logo
Life inside Iran: How war reduced bustling Tehran to a desert of empty streets and boarded-up shops

Life inside Iran: How war reduced bustling Tehran to a desert of empty streets and boarded-up shops

Independent5 hours ago

While Iranian officials continue to issue confident claims of being 'fully prepared', 'responding decisively' and 'managing the crisis ', the reality on the ground tells a very different story. On day six of Israeli strikes, Iranians are facing streets filled with fear, empty shelves at stores, long queues for bread and fuel, and promises of bomb shelters that do not actually exist. In a country that does not even have functioning air raid sirens, what people are feeling deeply, in every sense, is a slow collapse of both safety and hope. Even if they survive the missiles, the trauma of these days will linger for years.
Empty shops, trembling hands, anxious hearts
Reports from Tehran and other Iranian cities reveal that despite decades of threats against Israel, the Islamic Republic has no real plan in place to protect civilians during wartime. Now, the same population already battered by the regime's chronic mismanagement and deepening economic hardship is facing the added burden of war, and all the suffering that comes with it.
'There's visible anxiety on people's faces. Parents are deeply worried about their children, and those with little financial means look like they've aged years in just days,' says a food vendor in northeast Tehran, who has witnessed the panic buying firsthand, as he describes the slow unravelling of daily life.
He says all bottled water and packaged food sold out quickly, and those who could not afford to stock up are now under immense psychological and financial stress.
'War doesn't just hit people with missiles and drones – it crushes their mental health too,' he told Independent Persian. 'God knows how many suffer heart attacks or nervous breakdowns with every explosion, how many are left with lasting psychological trauma. The authorities won't take responsibility for any of that, but we see it with our own eyes.'
Social media users have also described stores being stripped even of basic snacks like cookies. A middle-aged man from southern Tehran said he visited six shops just to find a couple of chickens. Long-lasting food items are disappearing rapidly, he says, and people are now viscerally experiencing the war.
He remembers the long bread lines of the Iran -Iraq war in the 1980s. Now, again waiting hours for bread, he says: 'This regime has ruined our lives. Everyone is exhausted, anxious, angry and hopeless – and they blame Ali Khamenei.'
Shuttered businesses and a shaken marketplace
As the sky over Tehran rumbles with anxiety and explosions, shopping centres behind glass doors are eerily silent – not out of peace, but despair and distrust. Images from Tehran's Aladdin Mall on Sunday showed shopkeepers packing up, locking doors and leaving with no expectation of reopening soon.
But this scene is not limited to just one mall. These days, shopping centres from east to west Tehran – and in other cities – look much the same: shuttered shops, empty corridors, and people wandering through without buying, just glancing and moving on. A clothing store owner in a mall near Tehran's Farjam Street says, 'Almost everyone's closed. The few who remain open do so in the hope of making a daily sale – because if they don't sell anything today, they won't have bread tonight.'
In an economy that has long been reduced to day-by-day survival, the idea of savings has become a distant memory for many small business owners. Even before the war, shopkeepers, service workers and tradespeople were already struggling with soaring inflation, economic stagnation and rising taxes. Now, the sound of sirens and the looming shadow of war have delivered the final blow.
The same shopkeeper mentions a neighbour who had to borrow money from several people just to amass 10 million tomans to stock up on groceries – money he knows he may not be able to repay. What makes this crisis even more stark is that these stories are coming from relatively middle-class neighbourhoods, and not from areas that were already trapped in deep, structural poverty even before the war began.
This is more than economic disruption; it's the gradual collapse of urban family life. People who had barely managed to stay afloat under the weight of chronic economic instability are now forced to shutter their shops, dodge landlords and creditors, and worry about how to feed their families under the looming threat of war.
