logo
The day millennials' hip-hop went to the Klan's ball

The day millennials' hip-hop went to the Klan's ball

Al Jazeera27-01-2025

A few years ago, when reports came out that The Office star Ellie Kemper was crowned at the Veiled Prophet debutante ball, what critics called a Klan's ball, I turned over and went back to bed. A week ago, when TikTok gushed over Donald Trump and did as much of a digital soft-shoe as possible, thanking the soon-to-be president for saving its presence in the United States, I blew out my lamplight and slipped back under the sheets. But it was something about 90s hip-hop stars joining the queue to kiss the ring at Trump's inaugural balls that still keeps me up at night.
For many of us Black millennials – especially those raised in working-class neighbourhoods – hip-hop was the oxygen of our childhood. It documented every inch of our lives, reflecting back to us the sounds and feelings of our existence in a way that no one else could or cared to. Our ordinary lives wer mirrored in music even as it was demeaned or thought of as on the margins of real society.
It was also a window to what we could be. It lit the path to a fate that was beyond the minimum-wage job or the waste of our lives in the ' second childhoods ' laid out before us. It let us fantasise about being conquerors of the straits of lumpen and working-class life. To dress well, to be gangsta or appealing, and have respect.
More than that, it was a mind. It did not merely reflect the conditions of the neighbourhood, it was a conference of thought and clashing debates. We heard encouragement and a critique of intra-class antagonism when Aaliyah told us we 'don't need no Coogi sweater'. We saw visions of escape in Rich Boy's Throw Some D's and forced into quiet introspection after watching Pac's Brenda's Got a Baby and Latifah's U.N.I.T.Y. One hour we were trying to commit to memory the adrenaline-rush poetics of Bizzy Bone's entire Heaven'z Movie album and the next we were psyching ourselves up to meet the high school or street corner bully with Mobb Deep's Shook Ones.
We used this art as a soundtrack to what we knew they thought of as our disposable lives. It was the most accessible evidence to prove to ourselves that the world was lying to us about the 'inferiority of Black people'. We didn't need that well-intentioned white lady teacher pitying us for being Black, holding a poster with George Washington Carver with a jar of peanut butter, saying we, too, 'contributed'. We had her on mute, the CD player spinning as we busily tried to decipher the hieroglyphics of Wu-Tang.
So it was something else to see the intensity of our ghetto beauty being forced to fiddle for the discombobulated dancing of rich frat boys. To see our griots crouch to pick up dollars under the lowest of all intellectual ceilings: racism. To see it was our thinkers, too, who would play the white liberal game, squinting, pretending they could not tell if a Nazi salute is a Nazi salute. Turning their coat without being asked. Leaping even before the Anti-Defamation League at the chance to give white supremacists the benefit of the doubt.
Of all the daily bombardments of racism that have come to define this decade of settler supremacist resurgence, turncoat rappers have left the rawest wound. It is not easy to recover from witnessing our biographers reduced to being stool pigeons on a burning cross.
Excuses were preemptively flowing. It was said 'a check is a check'. It was said 'this isn't politics'. It was pretended that they don't know what MAGA stands for and is trying to achieve. As if we didn't know hip-hop is more university than the university.
I remember in the past scanning the channels and landing on Fox News mocking rappers' dancing. Now, Fox News is reporting that Snoop Dogg ' wows the crowd' at a pre-inauguration event. I remember Snoop Dogg talking about 187 and now I worry about the day I will see him waving a Blue Line Flag.
In the 90s, white power campaigned to ban hip-hop. How complete is its victory that now it has it rubbing its feet? Nelly said but 'he is the president'. But this is the point. There is no paucity of tracks that speak about our not being cool with presidents. One can start from any track by Dead Prez.
In 1988, the grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan entered the US presidential race. If he had won, then, were we to expect Eric B and Rakim to perform Microphone Fiend for 'fans' in white hoods because 'we support the troops'? How near are we to the day cop freestyle ciphers break out at a lynching?
We may not have known it then, but it wasn't only Black and Latin working-class life in North America that was carried along in the music. It was played in the Black poor's spaces in South America, Africa, Europe, Asia and Australia. It was the music of the slums, the colonised's counter-ideological weapon against the prison they kept us in.
So it is a stomach stab to see our culture and lives being put to the service of the men who shout we steal pets and call our demand to be allowed to live 'terrorism'. It trods on the morale of the people when our defenders are now tap-dancing for those who spray firehoses at the 'woke' and stand back up the monuments to Confederate generals.
You can only put so many more extensions on your pool house. Only drive so many cars in your lifetime. But ' what does it worth ' to sell your soul at the price of a noogie? To sign on to doing what they do, knowing your gifted mansion will never be more than massa's outhouse?
Of course, a few rappers taking photo ops with boys who no one would bet did not do blackface is not representative of all millennials' hip-hop. But it's not just them. Chuck D is fighting off the people coming for Elon Musk as he puts a spark plug to apartheid. Eve can't get out of a still of Downton Abbey. Nor can Common from commercials. Nor can our beloved Black Thought, caged-bird singing from the ' gilded cage ' – the people's oracle reduced to 'the entertainment' for fascist-petting Jimmy Fallon.
Still things fall apart and I should count my blessings. I would likely never get out of bed again if I saw Dead Prez or Lauryn Hill grab a fiddle. But it shouldn't have been any of them. It was art for us, by us. It is heart-wrenching to witness our secret inner lives laid at the feet of empire, alongside our bodies.
They stole woke from Erykah Badu and beat us down with it. And now they have our master teachers abandon their posts to bounce baby settler supremacists on their laps. It is heartbreaking to see so many of our epic poets fall in line to kiss the ring of Jim Crow society's warrior king.
But maybe it is better this way. When Nas said hip-hop is dead, it may have been a prophecy. Or at least these 'uncs of rap' may have outlived their relevance in the era of globalised apartheid. They are now rich and compromised. Millennials may have to abandon them and explore the colonised sector's new music and new generation of artists, here and abroad, where, for now at least, we are nowhere close to radical Palestinian rappers being caught moonlighting as court jesters for Benjamin Netanyahu.
Gen Z has spent half their lives staring directly into the eyes of open fascism and has been forced out to witness the public, viral lynching of the Black innocent daily. I see them every day. Nobody is tap-dancing.
Their 'mumble rap' – which we 'old heads' have mocked – is not only more developed but more coherent than any rapper who says 'f*** the police' from one side of their mouth and 'let's give the Confederacy a chance' from the other. As for drill, anticolonialism misdirected as horizontal violence in drill lyrics is more useful to Black liberation than a conscious rapper trying to find nuance in colonialism.
Millennials' hip-hop may abandon the slum, but the slum will have its day. It made hip-hop once; it can make another hip-hop. And when it does, it will stand over colonialism's body, Buggin Out's boombox on its shoulder, singing that old Black colonised sector's spiritual, 'It's bigger than hip-hop. '

