Before Muscle Had a Name: These Classic V8s Wrote the First Chapter
It's generally agreed upon that the 1964 Pontiac GTO was the car that popularized the muscle car segment, but there were other muscle cars before it.
Some say the 1949 Oldsmobile 88 was the first muscle car, and Hagerty says Jim Wangers, the man who turned the GTO into a superstar, wrote in his memoir that Chrysler built the first muscle cars. It doesn't really matter who was first: the point is that there were multiple American cars with powerful V8s long before the GTO came along. Let's look at some of the best.
Obviously, we needed to focus on models produced before the 1964 Pontiac GTO. By using reputable automotive publications such as Hagerty, Hot Rod, MotorTrend, and Autoevolution, we identified classic cars that combine powerful V8 engines with performance-oriented features.
These sources provided detailed specifications and historical context of pre-GTO performance cars, helping us understand how they contributed to the evolution of muscle cars. Not all the cars here are muscle cars in the traditional sense, i.e., two-door midsize models, but they were still a huge part of what was to come in the mid-1960s.
The Oldsmobile Rocket 88 is often considered the first muscle car, and it's easy to understand why. Autoevolution reports that Oldsmobile built it to attract younger buyers, so they gave the lightweight midsized car a 303 V8 engine with a two-barrel carb, resulting in a respectable 135 hp and 253 lb-ft of torque.
With that kind of power, the 2-door 88 would launch to 60 mph in 13 seconds and continued going until it hit its 97 mph top speed. It went on to dominate the NASCAR circuits, and people bought it in droves.
Not everyone agrees that the Rocket 88 was the first muscle car! Some will say the honor should go to the 1955 Chrysler C-300, the first of the brand's letter series models. According to Curbside Classic, its name comes from the fact that its Fireflite 331 Hemi V8 produced a whopping 300 hp — even the Corvette with the small-block V8 only had 195 hp at the time.
In 1955, the Chrysler C-300 was the most powerful American car money could buy, and it went on to completely dominate NASCAR that year. It would sprint from 0 to 60 mph in just 9.8 seconds, had a 130 mph top speed, and in the following years, it would only get more powerful.
IndieAuto reports that the Hawk was the 1950s equivalent of a mid-sized car, and weighing in at 3,360 lbs, the V8-equipped, top-of-the-line Golden Hawk was lightweight for a car from this era. Under the hood, the Golden Hawk had a Packard 352 V8 producing 275 hp, giving it the best power-to-weight ratio of any mass-produced American car at the time.
The big V8 was found to be overwhelming for the light cars, leading to mixed reviews, and MotorTrend said the tires struggled to find grip. Still, once the tires did dig in, the Studebaker Golden Hawk would reach a top speed of 120 mph.
AMC didn't have the money or manpower of the Big Three, but they did have bucket loads of chutzpah and certainly deserve some credit for putting muscle cars on the map. One such car was the 1957 AMC Rebel.
Packing a 255-hp 327 V8 into a midsize body, the 1957 Rebel was a formidable performer. According to Curbside Classic, it blew away the competition at the Daytona Speed Trials, proving itself as the quickest production sedan there.
According to Automobile Catalog, Plymouth introduced the Fury V-800 in 1957. Unlike the other Chrysler divisions, they chose not to use a Hemi engine; instead, they opted for a 318 engine featuring a polyspherical cylinder head, as referred to by Chrysler. Still, in the Fury V-800, this mill pumped out 290 hp, making it plenty quick.
The Plymouth Fury also received new styling for this year, and while it was available in different body styles, none looked as good as the big-finned, two-door version with a gold spear on its flanks.
Autoevolution reports that 1957 marks the first year Chevrolet offered fuel injection on a car that wasn't the Corvette, and that honor went to the stylish Bel Air.