Widespread fear and anger
Five days into the Israeli strikes, the dominant public feeling is a mix of deep fear and unrelenting anger. The anxiety is heavier than the sound of explosions and can be felt in the streets, by windows and inside homes. And perhaps the darkest truth: there is not a single functioning public shelter to ease that fear.
On Sunday, a government spokesperson announced that metro stations and mosques would remain open 24/7 as shelters. But by Monday morning, images showed Tehran's metro stations locked, leaving panicked citizens stranded outside. People seeking safety only found more broken promises.
This issue extends beyond Tehran. The public information council in Isfahan also confirmed that metro stations there were not functioning as emergency shelters. Across major cities, people remain exposed to direct threats without being offered a single basic safe space.
A burning public question now is: Four decades after enduring devastating missile attacks during the Iran-Iraq, why does the country continue to lack substantial civilian protection infrastructure?
Mehdi Chamran, head of Tehran's City Council, made what sounded like a belated admission: 'We still don't have proper infrastructure to deal with threats. Even during the war, we lacked sufficient experience with shelter drills.' He suggested using metro stations and crisis shelters, but these ideas come too late – for a public now living under skies filled with shrapnel.
In the absence of real solutions, scenes from the 1980s are repeating themselves: people are taping their windows with an X shape, hoping to prevent the glass from shattering. It is a symbolic act that reflects a nation's profound helplessness in the face of a war it did not choose, under a regime that has failed to provide even the most basic sense of safety.
A 60-year-old woman living with her 87-year-old father in a fragile house in Tehran's Nezamabad neighbourhood said: 'Even under normal circumstances, I'm not feeling well. I take anti-anxiety medication. Every time I hear an explosion, I feel like half of my life is slipping away. My father tries to hide his fear so I don't get scared, but I can see he's deeply shaken too.'
Their house is old and unsafe. It cracks with any tremor, and a blast could bring it down. For them, the fear of dying is tangled with the fear of having nowhere safe to go. They didn't choose this war. They have no defence. Yet here they are, caught in a conflict no one prepared them for.
Crippling internet blackouts and psychological toll
Amid the crisis, at a time when people need reliable information, contact with loved ones and access to trustworthy news more than ever, the government has once again turned to a familiar tool used during politically sensitive moments: restricting internet access. Following the Israeli attacks, authorities have limited the public's connection to the outside world.
Iran's Ministry of Communications has officially stated that internet access is being restricted due to 'special circumstances' – a vague announcement offering neither a clear explanation nor any assurance of improvement. But what people are actually experiencing goes far beyond 'restrictions': extreme slowdowns, constant disconnection of VPNs, disruptions to messaging apps like WhatsApp and, in some cases, total loss of connectivity.
Deputy Communications Minister Ehsan Chitsaz tried to deflect blame, saying on X, formerly known as Twitter: 'We wish there was internet access, but it's out of the ministry's hands.' Simple as it sounds, the remark amounts to a quiet admission that cutting off public access to the outside world is a decision driven not by executive bodies, but by the Islamic Republic's security apparatus.
The effects go far beyond inconvenience. One Iranian living abroad recounted: 'I heard there was a strike near my parents' home. I sent a message in our family group, but it wouldn't go through. I didn't get a reply for three hours – I was frantic.' This experience is shared by thousands inside and outside the country; trapped in silence, unable to reach or be reached.
In the absence of a free flow of information, the regime's official narrative, once again, becomes the only one available. In the absence of independent media, state broadcaster IRIB pushes messages of a 'crushing response to Israel', while the public, cut off from reliable news sources, is left trapped between fear, uncertainty and one-sided narratives. This deliberate restriction is not only a blatant violation of the right to communication and access to information – it's also a tool for shaping public opinion in the midst of crisis.
