Trump departs G7 early as Israel-Iran conflict shows signs of intensifying
President Donald Trump has abruptly left the G7 summit, departing a day early on Monday as the conflict between Israel and Iran intensifies and the US leader has declared that Tehran should be evacuated 'immediately'.
World leaders had gathered in Canada with the specific goal of helping to defuse a series of global pressure points, only to be disrupted by a showdown over Iran's nuclear programme that could escalate in dangerous and uncontrollable ways.
Advertisement
Israel launched an aerial bombardment campaign against Iran four days ago.
Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney, US President Donald Trump and Britain's Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer participate in a group photo at the G7 Summit (Mark Schiefelbein/AP)
At the summit, Mr Trump warned that Tehran needs to curb its nuclear programme before it is 'too late'.
He said Iranian leaders would 'like to talk' but they had already had 60 days to reach an agreement on their nuclear ambitions and failed to do so before the Israeli aerial assault began.
'They have to make a deal,' he said.
Advertisement
Asked what it would take for the US to get involved in the conflict militarily, Mr Trump said on Monday morning: 'I don't want to talk about that.'
But by Monday afternoon, Mr Trump warned ominously on social media, 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!'
Shortly after that, Mr Trump decided to leave the summit and skip a series of Tuesday meetings that would address the ongoing war in Ukraine and global trade issues.
As Mr Trump posed for a picture on Monday evening with the other G7 leaders, he said simply: 'I have to be back, very important.'
Advertisement
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, the host, said: 'I am very grateful for the president's presence and I fully understand.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Watch: Lebanese dance and cheer under missiles heading for Israel
A saxophonist belts away at a rooftop bar as partygoers gaze up at a glittering arc in the night sky. It looks like a perfect night out, except what's lighting the scene isn't sparkling stars – it's a barrage of missiles fired from Iran to Israel. Elsewhere in the city, a wedding party is filmed dancing along to music as the attacks continue. This is Beirut, the capital of Lebanon, some 75 miles as the crow flies to the still contested border with Israel. To outsiders, it might seem surreal. But for many in Lebanon – a country invaded three times by Israel and attacked countless more times – war involving its southern neighbour is nothing new. Many even feel vindicated by the daily volley of fire that Iran has returned to Israel, in retaliation for Benjamin Netanyahu's massive strike early Friday morning that set off a significant escalation in regional tensions. 'I don't know what will happen, but it's payback to Israel,' said Ibrahim, a 25-year-old port worker. 'We didn't expect Israel to be this stupid. Iran is a big state with a lot of territory.' For many Lebanese, the Israelis have long posed a serious threat, given the latter's expansionist ambitions – into Lebanon, Gaza, and even Syria and Jordan. In fact, three of Israel's five borders remain disputed. That Hezbollah, an Iran-backed terrorist group, is based in Lebanon has always been Israel's justification for bombing further and further north beyond its borders. A tenuous ceasefire was agreed only last November after Israeli forces assassinated the group's leader, Hassan Nasrallah. Many here feel that things are coming full circle now, that this is perhaps fate. Israel's war in Gaza, nearing two years, has not helped those sentiments, as the military's operations have perpetrated a huge humanitarian catastrophe among the Palestinian community. The death toll is now more than 55,000 people, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. Some in Beirut hope that the Israelis might finally, upon experiencing such pain, come to understand the extent of the violence Israel has inflicted upon others in the Middle East for so long. 'It's a taste of their own medicine,' said one woman at a downtown cafe. At the same time, there is nervousness and hesitation about getting drawn into the fighting. A loud boom that rang across central Beirut Tuesday morning startled many – a reflection of how the public remains on edge, despite the party scenes indicating otherwise. The explosion sound, in the end, turned out to be a truck tyre popping. Lebanon has battled crisis after crisis, from the economy to corruption to war, in just the past few years. The country, some say, is tired, and cannot afford more setbacks from yet another crisis – especially as a formal government was only installed six months ago after more than two years without a president in place. It's a message that Joseph Aoun, the new Lebanese president, and Nawaf Salam, the prime minister, reiterated on Monday – that the country needed to stay out of the conflict. But that's a tall order for a nation that, despite drawdowns and ceasefires, technically remains at war with Israel and is still home to Hezbollah, an armed group that forms the centrepiece of Iran's 'axis of resistance'. Brutal fighting with the Israeli military, plus devastating attacks last autumn, have significantly weakened Hezbollah, but the terrorist organisation retains a fury in spirit and a capacity to fight. That it could be unleashed at any time to divert and dampen Israeli military resources, energy and attention means Hezbollah – and other Iran-backed militant factions in the region – could inflict further damage still. A reminder of that is, perhaps, reflected as images of Nasrallah continue to beam down from billboards in Lebanon. 'It's not over for Iran just because they killed a few generals, a few scientists,' said Ibrahim.
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
Newsmax once courted Tucker Carlson. Now they say he's irrelevant after Trump-Iran criticism.