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sabalenka to meet Swiatek after ‘dance' thaws relations
Sabalenka to meet Swiatek after ‘dance' thaws relations

Qatar Tribune

time03-06-2025

  • Qatar Tribune

Sabalenka to meet Swiatek after ‘dance' thaws relations

PA Media/DPA Paris Aryna Sabalenka has revealed how her frosty relationship with Iga Swiatek thawed over a TikTok dance. World number one Sabalenka and four-time champion Iga Swiatek will meet in a blockbuster French Open semi-final on Thursday after both won in the last eight on Tuesday. It will be the first time the duo, who have been jousting at the top of the rankings for the past three years, have played each other at a Grand Slam since the 2022 US Open. They barely used to speak until an impromptu bonding session at last year's WTA Finals in Riyadh. 'Before it wasn't any communication, any practices with her, but now we are getting better,' said 27-year-old Sabalenka. 'We get along better and we practice more often and we know each other quite well. 'I think everything started when I just came to her and asked to do a TikTok in Riyadh. We just did, like, a little dance together. 'Since that, we were like 'OK, maybe we can communicate, we can be good to each other, we can practice sometimes'. 'So I think that was the first step to a better relationship.' The blossoming friendship will be put on hold when Belarusian Sabalenka continues her bid for a first Roland Garros title against the player who has won her last 26 matches at the French Open. Sabalenka has now reached the semi-finals in nine of the last 10 grand slams she has competed at after battling past Olympic champion Qinwen Zheng 7-6 (7-3), 6-3. It was a shame that the match between two top WTA stars began at 11 am (0900 GMT), meaning there were hundreds of empty seats around the vast Court Philippe-Chatrier. The scheduling of women's matches has been a hot topic again this fortnight, and Sabalenka said: 'I agree it was a big match and probably would make more sense to put us a little bit later just so more people could watch it.' Swiatek's patchy form since winning the title last year has seen her slip to number five in the rankings, but the 24-year-old from Poland remains the player to beat in Paris after a 6-1, 7-5 quarter-final victory over Ukrainian 13th seed Elina Svitolina. The second semi-final will be decided on Wednesday with Coco Gauff taking on fellow American Madison Keys and Russian sixth seed Mirra Andreeva facing the French Open surprise package, world number 361 Lois Boisson of Dijon.