Restrictions everywhere – from fuel to cash
What's unfolding in Iran now feels like a slow-motion collapse, one that only the people seem to fully perceive. Long queues at petrol stations are among the most common images. People wait in the heat for hours, only to be allowed 15 litres of fuel – no more.
A 32-year-old from southeast Tehran, who now drives for Snapp (Iran's Uber), said: 'I had to close my shop because of high prices and blackouts. Now I've got rent, a newborn baby, and no fuel – or even formula.' Frustration and anger weighed down his voice. He, like many others, spends three hours queuing for fuel, only to make a few short trips before needing more.
But the crisis goes beyond transportation. Cash itself is becoming scarce. Many ATMs are down, either due to banking system failures or because they have simply run out of cash. People spend hours going from one machine to another just to withdraw a few hundred thousand tomans – cash that could be vital in an emergency, whether to buy bread and medicine or make a possible escape from the city.
While some bank branches remain open, many are running low on cash. In an atmosphere of growing panic, the lack of fuel, infant formula and cash has left many feeling besieged – not by a foreign power, but by their own government's chronic failure to anticipate crises and provide even the most basic needs for its citizens.
A capital emptied by fear
Tehran is no longer its usual bustling self. The streets are quieter—but this silence isn't peace. It's a survival strategy. Many residents of the capital and other major cities are fleeing. Those who have left are now stuck for hours in traffic on highways out of Tehran.
Footage from Sunday showed major exits clogged with anxious families, driving without direction or destination – just desperate for safety. Yet the question remains: where is safe? Those left behind in their homes ask the same thing. They don't have a place to go, nor a vehicle, nor the confidence that leaving will even help.
At Iran's land borders, especially Bazargan, new scenes are unfolding: long lines of people trying to escape to Turkey or neighbouring countries. With flights suspended, people are pinning their hopes on overland routes. But capacity is limited. Those without cars are left completely stranded in the absence of an emergency transport system or even an alternative plan.
In the absence of state coordination, people have taken matters into their own hands, creating grassroots Telegram groups where those with cars offer their spare seats to others in need of a ride. These improvised efforts reveal that, in the regime's vacuum, social solidarity remains the sole functioning aspect.
At the same time, Iranian expats, especially in Turkey and the UAE, have begun offering housing to fellow citizens – people stranded by flight cancellations or seeking temporary refuge.
A wartime reality
What Iranians are now living through is unmistakably a state of war, though the regime avoids using the term. There's no clear end in sight, and fear, helplessness, and distrust have taken hold. Even if they survive the bombs, the psychological scars of this war will last for years. These are people already crushed by poverty, inflation, censorship and repression.
This war, imposed on the Iranian people without their choice, has not only damaged the physical fabric of cities but also struck at the psyche of an entire nation. Psychologists call it 'collective trauma': a wound not on the body, but on the soul of a people. And if left unacknowledged, it can fester into hatred, distrust, and social collapse.
The consequences of this crisis extend far beyond psychological trauma. Damaged small businesses, widespread closures, a new wave of unemployment, shortages of essential goods, disruptions in banking and internet services, interrupted education and capital flight – all mark the beginning of a path leading to a deeper, long-term crisis.
In the end, whether this war continues or comes to a halt, for the people of Iran it is not just a military conflict, it is an experience of total abandonment. And that sense of abandonment will not end when the bombs stop falling. What is left is a generation that no longer fears, but no longer hopes, either. A generation with no voice, no shelter and no clear future.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran-Israel war explained - exactly what happens if US intervenes amid WW3 fears
Iran-Israel war explained - exactly what happens if US intervenes amid WW3 fears

