
As state, federal Medicaid cuts loom, Hoosiers anxious about impact
Jordan Musenbrock, 35, said Medicaid helped pay for her manual wheelchair and its repairs, shower chair, catheters and multiple medications.
Musenbrock, who has been wheelchair-bound since she was 17 years old following a car accident, said without Medicaid she will have to choose between a drastic decline in health, even death, or financial hardship.
'Either I won't have what I need to live or I'm going to be in debt to survive,' Musenbrock, of Michigan City, said. 'I already have the added difficulty of having a disability, and so now it's just added difficulty, added stress of will I have what I need to live.'
Over the years, Musenbrock said she has been on Medicaid either as a primary insurance or secondary insurance in various states. Currently, she's not on Medicaid because of a car accident she was in last year, she said.
After the accident, which was minor, insurance sent her money, which put her over the income limit to be eligible for Medicaid, Musenbrock said. While she's working toward spending down the money to be eligible for the program again, Musenbrock said the money she received won't cover her medical payments and has already left her in debt to her wheelchair and medical supply providers.
'Medicaid is not just health care. Medicaid is a lot of people's lifeline,' Musenbrock said. 'People with disabilities want and are a part of the community. We are only asking for our basic needs to be met so that we have the same opportunities as everyone else.'
Carrie Cool, who grew up in Hobart, said she developed psoriatic arthritis when she was 50 years old, which had resulted in many complications, surgeries and medications.
Cool, who is now 64 years old, said Medicaid has helped pay for all her surgeries and the majority of her medications. Without Medicaid, Cool said she wouldn't be able to afford to pay for her medical expenses on top of her house and bills.
Even on Medicaid and social security disability, Cool said she goes to local food pantries, has started a garden to grow some foods like lettuce and cut meat out of her diet to save money.
'I'm trying right now, but if you took away everything and I had to pay more, there's no way I could stay (in my house),' Cool said.
Every time she checks the mail, Cool said she has been stressed about getting a letter with bad news about her Medicaid coverage.
'I just wait, I wait for that letter. If I don't get a letter, everything is okay so far,' Cool said.
Senate Bill 2 — authored by Sen. Ryan Mishler, R-Mishawaka — places restrictions on Medicaid, including work requirements on an insurance program for Hoosiers with a medium income and between ages 19 to 64. There are 11 exemptions, including medical clearance as physically unable to work and a parent or caretaker for someone with a serious medical condition.
The bill, which was signed into law May 1, initially set a 500,000 cap on the Medicaid program. The legislature removed that portion of the bill before sending it to Gov. Mike Braun's desk for signature.
Tracey Hutchings-Goetz, an organizer with Hoosier Action, said if the cap had remained in place, about 250,000 Hoosiers would've been kicked off the program arbitrarily. Hoosier Action also worked to ensure the three-year enrollment cap was removed from the bill, Hutchings-Goetz said.
'Those two things would've been extraordinarily devastating and cruel to everyday people, and frankly destabilize our state's entire health care system,' Hutchings-Goetz said.
When the state first established the Healthy Indiana Plan as part of the Indiana Medicaid program in 2006, there were 40,000 people on the program, Mishler said. Before COVID-19, there were 390,000 on HIP and currently there are more than 700,000 people on the program, Mishler said.
Overall, Medicaid has grown by $5 billion in the last 4 years, Mishler said, and the rate of growth is greater than the state's revenue increase. In the two-year budget the legislature passed, Mishler said the majority of new revenue covered Medicaid costs.
The HIP program is 90% federally funded and 10% state funded, Hutchings-Goetz said. Braun has stated he won't end the match to HIP, Hutchings-Goetz said.
But, under the new Medicaid law, which goes into effect July 1, Hutchings-Goetz said the state's Family and Social Services Administration secretary has the authority to end the Healthy Indiana Plan.
The remaining work requirements in the law will likely see 100,000 to 150,000 people kicked off the program, Hutchings-Goetz said, while requiring FSSA to 'conduct more frequent, repetitious, expensive eligibility checks.'
'Those things definitely make the program more inefficient, more expensive and are going to contribute to the suffering of Hoosiers across the state,' Hutchings-Goetz said. 'Members of the General Assembly should hear from their constituents every time they have to deal with paperwork issues.'
Any changes to Medicaid 'which make it harder to navigate and more expensive to run are not Hoosier common sense; they are just cuts by another name,' Hutchings-Goetz said.
'Cuts to health care are deadly,' Hutchings-Goetz said.