Under the hood, it still has the Rochester Ramjet 283 mill, but it now featured a continuous flow fuel-injection system, showcasing advanced technology for the time. Whereas the standard 283 had a four-barrel carb and mustered around 220 hp, Audrain Auto Museum claims the Fuelie version produced a very respectable 283 hp.
This luxury cruiser wasn't just about chrome and tailfins! The Adventurer was fast, flashy, and exclusive, giving DeSoto a halo car that could go toe-to-toe with the best from Chrysler and Dodge. One of the things that made it so good was found under the hood.
As reported by Autoevolution, the DeSoto Adventurer packed a 345ci Hemi V8 with dual four-barrel carburetors, resulting in a whopping 345 hp. It was one of the first production cars to achieve one horsepower per cubic inch. All this power was sent to the rear via a three-speed automatic transmission. Today, the Adventurer is often overlooked, but it was a beast in its time.
Granted, the Ford Thunderbird wasn't a muscle car; it was a "personal luxury car," but in 1958, it did receive a rear seat, and up front, it was certainly packing a punch.
MotorTrend was so pleased with its stylish looks, cavernous interior (for its size), and excellent performance, they made it their Car of the Year. Speaking of performance, a 352 V8 pumped out 300 hp, and the following year, Ford even offered it with a 430 unit housing 350 wild stallions.
In 1958, Dodge offered the D-500 high-performance engine option for all its models and body styles. This was Dodge's answer to the horsepower wars.
As per Mecum, with the Super D-500 option box ticked, the 1958 Dodge was fitted with a 345ci V8 with dual four-barrel carbs, pushing 320+ hp. With upgraded suspension and brakes, the D-500 was more than just a straight-line machine, it could go around corners, too. A rare factory hot rod that hinted at the muscle cars to come.
With all its straight lines and big fins, the 1959 Pontiac Bonneville certainly looks like a product of its era. Autoevolution reports that this full-sized behemoth was available in both coupe and convertible form for those wanting sportier looks, and a 4-door and wagon if practicality was prioritized.
Under the hood, the Bonneville had a 389 V8 available with varying degrees of power depending on carburation, ranging from 215 to 345 hp. It also had a wide-track design to improve handling, and a limited-slip diff was available as an option.
As reported by Autoevolution, the 1961 model year marked the debut of the third-generation Chevy Impala. Chevrolet also offered a performance package for its full-size model, which was a first for an affordable 1960s car.
This Super Sport, or SS, package included chassis reinforcements, heavy-duty springs, and upgraded drum brakes. It had a four-barrel 348 V8 with 305 hp as standard, as well as an optional four-barrel version with 340 hp or a tri-power with 350 hp. Those looking for maximum performance would opt for the brand-new 409 unit with 360 ponies.
The 1961 Starliner was a sleek two-door hardtop model with a fastback roofline, built to slice through the air as one of Ford's NASCAR racers. Hot Rod reports that, at the time, the Starliner 390 was the only Ford that could be ordered with an optional performance package.
That package included the 390 big-block with 10.5:1 compression, a solid lifter camshaft, a special heavy-duty block, and magnafluxed crank, pistons, and connecting rods, for a total of 357 hp. Ford didn't end things there, though. Buyers could also opt for a tri-power setup, pushing the power to 401 hp. The icing on the cake? It could only be had with a four-speed manual transmission.
According to Autoevolution, Pontiac's management decided to build a race car that qualified as a "stock" model for both NASCAR and NHRA racing — the Catalina Super Duty.
On the outside, there wasn't much that separated it from the standard model, but looks can be deceiving. The Pontiac Catalina Super Duty was a proper race car with an aluminum front clip and drilled frame rails to reduce weight. Pop the hood, and you'll be greeted by a 421 V8 engine pushing out 405 thoroughbred American ponies.
It may have been a luxury icon, but according to AutoEvolution, the Continental packed a punch with its 430-cubic-inch V8 pumping out 300 horsepower. Sure, it certainly wasn't a drag racer, but it brought torque in spades and effortless cruising power.
