logo
Months after detaining 47 people accused of being Tren de Aragua in Hays County, authorities offer no evidence of gang ties

Months after detaining 47 people accused of being Tren de Aragua in Hays County, authorities offer no evidence of gang ties

Yahoo5 days ago

HAYS COUNTY, Texas (The Texas Tribune) — In late March, a group of Venezuelan relatives and friends, celebrating a pair of birthdays, rented a six-bedroom house in the southern tip of Austin with a pool and stunning views from every window of Texas' Hill Country.
They decorated a table for a cake and blew up balloons. As the night faded, the kids went to bed and the adults kept hanging out.
More than 40 people possibly linked with Venezuelan gang taken into custody in Hays County
Suddenly, at about 5 a.m. the next morning, the group heard explosions from flashbangs, followed by shouts from law enforcement yelling commands to get out of the house, according to interviews with two attendees.
'We all started shouting that there were babies — 'Babies, there's babies,'' recounted a 30-year-old Venezuelan man, who said he was at the house to celebrate the birthdays of his son, who turned 5, and his best friend, who turned 28.
'They were like bombs, like boom,' he said of the disorientating devices.
A cadre of Texas and federal authorities arrived as part of an operation that resulted in the apprehension of 47 people including nine minors — at least one as young as 3 — though it is not clear whether all were at the party. The authorities later claimed they had busted a gathering of members and associates of Tren de Aragua, a violent gang that began in a Venezuelan prison before extending to other parts of Latin America.
Two were arrested on state charges related to drugs. In the only press release to date, authorities said the sting was the result of a yearlong, multi-agency investigation that revealed the gang ties. They said they would release more details 'as they become available.'
But two months later, authorities have yet to provide any evidence that the more than three dozen people they arrested that night have connections to the gang.
In an interview with The Texas Tribune, the Venezuelan father — who was apprehended with his 24-year-old wife and their kids, ages 5 and 3 — denied being associated with the gang and said an agent accused him of being a gang member because of two star-shaped tattoos on his shoulders. He asked that his name not be published because of fear of retribution from the U.S. and Venezuelan governments, as he has a pending asylum case and faces a deportation order.
VIDEO: New look at operation leading to 40 people possibly linked to Venezuelan gang arrested in Hays County
The Hays County operation resembles arrests across the country since President Donald Trump invoked an 18th Century wartime law to expel Venezuelan nationals: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detains someone, accuses them of being a Tren de Aragua member, and moves to deport them with little opportunity to mount a legal defense themselves or evidence to support the accusation.
In less than five months, the Trump administration has whisked immigrants to a notorious prison in El Salvador without court hearings, publicly attacked judges who have ruled against it, continued arresting alleged gang members and contended that Trump, as the commander in chief, has the ultimate authority to accomplish a mandate — mass deportations — he received from voters.
In some cases, the government has pointed to tattoos, social media posts and streetwear, like Michael Jordan basketball jerseys, to back its allegations of gang affiliation.
The actions have worried experts who see a troubling pattern of the government violating due process.
'This is about something much bigger,' said Muzaffar Chishti, director of the Migration Policy Institute office at New York University School of Law. 'If it happens to a person who is accused of being a (gang member) today, tomorrow it could happen to you and me. And if the alleged member of this gang does not have the right to contest [charges against them], how can you know I'll have it? The next person will have it?'
The government agencies involved in the Hays County raid have not shared any evidence backing up their claims that they busted a gang party, as is the case in many other immigration operations across the country. A copy of the search warrant has little information about what authorities knew before the raid, and a district court judge sealed an accompanying document that includes details about the officer's request for the warrant.
Read the search warrant that allowed the raid on the house in Hayes County.
(1.6 MB)
ICE has refused to release the names of who was detained and where they are currently. The Tribune identified 35 of the people apprehended in the raid by reviewing documents provided by DPS in response to public information requests. All 35 were arrested on suspicion of illegally entering the country, a federal violation, and the government intends to deport them, DPS reports show.
DPS is asking the attorney general for permission to withhold other records — including footage from body-worn cameras or any documentation of injuries recorded during the operation — because their release could hinder an ongoing criminal investigation, a DPS lawyer argued in mid-May.
DPS spokesperson Sheridan Nolen said two people were arrested on state charges: Antonio Jesus Vizcaino Gonzalez and Jeankey Jhonayker Castro-Bravo, both accused of drug possession. Court records say state troopers confiscated nearly 4 grams of powder that tested positive for either methamphetamine or ecstasy, 7.6 grams of cocaine and three methamphetamine or ecstasy pills.
Two months after their arrest, both have detainers from federal immigration authorities, according to a Hays County prosecutor.
A lawyer for one of the men did not return requests for comment.
The Tribune ran the 35 names found in the DPS records through databases of federal, Travis and Hays County court cases. None of the 35 had previous criminal cases in those jurisdictions, according to that review.
The Venezuelan man arrested with his family said he showed the authorities his legal work permit, Social Security number and papers related to his pending asylum case.
