
Senate Republicans circle wagons as Trump beats war drum on Iran: ‘They've all had their spines removed'
Senate Republicans are largely standing with President Donald Trump as he escalates U.S. involvement in Israel's war with Iran.
On Tuesday, the president demanded that Iran lay down its weapons in an 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER ' and said that he knew exactly where Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was hiding.
Trump insisted that Iran was 'very close' to a working nuclear weapon. He also disregarded testimony from his own Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who said in March that Iran was not working toward building a nuclear weapon.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters that Trump would have constitutional authority to bomb Fordow, which is located deep inside a mountain near the city of Qom.
'Under Article II of the Constitution, the president is the commander in chief, and he has the authority and responsibility to keep Americans safe and defend American servicemen and women,' Cruz said.
'Congress has the authority to declare war, and war is considered sustained and longstanding hostilities,' he maintained.
'A single bombing run, historically, has not been understood to require congressional authorization to engage in sustained hostility, to engage in continued warfare, does require congressional coming to the floor.'
Other Republicans echoed Cruz's words on Iran.
While Republicans in the House like Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and MAGA hardliner Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia have criticized the idea of U.S. involvement in Israel's war with Iran, the Senate still has plenty of majority members who have a more traditionally Republican interventionist foreign policy.
'I think he's doing quite well actually,' Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa, a member of the Armed Services Committee, told The Independent. 'He's been very well measured in allowing Israel to do what they think they need.'
Ernst said if necessary, Trump would consult Congress.
'I think we'll need to understand the situation and get briefings on it, and then we'll take measure as necessary,' she said.
Republicans in the Senate have historically been uneasy with Trump's plans to negotiate with Iran. In March, 51 Republican Senators sent a letter to the Trump administration regarding its negotiations with Iran.
During Trump's first administration, he withdrew with the Iran nuclear agreement brokered by former president Barack Obama. Trump also put in place sanctions. But in the second administration, he dispatched his envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff to negotiate with Iran in Oman while maintaining hawkish rhetoric on Iran.
But on Thursday, Israel began its strikes on Iran, which led to Iran responding in kind. Trump called for a deal between Israel and Iran, but has also signaled support for Israel, which many Republicans in the Senate welcomed.
'Right now, we should defend Israel against any counter attacks, and then I'll leave it to the administration to mount about a plan that comports with what we want to do here in Congress,' Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, a hawk on Iran, told The Independent.
But support is not unanimous even among Republicans.
Sen. Rand Paul, the sole Republican who did not sign the letter, told The Independent that he would have more to say about war with Iran. But he did have concerns.
'It's always been my belief that you don't go to war without the approval of Congress, and bombing another country is obviously war,' the libertarian said.
Only a handful of Democrats in the Senate, meanwhile, have voiced their full-fledged opposition to war with Iran.
Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia introduced a war powers resolution. Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent and socialist from Vermont who caucuses with the minority party, also introduced a resolution with other Democrats.
'We should not stand by why Donald Trump tries to drag America to another endless war in the Middle East,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a member of the Armed Services Committee, who joined the resolution, told The Independent.
'There's evidently a serious medical problem with the Senate Republicans,' the Massachusetts senator said.
'They've all had their spines removed,' said Warren. 'None of them seem capable of standing up to Donald Trump, which means they cannot fulfill their oaths to the Constitution of the United States.'
But many Republicans will likely continue to support Trump's efforts on Iran.
Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota showed up to the Senate wearing a lapel pin shaped like a fighter plane with Israel's flag on it.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Albanese considers snap visit to Europe next week in hope of securing meeting with Trump
Anthony Albanese is considering a snap visit to Europe next week to meet Donald Trump, days after their first meeting at the G7 in Canada was cancelled. Nato leaders will gather at The Hague on 24-25 June, talks set to be dominated by the growing Middle East war. Ahead of leaving the summit in Kananaskis on Tuesday local time, Albanese said he could join the talks next week, a move that is incumbent on a face-to-face meeting with the US president being locked in. 'Yes that is being considered,' Albanese said. Trump and Albanese had been due to discuss Australia's defence spending and the Aukus nuclear submarines agreement, as well as Washington's punishing trade tariffs. But Trump left the summit a day early to return to Washington to deal with the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, standing up a group of world leaders including Mexico's Claudia Sheinbaum and European Union boss Ursula von der Leyen. Albanese instead met the US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, as well as the US trade representative, Jamieson Greer, and the director of the US National Economic Council, Kevin Hassett. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email A spokesperson for Albanese said the US ambassador, Kevin Rudd, joined the meeting, which also included discussions on wider trade issues, critical minerals and rare earths. Albanese said he was 'mature' about Trump's early departure and the cancelled talks, but the prospect of a Nato visit suggests the government is eager to lock in a meeting before long. The prime minister held warm talks with the Nato secretary general, Mark Rutte, while in the Rocky Mountains. The defence minister, Richard Marles, had been due to represent Australia at the Nato summit. The White House confirmed Trump would attend in early June. 'I am considering it,' Albanese said. 'I had discussions with a range of people over the last couple of days, obviously, including I met with the Nato secretary general yesterday. He's well known to me, but I had discussions with others here as well.' In one of the main summit sessions, Albanese told G7 leaders and other partner countries that a handful of nations should not be allowed to control global supply of critical minerals. 'Critical minerals are the new drivers of energy security,' Albanese said. 'Australia is blessed to have some of the largest critical minerals deposits on Earth. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'But we are increasingly finding that critical minerals markets are concentrated and vulnerable to manipulation. Producers struggle to remain competitive, and supply chains are affected by export bans and controls.' Australia signed on to the G7's critical minerals action plan, which Albanese said would 'support secure, diversified critical minerals supply chains'. Albanese also accepted the European Union's offer of high-level negotiations on a new defence and security pact in a meeting with Von der Leyen and the European Council president, António Costa. Marles and the foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, have been charged with leading work on the agreement. The EU already has similar deals in place with countries including Japan, South Korea and the United Kingdom. It is not legally binding and would not include troop deployment, but is designed to strengthen cooperation on global security challenges. It comes amid renewed talks on a possible Australia-EU free trade agreement. The deal could be used in areas including foreign interference, cybersecurity, counter-terrorism, defence industries and critical technologies. Negotiations on the new agreement were first proposed at the inauguration mass of Pope Leo XIV in Rome last month. Australia was initially cool on the idea, but it has picked up serious momentum at the G7 summit in Canada. Albanese is due to return to Australia on Thursday morning.


Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Disgraceful' former CNN star slammed for vile joke about Trump's dead ex-wife - as White House hits back
Former CNN reporter Jim Acosta has been slammed with backlash after making a vile joke about President Donald Trump 's deceased ex-wife, Ivana. Acosta made the remark during a Monday interview on The Contrarian podcast while discussing the Trump administration's immigration policies. The correspondent's crude remark prompted a response from the White House, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt telling Fox Digital he is a 'disgraceful human being.' 'Where are the ICE raids at the Trump properties?' he began his tangent on the No Kings Day episode of the show. 'Could somebody call ICE on the Trump golf course in Virginia? You're telling me there's nobody in there that is undocumented or has some kind of squirreliness going on with their paperwork?' The left-leaning 54-year-old went on to Trump's personal life, asking: 'How many immigrants has he married?' 'He's got one buried at his golf course in New Jersey! Isn't she buried by the first hole or the second tee or something like that?' he said as liberal reporter April Ryan and show host Jennifer Rubin cackled along. Trump's first wife, Ivana, who passed away in 2022, is buried at his golf course in Bedminster, New Jersey. Aside from the White House's take on Acosta's dig, Trump supporters have taken to social media to tear into the correspondent. 'Jim Acosta is a whole new level of Messed Up,' one man reacted on X.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Ohio Republicans to introduce bill that would treat abortion as homicide and ban all procedures in the state
Ohio Republicans are introducing a bill to ban all abortions in the state by classifying the procedure as homicide. Representatives Levi Dean and Johnathan Newman are set to introduce the " Ohio Prenatal Equal Protection Act ' on Wednesday, which would classify abortion as homicide. Austin Beigel, founder of End Abortion Ohio, told The Independent the bill will 'make a positive affirmation of the personhood of the pre-born.' In 2023, Ohio residents voted to enshrine abortion access in the state Constitution. Since then, judges have struck down legislation that seeks to limit or ban abortion access despite the amendment. The legislation will almost certainly face legal challenges if it passes. Beigel told The Independent the goal of the bill is to 'create an immediate conflict between our state's the U.S. Constitution, which declares that no state may deprive a person of life, liberty or property without due process of the law.' Beigel hopes legal challenges to the bill could rise as far as the Supreme Court. The bill could also end in vitro fertilization in the state and ban some forms of contraception, including IUDs, The Columbus Dispatch reports. Beigel said IVF clinics 'will not be able to operate the way they are right now' under the legislation, but noted the bill does not mention contraception. Several abortion rights advocates — and even some anti-abortion activists — have come out against the bill. Ohio Right to Life President Mike Gonidakis said his organization doesn't support the bill. 'We have never supported criminalizing a woman for having an abortion, and we never will,' Gonidakis told the Dispatch. 'It's completely out of bounds and inappropriate.' "This isn't even a Hail Mary," he added. "It's a strategy that won't be successful at the legislative level and it's a strategy that won't be successful at the judicial level." Beigel said End Abortion Ohio doesn't align with Ohio Right to Life: 'We do not have the same goals, because Ohio Right to Life does not want to abolish abortion, they want to regulate abortion.' Kellie Copeland, executive director of the advocacy group Abortion Forward, called the bill's supporters 'out-of-touch anti-abortion extremists.' "This would strip Ohioans' ability to make decisions for our lives, health and well-being, including banning all abortion care, banning some types of birth control, and denying IVF treatment that helps people build their families,' Copeland told the Dispatch. The Supreme Court enshrined abortion access as a Constitutional right in the 1973 case Roe v Wade. But the nation's highest court overturned the ruling in 2022 with its 6-3 decision on Dobbs v Jackson. Since then, abortion has been banned in 12 states, while six states have instituted a gestational limit between six and 12 weeks. But most people don't know they're pregnant until their first missed period, which means many don't find out until after six weeks. Georgia is one of the states which bans abortion after six weeks. There, Atlanta resident Adriana Smith was kept alive on life support for months after doctors declared her brain dead so she could carry out her pregnancy. Her family says doctors kept her on life support due to the gestational limit law. said she gave birth via C-section on June 13 to a baby boy.