As an added bonus, those rear-hinged doors gave it serious street presence. The Lincoln Continental packed American muscle in a tuxedo, as it was as powerful as it was classy.
As stated by Curbside Classic, the Dodge Max Wedge ruled the drag strip for a couple of years, until the 426 Hemi arrived in 1964. According to Volocars, Dodge only built 55 Dart 2-door Max Wedges in 1962, making it excruciatingly rare.
Seeing as Dodge built it specifically for those who wanted to go racing, it's no surprise that it packs a serious punch. While it was never a big seller, it's fair to say that the Dart Max Wedge 413 is one of the models that ushered in the 400+ hp muscle car era.
Dodge wasn't the only company under the Chrysler umbrella to use the Max Wedge mill. Plymouth installed it in its mid-sized Fury model, and like the Dodge, it was a factory racer built for straight-line speed.
HotRod says that, unlike the Pontiac GTO, the Max Wedge cars, while technically road-legal, were sold with the understanding that they were strictly for competition use, although many were still used on public roads.
The 1962 Chevrolet Impala is one of the most popular American classics. Autoevolution reports that this was the year it received a convertible-style roof, making it an instant hit. However, we're more interested in what's hiding under the hood.
A new 327 small-block was brought in to replace the 4-barrel 283, but more importantly, buyers could now spec their Impala with a massive 409 V8, producing either 380 or 409 hp, depending on the carb. Chevy also built a Lightweight model that shed 125 pounds, and thanks to dual four-barrel carburetors, new cylinder heads and pistons, its 409 V8 engine was officially rated at 425 hp.
According to Hemmings, Henry Ford II was determined to build something that would dominate the competition, and the answer came in the form of the 427 V8. Of course, they just had to offer it in the full-size Galaxie flagship model.
In R-Code spec, the 425 produced a whopping 425 hp, more than enough to send the big brute flying. In fact, the Galaxies secured a 1-2 finish at the 1963 Daytona 500 and even set Ford's first national record ever in NHRA Super Stock drag racing.
Don't worry if you can't remember the Plymouth Savoy; most people have forgotten about it by now. But, there was one version that's worth remembering. We've mentioned the Max Wedge engine previously, but the one found under the '63 Savoy's hood turned everything up to 11.
As reported by Autoevolution, when it was first introduced, the Max Wedge measured 413 cubic inches, but in 1963, it was increased to 426, the same as the famous Hemi unit that would make its debut the following year. In the Savoy, the Max Wedge produced 415 hp, and only 18 units are known to have been made.
In 1963, the Impala was in its third generation, and Chevrolet introduced a high-performance version under what's known as Regular Production Option (RPO) Z11. The Impala Z11 was only available as a two-door hardtop, as it was based on the Sport Coupe version, and Car and Driver says it added nearly a third to the car's price.
Under the hood, the Z11 had a 427 V8 that received multiple upgrades. The engine was based on the W-series 409 unit but had a longer stroke, a different compression ratio, a two-piece aluminum intake manifold, and dual Carter AFB carburetors. It produced 430 horsepower and 575 lb-ft of torque, making the Z11 a proper sleeper. Exterior-wise, it had aluminum body panels but not much else to hint that it was something special.
The Riviera was GM's first entry into the personal luxury car market, and automotive journalists loved its sharp styling, luxurious interior, agile driving dynamics, and powerful V8 engine. As noted by Autoevolution, the Riviera name had previously been used as a trim level on the Buick Roadmaster and Super models.
For 1963, the Riviera was a standalone model, and while it may have been more of a luxury car than all-out muscle, it was the perfect option for driving enthusiasts. Inside, it had bucket seats in the front and bucket-style seats in the back. Under the hood, it had a Nailhead V8 with 325 hp when it was launched, but a 425 V8 with 340 hp was made available a couple of months later.
The Golden Hawk wasn't Studebaker's only performance model with a superhero-like name. In 1963, as the company neared its final days, it introduced the Super Lark.