It was just two years ago that Newsmax shamelessly tried to make a play for Fox News' much larger audience by publicly courting Tucker Carlson after the conservative cable giant unceremoniously fired the far-right star. Now that Carlson is leading a MAGA insurgency against Donald Trump amid the ongoing crisis in the Middle East, however, Newsmax is telling its audience – and one viewer in particular – that the former Fox News primetime host has 'jumped the shark' and is no longer relevant. In fact, the network's guests have even gone so far as to float the notion that Carlson is getting paid by foreign adversaries to oppose America's involvement in the burgeoning war between Israel and Iran. As you may recall, Carlson was the top-rated personality in cable news in April 2023 when Fox shockingly dumped him just a week after the Murdoch-owned channel paid $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems. Though it still isn't clear exactly what led to the network parting ways with its biggest star, the timing of his departure so soon after Fox essentially admitted to peddling pro-Trump election lies sparked a MAGA revolt against the network – leading to a short-lived ratings slump. Newsmax, meanwhile, brazenly looked to take advantage in an effort to peel away some of Fox's conservative cable market share. In the days after Carlson's termination, Newsmax mentioned his name on the air hundreds of times and devoted dozens of segments to the situation, which generally featured conservative guests railing against Fox News for letting him go. With Newsmax suddenly seeing a spike in ratings, the network even ran an 'urgent poll' asking viewers if 'it was right for Fox News to fire Tucker Carlson' and whether they 'want Tucker back on cable TV.' The implication, of course, was clear. And behind the scenes, the network's CEO and founder Chris Ruddy was apparently making a full-court press to get Carlson on Newsmax's airwaves. According to TMZ, Ruddy wasn't just offering Carlson his own primetime show, but he also floated the idea of having the nationalist commentator program the entire channel in order to sweeten the deal. TMZ added that the network's executives made it clear to Carlson's people that 'they would basically give him a big say in rebranding their channel.'In the end, nothing came to fruition as Carlson decided to launch his own right-wing media company, which largely revolves around his successful podcast. In this role, he also found himself – especially during the 2024 presidential campaign – part of Trump's inner circle, and was influential in getting Trump to choose JD Vance as his running mate. Despite no longer hosting a cable news show, Carlson's influence in the right-wing media ecosphere makes him a direct competitor to television networks like Newsmax, which has staked its entire business model and identity around Trump's cult of personality. This brings us to the present, which sees Carlson – the undisputed leader of MAGA's isolationist wing when it comes to foreign policy – at loggerheads with the president over the specter of the United States directly involving itself in yet another Middle Eastern war that could have lasting impacts in the region and world. Having warned Trump for months about bombing Iran and raging against 'crazy' former Fox News colleagues for egging the president on, Carlson blasted the president as being 'complicit' in Israel's strikes on Iran while saying a war could 'end Trump's presidency' and the 'American empire.' He also took aim at Fox News for 'turning up the propaganda hose to full blast' in pushing for war and regime change in Iran. With other MAGA luminaries like Steve Bannon and Marjorie Taylor Greene siding with Carlson, the president eventually returned rhetorical fire, labeling his longtime ally as 'kooky Tucker' while mockingly dismissing the ex-Fox star's opinions due to him no longer being on cable news. 'I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying,' Trump seethed at this week's G7. 'Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen.' Newsmax hosts and pundits, meanwhile, have rallied around the president while taking potshots at Carlson, insisting that the former Fox News primetime anchor is uneducated about the conflict and is just searching for relevancy by attacking Trump. 'I think Tucker Carlson has now jumped the shark,' conservative radio personality Jeff Kuhner declared on Newsmax's morning show The National Report on Monday. 'The big distinction, and I think Trump made it very clear, is that Israel is at war with Iran – not the United States.' Throughout the day on Monday, former Fox News reporter James Rosen – who now serves as Newsmax's chief White House correspondent – delivered lengthy on-air reports laying out the back and forth between the president and Carlson. These dispatches would then lead into panel discussions, which featured the network's personalities and guests criticizing Carlson. 'People trying to stay relevant, perhaps,' anchor Bianca de la Garza said on her program Newsline. 'I mean, let's just be clear, President Trump is not a warmonger. He has given Iran so many olive branches, and he is seeking to end wars.' Newsbusters editor Tim Graham, a frequent contributor on Newsmax, added that while Carlson ripped his former Fox News colleagues like Sean Hannity and Mark Levin for consistently being 'warmongers,' Carlson 'hasn't been consistent on anything' before suggesting that is why Fox got rid of him. 'It is kind of befuddling, and maybe this is why he got driven out of Fox in the first place,' he declared while de la Garza wondered if 'this is why' the Dominion texts that found Carlson blasting Trump in private 'surfaced in the first place.' Later that afternoon, de la Garza would join four other hosts and pundits to once again discuss the Carlson-Trump feud, and this time around her criticism was far more strident, especially when anchor Krysia Lenzo said Carlson 'appeared to have flip-flopped' on his anti-war position with Iran. 