He said the officers told him they meant nothing.
'Ever since I've been here, I haven't had any problems with the law, no criminal record,' the man said, disputing officials' statements that everyone arrested was connected to Tren de Aragua and adding that he has been working two jobs. 'When they showed up, they treated us like delinquents.'
ICE, the Department of Homeland Security, and the FBI did not respond to requests for comment.
After being handcuffed as the sun rose in Hays County, agents separated the Venezuelan man from his wife and kids, took him to a processing center and scanned his fingerprints, he said.
'I asked why we were there if we had been at a family birthday party,' he said. 'They basically treated me like a criminal because I have tattoos.'
He said two of his tattoos honor his kids. His forearm is inked with April 3, his eldest son's birthday, and his back with an homage to his youngest. He also has stars tattooed on his shoulders.
'They told me to my face: 'You know what those stars mean? Those stars are styled by gangsters in your country,'' he recounted. 'I said, no. I got these stars when — no kidding — I was starting to leave adolescence, started working. I got them because I liked them and I wanted to get them.'
He noticed the officers had more visible tattoos than he did.
While the Trump administration has increasingly emphasized tattoos as evidence of gang participation, criminologists say Tren de Aragua does not use tattoos for membership. And the extent of the gang's presence in the U.S. is also unclear and difficult to measure.
Two criminologists who study Latin American gangs pointed to one-off arrests throughout the country in which local authorities have not provided evidence that alleged Tren de Aragua members in the U.S. take orders from the gang's international leadership — or have any connection to that leadership at all.
'Tattoos are not at all a practice used by Venezuelan gangs to indicate association,' said Rebecca Hanson, an assistant professor at the University of Florida's Department of Sociology, Criminology and Law, and Center for Latin American Studies. 'I don't think we can jump to the following questions about what do you do about a Tren de Aragua presence in the United States until their presence has been established, and I just think it's highly unlikely there's any kind of real Tren de Aragua presence in the U.S.'
When investigating possible gang ties in any investigation, police and researchers also must consider that they may be dealing with imposters who use the name of infamous gangs to add credibility to their illegal activities, which has been documented in South America with Tren de Aragua wannabees, the criminologists said.
Mike LaSusa, of InSight Crime, a nonprofit that studies organized crime in Latin America and the Caribbean, echoed that sentiment.
'I don't necessarily know why they have chosen to use tattoos as a way to identify alleged Tren de Aragua members,' he said. 'Just because one or even several members of a gang have the same or a similar tattoo doesn't necessarily mean that it's a gang tattoo. A lot of people just have tattoos of stars.'
Doubts about the gang's reach within the U.S. have done little to stop the Trump administration.
Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 against Tren de Aragua in March.The act grants a president wide discretion to imprison and swiftly remove people during times of war. It has been only used three previous times: during the War of 1812, World War I and World War II. During the second world war, President Franklin D. Roosevelt invoked it to imprison an estimated 120,000 people of Japanese heritage, including American citizens.
Already, the Trump administration has used the law to deport more than 230 men accused of being violent gang members to a maximum security prison in El Salvador. A series of news reports have found that few of those deported had a documented history of committing serious or violent crimes — which the administration knew. Yet, they have no recourse to defend themselves against the allegations because they can't contact lawyers and both federal governments have claimed there is nothing they can do now.
Top Trump administration officials have suggested those individuals could spend the rest of their lives in that prison.
In the meantime in the U.S., legal challenges to the administration's authority have popped up throughout the country resulting in a patchwork of rulings limited to certain judicial districts that have largely blocked such deportations; only one judge, in Pennsylvania, has ruled that the administration can fast-track deportations under the act.
The U.S. Supreme Court, for its part, ruled that the administration must offer detainees a proper opportunity to raise legal challenges. But the high court stopped short of prescribing what that procedure, known as due process, should look like.
As the lawsuits unfold, Trump administration officials have blasted judges — even those appointed to the bench by Trump — and floated the idea of suspending habeas corpus, a fundamental legal principle that's meant to ensure that a person accused of wrongdoing knows what they stand accused of and can contest the allegation before a judge. It is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees the right to any person, not just citizens.
The Venezuelan man and his family were released from detention in Frio County after 23 days following the Hays County raid. They came home, wearing ankle monitors, to find an eviction notice on their Pflugerville home and a stack of past due bills. Their eldest son, whose birthday was going to be celebrated by splashing in the pool, was kicked out of school because of too many unexcused absences while they were detained, his dad said.
While they are glad to be out of detention and working again, the family's future is unclear, he said.
He still has his pending asylum application but the entire family has received removal orders.
But perhaps nothing is as unclear to them as to why authorities treated them the way they did.
'I myself lived it, how they treat you,' he said.Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce US defense reliance, Carney says
Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce US defense reliance, Carney says

