logo
Washington could bear responsibility for natural disasters as Trump eyes changes to FEMA

Washington could bear responsibility for natural disasters as Trump eyes changes to FEMA

Yahooa day ago

Jun. 11—Washington state could soon be responsible for a bigger share of disaster relief response, a possibility state officials have spent months preparing for.
Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Tuesday, President Donald Trump said his administration is examining multiple options for "phasing out" the Federal Emergency Management Agency and providing funding directly to states that experience a natural disaster.
The plan, Trump said, wouldn't necessarily mean that states receive less money, but that the funds would be given "directly" from the president's office or Homeland Security. According to the president, the overhaul could take place after the hurricane season in the Atlantic Ocean, which ends on Nov. 30.
"We're going to do it much differently," Trump said.
Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem added that administration will spend the next several months "working on reforms" for the agency. Established by President Jimmy Carter in 1979, the agency has a budget of $33 billion for fiscal year 2025.
"It will empower governors to go out and respond to emergency situations, and what the president does best is to make sure that the taxpayers are only fulfilling the need to which is appropriate," Noem said. "And that people are responsible to respond to their own people closest to home."
Noem said that in the past, the agency has failed "thousands if not millions of people."
"And President Trump does not want to see that continue into the future," Noem said. "This agency, fundamentally, needs to go away as it exists."
Faced with a natural disaster, Trump said the governor of a state "should be able to handle it."
"And, frankly, if they can't handle it, the aftermath, then maybe they shouldn't be governor," Trump said.
For months, state lawmakers have been preparing for the possibility that Washington may receive less federal assistance during natural disasters. During an April 1 news conference, Gov. Bob Ferguson said the state receives $600 million for disaster recovery and response from the federal government during a two-year budget cycle. In total, federal funding accounts for 28% of the state's revenue.
"There are no guarantees that federal funding will continue in these and other areas," Ferguson said.
During the news conference, which came as budget writers worked to craft the state's two-year budget, Ferguson called on the state to maintain its rainy day fund, which he said was necessary in part to maintain services should the state face additional federal cuts.
"Washington is the fourth-most disaster-prone state in the nation. The federal government, as you know, is making dramatic cuts to FEMA," Ferguson said. "It is a sad commentary on what is happening with the federal administration that we can no longer count on them when we have our next natural disaster. We must be prepared to help communities and Washingtonians across the state who find themselves confronting the impacts of, for example, a fire, if the federal government does not come through with assistance."
In April, FEMA denied Washington's application to assist with federal disaster relief to aid with an estimated $34 million in damage from a series of storms in Western Washington last fall. Following the announcement, Ferguson said the state would appeal the decision and said it was "another troubling example of the federal government withholding funding."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP Senator Ron Johnson says he's 'trying to force reality' on DC
GOP Senator Ron Johnson says he's 'trying to force reality' on DC

