Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for U.S. colleges to pay athletes millions
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday (June 6, 2025), clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century.
Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports.
The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years.
The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming.
The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes.
The road to a settlement: Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as 'March Madness' or 'Roll Tide.' It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger.
Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
Trump-backed tax bill aims to undo Obama and Biden policy milestones
Chiseling away at President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act. Rolling back the green energy tax breaks from President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. At its core, the Republican big, beautiful bill is more than just an extension of tax breaks approved during President Donald Trump's first term at the White House. The package is an attempt by Republicans to undo, little by little, the signature domestic achievements of the past two Democratic presidents. We're going to do what we said we were going to do, Speaker Mike Johnson said after House passage last month. While the aim of the sprawling 1,000-page plus bill is to preserve an estimated USD 4.5 trillion in tax cuts that would otherwise expire at year's end if Congress fails to act and add some new ones, including no taxes on tips the spending cuts pointed at the Democratic-led programmes are causing the most political turmoil. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said this week that 10.9 million fewer people would have health insurance under the GOP bill, including 1.4 million immigrants in the US without legal status who are in state-funded programs. At the same time, lawmakers are being hounded by businesses in states across the nation who rely on the green energy tax breaks for their projects. As the package moves from the House to the Senate, the simmering unrest over curbing the Obama and Biden policies shows just how politically difficult it can be to slash government programmes once they become part of civic life. "When he asked me, what do you think the prospects are for passage in the Senate? I said, good if we don't cut Medicaid," said Sen Josh Hawley, R-Mo, recounting his conversation last week with Trump. And he said, I'm 100 per cent supportive of that. Health care worries Not a single Republican in Congress voted for the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, in 2010, or Biden's inflation act in 2022. Both were approved using the same budget reconciliation process now being employed by Republicans to steamroll Trump's bill past the opposition. Even still, sizable coalitions of GOP lawmakers are forming to protect aspects of both of those programs as they ripple into the lives of millions of Americans. Hawley, Sen Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and others are wary of changes to Medicaid and other provisions in the bill that would result in fewer people being able to access health care programs. At the same time, crossover groupings of House and Senate Republicans have launched an aggressive campaign to preserve, at least for some time, the green energy tax breaks that business interests in their states are relying on to develop solar, wind and other types of energy production. Murkowski said one area she's "worried about is the House bill's provision that any project not under construction within 60 days of the bill becoming law may no longer be eligible for those credits. These are some of the things we're working on, she said. The concerns are running in sometimes opposite directions and complicating the work of GOP leaders who have almost no votes to spare in the House and Senate as they try to hoist the package over Democratic opposition and onto the president's desk by the Fourth of July. While some Republicans are working to preserve the programs from cuts, the budget hawks want steeper reductions to stem the nation's debt load. The CBO said the package would add $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. After a robust private meeting with Trump at the White House this week, Republican senators said they were working to keep the bill on track as they amend it for their own priorities. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the president made the pitch and the argument for why we need to get the bill done." The disconnect is reminiscent of Trump's first term, when Republicans promised to repeal and replace Obamacare, only to see their effort collapse in dramatic fashion when the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, voted thumbs down for the bill on the House floor. Battle over Medicaid In the 15 years since Obamacare became law, access to health care has grown substantially. Some 80 million people are now enrolled in Medicaid, and the Kaiser Family Foundation reports 41 states have opted to expand their coverage. The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid to all adults with incomes up to about USD 21,500 for an individual, or almost USD 29,000 for a two-person household. While Republicans no longer campaign on ending Obamacare, advocates warn that the changes proposed in the big bill will trim back at access to health care. The bill proposes new 80 hours of monthly work or community service requirements for able-bodied Medicaid recipients, age 18 to 64, with some exceptions. It also imposes twice-a-year eligibility verification checks and other changes. Republicans argue that they want to right-size Medicaid to root out waste, fraud and abuse and ensure it's there for those who need it most, often citing women and children. Medicaid was built to be a temporary safety net for people who genuinely need it young, pregnant women, single mothers, the disabled, the elderly, Johnson told The Associated Press. But when when they expanded under Obamacare, it not only thwarted the purpose of the program, it started draining resources. Initially, the House bill proposed starting the work requirements in January 2029, as Trump's term in the White House would be coming to a close. But conservatives from the House Freedom Caucus negotiated for a quicker start date, in December 2026, to start the spending reductions sooner. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has said the changes are an Obamacare rollback by another name. It decimates our health care system, decimates our clean energy system, Schumer of New York said in an interview with the AP. The green energy tax breaks involve not only those used by buyers of electric vehicles, like Elon Musk's Tesla line, but also the production and investment tax credits for developers of renewables and other energy sources. The House bill had initially proposed a phaseout of those credits over the next several years. But again the conservative Freedom Caucus engineered the faster wind-down within 60 days of the bill's passage. Not a single Republican voted for the Green New Scam subsidies, wrote Sen Mike Lee, R-Utah, on social media. Not a single Republican should vote to keep them.