Daily Mirror

time20 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Iran-Israel war explained - exactly what happens if US intervenes amid WW3 fears

Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has dismissed Donald Trump's "threatening and absurd statements" after the US president called for Iran's "unconditional surrender" Iran has issued a stark warning that if the US joins forces with Israel, it will "result in irreparable damage for them" - amid fears of an "all-out war." Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has dismissed Donald Trump's 'threatening and absurd statements' after he hinted he could assassinate the 86-year-old. He also called for the country's "unconditional surrender." 'Wise individuals who know Iran, its people, and its history never speak to this nation with the language of threats, because the Iranian nation is not one to surrender,' Khamenei said. 'Americans should know that any military involvement by the U.S. will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage to them.' ‌ Khamenei also urged officials to 'continue their work with strength and trust in God.' 'God will certainly and surely make the Iranian nation ... victorious,' he said. ‌ Trump initially distanced himself from Israel's attack on Friday that triggered the conflict, but in recent days has hinted at greater US involvement, saying he wants something 'much bigger' than a ceasefire. The US has also sent more military aircraft and warships to the region. An Iranian official had earlier warned that US intervention would risk 'all-out war.' Israeli strikes have killed at least 224 people in Iran. Meanwhile, Iran has retaliated by launching 400 missiles and hundreds of drones at Israel. So far, 24 people have been killed in Israel. Why did Israel attack Iran? Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has claimed that his actions were in response to an Iranian scheme to construct a nuclear bomb, alleging that Tehran already possesses the capability to create nine nuclear bombs. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) board determined last Thursday that Iran had breached its commitments under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty by not fully cooperating with IAEA inspections and accumulating an estimated 400kg of highly enriched uranium. Until now, Western intelligence evaluations had stated that Iran has not made the final decision to build a bomb. ‌ Will the US get involved in the conflict? President Trump claimed he left the Group of Seven summit in Canada a day early to deal with the issue, telling reporters: 'I'm not looking at a ceasefire. We're looking at better than a ceasefire.' When asked to explain, he said the US wanted to see 'a real end' to the conflict that could involve Iran 'giving up entirely.' He added: 'I'm not too much in the mood to negotiate.' ‌ However, he held a 90-minute meeting on Tuesday with his national security team in the Situation Room of the White House. According to reports, the president's advisers are divided on how to act. But in a chilling warning on Truth Social, Trump said the US knows where Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is hiding but that there were no plans to kill him 'at least not for now.' His mixed statements have caused confusion about the US's role in the conflict as Tehran residents flee their homes on the sixth day of Israel's air campaign aimed at Iran's military and nuclear program. Thousands of American troops are based in nearby countries within range of Iran's weapons. The U.S. has threatened a massive response to any attack. ‌ US military action will be met with 'irreparable harm' Iran's supreme leader has warned the United States that joining the Israeli strikes targeting the Islamic Republic will 'result in irreparable damage for them.' Khamenei dismissed the 'threatening and absurd statements' by Trump. 'Wise individuals who know Iran, its people, and its history never speak to this nation with the language of threats, because the Iranian nation is not one to surrender,' he said. 'Americans should know that any military involvement by the U.S. will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage to them.' A state TV anchor had read Khamenei's statement earlier, before the video was aired. Iran followed a similar sequence in releasing an earlier statement from the supreme leader, perhaps as a security measure. His location is not known. His voice echoed as he sat in a room with beige curtains. An Iranian flag and a portrait of Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who Khamenei succeeded in 1989, hung behind him. Khamenei also urged officials to 'continue their work with strength and trust in God.' 'God will certainly and surely make the Iranian nation ... victorious,' he said.

Keir Starmer to chair emergency Cobra meeting on Middle East today
Keir Starmer to chair emergency Cobra meeting on Middle East today

The National

time26 minutes ago

  • The National

Keir Starmer to chair emergency Cobra meeting on Middle East today

The high-level meeting follows the Prime Minister's return from the G7 summit in Canada at which he and other world leaders reiterated their 'commitment to peace and stability' but stopped short of calling for a truce between Israel and Iran. But reports have also suggested president Donald Trump is considering joining Israeli action against Iran after he left the G7 summit a day early to meet with military chiefs. READ MORE: 'I may do it, I may not': Donald Trump on whether US will strike Iran Wednesday's Cobra meeting comes amid confusion over whether British nationals should remain in Israel after the Foreign Office withdrew family members of embassy staff from the country. The Foreign Office said the withdrawal was temporary and a 'precautionary measure', with staff remaining at both the embassy in Tel Aviv and the consulate in Jerusalem. A spokesperson for the Foreign Office said: 'Our embassy in Tel Aviv and consulate in Jerusalem remain fully staffed and continue to provide consular services to those who require assistance.' But Downing Street would not say whether British nationals should attempt to leave the country. Asked whether British nationals should leave Israel, a Number 10 spokesman would only say that the UK Government's 'key message' was to 'follow the advice of local authorities on staying close to shelter'. Britons have already been advised against all travel to Israel, and those already in the country have been urged to register their presence with the embassy. The Number 10 spokesman added: 'This is a fast-moving situation. We are keeping all our advice under constant review and the FCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) continues to plan for a variety of developments as you would expect.' The decision to withdraw family members of embassy staff comes as Israel's air campaign against Iran entered its sixth day, with jets striking the Iranian capital Tehran overnight. Israeli military chiefs said the air strikes targeted a facility used to make uranium centrifuges, part of Iran's nuclear programme, and a factory building missile components. READ MORE: G7 support for Israel's war on Iran 'threatens humanity', expert warns Tehran has accused Tel Aviv of attacking civilians, while US-based group Human Rights Activists said on Wednesday that Israeli bombardment had killed 585 people in Iran, including 239 civilians. In response, Iran has fired some 400 missiles and hundreds of drones at Israel, killing at least 24 people. But its response appeared to diminish on Tuesday night, with only 10 missiles intercepted by Israel's Iron Dome. Meanwhile, Trump is reported to be considering whether to deploy American forces in support of Israel's operations against Iran. Trump met with top military advisers on Tuesday night to discuss the situation, shortly after a series of social media posts in which he described Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as an 'easy target'. He later posted the words 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER', prompting Khamenei to warn that any American military involvement would result in 'irreparable damage' to the US. The posts followed Trump's decision to leave the G7 conference in Canada a day early to deal with what he called 'big stuff', triggering speculation that American forces might join Israeli strikes. Earlier, Keir Starmer had insisted Trump was interested in de-escalation in the Middle East, saying 'nothing' he had heard from the president suggested Washington was poised to get involved. Asked whether the Prime Minister was still confident that Trump would not involve US forces in the conflict, a Number 10 spokesman said the UK's position was still that 'we want to de-escalate rather than escalate'.