Associated Press

time27 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce US defense reliance, Carney says

TORONTO (AP) — Canada will meet NATO's military spending guideline by early next year and diversify defense spending away from the United States, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday. Carney said Canada will achieve NATO's spending target of 2% of gross domestic product five years earlier than it had previously planned. 'Our military infrastructure and equipment have aged, hindering our military preparedness,' Carney said. 'Only one of our four submarines is seaworthy. Less than half of our maritime fleet and land vehicles are operational. More broadly we are too reliant on the United States.' According to NATO figures, Canada was estimated to be spending 1.33% of GDP on its military budget in 2023, below the 2% target that NATO countries have set for themselves. Canada previously said it was on track to meet NATO's spending target by the end of the decade. 'Our goal is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants,' Carney said. The announcement of increased spending came as Canada is about to host a summit of the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations in Alberta on June 15-17, and before the NATO summit in Europe. It also comes as NATO allies are poised to increase the commitment well beyond the 2% target. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said last week that most U.S. allies at NATO endorse U.S. President Donald Trump's demand that they invest 5% of gross domestic product on their defense needs and are ready to ramp up security spending even more. Carney has said that he intends to diversify Canada's procurement and enhance the country's relationship with the EU. 'We should no longer send three quarters of our defense capital spending to America,' Carney said in a speech at the University of Toronto. 'We will invest in new submarines, aircraft, ships, armed vehicles and artillery, as well as new radar, drones and sensors to monitor the seafloor and the Arctic.' Canada has been in discussions with the European Union to join an EU drive to break its security dependency on the United States , with a focus on buying more defense equipment, including fighter jets, in Europe. Carney's government is reviewing the purchase of U.S. F-35 fighter jets to see if there are other options. Carney said that the U.S. 'is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its (relative) contributions to our collective security.' 'Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they will be on the menu,' Carney said. Trump's calls to make Canada the 51st U.S. state have infuriated Canadians, and Carney won the job of prime minister after promising to confront the increased aggression shown by Trump. Carney said that the long-held view that Canada's geographic location will protect Canadians is becoming increasingly archaic. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022.

Travel Ban Reinstated By Trump With Mostly Muslim Countries
Travel Ban Reinstated By Trump With Mostly Muslim Countries

Forbes

time30 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Travel Ban Reinstated By Trump With Mostly Muslim Countries