Fox News

time11 minutes ago

  • Fox News

GOP Senator Ron Johnson says he's 'trying to force reality' on DC

When it comes to the nation's federal government, GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin is "not a fan." He believes that it "causes or exacerbates more problems than it actually solves," telling Fox News Digital during an interview on Wednesday that the bulk of his oversight is "to expose how awful government is" in order to obtain "public support for reducing it, limiting its size, limiting its cost, limiting its influence over our lives." "As our federal government grows, our freedoms recede," he said. "You see what the federal government does, how it wastes money." The national debt has ballooned to the eye-watering sum of more than $36 trillion, with lawmakers and presidents from both parties presiding over the deficit spending that has led the nation to this point. Johnson said he's "trying to force reality" upon everyone in the nation's capital, regardless of whether they want to face that reality. He said for decades the nation has been suffering a "chronic debt crisis," illustrating the dramatic decline in the value of the U.S. dollar by noting that "the dollar you held back in 1998 is now only worth $0.51 cents," while "a dollar you held in … 2019 is only worth $0.80 cents." The senator referred to inflation as "the silent tax." But he's certainly not staying silent. Johnson indicated that the elected leaders are mortgaging the future of American children, but "don't talk about it." "I'm forcing everybody to look at it," he said, noting that his "primary role" is to force "acknowledgment of our problem." But as keenly as Johnson advocates the idea of slashing the sprawling tentacles of the massive federal bureaucracy, right now he's just pushing to pare spending down to pre-pandemic levels. The conservative fiscal hawk has been making headlines for taking a stand against the Trump-backed One Big Beautiful Bill Act that cleared the GOP-controlled House of Representatives last month. But Johnson told Fox News Digital that he actually likes a lot of the measure. "I'm really not critical of the bill as far as it goes," Johnson explained, noting that he's a "big supporter" of much of what's in it, though he noted that has not read all of it — the measure is more than 1,000 pages long. "My main beef is it just doesn't go far enough," he said, noting that after the COVID-19 pandemic Democrats failed to return to pre-COVID spending and deficit levels. The Congressional Budget Office's estimated budgetary impact for the measure indicates that the net effect on the deficit would be a more than $2.4 trillion increase over the fiscal years 2025-2034. But White House Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought has said the measure would decrease deficits. "The bill REDUCES deficits by $1.4 trillion over ten years when you adjust for CBO's one big gimmick--not using a realistic current policy baseline. It includes $1.7 trillion in mandatory savings, the most in history. If you care about deficits and debt, this bill dramatically improves the fiscal picture," Vought said in a post on X. Johnson also noted during the interview that there has not been a "reckoning" regarding the "abuse" at all levels of government during the COVID-19 pandemic. He noted that he does not refer to the COVID-19 jab as a vaccine. Instead, he referred to it as an "injection," asserting that it is "not a vaccine," and that it caused injuries and death. The senator said that he thinks the shots should have "black box warnings." The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website states that the "CDC recommends a 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine for most adults ages 18 and older" and claims that the "vaccine helps protect you from severe illness, hospitalization, and death." Johnson, who has served in the Senate since 2011 and won election to a third term in 2022, said he'd prefer not to seek another term in office. "I don't covet this job," he said, noting that he wants to leverage his post to help save America and aid those who are "ignored by the system." While he's not ruling out another run, Johnson, who turned 70-years-old earlier this year, said he'd "be happy" to return to Oshkosh and "live a nice, peaceful life."

Trump doesn't know if he's the hero or villain in 'Les Mis.' How ironic.
Trump doesn't know if he's the hero or villain in 'Les Mis.' How ironic.

USA Today

time23 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump doesn't know if he's the hero or villain in 'Les Mis.' How ironic.

Trump doesn't know if he's the hero or villain in 'Les Mis.' How ironic. | Opinion Sending the military in to quell protests is more aligned with the French monarchy than the revolutionaries. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump met with boos, cheers before Les Misérables at Kennedy Center President Donald Trump attended "Les Miserables" at the Kennedy Center after overhauling its leadership and naming himself chairman. On June 11, President Donald Trump appeared at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts for the opening night of 'Les Misérables.' If you're at all familiar with the musical, you'll understand why that's so ironic. Trump staged a hostile takeover of the Kennedy Center back in February, changing up the board and making himself chairman of the iconic performing arts venue. It led several artists to cancel performances. According to The New York Times, some 'Les Misérables' cast members had considered boycotting the Wednesday performance that kicked off the summer 2025 season. The president, oblivious as always, says the show is 'great.' Ever the musical theater fan, he has used one of the most recognizable songs from 'Les Mis' at multiple rallies over the years. You know, the one the cast sings on the eve of revolting against the monarchy? Surely the man who has inspired nationwide 'No Kings Day' protests understands how laughable that is. Does Trump identify with hero or villain of 'Les Mis'? He doesn't know. If you're unfamiliar with the musical, let me give you a rundown. Based on the novel by Victor Hugo, the story follows Jean Valjean after he leaves prison for stealing a loaf of bread for his starving relatives. After an interaction with a priest, he is inspired to live a better life, which includes adopting and raising a child named Cosette after her mother dies. The musical is set during a French revolution that culminates in the 1832 June Rebellion, where a group of student revolutionaries known as the Friends of the ABC try to lead the city into revolt. These are the students Republican leaders would want to deport. Opinion: Trump supporters, this is what you're cheering as his deportation scheme unfolds Apparently, despite his love of the musical, Trump doesn't know if he's the hero or villain of this story. He told The Washington Post he wasn't sure if he identified more with Valjean or Javert, the prison guard turned inspector who is obsessed with bringing Valjean to justice. It's an ironically indecisive thing to say, considering he has sent military troops to Los Angeles to quell protests against raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and has spent much of the past few months raging against students protesting for Palestine. It's hard to picture Trump as the hero of this story. That would require him learning how to be a more caring person over time. Given his rhetoric on immigrants, trans people and basically anyone who disagrees with him, I doubt he's experienced that kind of transformation. Imagine treating immigrants like they stole bread Art has always been part of protest and resistance. The theater is no exception. These forms of expression can also be used as propaganda. With Trump's declaration that the Kennedy Center's "woke" programming is done for, it seems that only tolerable art will make it through the vetting process. Somehow, "Les Mis" slipped through the cracks, likely because Trump actually likes the musical. Opinion: I told you GOP would come for marriage. Southern Baptists just proved my point. If Trump actually paid attention to the songs and themes of "Les Mis," maybe he'd realize that his desire to lay down the law is more aligned with Javert than anyone else in the show. Maybe he'd realize that sending the military to quell protests is more aligned with the actions of the French monarchy than those of the revolutionaries. Maybe he'd realize that he has more in common with the monarchy than the people. Probably not. But maybe. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter, @sara__pequeno