News18
4 hours ago
- News18
JD Vance Defends Donald Trump On Musk's Epstein Files Claim: 'Hope Elon Comes Back'
Last Updated: JD Vance expressed hope for reconciliation, saying, 'I hope eventually Elon comes back into the fold.' US Vice President JD Vance come to the defense of Donald Trump following a controversial and now-deleted tweet by billionaire Elon Musk. Elon Musk had claimed that Donald Trump's name appears in the sealed Jeffrey Epstein files, suggesting this was why the documents had not been made public. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Elon Musk wrote, 'Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" The post quickly went viral but was later removed by Musk without explanation. Responding to Elon Musk's allegation, JD Vance firmly rejected the claim, stating, 'Absolutely not, Donald Trump didn't do anything with Epstein." He also expressed hope for reconciliation, saying, 'I hope eventually Elon comes back into the fold." Elon Musk-Donald Trump Spat The exchange between Elon Musk and Donald Trump unfolded amid ongoing tensions between the billionaire CEO and the President. Elon Musk, who recently stepped down from his government advisory role to focus on his businesses, has increasingly criticized Donald Trump, including over the US president's proposed 'Big Beautiful Bill". Elon Musk also claimed, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate." When asked about the ongoing spat with Musk during a phone call with POLITICO, Trump responded confidently, 'Oh, it's okay. It's going very well, never done better." Mallika Soni When not reading, this ex-literature student can be found searching for an answer to the question, "What is the purpose of journalism in society?" First Published: June 07, 2025, 18:11 IST
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Olympian Simone Biles slams anti-trans activist Riley Gaines: Here's why they are clashing over transwomen in sports
The Minnesota State High School Softball Championship became a national flashpoint when Marissa Rothenberger, a transgender girl and star pitcher for Champlin Park High School, led her team to a dominant 6–0 win in the Class 4A title game. Her standout performance, which included seven shutout innings and two doubles, reignited the national debate surrounding transgender participation in women's sports. Minnesota's 2015 policy allowing transgender athletes to play in alignment with their gender identity has long been controversial. But Rothenberger's success in a high-profile championship, just months after a federal executive order sought to ban transgender girls from girls' and women's sports, brought the issue to national attention. The victory set off a social media firestorm, culminating in a bitter and highly public feud between former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines and Olympic gymnast Simone Biles . Minnesota's policy: Transgender's participation under fire Marissa Rothenberger began transitioning at age nine and was cleared to play under the Minnesota State High School League's guidelines. These rules allow transgender athletes to compete according to their gender identity after undergoing a review process. Her teammates and coaches praised her performance and resilience, but her participation quickly became a focal point for critics of transgender inclusion. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo A lawsuit filed in May 2025 by the advocacy group Female Athletes United argues that Rothenberger's inclusion violates Title IX, which bars sex-based discrimination in federally funded education. Plaintiffs in the case allege that cisgender female athletes lost opportunities due to Rothenberger's presence, including one who reportedly missed a chance to advance to the state tournament and another who suffered an injury from a fast pitch. Riley Gaines responds: 'When your star player is a boy' you win Riley Gaines, a former NCAA swimmer who has become one of the most vocal critics of transgender participation in women's sports, responded swiftly to Champlin Park High School's state championship win. She framed the outcome as yet another example of biological males dominating girls' sports, arguing that the inclusion of Marissa Rothenberger compromised the fairness of the competition. Gaines also took aim at Minnesota Governor Tim Walz for supporting the state's transgender inclusion policy, accusing him of failing to protect the rights and opportunities of cisgender female athletes. She further criticized the team for turning off public comments on their championship post, implying it was an attempt to silence backlash over Rothenberger's gender identity. In a widely circulated comment, Gaines remarked, 'Comments off lol. To be expected when your star player is a boy,' underscoring her stance that allowing transgender athletes in girls' sports undermines integrity and transparency. Her activism is deeply rooted in her