Why would the US strike Iran and how?
Why would the US strike Iran and how?

ITV News

time29 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Why would the US strike Iran and how?

US President Donald Trump's officials say he is considering a number of options when it comes to Iran, including a possible US strike on the country. Trump initially distanced himself from Israel's surprise attack on Iran on Friday, but in recent days has hinted at greater American involvement, saying he wants something "much bigger" than a ceasefire. He has also made it clear that the US wants to end Iran's nuclear capability. A White House statement on Tuesday said: "President Donald J. Trump has never wavered in his stance that Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon — a pledge he has made repeatedly, both in office and on the campaign trail." The US has also sent more military aircraft and warships to the region. ITV News looks at why the US might be considering a strike on Iran, what that would involve and what the consequences could be. Nuclear sites Trump is said to be warming to the idea of using US assets to disable Iran's nuclear programme, rather settling the issue through talks. The biggest challenge to achieving that goal is the Fordow nuclear enrichment plant - which appears to have been built specifically to withstand airstrikes. Fordow is Iran's second enrichment facility after Natanz, its main facility, which already has been targeted by Israeli airstrikes. Fordow, is smaller than Natanz but in addition to being an estimated 80 meters (260 feet) under rock and soil, the site is reportedly protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems. Despite those challenges, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear programme - and officials say Fordow is key to that plan. "This entire operation ... really has to be completed with the elimination of Fordow,' Yechiel Leiter, Israel's ambassador to the US, told Fox News on Friday. Israel doesn't have the massive munition it would take to destroy Fordow, or the aircraft needed to deliver it. Only the US does. 'Bunker-busting' bombs Trump is reportedly deliberating whether to use America's GBU-57 "Massive Ordnance Penetrator' guided bombs to destroy Fordow, which is entombed below several hundred feet of concrete in a mountain. These 30,000 bombs, known as 'bunker busters' were designed to destroy underground sites at the height of concerns a decade ago over Iran's nuclear programme. The powerful GBU-57 uses its weight and sheer kinetic force to reach deeply buried targets — and then explode. The US Air Force's B-2 Spirit stealth bomber is the only aircraft that can carry the GBU-57. There are currently no B-2 bombers in the Middle East region. If tapped for use, the B-2 bombers would have to make the 30-hour round trip from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, refueling multiple times. Consequences Those calling for a US strike, say that a devastating, contained US military strike would destroy Iran's nuclear programme and remove an existential threat to Israel and national security risk for the United States. However, opponents to the idea point to the probability of an Iranian response; the chaos that would result from a possible downfall of the Iranian regime and the further estabilisation of the entire Middle East region. Iran's supreme leader on Wednesday warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause "irreparable damage" to them, in recorded video aired by state TV. Earlier that day, a spokesman for the Iranian foreign ministry said: "Any American intervention would be a recipe for an all-out war in the region." In addition there is a risk of nuclear contamination. The International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that Iran is producing highly enriched uranium at Fordow, raising the possibility that nuclear material could be released into the area if the GBU-57 A/B were used to hit the facility. However, Israeli strikes at another Iranian nuclear site, Natanz, on a centrifuge site have caused contamination only at the site itself, not the surrounding area, the IAEA has said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store