Federal Medicaid cuts
The U.S. House of Representatives passed domestic policy bill backed by President Donald Trump after starting debate before midnight Wednesday and calling for a vote by dawn on Thursday. The vote was 215-214, with all Democrats opposing the bill.
The bill moves forward to the Senate, which hopes to vote on the bill by the Fourth of July holiday.
The more than 1,000-page bill focuses on changes to Medicaid and the food stamps program to make up for some of the lost tax revenue. The bill imposes work requirements on many of those receiving benefits.
Under the bill, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates 8.6 million fewer people would have health care coverage and 3 million fewer people a month would have SNAP food stamps benefits with the proposed changes.
The CBO said the tax provisions would increase federal deficits by $3.8 trillion over the decade, while the changes to Medicaid, food stamps and other services would tally $1 trillion in reduced spending. The lowest-income households in the U.S. would see their resources drop, while the highest ones would see a boost, it said.
U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, D-Highland, said in a statement he opposed the bill because it prioritizes tax breaks for the wealthy 'at the cruel expense of seniors, veterans, children and working families.'
'It is immoral for the powerful and politically-connected to exploit the legislative process for personal gain, and this legislation amounts to the largest transfer of wealth from the pockets of the most vulnerable and working families to the richest amongst us,' Mrvan said.
As the former North Township Trustee, Mrvan said he has 'seen the tangible value of the Medicaid program in Indiana' and how it helps seniors, people with disabilities and children.
'Throughout my career, I have worked to support all individuals when they need emergency assistance or hit a bump in the road,' Mrvan said. 'It will not only strip away these health benefits, it will also increase private healthcare costs and reduce services for everyone.'
Mrvan said he offered an amendment to the bill to study the effects of this legislation on out-of-pocket costs for healthcare services to prevent, screen for and treat cancer, but the majority did not call the amendment for consideration.
'This deal leaves everyday Americans behind, and our job is to protect and fight for them. I encourage the Senate to reject this deeply flawed legislation,' Mrvan said.
Musenbrock and Brianna Fotinos, both members of the disabilities rights organization Everybody Counts, recently attended ADAPT's protest in Washington D.C. from May 12 through May 14 to oppose cuts to Medicaid and support fair wages for people with disabilities and their care attendants and affordable, integrated and accessible housing.
The highlight of the protest, Fotinos said, was waiting outside the House Energy and Commerce meeting, where legislators were discussing cuts to Medicaid. The protestors chanted 'no cuts to Medicaid' inside the meeting and some got arrested, Fotinos said, which delayed the meeting enough that no vote was held.
The group wasn't able to talk with U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, Fotinos said. But, had they been able to talk to Johnson, she said they would have stressed that Medicaid cuts will lead to people dying and focused on the human right to shelter, fair wages and healthcare.
'These are basic human things that we're asking for, and it's up to you to also be a human being about this and see what the right choice is,' Fotinos said.
The biggest misconception about Medicaid is that it allows people to 'free load' off the government, Fotinos said.
Medicaid offers health insurance to those who need it, Fotinos said. The people on Medicaid either physically can't work or are working but don't make enough money for insurance, she said.
With the federal cuts and caps to Medicaid, Fotinos said people who physically can't work will be forced to meet a work requirement and people will be forced to live in poverty to access basic human needs.
'A system that is already being overtaxed is going to be even more overtaxed. That's the future that I'm foreseeing with these cuts. A lot of people are going to lose access to very basic needs and a lot of people are going to be left to wither away and die,' Fotinos said.
Hutchings-Goetz said the federal changes to Medicaid will cut funding that trickles down to states and enforce mandatory work reporting requirements. Studies have found that work reporting requirements lead to eligible people being kicked off the program and increases the cost of running the program, she said.
Work requirements don't help connect people with job opportunities, Hutchings-Goetz said. In the end, work requirements don't lead to an increase in employment but rather a decrease in people covered by health insurance, she said.
'They are making changes to Medicaid which will only further contribute to the cost of the program in addition to harming people by kicking them off. Fundamentally, you need health care, you need to be healthy, to be able to work,' Hutchings-Goetz said.
The federal Medicaid cuts will just force people, some with serious diagnoses or mental health challenges, to deal with complicated paperwork and bureaucracy 'at the hardest time in their life.'