personal experience at the 2022 NCAA Championships, where she tied with Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer, for fifth place in the 200-yard freestyle. While both finished with identical times, Thomas was awarded the fifth-place trophy, a decision Gaines has since cited as symbolic of what she sees as the disadvantages faced by female athletes in the current landscape. Simone Biles defends inclusivity Simone Biles responded strongly to Gaines's remarks, condemning her for using past trauma for political arguments. Biles accused Gaines of being a sore loser and suggested that her campaign against transgender athletes was rooted more in personal resentment than genuine concern. Biles called for more inclusive solutions, such as developing new categories or structures that could allow transgender athletes to compete fairly and safely. Biles emphasized that the well-being and mental health of all athletes should be prioritized and argued that inclusivity and fairness do not need to be mutually exclusive. Her stance, shaped by her own experience of abuse and advocacy for athlete protection, emphasized creating safe and respectful environments for everyone in sports. The Nassar Controversy The controversy escalated when Gaines drew a comparison between transgender inclusion and the sexual abuse scandal involving former USA Gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar. She referenced Simone Biles's advocacy for inclusion and contrasted it with Biles's history as a survivor of Nassar's abuse. Gaines suggested that Biles's support for policies allowing transgender women in locker rooms conflicted with her previous efforts to speak out against sexual exploitation in sports. Riley Gaines shared a video of Simone Biles testifying about surviving Larry Nassar's sexual abuse alongside Biles' recent tweet criticizing Gaines, with the text "Simone Biles when she had to endure a predatory man Vs Simone Biles when other girls have to endure predatory men," suggesting inconsistency in Biles' stance on athlete safety regarding transgender inclusion. The post, with over 1 million views, drew mixed reactions, with critics like @NebsGoodTakes calling it "evil" for exploiting Biles' trauma, while supporters like @ValentinaForUSA found Biles' support for transgender inclusion "astonishing" given her Nassar experience. Gaines clarified her position, hoping Nassar "rots in prison" and arguing both Nassar's abuse and transgender inclusion threaten female athletes, but the post's sensitivity has intensified the debate over fairness and inclusivity in sports. The reference to Nassar hit a nerve because it reopened wounds from one of the most horrifying abuse scandals in sports history. Larry Nassar, the longtime team doctor for USA Gymnastics and a physician at Michigan State University, sexually abused more than 300 girls and young women under the guise of medical treatment. Despite multiple reports over decades, institutions failed to act, allowing the abuse to continue unchecked. The scandal came to light in 2016, and in the years that followed, top athletes like Simone Biles, Aly Raisman, and Jamie Dantzscher gave powerful testimony about how a culture of silence and institutional protection enabled Nassar's crimes. His case exposed how sports organizations had prioritized medals and reputation over athlete safety. Legal and social ramifications The ongoing lawsuit in Minnesota could become a pivotal legal case as it challenges the long-standing policy of transgender inclusion at the state level. Female Athletes United is demanding changes that would prohibit transgender girls from participating in girls' sports and retroactively adjust records where they believe competitive integrity was compromised. On social media, reactions have been highly polarized. Supporters of Gaines continue to argue that allowing transgender athletes creates an unfair advantage and diminishes opportunities for cisgender girls. Others, like supporters of Biles, stress the need to support transgender youth and argue that inclusion can be achieved while still respecting the integrity of competition. The Minnesota softball championship has become a defining moment in the escalating debate over gender identity and fairness in school sports. At the core of the controversy is a growing concern among female athletes and advocates like Riley Gaines, who argue that the integrity of girls' sports is being compromised. For them, allowing biologically male athletes to compete in female categories threatens the level playing field Title IX was meant to protect. Gaines and others are calling for clear boundaries to ensure that cisgender girls retain equal opportunities, scholarships, and safety in competition. As Marissa Rothenberger's dominant performance reignites national attention, many believe it is time to prioritize fairness over ideology and protect the spaces originally created for women and girls.