'It's also all about Fox people, a lot of this, where he used to work. So it could be a combination of that and also, we talked about this earlier on Newsline, maybe just to stay relevant,' de la Garza asserted. 'President Trump is not a warmonger! Everything happening right now… is going to ensure peace in the world!' After she claimed it was likely just 'sour grapes' on Carlson's part, Rick Leventhal – another former Fox News reporter turned Newsmax host – continued the pile-on. 'I'm surprised Tucker has taken this position, first and foremost,' he said, adding: 'Tucker's entitled to his opinions, of course, as everyone else, but in this case I think the president made his position pretty clear.' While other pundits insisted that 'Trump is the only one who defines America First and MAGA at the end of the day,' de la Garza claimed that Carlson 'maybe just needs a little time to catch up' on the current situation between Israel and Iran. Though the network's primetime slate essentially took a more hands-off approach, mostly sticking with promoting the president's clapbacks at Carlson, host Rob Finnerty did bring on Daily Wire podcaster Andrew Klavan to react to the intra-MAGA feud. Klavan, a fervent pro-Israel conservative, suggested that there could be some ulterior motives at play for Carlson. 'It's strange that it hasn't happened before since we know that Tucker Carlson was secretly sending in-house emails at Fox, calling Trump virtually demonic and saying he has no power to do anything but destroy,' Klavan said. 'I want to know at this point, and I…don't want to sound conspiratorial, but I want to know exactly who pays people to say that we should not be involved in any way in any fight that supports Israel, and we should put Israel and Iran on some kind of moral parity.' Asked for clarity about his accusation, Klavan conceded that he didn't have any confirmation that Carlson was getting compensated to criticize Israel before doubling down on the suggestion anyway. 'I don't know, it's just a guess,' Klavan chuckled. 'Well, I'm not saying I have any information about it, but I'm starting to wonder about it because it doesn't make any sense, and it does not support America First.' He concluded: 'It just doesn't make any sense. So I want to know what sense does it make. I'm not making an accusation because I don't have the facts, but I have begun to wonder because it just doesn't hold together.'
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump says Iran's Supreme Leader is an 'easy target'
President Donald Trump brandished an online threat to Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, saying the U.S. knows his precise location and even calling him an 'easy target.' The president made the stunning pronouncement online hours after returning from G7 meetings in Canada to meet with top security advisors in the White House Situation Room, raising chatter about an expanded war between Israel and Iran. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' That came moments after another post where Trump also used the term 'we' to describe the security situation over Iran, amid a massive four-day bombing campaign by Israel using American-made weaponry. 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran . Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff.' Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA,' Trump wrote. In yet another post, Trump wrote simply in all-caps: 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' That was the ultimatum that the allies imposed on Nazi Germany and Japan during World War II. It came amid speculation about whether the U.S. would intervene to help Israel take out Iran's nuclear facilities that are buried deep under ground, with the help of 'bunker buster' munitions. His chilling online threats came came hours after Trump blasted French President Emmanuel Macron for having suggested he had put forward a ceasefire plan for the conflict. Trump said the reality was the opposite. But when pressed by the Daily Mail, Trump didn't name any new steps the U.S. was taking to help Isreal as it battles the Islamic Republic. 'An end. A real end. Not a cease fire. An end,' he said. 'I'm not looking at ceasefire. We're looking at better than cease fire,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One. He was blunt in his assessment on Iran's nuclear program. 'Remember, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. It's very simple. Not to go too deep into it, but they just can't have a nuclear weapon. He also predicted Isreal wouldn't let up. 'You're going to find out over the next two days. You're going to find out. Nobody's slowed up so far,' he said. President Trump said early Tuesday morning that he wants "a real end" to Iran's nuclear problem, with Tehran "giving up entirely" its enrichment activities. He said he was not just working toward a ceasefire to end the war between Iran and Israel, which has claimed at least two dozen lives in Israel and hundreds in Iran as it enters its fifth day. 'I didn't say I was looking for a ceasefire,' Mr. Trump told reporters on Air Force One after cutting short his time at the G7 summit in Canada. 'They just can't have a nuclear weapon,' Trump said of Iran. That doesn't mean there aren't plenty of options at his disposal. With 'complete' control over Iran's skies, the U.S. could assist Isreal's bombing campaign, perhaps even by dropping a 'bunker buster' munition from one of its fleet of bombers capable of carrying them. Trump on Sunday said it was 'possible' the U.S. would get involved in the conflict. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told ABC. There were multiple reports this weekend that Trump had nixed an Israeli request to take out Ayatollah Khamenei. In his comments to reporters Trump declined to confirm any new threat to U.S. troops or facilities. 'We have great people that know how to protect themselves... We'll come down so hard if they do anything to our people.'