'This is not going to make America healthy again. It's not going to make anyone's lives better. It is just going to increase suffering across this country and for Hoosiers in Indiana,' Hutchings-Goetz said.
akukulka@chicagotribune.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Medicaid cuts in ‘big beautiful bill' become flashpoint for GOP
Republicans are increasingly on the defensive over the party's handling of Medicaid cuts in the party's 'big, beautiful bill,' underscoring how the issue has become an early flashpoint ahead of next year's midterms. A number of Republicans have been pressed about cuts to Medicaid in heated town halls and conferences, most recently Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), whose sarcastic response went viral and has been mocked among Democrats. The moment underscored the challenge the party faces as it seeks to message on President Trump's agenda while also responding to growing criticism from Democrats over changes to the health care program, which could lead to millions of people losing coverage. 'As Republicans are bringing this bill home, they've got to focus their message around that waste, fraud and abuse, and they need to make sure that the policy is focused around that waste, fraud and abuse as well,' said Brian Reisinger, a former Wisconsin Republican strategist and rural policy expert who's authored 'Land Rich, Cash Poor.' House Republicans last month passed their sprawling package filled with several of Trump's top priorities, including extending the 2017 tax cuts and an immigration crackdown — overcoming their first major hurdle as they look to clear a Fourth of July holiday deadline to pass the bill in the Senate and get it signed into law. One of Democrats' clearest criticisms over the bill is the impact Medicaid changes could have on Americans. Millions are estimated to be uninsured and vulnerable to losing Medicaid coverage under the bill, though it remains unclear exactly how many will be impacted. Democrats and aligned groups like the Senate Democrats' campaign arm and Protect Our Care have attacked Republicans in ads over the issue. And the issue has come up in some public events that Republicans have participated in, most recently Ernst's town hall. The Iowa Republican drew the ire of Democrats when she quipped that 'we all are going to die' after an audience member shouted that people will die amid a discussion over the proposed Medicaid changes. In that same town hall, Ernst noted that 'Medicaid is extremely important here in the state of Iowa' and that 'those that meet the eligibility requirements for Medicaid, we will protect.' Speaking to reporters on Monday, Ernst defended her remarks, saying she was 'very passionate' and that 'you need to listen to the entire conversation.' But the fallout from the incident has been swift: a well-known Iowa Democrat, J.D. Scholten, jumped into the race following the controversy, and election handicapper Sabato's Crystal Ball shifted the race slightly toward Democrats as a result. Republicans have sought to counter the Democratic attacks, stressing the need for members of their party to frame the changes as part of an effort to make sure only those who really need Medicaid will have access to it. 'Narrative: Republicans are defending Medicaid for EVERY American who NEEDS and DESERVES it the most. That means seniors, low-income families, pregnant women, and disabled Americans, not fraudsters, able-bodied adults who refuse to work, or illegal immigrants,' reads messaging guidance from the House Republicans' campaign arm. 'FACT: Medicaid spending is going up year over year to support those in need.' Most immigrants without legal status can't qualify for Medicaid at the federal level, but some blue states have extended health care coverage to them. Republicans' legislation would lower the federal matching rate for states that make health care coverage available to immigrants without legal status. Other Republicans simply argue the party is tackling waste, fraud and abuse. 'The Democrats are just flat out lying about it. We're not doing Medicaid reform,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), an ally of President Trump, told reporters on Monday. 'We're kicking off the waste and the fraud off of it, people that should never be on it.' The Senate Republicans' campaign arm has also played up other aspects of the bill — such as tax cuts and border security — suggesting Democrats running for Senate who voted against it are also voting against the interests of their constituents. One Republican operative who requested anonymity to speak candidly acknowledged while the GOP was not 'entirely on offense on the Medicaid issue,' they noted that the party was at least 'muddying the waters and neutralizing it' by leaning into work requirements and illegal immigration. Yet not all Republicans are on the same page. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has opposed some of the Medicaid changes included in the bill, expressing concern over how parts of the legislation could impact rural hospitals. 'I'm concerned about the provider [tax]. I mean, that's not a direct benefit cut, but if it closes rural hospitals, I mean that's … people can't get coverage,' Hawley told reporters, referring to a provision of the bill that would help states fund Medicaid. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who's up for reelection next year, also said last month she was not going to support the bill 'if there are deep cuts in Medicaid that would endanger health care for low-income families, for disabled children, for other vulnerable populations, and for our rural hospitals,' according to Maine Public. Reisinger, the former Wisconsin Republican strategist, said the GOP's messaging needs to focus on the waste, fraud and abuse that resonates with rural communities. 'Right now, voters are hearing … deeply conflicting information from Republicans [and] Democrats, and here's the thing: Republicans need to remember that in rural areas, there are a lot of their voters who at one time voted for a blue-collar Democrat and could do so again,' he said. 'We don't know if that'll be in the near term, in the midterms,' he added. 'We don't know if that'll be long term, but if they're passing legislation that is not living up to the declarations around waste, fraud and abuse, and they're actually passing legislation that has a deeply negative economic impact on rural America, that's going to have an impact.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ernst risks political blowback with ‘we all are going to die' remarks