Editorial: Law must prevail over force — There's no invasion of LA except for federal troops
Editorial: Law must prevail over force — There's no invasion of LA except for federal troops

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: Law must prevail over force — There's no invasion of LA except for federal troops

Despite what President Donald Trump and his border czar Tom Homan claim, the only invasion of Los Angeles is by the illegally mobilized National Guard and Marines, brought into the city against the will of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The anti-ICE protests in L.A. were being contained and handled by local law enforcement, the robust LAPD and even larger Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. And today Newsom's lawsuit has a hearing in federal courts to end the military deployments even as the governor is facing idle threats of arrest from Homan and Trump himself. There is a thick stack of red lines that the administration has crossed just in the last few days. Troops in the streets? Check. Those troops conducting domestic law enforcement in clear violation of the law? Check; we are already seeing images of National Guard soldiers actively backing masked federal agents up as these round people up, reportedly soon joined by the Marines. In a speech, Newsom said: 'Authoritarian regimes begin by targeting people who are least able to defend themselves. But they do not stop there.' Trump openly admires foreign strongmen who put down dissent. Here he gets to try it out here at home. There is no emergency, other than the one that Trump has manufactured. But for a few spots here and there, 99% of L.A. is going about their daily live without incident. Trump is using apocalyptic language and deploying the troops not because he wants the situation to de-escalate but precisely because he wants very badly for there to be escalation, as that gives him additional latitude to crack down. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, long Trump's preeminent anti-immigrant zealot, has given the game away yet again with his descriptions of what's so wrong with L.A. that federal troops need to be brought in to fix it, moaning on Twitter that 'huge swaths of the city where I was born now resemble failed third world nations,' by which he really just means they're full of nonwhite people. This whole effort can best be understood as more akin to an occupation than an attempt to preserve order that the L.A. authorities are perfectly capable of maintaining themselves. Other cities, New York included, need to prepare given reports that ICE is surging special units to Seattle, Chicago, Philly, northern Virginia and New York as large protests are planned for this weekend against the ICE raids and Saturday's D.C. military parade on Trump's birthday. Knowing that there are nationwide protests planned against his procession, Trump has said that protesters will be met with 'very big force,' not bothering to distinguish between constitutionally protected speech and violence, because he neither understands nor cares about such distinctions. We hope that the courts will ignore the DOJ's mealy-mouthed defenses and act fast to state the obvious, which is that Trump is way overreaching his federal powers, and we hope that such rulings are expeditiously enforced, unlike the administration's track record so far of defying federal judges. For our service members who may be called upon to enact Trump's designs, we will remind you that your oath is not to the president, but to the Constitution. There are some lines that cannot be uncrossed. _____

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store