minnesota should bring out the best in our leaders. Their duty was, when Madison wrote, and remains today: 'to remind us of our shared humanity, not deepen our political divides.'
Austin Sarat, William Nelson Cromwell professor of jurisprudence and political science at Amherst College, is the author or editor of more than 100 books, including Gruesome Spectacles: Botched Executions and America's Death Penalty
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Donald Trump delays US TikTok ban again
Donald Trump has signed an executive order to keep TikTok running in the US for another 90 days to give his administration more time to broker a deal to bring the social media platform under American ownership. It is the third time the president has extended the deadline. The first one was through an executive order on January 20, his first day in office, after the platform went dark briefly when a national ban — approved by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court — took effect. Advertisement The second was in April when White House officials believed they were nearing a deal to spin off TikTok into a new company with US ownership that fell apart after China backed out after Mr Trump's tariff announcement. It is not clear how many times he can — or will — keep extending the ban as the government continues to try to negotiate a deal for TikTok, which is owned by China's ByteDance. While there is no clear legal basis for the extensions, so far there have been no legal challenges to fight them. Mr Trump has gained more than 15 million followers on TikTok since he joined last year, and he has credited the trendsetting platform with helping him gain traction among young voters. He said in January that he has a 'warm spot for TikTok'. As the extensions continue, it appears less likely that TikTok will be banned in the US any time soon. The decision to keep the site alive through an executive order has received some scrutiny, but it has not faced a legal challenge in court, unlike many of Mr Trump's other executive orders. Advertisement Jeremy Goldman, analyst at Emarketer, called TikTok's US situation 'deadline purgatory'. The whole thing 'is starting to feel less like a ticking clock and more like a looped ringtone. This political Groundhog Day is starting to resemble the debt ceiling drama: a recurring threat with no real resolution'. Donald Trump (Alex Brandon/AP) For now, TikTok continues to function for its 170 million users in the US, and tech giants Apple, Google and Oracle were persuaded to continue to support the app, on the promise that Mr Trump's Justice Department would not use the law to seek potentially steep fines against them. Americans are even more closely divided on what to do about TikTok than they were two years ago. Advertisement A recent Pew Research Centre survey found that about a third of Americans supported a ban, down from 50% in March 2023. Roughly a third said they would oppose a ban, and a similar percentage said they were not sure. Among those who supported a ban, about eight in 10 cited concerns over users' data security being at risk as a major factor in their decision, according to the report. Democratic senator Mark Warner, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the Trump administration is again 'flouting the law and ignoring its own national security findings about the risks' posed by a China-controlled TikTok. 'An executive order can't sidestep the law, but that's exactly what the president is trying to do,' he added. Advertisement


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump signs order granting TikTok a third reprieve from US ban
Donald Trump has signed an executive order to delay the ban or sale of TikTok for the third time. The order gives the Chinese-owned social media company another 90 days to find a buyer or be banned in the US. 'I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025),' the president said in a Truth Social post. Trump's first executive order giving TikTok a reprieve came on his first day in office – just three days after the supreme court ruled to uphold the ban. Trump issued the second executive order in April. The deadline for the sale or ban was then set for 19 June. Now, TikTok has until September. Mark Warner, a Democratic senator and the vice-chair of the Senate intelligence committee, accused Trump of sidestepping the law with an executive order. 'Once again, the Trump administration is flouting the law and ignoring its own national security findings about the risks posed by a PRC-controlled TikTok,' Warner said in a statement. TikTok is a tremendously popular social media app with 170 million users in the US. ByteDance, TikTok's parent company, said in April that it had been in discussion with the US government regarding a solution for the app. It added that any agreement 'will be subject to approval under Chinese law'. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion Before Trump issued his second executive order on TikTok, a possible deal was reportedly in place. But, according to Reuters, China put that deal on hold after Trump announced sweeping tariffs against the country. At the time, Trump indicated he was using tariffs for leverage in the deal. 'We have a situation with TikTok where China will probably say we'll approve a deal, but will you do something on the tariffs. The tariffs give us great power to negotiate,' Trump said. The idea of banning TikTok originated with Trump in 2020, who said the Chinese-owned app posed a danger to national security. It quickly became a bipartisan issue and Congress overwhelmingly voted to ban the app last year, which faced a legal challenge but was ultimately affirmed in the supreme court. The original deadline for the TikTok ban was on 19 January. Trump switched his stance on TikTok after joining the app while campaigning for president last year, amassing nearly 15 million followers and hosting the TikTok CEO, Shou Zi Chew, at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. Chew also attended Trump's inauguration. Several US investors have expressed interest in buying the social media app, which is likely worth tens of billions of dollars. Among those who've reportedly thrown in bids are a consortium led by the software giant Oracle, asset manager Blackstone, Amazon, Walmart, billionaire Frank McCourt, a crypto foundation and the founder of the adult website OnlyFans. TikTok, ByteDance and the White House did not return requests for comment.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
R. Kelly claims his ‘life remains in imminent danger' as prison officials ‘refuse to give him meds' for blood clots
R. Kelly claims his "life remains in imminent danger every minute" as prison officials have continued to "refuse to give him medication" for blood clots. The U.S. Sun can exclusively reveal that the disgraced R&B singer, 58, who's in prison in North Carolina, has claimed he is still being denied blood thinners, despite his legal team's allegations that he has several blood clots, which had been diagnosed at Duke University hospital. 1 In a filing on Wednesday, his attorney, Beau Brindley, said he and Kelly's co-counsel had just met with the singer for four hours. In that conversation, Kelly's team claimed their client still hadn't been given life-saving medication after being diagnosed with blood clots last week. In the filing, his attorney said after returning "from the hospital with medically CONFIRMED blood clots, Mr. Kelly is still not getting his prescribed blood thinners." In the federal court filing, his team continued: "After the meeting and obtainment of a signed HIPAA waiver, counsel travelled to Duke University Hospital to seek medical documents that are quickly becoming critical. "We have confirmed Mr. Kelly's presence at Duke University Hospital. We have confirmed the overdose. We have confirmed the blood clots. "But we need the medical documents to support it, which require extensive bureaucratic procedural steps. Those were taken," the filing continued. As The U.S. Sun previously reported, Kelly was rushed to the hospital after allegedly being given an extra dose of his medication. Earlier this week, Kelly was hospitalized after overdosing on medication in prison. According to a filing by his attorney, the overdose occurred after prison staff at the Federal Correctional Institute Facility in North Carolina administered the medications. The musician, whose real name is Robert Sylvester Kelly, is currently serving a 30-year sentence following his 2021 conviction on racketeering and sex trafficking charges in New York. On June 10, Kelly was placed in solitary confinement and given anxiety medication, his attorney Beau B. Brindley stated. He was later administered additional medications and instructed to take them, according to court documents reviewed by The Sun. However, three days later, Kelly reported feeling "faint" and "dizzy." Kelly's legal team accused prison officials of punishing him with isolation after he filed an emergency motion. The singer reported seeing "black spots in his vision" before he passed out and was rushed to Duke University Hospital on Friday. While in the ambulance, Kelly claims to have heard one of the prison officers say, "This is going to open a whole new can of worms," according to court documents. Kelly's legal team claimed that his deteriorating health was caused by being administered dangerously high doses of medication. While hospitalized, medical staff discovered blood clots in Kelly's legs and lungs and planned to keep him for surgery, according to his attorney, Beau B. Brindley. However, prison officials reportedly removed Kelly from the hospital and returned him to the facility, placing him back in solitary confinement. Kelly's defense attorney filed a motion on June 10, asking for his immediate release to escape an alleged murder-for-hire plot by prison officials and another inmate.