Sen. Joni Ernst's (R-Iowa) recent controversial remarks on Medicaid are threatening to become a political liability for the incumbent as she faces reelection next year. Ernst drew the ire of Democrats when she responded to concerns about potential Medicaid cuts by saying 'we all are going to die.' Despite the swift backlash, Ernst doubled down on the remarks in a sarcastic video posted Saturday on social media in which she appeared to be recording from a cemetery. While the second-term senator has been a formidable candidate and will benefit from the conservative lean of her state, some Republicans acknowledge the comments could follow her into the midterms. 'It is very, very early, but there is no question that that comment from Sen. Ernst will be on Iowa airwaves for the better part of the next 15 months,' said one Iowa Republican strategist. The election handicapper Sabato's Crystal Ball on Tuesday shifted Ernst's race slightly toward Democrats — from safe to likely Republican — citing her recent comments and a new challenge from Democratic state Rep. JD Scholten, who said the senator's remarks spurred him to jump in. Another GOP strategist acknowledged the risk posed by Ernst's comments but added the political climate next year is going to ultimately have a greater impact on the race. 'It probably wasn't helpful, and the cleanup wasn't helpful,' the strategist said. 'But the race, presuming it's these two candidates on the ballot, isn't going to be decided by Sen. Ernst's comments in 2025. It's going to be more influenced on where the country's at.' Ernst had pushed back against constituents who shouted at the Butler, Iowa, town hall event that cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) would cause people to die. 'Well, we all are going to die,' the senator responded, as she defended a House-passed budget reconciliation package that proposes cuts to Medicaid and SNAP funding. The exchange drew sharp backlash from Democrats. The party's Senate campaign arm called Ernst's remarks 'stunningly callous,' and Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin accused her, President Trump and the GOP of being 'hellbent on putting their own constituents at risk.' Scholten jumped into the race Monday following the backlash to her remarks. 'I wasn't planning on doing this right now, but I just can't sit on the sidelines after Joni's recent town hall justifying gutting Medicaid because 'we're all going to die,'' he said in his video launch. He enters the race alongside Democrat Nathan Sage, who said Ernst 'has stepped in it.' State Sen. Zach Wahls, another potential candidate, said 'we desperately need a new voice for Iowa in the US Senate.' Ernst also faces three long shot primary challengers on the right. Democrats argue that the comments will play poorly with much of Iowa's aging and rural population, which depend on programs like Medicaid. But Ernst doubled down on the comments in her sarcastic apology video, saying, 'I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that, yes, we are all going to perish from this Earth.' Even some conservatives took issue with her response. 'I wouldn't have posted the follow-up video,' said CNN commentator Scott Jennings. 'In fact, the answer she gave in the town hall, the first 98 percent of it was correct. She was talking about taking illegal immigrants off of Medicaid.' 'I wouldn't have posted the follow-up video myself, but I think the Republicans can actually win this debate,' he added. Last week's events would not be the first time a political candidate in the state has faced backlash for off-the-cuff remarks caught on camera. In fact, when Ernst first ran for Senate in 2014, her opponent, former Rep. Bruce Braley (D-Iowa), faced backlash when he was caught on camera at a fundraiser referring to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) as 'a farmer from Iowa who never went to law school.' 'Those things can be harmful,' said the unnamed GOP strategist. 'It won't decide the race, but on the periphery and on the edges, sure, it could have a long-term impact.' Still, Republicans are largely brushing off the criticism, arguing Ernst's comments were taken out of context. 'Anyone who knows Joni — especially the folks who heard her answer tough questions for over an hour — knows Dems and the mainstream media are purposefully replacing her core message because it helps their fearmongering,' said Iowa Republican Party Chair Jeff Kaufmann. 'But the fact is, without Sen. Ernst taking a strong stand to protect the integrity of programs like Medicaid, Iowans would be worse off.' Democrats, on the other hand, are leaning into the senator's comments because 'there's been nothing for them to really lean into' before this point, argued Iowa Republican consultant Luke Martz. 