How will Trump plan for tariffs on movies affect the global film industry?
How will Trump plan for tariffs on movies affect the global film industry?

Al Jazeera

time06-05-2025

  • Al Jazeera

How will Trump plan for tariffs on movies affect the global film industry?

President Donald Trump orders 100 percent tariffs on imported films and those made outside the US. In recent years, California – home to America's film industry – has slipped to become the sixth most preferred location to shoot and produce movies. Hollywood producers are moving to cities in Canada, the United Kingdom, Central Europe and New Zealand, lured by a range of financial benefits on offer. US President Donald Trump wants to reverse this trend and says he wants to 'make movies in America, again'. And he's using the stick to do so. Trump has ordered 100 percent tariffs on imported movies and those made outside the United States. The move has confused Hollywood and the European film industry. So, how will the tariffs be implemented? Will a movie partly produced outside the US be punished? And what about films made for streaming platforms? And how will the tariffs affect the movie industry globally? Presenter: James Bays Guests: Jonathan Handel – Entertainment lawyer and journalist Chris Southworth – Secretary-general of the International Chamber of Commerce United Kingdom Kamran Pasha – Hollywood director, screenwriter and novelist

Trump threatens tariffs on foreign films: Who could be hit?
Trump threatens tariffs on foreign films: Who could be hit?

Al Jazeera

time06-05-2025

  • Al Jazeera

Trump threatens tariffs on foreign films: Who could be hit?