Studebaker basically took the Avanti's supercharged 289ci engine and shoehorned it into the rather boring Lark. With 290 hp, a lightweight body, a limited-slip diff, and front disc brakes, Street Muscle Mag says the Super Lark was nothing like the base model.
As per How Stuff Works, Buick dusted off the Wildcat name from a series of one-off concepts from the '50s and introduced it in 1962 as a subseries of the Invicta, before the Wildcat became its own line in 1963.
Under its hood was a Wildcat 455 V8, a 401-cubic-inch mill producing 325 hp, delivering impressive performance for its time. As noted by Motortrend, the Wildcat combined full-size comfort with spirited driving dynamics, making it a noteworthy precursor to the muscle car era.
The 1963 Mercury Marauder, a full-size Mercury model, introduced a fastback roofline and the Marauder nameplate, which was initially a sub-model of the Monterey, Monterey Custom, and S-55 lines. It featured a variety of powerful FE V8 engines, including the 406, offered in 385 and 405 horsepower versions.
While it looked conservative, the Marauder was a legitimate street and strip contender. It was also popular in NASCAR, proving its high-speed credibility as Parnelli Jones drove it to victory, as reported by How Stuff Works. Mercury later revived the Marauder name for a different, high-performance model in 2003.
While the 1964 Pontiac GTO deserves endless credit for kickstarting the muscle car craze of the mid-'60s and early '70s, several models before it actually created the segment, even if they weren't called muscle cars.
We've barely scraped the surface in this article, so if you feel some models were left out, let us know in the comments.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bubba Wallace Shuts Down Reporters, Refuses to Answers Question About Future
Bubba Wallace Shuts Down Reporters, Refuses to Answers Question About Future originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Bubba Wallace finished sixth at Nashville last Sunday and snapped a rough stretch of racing that included three consecutive DNFs. Advertisement On Saturday at Michigan when meeting with the media, the 23XI Racing driver was happy to talk about his previous result or the upcoming race on the two-mile track. He also made it clear that he didn't have anything to say about the lawsuit ruling this week in favor of NASCAR that produces questions about the future of the three-car organization and its drivers. 'Focus on fast cars today, fellas,' Wallace started. 'So that's the question you're gonna get, Jordan." Bubba Wallace looks on during qualifying at Michigan International Speedway.'I'm gonna ask anyway,' The Athletic's Jordan Bianchi replied. 'That's the answer,' the driver responded. 'What'd Kyle Busch say, 'I'm here so I don't get fined. And everything's great, right?' There you go.' Advertisement 'Are you concerned about the future?' Fox's Bob Pockrass questioned. 'Everything's great. You know the answer already,' the No. 23 driver suggested. 'You can let Denny (Hamlin) comment on that stuff. You're not gonna get an answer that you want to hear from me.' 'Can I ask this one?' Bianchi asked. 'Do you pay attention to everything going on or just noise to you?' 'You just go out and race," Wallace answered. "That's what I pay attention to.' After answering a couple of questions on racing, including one on his top-10 result at Nashville, Pockrass circled back to the off-limits topic. Advertisement 'Are your contract negotiations being stalled?" he asked. 'Bob, come on now," Wallace said. "Let's talk about Michigan, dog. You ain't getting no comment. Come on. Jesus Christ.' Wallace and the Cup Series return to action on Sunday. Race coverage begins at 2 p.m. ET on Prime. Related: Bubba Wallace Admits He Disagreed With 23XI Racing Decision Not to Defend Him This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 7, 2025, where it first appeared.


CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Michigan native Carson Hocevar living the dream as headline-grabbing NASCAR driver
Court hearing on agroterrorism plot; poor air quality continues in Michigan; and more top stories Court hearing on agroterrorism plot; poor air quality continues in Michigan; and more top stories Court hearing on agroterrorism plot; poor air quality continues in Michigan; and more top stories Carson Hocevar grew up 80 miles west of Michigan International Speedway, where he attended his first race at the age of 5. As a kid in Portage, he dreamed of becoming a NASCAR driver that people talked about. The 22-year-old Hocevar got his wish. He knocked Ricky Stenhouse Jr. out of last week's race at Nashville and his aggressive style has created a buzz in a sport that traditionally has young drivers trying to find the line between aggressive and reckless driving. "It's cool to be talked about," Hocevar said Saturday, a day ahead of the FireKeepers Casino 400. "Obviously, you want to be talked about maybe in a different light. "But I mean, at least they're talking, right? And, I think that's big for me." Hocevar called Stenhouse earlier in the week to discuss their contact on Lap 106 of 300 at Nashville, where Stenhouse was bumped from behind and sent into a wall. Both said the conversation was productive. "I don't think he crashed me on purpose," Stenhouse said. "But I think he was super impatient. "We've never had any issues. He's had plenty of issues with other people." Hocevar, in his second full Cup season, was behind only winner Ryan Blaney at Nashville to match the career-best, second-place finish he had earlier this year. At the race in Atlanta, several drivers complained about Hocevar over the radio or some addressed their concerns face to face in pit lane. Blaney, who got turned by Hocevar in the final stage of the race, and Ross Chastain confronted him in February. Chastain sounded frustrated that Hocevar, who drives the No. 77 Chevrolet for Spire Motorsports, has not appeared to learn from his mistakes. His latest move was reckless, Chastain said. "Yeah, 47 spun off his front bumper," he said. "Been there, done that." Blaney has, too. "You can say you're sorry all you want, but if you don't learn from them and make a change, then everyone thinks you're lying," Blaney said. NASCAR's "In-season Challenge" will begin seeding drivers Sunday and at the following two races in Mexico City and at Pocono. The results will create a field of 32 drivers, who will race for a $1 million prize over a five-race competition that starts June 28 at Atlanta. Single elimination will reduce the field to 16 in Chicago, eight at Sonoma, four in Dover and the final two on July 27 at Indianapolis Motor Speedway. The NBA has had success with a similar format. "It's like the March Madness bracket," said Blaney, whose No. 12 Ford finished first last week at Nashville. "You want to do well to seed yourself against an easier opponent. "It could be big. It could grow. I think it's a great idea. Why not try it? You're still going to have racing. It's just going to be a race within the race between all the guys." Denny Hamlin is prepared to leave his No. 11 Toyota behind this weekend to join his fiancé, Jordan, who is due to give birth to a baby boy — their third child — at any time. Hamlin, who is also juggling his role as the co-owner of a team suing NASCAR, said he would skip next week's race in Mexico City if necessary to witness the birth of his boy. Hendrick Motorsports has won a record 316 Cup races, but hasn't finished first at Michigan in more than a decade. Jeff Gordon's third win on the track was the team's ninth and that was way back on Aug. 17, 2014. "It's just kind of surprising because I don't feel like it's a track that we struggle at by any means," said Kyle Larson, who drives the No. 5 Chevrolet for Hendrick. "Every time we've been here, we've been one of the fastest and up front. "It's not a track like Nashville, where we struggle." Larson at +300 is the betting favorite to win Sunday, according to BetMGM Sportsbook, followed by points leader William Byron (+375), defending race champion Tyler Reddick (+500) and Christopher Bell (+550).