'This isn't going to win the election for them. It's just giving them something to talk about.' Tim Hagle, a political science professor at the University of Iowa, also acknowledged Ernst doubling down was 'probably not a good idea' but forecasted voters will forget about the incident on the long road to the 2026 midterms. 'Ernst's comments give Scholten some opportunity to jump into the race, get some headlines. … I don't think it's a big enough deal that it's going to have legs, so to speak,' Hagle said. But Iowa State University political science professor Dave Peterson predicted that, while Republicans will try to ignore the incident and 'hope it goes away,' Democrats are likely to make sure it dogs her. 'This just seems like something that might not go away, something that might sort of linger with her,' Peterson said. Of course, Ernst — who has not yet formally launched a reelection bid — would enter 2026 as the favorite, despite the backlash and her new challengers. It's been more than a decade since a Democrat represented Iowa in the upper chamber. Ernst won reelection by roughly 7 points back in 2020, and Trump won the state by 13 points in November. 'Joni Ernst is Iowa's winner in Washington,' GOP strategist Michael Zona told The Hill in an email. But the latest controversy, adding to scrutiny that mounted on Ernst earlier this year over her support for Trump's Cabinet picks, could give Democrats leverage to make inroads in the midterms, Peterson said. 'It's Ernst's race to lose, and the last week has made that a little more likely,' he said. The Iowa Republican strategist said the attention drawn onto Iowa this week 'opens up the door to resources being put in,' and groups on both sides of the aisle will have to make calculations. However, Democrats argue the state already presented an opportunity for them prior to Ernst's comments, pointing to recent special election victories they say signal a shift in the political environment. In January, Iowa Democrats flipped the state's 35th Senate District, which Trump won by 21 points in November. In March, Democrats overperformed in the special election for the 100th House District. 'It's still a high bar for Democrats trying to win statewide,' said Iowa Democratic strategist Jeff Link, but 'video clips like this have a way of just hanging around.' If Ernst runs next year, 'we're going to see this clip a ton, and that's not good for her,' he said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Medicaid Cuts Are 'Heroic,' Speaker Mike Johnson Says: 4.8 Million Won't Lose Healthcare 'Unless They Choose To Do So'
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) doubled down on his defense of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill", arguing that those who lose Medicaid will do so by personal choice What Happened: During an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press, Johnson was asked about projections that 4.8 million people could lose Medicaid coverage under the new spending bill. "Those 4.8 million people will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so," he said. According to the plan, childless, able-bodied adults aged 19 to 64 are required to work or volunteer at least 20 hours a week to maintain eligibility for Medicaid. Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — "You're telling me that you're going to require the able-bodied — these young men, for example, OK — to only work or volunteer in their community for 20 hours a week, and that's too cumbersome for them? I'm not buying it. The American people are not buying it," Johnson said. On claims that people could lose coverage due to administrative obstacles, he said, "The people who are complaining about losing their coverage are doing so because they can't fulfill the paperwork." He said the policy was based on "common sense." "When people work, when able-bodied young men work, it's good for them, for their dignity, their purpose, and it's good for the community," he added. "If you can't find a job, then volunteer in your community for 20 hours, and you will meet the requirement." Defending the bill as a whole, Johnson said: "What Republicans are doing is an important and frankly heroic thing." He alleged that Medicaid is being misused, saying, "It's intended for young, you know, single, pregnant women and the disabled and the elderly. But what's happening right now is you have a lot of people, for example, young men, able-bodied workers, who are on Medicaid. They're not working when they can."Why It Matters: According to the Congressional Budget Office, the new provisions are projected to save $625 billion of the targeted $800 billion in savings over the next ten years. The controversial new measures have generated intense debate over the past few weeks. In April, Trump said he would "veto" any bill that includes cuts to Medicaid. However, as the bill evolved, Medicaid cuts became central to its project of reducing federal spending, and millions are set to lose coverage. Johnson previously denied that the bill would cut Medicaid, even as Trump's crypto and AI advisor, David Sacks, acknowledged that the bill "cuts $880 billion from Medicaid over a decade.' On the other hand, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) wrote in an op-ed that the Republican party is facing an "identity crisis" and that Medicaid cuts are "morally wrong and politically suicidal." Read Next: Hasbro, MGM, and Skechers trust this AI marketing firm — Invest before it's too late. Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Many are rushing to grab 4,000 of its pre-IPO shares for just $0.30/share! Photo courtesy: Shutterstock Send To MSN: Send to MSN Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Medicaid Cuts Are 'Heroic,' Speaker Mike Johnson Says: 4.8 Million Won't Lose Healthcare 'Unless They Choose To Do So' originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data