President Donald J. Trump, citing national security concerns, has reinstated and expanded the controversial nationality-based travel ban first introduced during his initial term. The new ban, formalized in a Presidential Proclamation that came into effect on Monday, June 9, 2025, suspends the entry of nationals from 19 countries, primarily targeting Muslim-majority and African nations. The proclamation fully suspends immigrant and nonimmigrant visa issuance to nationals of 12 countries: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. It imposes partial restrictions on B-1/B-2 tourist visas and F, M, and J student and exchange visas for nationals of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Exceptions apply to green card holders, dual nationals, certain special immigrant visa holders, athletes in international competitions, and immediate relatives of U.S. citizens. The administration relies on a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which authorizes the president to suspend the entry of any class of noncitizens deemed 'detrimental to the interests of the United States.' That authority was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Trump v. Hawaii (2018), which ruled 5-4 that President Trump's third version of the travel ban was constitutional, emphasizing executive deference on immigration and national security. But critics argue that this expanded ban perpetuates discriminatory intent, noting the disproportionate impact on Muslim and African nations and the invocation of Trump's 2024 campaign pledge to 'restore the travel ban and keep radical Islamic terrorists out.' Stephen Yale-Loehr, a professor of immigration law at Cornell Law School, predicts court challenges but warns that they may fail under the current precedent. 'Even if this expansion is legal, it is not good policy,' he said. 'Families will be separated, and we are not necessarily safer.' The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) called the order 'ideologically motivated,' 'unnecessary,' and 'overbroad,' criticizing its chilling effect on lawful travel, academic exchange, and humanitarian reunification. Legal scholars have started to question the constitutionality of this policy. More specifically, they contend that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits governments from denying equal legal protection, while the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment forbids favouring or disfavoring any religion. Critics argue that Trump's policy, which targets specific nations commonly associated with certain religions, risks violating both clauses by enabling discrimination based on nationality and faith. Additionally, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 abolished national origin quotas to prevent such bias. By reinstating restrictions linked to religious or national identity, opponents claim the policy mirrors discriminatory practices that the law aimed to eliminate. Jeremy Robbins, Executive Director of the American Immigration Council, noted: 'Blanket nationality bans have never demonstrated any meaningful national security value. This ban hurts our economy and punishes immigrants who qualify to come legally.' According to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) 'In total, just under 162,000 immigrant visas and temporary work, study, and travel visas were issued in fiscal year 2023 to nationals of the affected countries in the now banned visa categories, according to the Migration Policy Institute.' Nationals from the banned countries represent more than 475 million people globally. Beyond family separations, the ban may deter students, scientists, and health professionals at a time when the U.S. is experiencing labor shortages in STEM and healthcare. Universities like Harvard have expressed alarm at the targeting of international students, as the administration simultaneously suspended new visas for foreign scholars at select institutions, further stoking fears of ideological purges in academia. The 2025 travel ban echoes policies from Trump's first term and extends their scope. The first 'Muslim ban' of 2017 was repeatedly struck down until a more narrowly tailored version survived judicial review. Today's ban, while more procedurally refined, raises the same fundamental concern: are Americans safer by denying entry based on birthplace? Lyndon B. Johnson's signing of the 1965 INA famously stated that 'the harsh injustice of the national origins quota system' would never return. Critics now argue that President Trump has revived that very shadow, using presidential proclamations instead of legislative quotas. 'This is not national security—it's national scapegoating,' said CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad. 'It undermines constitutional values and stigmatizes entire populations for political gain.' The legality of the 2025 travel ban reinstated as it is may pass muster under Trump v. Hawaii, but its morality, logic, and long-term consequences remain in question. As lawsuits mount and civil rights groups prepare their defences, the nation must decide: do we protect ourselves by shutting doors or by standing firm in our values of openness, equality, and due process?

Musk predicts Trump's tariffs will cause recession amid growing spat with president
Musk predicts Trump's tariffs will cause recession amid growing spat with president

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk predicts Trump's tariffs will cause recession amid growing spat with president

Former presidential adviser and confidante Elon Musk escalated his growing feud with President Trump by saying the president's tariffs would result in a recession later this year. 'The Trump Tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year,' he wrote on his social media website, X. The remark is the latest dig at Trump's policies since the tech billionaire left his role in the administration last week as head of the government cost-cutting panel known as the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Musk blasted Republicans' tax-and-spending-cut bill this week, which Trump helped to shepherd through the House last month, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on X on Tuesday. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Beyond the president's policies, Musk also attacked Trump personally, claiming Thursday that Trump is mentioned in files pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted child abuser who died in jail in 2019. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: [Donald Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' he wrote on X. Musk's efforts with DOGE during his time in the Trump administration stirred a flurry of controversy and led to resignations of top officials in multiple agencies, including the IRS and the Treasury Department. Concerns about his team's access to private data have resulted in lawsuits. 'DOGE's mission to advise OMB and the White House on how to slash regulations and cut expenditures puts at risk important consumer safeguards and public protections,' Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen, an advocacy group that brought a lawsuit against the administration, said in a January statement. Controversies have also been swirling about Musk's personal life. A recent New York Times investigation found that Musk was 'juggling … a drug habit far more serious than previously known.' Musk's criticism is channeling concerns among economists and business leaders about the prospect of a recession resulting from tariffs. Trump's tariffs — notably his 'reciprocal,' country-specific tariffs and triple-digit tariffs on China — have been walked back, but a highly elevated overall U.S. tariff rate relative to recent decades has remained in place. The overall tariff rate is somewhere between 10 and 15 percent now, according to various estimates, and Trump's tariffs are expected to pull in about $2.5 trillion in federal revenues. The Federal Reserve has repeatedly painted a stagflationary picture of the economic outlook in recent months. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) factored a boosted inflationary prediction of 0.4 percentage points as a result of the tariffs into its budgetary calculations this week. However, a recession is far from guaranteed, and many predictions about the economy have grown more positive as trade negotiations have continued. The U.S. trade deficit narrowed by a record amount in April following intense front-running of tariffs by importers in the first quarter, causing a collective sigh of relief from many investors. 'The drop in imports should have a positive impact on GDP, quelling any fears of a recession in the near term,' Damian McIntyre, vice president at investment firm Federated Hermes, commented Thursday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store