Popular US films from Wicked to Nosferatu were filmed in other countries including Australia and the UK. United States President Donald Trump has threatened to impose a 100 percent tariff on foreign films, calling them a 'National Security threat' in a social media post on Sunday. With details sparse, Trump's threat has left many questions lingering. We unpack what his threat, if enforced, could mean; which film industries might take a hit; how his tariff targets might retaliate and how this would affect ticket prices. What did Trump announce? 'The Movie Industry in America is DYING a very fast death,' Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform. He added that other countries are offering 'all sorts of incentives' to drive filmmakers and studios away from the US. 'This is a concerted effort by other Nations and, therefore, a National Security threat,' Trump wrote. Trump also described foreign films as 'messaging and propaganda'. He concluded his post saying he was authorising the Department of Commerce and the US Trade Representative 'to immediately begin the process' of imposing a 100 percent tariff on films coming into the US which are 'produced in Foreign Lands'. Sign up for Al Jazeera Americas Coverage Newsletter US politics, Canada's multiculturalism, South America's geopolitical rise—we bring you the stories that matter. Subscribe Your subscription failed. Please try again. Please check your email to confirm your subscription By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy protected by reCAPTCHA Advertisement On Monday, the White House appeared to take a step back. 'Although no final decisions on foreign film tariffs have been made, the administration is exploring all options to deliver on President Trump's directive to safeguard our country's national and economic security while Making Hollywood Great Again,' White House spokesperson Kush Desai said. What counts as a foreign film? That's one of the many questions that have arisen from Trump's threat. As with most things, films in a globalised world rarely rely on resources from just one country: Hollywood movies, for instance, might have an American financial backer but could be shot in other countries, with actors and crew from different parts of the world. For instance, one of 2024's top-grossing Hollywood films, Wicked, was filmed in Sky Studios Elstree in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, in the United Kingdom. Parts of Greta Gerwig's Barbie, released in 2023, were filmed in Warner Brothers' studios in Leavesden, Hertfordshire in the UK. Barbie's California-esque Dreamhouse was actually built in a UK studio. During filming, Barbie's production generated more than 80 million pounds ($106m) for the UK economy, creating jobs and supporting local businesses. Trading bright pink pool slides for candy-churning Rube Goldberg machines, the same studio morphed into Willy Wonka's chocolate factory in Paul King's Wonka, released later that year. Many US movies last year were also filmed partly or completely in Australia, including The Fall Guy, a comedy action film starring Ryan Gosling, and Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes. Australia's federal government offers incentives for big film projects in Australia, including a 30 percent rebate under the location offset scheme. New Zealand offers similar tax break incentives. Advertisement Released in the same year, US Gothic horror film Nosferatu was filmed in Prague, Czech Republic. US movies have also been filmed in New Zealand, Spain and Germany, among other countries. On the flip side, many non-US films are shot at least partly in the US. Successful Bollywood movies of the past two decades have used the Brooklyn Bridge, Miami's beaches and Chicago's neighbourhoods as backdrops for plots that have ranged from romantic comedies to robberies – adding to the attraction of US cities for Indian tourists. It's unclear whether such films – which bring revenue to the US – would classify as 'foreign' films. How much do foreign films rely on the US as a market? Indian films generate significant revenue from markets abroad. The 2016 film, Dangal, a biopic of India's famous wrestling sisters, Geeta Phogat and Babita Phogat, generated about $12.4m from the US and Canada, according to website Box Office India. Indian films gross about $100m at the US box office, Shibasish Sarkar, president of the Producers Guild of India, told the Press Trust of India (PTI) on Monday. 'The diaspora market, which is price-sensitive, became a revenue source for Indian films,' filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri told PTI. Sarkar and Agnihotri speculated that ticket prices would increase if the tariffs were applied. 'I don't think anybody will watch them in theatres, especially when the films will be available on Netflix, Amazon, etc,' Agnihotri said. The US is home to 5.4 million people of Indian origin, the largest Indian diaspora population in the world. Advertisement But it isn't just Indian films that earn significantly in the US. Paddington in Peru, the 2024 film that's part of the UK franchise revolving around Paddington, the anthropomorphic bear, earned more than $45m in the US. Films from South Korea also fare well in US markets. In April this year, animated film The King of Kings, directed by Seong Ho Jang, earned $54.7m at the box office, surpassing Bong Joon-ho's 2019 film Academy Award-winning Parasite, which generated $53.8m in the US. These are the top-earning South Korean films in the US. But The King of the Kings is an English-language film, starring big Hollywood names such as Oscar Isaac. Parasite is a Korean-language film. On the other hand, films from countries like China are barely reliant on US viewership – with language still a barrier they haven't been able to overcome. In February this year, Chinese animated film Ne Zha 2 became the highest-grossing animated film in history, making $1.9bn from nearly 80,000 screens four weeks after its release, according to Chinese ticketing platform Maoyan. More than 99 percent of the Mandarin-language film's box office income came from mainland China. Yolo, the Chinese comedy superhit from 2024, earned only $2m in the US despite being the 14th highest-grossing film globally, according to IMDb's Box Office Mojo. How have other countries reacted to Trump's threat? Australian home affairs minister and minister for the arts, Tony Burke, responded to Trump's threat: 'Nobody should be under any doubt that we will be standing up unequivocally for the rights of the Australian screen industry.' Advertisement New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said his government was awaiting further details on the tariffs. 'We'll have to see the detail of what actually ultimately emerges. But we'll be obviously a great advocate, great champion of that sector and that industry,' he said. Philippa Childs, the head of UK media and entertainment union Bectu, called on her government to protect its film industry. 'These tariffs, coming after COVID and the recent slowdown, could deal a knock-out blow to an industry that is only just recovering,' Childs said. How has the US reacted? US media stocks fell on Monday in the aftermath of Trump's announcement. The shares for streaming giant Netflix fell by 2.5 percent in early trading, while Disney, Warner Brothers and Comcast also declined between 0.7 and 1.7 percent. 'There is too much uncertainty, and this latest move raises more questions than answers,' PP Foresight analyst Paolo Pescatore told the Reuters news agency. 'It doesn't feel like something that will happen in the short term as everyone will be grappling to understand the whole process. Inevitably costs will be passed on to consumers.' Is Hollywood 'dying' as Trump said? In recent years, Hollywood has faced several setbacks, among them the COVID-19 pandemic. Last year, Hollywood studios grossed about $30bn globally, down by about 7 percent from 2023, according to Gower Street Analytics. Despite last year's performance being better in terms of revenue than 2020, 2021 and 2022, it was still about 20 percent below the pre-pandemic average. Advertisement In 2023, the Writers Guild of America (WGA) and the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) – trade unions representing Hollywood writers and performers – went on strike, demanding better working conditions and stronger protection against AI use. This led to the closure of some studios while others scaled back staff. In January this year, wildfires ravaged Los Angeles, the home of Hollywood. Several filming locations for television and movie productions in southern California were damaged or destroyed. Many actors also lost their homes to the fire. Many in the US film and television industry have rallied to bring production back to Hollywood, urging California legislators and the state's Governor Gavin Newsom to enact measures such as raising tax incentives to bring this to effect. The argument is that Hollywood is full of middle-class workers, gig workers and local businesses hit by a decline in production. 'If we don't stop the bleeding, then Los Angeles is at risk of becoming Detroit,' said filmmaker Sarah Adina Smith, an organiser of the 'Stay in LA' campaign that calls for productions to remain in the city, Reuters reported in April.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store