logo
Supreme Court orders status quo on Bhushan Steel liquidation

Supreme Court orders status quo on Bhushan Steel liquidation

Hindustan Times27-05-2025

The Supreme Court on Monday stopped liquidation proceedings of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd , weeks after it scrapped JSW Steel's deal to acquire the company.
The court's order came after JSW Steel and other creditors told the court that they plan to file a review petition against the May 2 order, which rejected JSW's acquisition of Bhushan Power & Steel and ordered that the company be liquidated. That order created a flutter in corporate and banking circles as it came six years after JSW's deal was approved. The acquisition under India's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, introduced in 2016, was often held up as an example of constructive resolution.
The liquidation was to happen before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and a bench of justices BV Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma said it was not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case at the present stage, but that 'it would be in the interest of justice if status quo is maintained on the proceedings pending in NCLT.'
The bench also recorded the assurance of senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, who appeared for JSW, that a review petition would be filed before the expiry of the limitation period. 'We also record the submission of the senior counsel for the appellant that the review petition shall be filed prior to the expiry of the limitation period and in accordance with the law,' the bench said.
Shares of JSW closed 2.13% higher at ₹1,030 apiece on a day the benchmark BSE Sensex index rose 0.56%.
Arguing for a stay of the earlier order, Kaul submitted that NCLT was rushing to appoint a liquidator even though the window for filing a review petition had not closed.
'If a liquidator is appointed, we will be in great difficulty. It is a profit-making company and this resolution plan was given four years ago,' he said.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Committee of Creditors (CoC), did not oppose the plea for deferring the liquidation and suggested the matter be taken up on June 10 . 'I am not opposing. NCLT will have to hear the matter. The question is on which date. Kindly ask them to take up this matter on June 10. Everybody's interests is taken care of.'
When the bench noted that review petitions are not typically listed during the summer break, Mehta pointed out the large financial implications pertaining to the case. 'This was a resolution plan implemented five years back. We have taken the money. Now, to reverse everything... they have taken money from other banks. Some of them are foreign banks. It will be difficult for them to deal with foreign banks. So some way will have to be found ,' Mehta told the Court.
The apex court is closed for the summer between May 26 and July 13, during which a vacation bench will sit to hear emergency matters.
The counsel appearing for Bhushan Steel's former promoter argued that JSW's appeal against NCLT's order was not maintainable.
On May 2, the Supreme Court had rejected JSW Steel's ₹19,700 crore acquisition of BPSL, calling it illegal and in breach of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Court had noted at the time that the resolution professional and the CoC should never have approved the plan and ordered the liquidation of Bhushan Power.
The insolvency proceedings began in 2017. In 2019, several steel companies, including Tata Steel and JSW came up with resolution plans offering to acquire the BPSL. JSW Steel emerged victorious in the bidding race and in September 2019, NCLT had approved its resolution plan.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Tajpur port tender in mths; JSW, DP World may bid
New Tajpur port tender in mths; JSW, DP World may bid

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

New Tajpur port tender in mths; JSW, DP World may bid

K olkata: The new tender for the Tajpur deep sea port would be floated in a few months and JSW, DP World and Port of Singapore may be interested in the project, sources said on Tuesday. This comes after the Bengal cabinet on Monday said it would issue a fresh tender for the project, effectively scrapping the first tender that had gone to Adani Ports and SEZ (APSEZ) in 2021. Sources said the state decided on a fresh tender because necessary clearances from the Centre were not received. In 2021, when the first tender was floated, JSW competed with APSEZ but lost by a narrow margin. JSW currently has a special focus on airport and port infrastructure and has already expressed its interest in Andal airport, now run by Bengal Aerotropolis Ltd. DP World and Port of Singapore had expressed interest in the Tajpur project in 2021 as well. According to the 2021 tender, which valued the project at Rs 25,000 crore, the successful bidder was to be given 125 acres of seafront to develop the port.

Parliamentary panel to review IBC and propose reforms for efficiency
Parliamentary panel to review IBC and propose reforms for efficiency

Business Standard

time5 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Parliamentary panel to review IBC and propose reforms for efficiency

The Centre is expected to table an amendment Bill in the monsoon session as a parliamentary panel examines the Code amid concerns flagged by the Supreme Court Ruchika Chitravanshi New Delhi Listen to This Article A parliamentary panel is taking a comprehensive look at the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to suggest the changes and measures that need to be taken to make it more efficient, a senior government official said. 'The committee is looking at IBC in totality, just as they did with the Competition Law as well,' the senior official said. The government is expected to bring the IBC Amendment Bill in Parliament in the upcoming monsoon session. Several Supreme Court rulings in the recent past have pointed to gaps in the implementation of the IBC, the latest being the Bhushan Power and

Aakash Educational moves NCLT to implead EY in edtech firm Byju's dispute
Aakash Educational moves NCLT to implead EY in edtech firm Byju's dispute

Business Standard

time6 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Aakash Educational moves NCLT to implead EY in edtech firm Byju's dispute

The dispute between Aakash Educational Services (AESL) and edtech firm Byju's has escalated, with Aakash filing a sharply worded petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Bengaluru, alleging conflict of interest and professional misconduct by global consulting firm Ernst & Young (EY), according to court filings reviewed by Business Standard. In an impleadment application filed on June 1, AESL has urged the tribunal to either dismiss the company petition filed by Byju's under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, alleging oppression and mismanagement, or make EY LLP and its partner Ajay Shah respondents in the case. AESL alleges that EY, which has been involved in a wide range of strategic, financial, and compliance-related advisory services for the company, is now acting against it through Shailendra Ajmera, the Resolution Professional (RP) of Byju's, who is also a senior EY functionary. 'This is a classic case of conflict of interest and abuse of the process,' said the application. 'The very transactions now being challenged in the petition — such as the issuance and conversion of non-convertible debentures (NCDs), equity restructuring, and internal governance matters — were structured and overseen by EY,' the application added. According to the filing, EY advised on the valuation and structuring of NCDs issued to Davidson Kempner. It also advised on tax and regulatory aspects of equity conversion to the Manipal group. Additionally, EY was involved in internal board-level decisions and corporate strategy at AESL as recently as October 2024. AESL is showcasing internal emails and advisory documents, evidencing EY's alleged involvement in financial forecasting, liquidity management, and decision-making processes. 'The RP has suppressed material facts, has no locus standi to file this petition under the Companies Act, and is acting in excess of his powers under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC),' AESL said in the filing. AESL has also warned that it may escalate the matter to regulators, including the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, alleging that Ajmera's position as RP is 'severely compromised'. The move comes just days after the RP wrote to the AESL board, seeking clarity on the independence and nomination status of its directors, signalling a broader governance challenge in the ongoing tussle. What's at stake The fight over Aakash, which Byju's acquired in a $1 billion deal in 2021, has become a flashpoint in the edtech giant's ongoing financial and legal troubles. The Manipal group, which took over a significant stake by converting debt into equity, now controls the board of AESL. With this filing, AESL is preparing for a full-blown legal and reputational offensive, challenging both the admissibility of Byju's petition and the professional neutrality of the advisers involved. Both EY and the RP are yet to file a formal reply to the impleadment request. 'The matter is sub judice and, therefore, we cannot offer any further comment at this time. However, we refute the allegations and will defend any such legal action vigorously,' an EY spokesperson told Business Standard on Tuesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store