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
This corny ‘conservative credit card' ad signals a very scary future for AI
A fresh glimpse at our AI-filled future arrived this week, in the form of an unmemorable ad by a company most people have never heard of. The ad is kind of flat and will probably scan as goofy to everyone outside its target demo, but don't write it off just yet: It could signal the beginning of some very big (and scary) changes. Why you're catching the 'ick' so easily, according to science Waymo is winning in San Francisco Supersonic air travel gets green light in U.S. after 50-year ban lifted The upstart fintech company Coign claims to be a 'conservative credit card company,' a distinction that boils down to the founders' pledge to never donate to liberal causes and candidates. And while that self-definition raises some questions, it pales in comparison to the actual ad. The 30-second clip is a patriotic parade of red-blooded, red-voting Americans boasting about recent Coign-fueled purchases such as deer-hunting gear, a stack of cartoonish gold bars, and the 'biggest American flag' available. But here's the most striking thing about the ad: All of those situations, and all of the actors, were created by AI. There's something a little off about Coign's ad, to be clear. The pacing of the phony satisfied customers' movements feels too jittery at times, and there's an eagle at the end that is not exactly natural looking. While the ad is spiritually the same AI slop as Shrimp Jesus, it doesn't carry the same overtly synthetic visuals. In that regard, it's a lot more casually AI-generated than many of its predecessor ads. When Coca-Cola released an AI-generated holiday spot last fall, it sparked an uproar. Creatives were livid about such a monumentally successful company neglecting to splash out on an all-human production, and even casual observers noticed the glaring flaws in the video: The truck's tires glided over the ground without spinning, Santa's hand was bizarrely out of proportion with the Coke bottle it gripped, and the entire ad sat squarely in the 'uncanny valley.' The same goes for the ad Toys R Us released last year using OpenAI's text-to-video tool Sora: The kindest thing one could say is that its human characters looked marginally more lifelike than the unsettling, motion-captured Tom Hanks from The Polar Express two decades earlier. So far, AI-generated ads have been rare enough and mostly the domain of heavy-hitter companies, making them lightning rods for attention and backlash just about every time a new one is released. The simple fact that they were AI-made has been enough to generate headlines, even before factoring in the slop. But maybe not for much longer. If the Coign ad is any indication, there may be an entire class of AI ads coming that will be subject to far less attention—and far less scrutiny. We're at a precarious moment with AI, collectively feeling out its least objectionable uses through trial and error. So far, uncanny ads from massive companies have triggered backlash, but when lesser-known brands dabble—especially without obvious visual glitches—they often escape notice. Advertising legend David Droga once noted the existence of a 'mediocre middle' in marketing and entertainment, and that may be exactly where AI quietly thrives: in ads from companies too small to spark outrage. Advertising, after all, is already the most disposable and least emotionally protected form of media—expensive to make, widely avoided, and largely unloved. That makes it the perfect Trojan horse for AI—slipping past scrutiny not because it's good, but because few people care enough to notice. On a moral and economic level, the advertising industry should not be diving headlong into a technology that makes large swaths of professional workers expendable. And on an aesthetic level, just because AI technically can create an ad doesn't mean it can create a good one. Once a seemingly harmless use case eases people's minds about a given technological breakthrough, it's only a matter of time before the more flagrantly objectionable use cases take hold. The facial recognition tech that first allowed Facebook users to tag their friends in photos was eventually used to strengthen the surveillance state and threaten privacy everywhere. Today's drones that make aerial photography easier become tomorrow's drones that mistakenly blow up weddings in other countries and threaten to displace delivery workers. Obviously, AI is going to play some role in humanity's future. The size of that role, however, is not yet set in stone. As machine learning creeps into all creative fields, workers need regulations to ensure the technology doesn't spread too far too fast. The good news is that a majority of Americans seem to want AI regulation. Although the House of Representatives recently passed a major tax and spending bill with a provision forbidding state governments to regulate AI over the next 10 years, that clause is getting bipartisan blowback. According to a recent poll, 81% of voters agree that 'advances in AI are exciting but also bring risks, and in such fast-moving times, we shouldn't force states to sit on the sidelines for a full decade.' Even the CEO of generative AI company Anthropic is a full-throated advocate for stricter AI regulation. The people have spoken. Whether they are listened to is another matter altogether. A single, silly credit card ad may seem an unlikely step toward a dystopian future of unfettered AI and full unemployment, but if we laugh it off now, the bill may still come due later. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data